Bitcoin Forum
September 27, 2016, 08:42:07 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.0 (New!) [Torrent]. Make sure you verify it.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3151 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3915

Pages: « 1 ... 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 [272] 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 ... 1104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3854451 times)
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 19, 2012, 12:29:21 AM
 #5421

So...

All of a sudden one of my workers isn't getting any shares through, the miner is working fine, but every time a share is submitted the proxy log says that it was rejected by the pool and my "worker is not authorized"

As far as I know, nothing has changed.  I did just recently download the latest version of the proxy, but I'm pretty sure it had been working for several hours, and just in the last hour or so it started doing this...

Any thoughts?

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
1474965727
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474965727

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474965727
Reply with quote  #2

1474965727
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1474965727
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474965727

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474965727
Reply with quote  #2

1474965727
Report to moderator
1474965727
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474965727

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474965727
Reply with quote  #2

1474965727
Report to moderator
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 19, 2012, 02:01:32 AM
 #5422

Well, I ended up restarting the proxy and everything is working now.

But it might be something to keep in mind because I downloaded the newest proxy around 2pm today, then everything ran great until about 7pm.  Then I started getting the shares rejected with an error that said my worker was not authorized.  It looked like it started with a new block.

After restarting the proxy it started working again.

I'll keep an eye on things going forward and report any other oddities...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2012, 08:09:36 AM
 #5423

I live in Western Canada... is one of those better than another for my location?

I set it back to poclbm.exe [userdeatils]@api.bitcoin.cz:8332 -d0 -v -w128 -f1

The way I had it before trying Stratum, although now I am using the new version of poclbm.exe. 

In new poclbm, you should see some informational message that it is switching to stratum, correct?

Both proxy and native support will work good, except that with native support in miner you don't need to run special software on the machine.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2012, 08:11:16 AM
 #5424

All of a sudden one of my workers isn't getting any shares through, the miner is working fine, but every time a share is submitted the proxy log says that it was rejected by the pool and my "worker is not authorized"

As far as I know, nothing has changed.  I did just recently download the latest version of the proxy, but I'm pretty sure it had been working for several hours, and just in the last hour or so it started doing this...

Yes, this is quite interesting. I have similar bug report by another user. However I'm running latest proxy version overnight and don't see any problem. What miner are you using?

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2012, 12:09:10 PM
 #5425

There's some uncertainity how to connect newest poclbm to the pool using Stratum.

You don't need to change any settings in your miners, just connect them to "api.bitcoin.cz" port "8332" as usual. Pool is advertising special HTTP header which tell poclbm how to switch to Stratum automatically. You should see message about switching to Stratum in the console.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 19, 2012, 02:17:09 PM
 #5426

All of a sudden one of my workers isn't getting any shares through, the miner is working fine, but every time a share is submitted the proxy log says that it was rejected by the pool and my "worker is not authorized"

As far as I know, nothing has changed.  I did just recently download the latest version of the proxy, but I'm pretty sure it had been working for several hours, and just in the last hour or so it started doing this...

Yes, this is quite interesting. I have similar bug report by another user. However I'm running latest proxy version overnight and don't see any problem. What miner are you using?

That machine was using Guiminer w/ OpenCL.    Not exactly sure which version, cause I don't have the machine in front of me right now, but if I had to guess I would say it's probably the most recent version.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 19, 2012, 03:53:20 PM
 #5427

digital, please PM me with some logs if you'll see such bug again. I understand it's quite annoying, but I need some log or error message to debug&fix it.

Portnoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778

My money; Our Bitcoin.


View Profile
September 19, 2012, 04:55:19 PM
 #5428

I live in Western Canada... is one of those better than another for my location?

I set it back to poclbm.exe [userdeatils]@api.bitcoin.cz:8332 -d0 -v -w128 -f1

The way I had it before trying Stratum, although now I am using the new version of poclbm.exe. 

In new poclbm, you should see some informational message that it is switching to stratum, correct?

