Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 07:50:35 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 [269] 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3931595 times)
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2012, 11:34:17 PM
 #5361

Fine, I just finished necessary maintenance on the stratum pool. Load balancing is now in use. Not that it's required for 30 connections, but it's better to tune it up early. Now I can add backends into the loadbancer without interrupting current connections (which is anyway great improvement over Nginx load balancing used on getwork pool).

Now I don't know about any issue with Stratum and I'll leave it running for some time, to collect some stats (and hopefully solve the first block!).

1481313035
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481313035

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481313035
Reply with quote  #2

1481313035
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
September 11, 2012, 11:35:03 PM
 #5362

LOL, typo. It should be "There's basically NO reason why..." :-)

had me completely confused there for a bit Smiley

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
Mobius
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 957



View Profile
September 12, 2012, 05:53:28 AM
 #5363

error:?

~/stratum-mining-proxy$ ./mining_proxy.py -gp 8899
2012-09-12 01:47:52,279 DEBUG stats logger.get_logger # Logging initialized
2012-09-12 01:47:52,282 DEBUG protocol logger.get_logger # Logging initialized
2012-09-12 01:47:52,282 DEBUG socket_transport logger.get_logger # Logging initialized
2012-09-12 01:47:52,282 DEBUG proxy logger.get_logger # Logging initialized
2012-09-12 01:47:52,284 INFO proxy mining_proxy.main # Trying to connect to Stratum pool at api-stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333
Unhandled error in Deferred:
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
Failure: stratum.custom_exceptions.TransportException: SocketTransportClientFactory connection timed out
2012-09-12 01:48:22,314 DEBUG socket_transport socket_transport.clientConnectionFailed # [Failure instance: Traceback (failure with no frames): <class 'twisted.internet.error.TimeoutError'>: User timeout caused connection failure.
]
2012-09-12 01:48:54,790 DEBUG socket_transport socket_transport.clientConnectionFailed # [Failure instance: Traceback (failure with no frames): <class 'twisted.internet.error.TimeoutError'>: User timeout caused connection failure.
]
2012-09-12 01:49:32,289 DEBUG socket_transport socket_transport.clientConnectionFailed # [Failure instance: Traceback (failure with no frames): <class 'twisted.internet.error.TimeoutError'>: User timeout caused connection failure.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 12, 2012, 09:55:11 AM
 #5364

"SocketTransportClientFactory connection timed out" - looks like firewall issue. Don't you have some ports blocked?

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 12, 2012, 03:43:29 PM
 #5365

I just added Stratum hashrate indicator to Stats page. We're already on 20 Ghash/s and everything seems perfectly stable - few of these disconnections were caused by me, pushing new versions to live server.

I'm being pretty optimistic and I'd like to encourage more users to move to Stratum protocol, or current Stratum beta testers to move more hashpower to it.

I knocked up short page describing main advantages of using mining proxy for miners. There're also step-by-step instructions how to run mining proxy on your rig: http://mining.bitcoin.cz/mining-proxy-howto

Stratum submitted around 300k shares. We need much more power to find the block in some reasonable time to confirm that everything is working correctly. Of course I tested it on hundreds testnet blocks, but I'd like to see first livenet block mined by Stratum pool soon :-).

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 12, 2012, 03:48:05 PM
 #5366

I've got my full 2.4ghash using the proxy...

Im really hoping to be the one to find the first block.  Bragging Rights! lol

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
jborkl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 234



View Profile WWW
September 12, 2012, 06:23:31 PM
 #5367

Just have a test running to see, so easy to install - no errors, easy setup. Seems like  great piece of work

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 12, 2012, 06:51:00 PM
 #5368

175% luck!

Lets keep it up...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 12, 2012, 10:12:57 PM
 #5369

I just released new version of mining proxy, version 0.5.0. Older versions still works nicely, this adds some few features:

* Implemented method client.reconnect(host, port), so pool can now easily balance clients between backends or gracefully shutdown a backend without a miner outage.

* Added "--no-midstate" parameter. When used, proxy won't generate "midstate" field in the getwork response. Some old miners and Diablo still requires this field, but modern miners like poclbm/cgminer can generate midstate ourselves and in much faster way. So if you're using these miners and want to save a bit of CPU time, this argument is just for you. It speeds up getwork creation twice.

digital: The luck of whole bitcoin network in the last hour is quite interesting Smiley.


slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 13, 2012, 05:48:21 AM
 #5370

Let's celebrate! Block of round #13852 has been finished by Stratum pool! And the founder iiiis.... no digital, it's not you :-(.

Blocks done by Stratum can be easily identified on blockchain.info; they're "Relayed by slush" and have "Version 2".

keystroke
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 824


advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe


View Profile
September 13, 2012, 05:09:48 PM
 #5371

Let's celebrate! Block of round #13852 has been finished by Stratum pool! And the founder iiiis.... no digital, it's not you :-(.

Blocks done by Stratum can be easily identified on blockchain.info; they're "Relayed by slush" and have "Version 2".

Congrats! I'm planning on trying it soon with about 2.8Ghash (I emailed yesterday with a bug which you are working on), but I am running phoenix miner. I think it is the latest of the 1.x branch. Should it work? (Also any reason to switch miners... I get about 400Mhash from each of my 5870s. It could be a pain cause I have a lot of custom scripts for temperature control although IIRC they should work with any miner as they just use aticonfig.)

"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 13, 2012, 08:20:54 PM
 #5372

Let's celebrate! Block of round #13852 has been finished by Stratum pool! And the founder iiiis.... no digital, it's not you :-(.

