Bitcoin Forum
February 25, 2024, 05:26:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 [270] 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4381731 times)
VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 752
Merit: 500


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
September 17, 2012, 08:24:33 AM
 #5381

Wow, Stratum climbed from 80 or so if I recall correctly to 124.506 Ghash/s over night.

that might be because Slush presented it at the bitcoin conference in London
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1708882015
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1708882015

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1708882015
Reply with quote  #2

1708882015
Report to moderator
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 17, 2012, 03:23:57 PM
 #5382

I just "fixed" the lost blocks 917,923,926 by doubling rewards for rounds #13919, #13920, #13921. I'm sorry for inconvenience.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 17, 2012, 03:31:46 PM
 #5383

I just "fixed" the lost blocks 917,923,926 by doubling rewards for rounds #13919, #13920, #13921. I'm sorry for inconvenience.

Thanks Slush!

Just out of curiosity, did you figure out what cause the bug in the first place?

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 17, 2012, 06:15:18 PM
 #5384

Hm, actually not. Mysql log didn't tell me anything significant, but it clearly failed during the insert to block table.


I just "fixed" the lost blocks 917,923,926 by doubling rewards for rounds #13919, #13920, #13921. I'm sorry for inconvenience.

Thanks Slush!

Just out of curiosity, did you figure out what cause the bug in the first place?

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 18, 2012, 01:51:35 PM
 #5385

Hm, actually not. Mysql log didn't tell me anything significant, but it clearly failed during the insert to block table.


I just "fixed" the lost blocks 917,923,926 by doubling rewards for rounds #13919, #13920, #13921. I'm sorry for inconvenience.

Thanks Slush!

Just out of curiosity, did you figure out what cause the bug in the first place?

Oh nice. Can this happen more often please :p . Thanks for the double up.
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 18, 2012, 04:29:11 PM
 #5386

m0mchil just released new version of poclbm with native support of Stratum. Can anybody check it and confirm that it works as expected? I don't have a reason to think an oposite, I just don't have GPU here around to check it myself.

Portnoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1000

My money; Our Bitcoin.


View Profile
September 18, 2012, 07:10:08 PM
 #5387

m0mchil just released new version of poclbm with native support of Stratum. Can anybody check it and confirm that it works as expected? I don't have a reason to think an oposite, I just don't have GPU here around to check it myself.

Working fine for me.  Although I don't see anything different. The last version worked fine for me with Stratum.
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 18, 2012, 07:18:03 PM
 #5388

Portnoy: Can you confirm that it is connecting to port 3333 instead of 8332? If so, then poclbm is mining on Stratum interface and thus giving you all benefits included in this protocol.

Portnoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1000

My money; Our Bitcoin.


View Profile
September 18, 2012, 08:04:53 PM
 #5389

Portnoy: Can you confirm that it is connecting to port 3333 instead of 8332? If so, then poclbm is mining on Stratum interface and thus giving you all benefits included in this protocol.

Sure. How do I do that?

This is what I have in my batch file:
poclbm.exe [userdetails]@localhost:8332 -d0 -v -w128 -f1

Should I change that 8332 above to 3333? 
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 18, 2012, 09:27:36 PM
 #5390

Portnoy, the main reason for native support in miners is that users don't need mining proxy. So try to point latest poclbm to http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 again, it should redirect to Stratum automatically (by following X-Stratum HTTP header in the response). Or you can put stratum://api-stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 instead, to point miner to stratum interface directly.

Portnoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1000

My money; Our Bitcoin.


View Profile
September 18, 2012, 10:27:18 PM
 #5391

Portnoy, the main reason for native support in miners is that users don't need mining proxy. So try to point latest poclbm to http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 again, it should redirect to Stratum automatically (by following X-Stratum HTTP header in the response). Or you can put stratum://api-stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 instead, to point miner to stratum interface directly.

I live in Western Canada... is one of those better than another for my location?

I set it back to poclbm.exe [userdeatils]@api.bitcoin.cz:8332 -d0 -v -w128 -f1

The way I had it before trying Stratum, although now I am using the new version of poclbm.exe. 
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 19, 2012, 12:29:21 AM
 #5392

So...

