Bitcoin Forum
February 19, 2018, 06:28:35 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3217 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 414 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 371 (9.3%)
Total Voters: 4000

Pages: « 1 ... 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 [272] 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [2+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 4323857 times)
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1016



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 02:49:34 PM
 #5421

Hm, without a proxy log I cannot debug this more. It would be useful if you will be able to store proxy log when this happen next time. Btw I just relased 0.8.2 and I recommend to update the proxy.

1519021715
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1519021715

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1519021715
Reply with quote  #2

1519021715
Report to moderator
1519021715
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1519021715

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1519021715
Reply with quote  #2

1519021715
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1016



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 02:55:15 PM
 #5422

New version of poclbm just released. It fixes one bug with Stratum and I strongly recommend you the update.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 20, 2012, 03:04:58 PM
 #5423

New version of poclbm just released. It fixes one bug with Stratum and I strongly recommend you the update.

No kidding, it even qualified for bold on the news sidebar!

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1016



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 03:07:32 PM
 #5424

Smiley Yes, now poclbm has native (and tested) stratum support...

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 20, 2012, 04:20:08 PM
 #5425

K, I will update it.

Also, for this new poclbm, I use guiminer on windows7, can I insert this new poclbm somewhere into a directory of guiminer to have the newest version of poclbm?
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1016



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 04:22:27 PM
 #5426

pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.

Edit: I tested it and it don't work. Newest poclbm has slightly different parameters, so it requires small change in GUIminer...

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 20, 2012, 04:26:14 PM
 #5427

pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.

Could u point me to the right place for a howto do this?

All i see on github is .py files.
pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 20, 2012, 04:37:04 PM
 #5428

pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.

Edit: I tested it and it don't work. Newest poclbm has slightly different parameters, so it requires small change in GUIminer...

kk, I will leave guiminer as is, and I updated the proxyprogram.

thanks.
gr0bi42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 06:42:14 PM
 #5429

Hi slush, I guess there is once again a missed block (199709).

Edit: ... and block 199724 is missing too.

Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1016



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 09:04:36 PM
 #5430

I see. Looks like I'm going to have a nice debugging session now. Looks like mysql issue...

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1016



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 09:44:23 PM
 #5431

Ok, looks like I found something. One backend didn't restart succesfully on last update and it has been running on older pool source code. All "skipped" blocks were generated by him and I also found some related errors in the log. Backend is now restarted and running on latest pool sources. I'll keep eyes on him, but I expect it will be fine now. Of course I'll add skipped rewards to some following rounds.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1016



View Profile WWW
September 21, 2012, 01:20:16 AM
 #5432

Users mining for the last super-extra long round has been credited for 3x their standard block reward.

maxi75
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0



View Profile
September 21, 2012, 06:08:07 AM
 #5433

I worked on this long round almost 14h with 19.5 Ghs and I got only 0.00000606 BTC, is that my 3x reward??? Undecided
My reward is usually 0.52 BTC per block.

Edit: Using stratum.
VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 751
Merit: 500


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
September 21, 2012, 07:49:31 AM
 #5434

I worked on this long round almost 14h with 19.5 Ghs and I got only 0.00000606 BTC, is that my 3x reward??? Undecided
My reward is usually 0.52 BTC per block.

Edit: Using stratum.

I got my usual reward, it also doesn't look like it's 3x as much as I was supposed to get, but my main miner wasn't running in the night so I guess the score system would make my reward lower...
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1016



View Profile WWW
September 21, 2012, 07:55:47 AM
 #5435

I worked on this long round almost 14h with 19.5 Ghs and I got only 0.00000606 BTC, is that my 3x reward??? Undecided
My reward is usually 0.52 BTC per block.

maxi75, I'm sorry for hear this. But it looks like you had connection issues near the end of that long round. Can you check proxy log for any connection errors?

Although I restarted backends on the old pool, Stratum has been stable all the time. I also see that other running miners got the expected reward for this round, so there no reason to think that your lower reward was caused by any pool issue.

VeeMiner - same for you.

maxi75
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0



View Profile
September 21, 2012, 09:10:23 AM
 #5436

Yes, my miners disconnected 50min before block end, and my score probably went down...
But I'm asking what happend for reward for skipped blocks 199709, 199724 my miners worked for those blocks?
Vasilis
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0



View Profile
September 21, 2012, 10:32:48 AM
 #5437

199818, 199820 ??
http://blockchain.info/blocks/Slush
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1016



View Profile WWW
September 21, 2012, 10:53:20 AM
 #5438


Yes, I'm aware of this and debugging the server now. I'll keep you updated if I'll find anything.

Edit: Looks like that bitcoind is occasionally timing out on block submission. I used quite strict timeout settings on bitcoind connections, so I changed it and it should help. Still don't understand why this started to happen, pool load is fine and I didn't changed anything in this area for many weeks.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1016



View Profile WWW
September 21, 2012, 10:55:32 AM
 #5439

But I'm asking what happend for reward for skipped blocks 199709, 199724 my miners worked for those blocks?

As I stated at 2am, I credited users for that super-long round by 3x of super-long round reward. Your miners worked, but because of some bug in server stats I don't have scores for these rounds, so I included reward from these blocks to the next recorded round.

maxi75
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0



View Profile
September 21, 2012, 11:50:58 AM
 #5440

But I'm asking what happend for reward for skipped blocks 199709, 199724 my miners worked for those blocks?

As I stated at 2am, I credited users for that super-long round by 3x of super-long round reward. Your miners worked, but because of some bug in server stats I don't have scores for these rounds, so I included reward from these blocks to the next recorded round.

hmm, but my miners was disconected next two blocks, so I got 0 there, I connected on third block after the long one and got as usual around 0,50BTC

Quote
13956   2012-09-21 07:31:57   0:44:49   1192369   0.45140752   1.34604280   199798    69 confirmations left
13955   2012-09-21 06:47:00   1:58:59   3024065   none   none   199791    62 confirmations left
13954   2012-09-21 04:47:54   3:36:53   5256745   none   none   199782    53 confirmations left
13953   2012-09-21 01:10:54   14:51:27   22346268   0.00000606   0.00003590   199755    26 confirmations left
Pages: « 1 ... 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 [272] 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!