Blocks done by Stratum can be easily identified on blockchain.info; they're "Relayed by slush" and have "Version 2".

Congrats! I'm planning on trying it soon with about 2.8Ghash (I emailed yesterday with a bug which you are working on), but I am running phoenix miner. I think it is the latest of the 1.x branch. Should it work? (Also any reason to switch miners... I get about 400Mhash from each of my 5870s. It could be a pain cause I have a lot of custom scripts for temperature control although IIRC they should work with any miner as they just use aticonfig.)

Did you tried to install dependencies by "sudo easy_install twisted stratum" ? I'll have time to dig into and release some fix only on Monday. But this is quite specific bug happening on your system and that command above should help you.

Basically you can run any getwork miner towards stratum proxy, including phoenix. So there's no reason to move to other miner if you'll have some monitoring scripts. Also I'll work on stratum patch for Phoenix 2 soon.

keystroke
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 824


advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe


View Profile
September 13, 2012, 08:49:43 PM
 #5373

Let's celebrate! Block of round #13852 has been finished by Stratum pool! And the founder iiiis.... no digital, it's not you :-(.

Blocks done by Stratum can be easily identified on blockchain.info; they're "Relayed by slush" and have "Version 2".

Congrats! I'm planning on trying it soon with about 2.8Ghash (I emailed yesterday with a bug which you are working on), but I am running phoenix miner. I think it is the latest of the 1.x branch. Should it work? (Also any reason to switch miners... I get about 400Mhash from each of my 5870s. It could be a pain cause I have a lot of custom scripts for temperature control although IIRC they should work with any miner as they just use aticonfig.)

Did you tried to install dependencies by "sudo easy_install twisted stratum" ? I'll have time to dig into and release some fix only on Monday. But this is quite specific bug happening on your system and that command above should help you.

Basically you can run any getwork miner towards stratum proxy, including phoenix. So there's no reason to move to other miner if you'll have some monitoring scripts. Also I'll work on stratum patch for Phoenix 2 soon.

It works! I had to install easy_install first naturally and run "sudo easy_install -U distribute" but it looks good!

I just moved one rig outside and there's a tarp over it to deflect any rain so that is a bit of fun today... 1 card on that rig is now on stratum! I'll compare the rejects over the next 24 hours or so and report back. Then I'll switch both cards to stratum. Next week I'll move over all 2.8 Ghash.

"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 13, 2012, 08:56:41 PM
 #5374

I just moved one rig outside and there's a tarp over it to deflect any rain so that is a bit of fun today...

Awesome.

I'm inspired to move my rigs to the garage.  At least until it starts getting colder, lol.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
keystroke
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 824


advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe


View Profile
September 13, 2012, 10:29:33 PM
 #5375

Go for it!

Looks like I just found a block! Brings our total to 10... any way of finding out which blocks were mine?

So far 0 stales on the new proxy Cheesy We average about .8%. Is that normal?

PS Could not resist and have 2 cards on the new Stratum protocol now!

"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 14, 2012, 09:52:44 AM
 #5376

So far 0 stales on the new proxy Cheesy

I'm not surprised Smiley.

Quote
We average about .8%. Is that normal?

Well, unfortunately, this is possible on some backends. That's why I want to switch to Stratum as soon as possible. Next week there'll be already native support in some miners, so I hope that more people switch transparently.

In the last phase, I'll switch off the old pool and start bunch of proxies to Stratum there instead.


Quote
PS Could not resist and have 2 cards on the new Stratum protocol now!

Excellent! Smiley

WhiteShum
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456


View Profile
September 14, 2012, 10:31:50 AM
 #5377

Question

in DiabloMiner i have accept 100 shares and redject 10 shares,BUT in my account i see "Current shares" 110 --Pool accept my redject?

p.s. now i have 500 accept and 10 redject, in other pool i have 0.5-0.01 % redject  wtf?
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 14, 2012, 11:58:12 AM
 #5378

WhiteShum, honestly, I'm sure there're many bugs in Diablo. All rejected should be logged in proxy (although I agree that the proxy log is quite verbose at this moment). What do you see there? If you see accepted on the pool and accepted in the proxy, then it's definitely just Diablo failing in rejection reporting.

I've tested all stuff with cgminer, poclbm and ufasoft and no one of these miners have such problems.

keystroke
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 824


advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe


View Profile
September 14, 2012, 10:55:31 PM
 #5379

I have 4 cards on there now Smiley

Here are the stats:
[397.47 Mhash/sec] [7714 Accepted] [8 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)]
[398.73 Mhash/sec] [7717 Accepted] [9 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)]
[383.78 Mhash/sec] [7205 Accepted] [3 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)]
[400.54 Mhash/sec] [7507 Accepted] [3 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)]
23/30,140 = .07631055%

vs.

[366.03 Mhash/sec] [114607 Accepted] [980 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)]
[401.11 Mhash/sec] [199204 Accepted] [1697 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)]
[398.42 Mhash/sec] [199115 Accepted] [1620 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)]

4,297/512,926 = .837742676%

So there's some real world data for everyone!

Edit: Make that 7!

"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
gr0bi42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2012, 06:21:55 PM
 #5380

Hi Slush,

is something wrong with the stats?

According to blockchain.info, blocks 198917, 198923 and 198926 are mined by your pool, but stats still shows 198915 as the last mined block  Huh

Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
Pages: « 1 ... 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 [269] 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!