All of a sudden one of my workers isn't getting any shares through, the miner is working fine, but every time a share is submitted the proxy log says that it was rejected by the pool and my "worker is not authorized"

As far as I know, nothing has changed.  I did just recently download the latest version of the proxy, but I'm pretty sure it had been working for several hours, and just in the last hour or so it started doing this...

Any thoughts?

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 19, 2012, 02:01:32 AM
 #5393

Well, I ended up restarting the proxy and everything is working now.

But it might be something to keep in mind because I downloaded the newest proxy around 2pm today, then everything ran great until about 7pm.  Then I started getting the shares rejected with an error that said my worker was not authorized.  It looked like it started with a new block.

After restarting the proxy it started working again.

I'll keep an eye on things going forward and report any other oddities...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2012, 08:09:36 AM
 #5394

I live in Western Canada... is one of those better than another for my location?

I set it back to poclbm.exe [userdeatils]@api.bitcoin.cz:8332 -d0 -v -w128 -f1

The way I had it before trying Stratum, although now I am using the new version of poclbm.exe. 

In new poclbm, you should see some informational message that it is switching to stratum, correct?

Both proxy and native support will work good, except that with native support in miner you don't need to run special software on the machine.

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2012, 08:11:16 AM
 #5395

All of a sudden one of my workers isn't getting any shares through, the miner is working fine, but every time a share is submitted the proxy log says that it was rejected by the pool and my "worker is not authorized"

As far as I know, nothing has changed.  I did just recently download the latest version of the proxy, but I'm pretty sure it had been working for several hours, and just in the last hour or so it started doing this...

Yes, this is quite interesting. I have similar bug report by another user. However I'm running latest proxy version overnight and don't see any problem. What miner are you using?

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2012, 12:09:10 PM
 #5396

There's some uncertainity how to connect newest poclbm to the pool using Stratum.

You don't need to change any settings in your miners, just connect them to "api.bitcoin.cz" port "8332" as usual. Pool is advertising special HTTP header which tell poclbm how to switch to Stratum automatically. You should see message about switching to Stratum in the console.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 19, 2012, 02:17:09 PM
 #5397

All of a sudden one of my workers isn't getting any shares through, the miner is working fine, but every time a share is submitted the proxy log says that it was rejected by the pool and my "worker is not authorized"

As far as I know, nothing has changed.  I did just recently download the latest version of the proxy, but I'm pretty sure it had been working for several hours, and just in the last hour or so it started doing this...

Yes, this is quite interesting. I have similar bug report by another user. However I'm running latest proxy version overnight and don't see any problem. What miner are you using?

That machine was using Guiminer w/ OpenCL.    Not exactly sure which version, cause I don't have the machine in front of me right now, but if I had to guess I would say it's probably the most recent version.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2012, 03:53:20 PM
 #5398

digital, please PM me with some logs if you'll see such bug again. I understand it's quite annoying, but I need some log or error message to debug&fix it.

Portnoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1000

My money; Our Bitcoin.


View Profile
September 19, 2012, 04:55:19 PM
 #5399

I live in Western Canada... is one of those better than another for my location?

I set it back to poclbm.exe [userdeatils]@api.bitcoin.cz:8332 -d0 -v -w128 -f1

The way I had it before trying Stratum, although now I am using the new version of poclbm.exe. 

In new poclbm, you should see some informational message that it is switching to stratum, correct?

Yes it says something like, "diverting to stratum".

Quote
Both proxy and native support will work good, except that with native support in miner you don't need to run special software on the machine.

I see, so one doesn't need that mining_proxy.exe anymore with this new version of poclbm. 

Thanks for the info. 
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 19, 2012, 05:57:30 PM
 #5400

digital, please PM me with some logs if you'll see such bug again. I understand it's quite annoying, but I need some log or error message to debug&fix it.

No problem, I'm happy to help.  If it pops up again i'll definitely send you over the logs...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
Pages: « 1 ... 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 [270] 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!