Yes it says something like, "diverting to stratum".

Quote
Both proxy and native support will work good, except that with native support in miner you don't need to run special software on the machine.

I see, so one doesn't need that mining_proxy.exe anymore with this new version of poclbm. 

Thanks for the info. 

Buy Bitcoin from CoinbaseXapo
Faucets & Earn Bitcoin Sites: FreeBitco.in; BitsForClicks; Moonbit
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 19, 2012, 05:57:30 PM
 #5429

digital, please PM me with some logs if you'll see such bug again. I understand it's quite annoying, but I need some log or error message to debug&fix it.

No problem, I'm happy to help.  If it pops up again i'll definitely send you over the logs...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
keystroke
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 823


advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe


View Profile
September 20, 2012, 05:00:50 AM
 #5430

Hi Slush,

Can you tell us more about the democratic mining you propose? Would that give miners the ability to select which transactions go into a block?

Re: "I already have some ideas for Stratum mining protocol extension, where miners will be able to suggest their own merkle branch (I call it internally “democratic mining”), which will solve such issues as centralized selection of transactions. For now I decided to focus on such a solution, which will fit to majority of miners and do some extensions later."

Thanks!

"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 11:25:21 AM
 #5431

Can you tell us more about the democratic mining you propose? Would that give miners the ability to select which transactions go into a block?

Well, it's just more like a future concept than something what I'm working on right now. The very basic idea is that miners will be able to propose their own merkle trees, so they'll be able to pick transactions, but there are many open questions, mostly about pool performance. It's even not clear if this will have any significant benefits over p2pool (except that you'll be able to propose your own transactions and use PPS rewarding system, which is not possible on P2Pool now). Right now I'm not working on it, I'm more focused to giving a support for miners and miner developers for current Stratum specification, because it has huge benefits for pooled mining and it is ready for use right now.

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770



View Profile
September 20, 2012, 02:42:16 PM
 #5432

Found this, this morning. This is from yesterday.

For about an hour it did this. To big to post an hour of these, it was like 2 or 3 of these a second for an hour + Problems communicating with bitcoin RPC errors.
Code:
2012-09-19 03:14:30: Listener for "Anonymous883.WorkerTwo": localhost:8332 19/09/2012 03:14:30, Unexpected error during authorization

I couldn't grab anything from the proxymining program as the cmd console only goes so far back.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 02:49:34 PM
 #5433

Hm, without a proxy log I cannot debug this more. It would be useful if you will be able to store proxy log when this happen next time. Btw I just relased 0.8.2 and I recommend to update the proxy.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 02:55:15 PM
 #5434

New version of poclbm just released. It fixes one bug with Stratum and I strongly recommend you the update.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 20, 2012, 03:04:58 PM
 #5435

New version of poclbm just released. It fixes one bug with Stratum and I strongly recommend you the update.

No kidding, it even qualified for bold on the news sidebar!

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 03:07:32 PM
 #5436

Smiley Yes, now poclbm has native (and tested) stratum support...

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770



View Profile
September 20, 2012, 04:20:08 PM
 #5437

K, I will update it.

Also, for this new poclbm, I use guiminer on windows7, can I insert this new poclbm somewhere into a directory of guiminer to have the newest version of poclbm?
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 04:22:27 PM
 #5438

pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.

Edit: I tested it and it don't work. Newest poclbm has slightly different parameters, so it requires small change in GUIminer...

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770



View Profile
September 20, 2012, 04:26:14 PM
 #5439

pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.

Could u point me to the right place for a howto do this?

All i see on github is .py files.
pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770



View Profile
September 20, 2012, 04:37:04 PM
 #5440

pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.

Edit: I tested it and it don't work. Newest poclbm has slightly different parameters, so it requires small change in GUIminer...

kk, I will leave guiminer as is, and I updated the proxyprogram.

thanks.
Pages: « 1 ... 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 [272] 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 ... 1104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!