Slave2school
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
May 10, 2013, 11:25:11 PM |
|
You mean the world doesn't revolve around EST?!
|
|
|
|
PeBo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
May 10, 2013, 11:35:23 PM |
|
The world? Maybe. But Slush's Pool is something special then... All times are in UTC.
|
|
|
|
stephengillon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2013, 12:29:33 AM |
|
bitminter has nmc earning on stratum
i mined there for a few days to try, getting paid while waiting for blocks is nice, but the pay out is not nearly as good as on slush.
|
|
|
|
vs3
|
|
May 11, 2013, 01:06:53 AM |
|
bitminter has nmc earning on stratum
i mined there for a few days to try, getting paid while waiting for blocks is nice, but the pay out is not nearly as good as on slush.
How do you know it is on stratum? (and not just on getwork) They have a lot of users on both interfaces - so it quite possible that just those on getwork make the NMCs, but similarly as Slush's - everyone (on both stratum and getwork) receives NMCs.
|
|
|
|
Uliss
|
|
May 11, 2013, 01:13:05 AM |
|
On slush site in Graph section my daily reward is displayed only till 8 of May. Any reason for that? is there any problem?
I think this is by design (and not necessarily a problem). At midnight when it calculates the totals many of the blocks are not yet confirmed, so it can't count them (at least not yet - some may get orphaned or invalidated). So as a result it would be always a day behind. In late April, the pool had a problem and for 1 day statistics ... Now the statistics are displayed correctly, but the late date. I have reported this before but without results.
|
|
|
|
Uliss
|
|
May 11, 2013, 01:31:07 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Kruncha
|
|
May 11, 2013, 02:09:57 AM |
|
Looks like your avatar, lol K.
|
|
|
|
rsbriggs
|
|
May 11, 2013, 02:38:20 AM |
|
Looks like I missed the excitement of 3, almost 4, blocks in a row. But I did pop back with 1.2 GH/s just in time to catch this other nice one - squeezed by with 12 shares in 24 seconds.... # Block found at Duration Total shares Your shares 17974 2013-05-11 02:03:08 0:00:24 52466 12 Decided to give it a go with all miners using one worker...
|
|
|
|
vs3
|
|
May 11, 2013, 02:54:16 AM |
|
Looks like I missed the excitement of 3, almost 4, blocks in a row. But I did pop back with 1.2 GH/s just in time to catch this other nice one - squeezed by with 12 shares in 24 seconds.... # Block found at Duration Total shares Your shares 17974 2013-05-11 02:03:08 0:00:24 52466 12 Decided to give it a go with all miners using one worker... Lucky you! At 910MH I barely managed to get 3... Still - for a 24sec round - any income is just bonus.
|
|
|
|
Kruncha
|
|
May 11, 2013, 03:06:42 AM |
|
Looks like I missed the excitement of 3, almost 4, blocks in a row. But I did pop back with 1.2 GH/s just in time to catch this other nice one - squeezed by with 12 shares in 24 seconds.... # Block found at Duration Total shares Your shares 17974 2013-05-11 02:03:08 0:00:24 52466 12 Decided to give it a go with all miners using one worker... Lucky you! At 910MH I barely managed to get 3... Still - for a 24sec round - any income is just bonus. I was unlucky on that one, didn't even squeeze in a share (sometimes, it's just not meant to be). K.
|
|
|
|
stephengillon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2013, 03:39:48 AM |
|
bitminter has nmc earning on stratum
i mined there for a few days to try, getting paid while waiting for blocks is nice, but the pay out is not nearly as good as on slush.
How do you know it is on stratum? (and not just on getwork) They have a lot of users on both interfaces - so it quite possible that just those on getwork make the NMCs, but similarly as Slush's - everyone (on both stratum and getwork) receives NMCs. could be, i was connected to stratum though. i was making more nmc then btc lol.
|
|
|
|
CapnGimp
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2013, 04:34:46 AM |
|
Looks like I missed the excitement of 3, almost 4, blocks in a row. But I did pop back with 1.2 GH/s just in time to catch this other nice one - squeezed by with 12 shares in 24 seconds.... # Block found at Duration Total shares Your shares 17974 2013-05-11 02:03:08 0:00:24 52466 12 Decided to give it a go with all miners using one worker... Lucky you! At 910MH I barely managed to get 3... Still - for a 24sec round - any income is just bonus. 17974 2013-05-11 02:03:08 0:00:24 52466 4 I've got about a 475MH
|
|
|
|
im_riley
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2013, 04:54:44 AM |
|
Approx. cluster performance (30 min average): 10019.818 Ghash/s
it just keeps going up, serious power being added to the pool. Approx. cluster performance (30 min average): 10222.382 Ghash/s
|
|
|
|
vs3
|
|
May 11, 2013, 05:22:47 AM |
|
Looks like I missed the excitement of 3, almost 4, blocks in a row. But I did pop back with 1.2 GH/s just in time to catch this other nice one - squeezed by with 12 shares in 24 seconds.... # Block found at Duration Total shares Your shares 17974 2013-05-11 02:03:08 0:00:24 52466 12 Decided to give it a go with all miners using one worker... Lucky you! At 910MH I barely managed to get 3... Still - for a 24sec round - any income is just bonus. 17974 2013-05-11 02:03:08 0:00:24 52466 4 I've got about a 475MH That's interesting ... I'm connected via the stratum proxy (I'm using an older miner that can do getwork only). I've noticed on a few other occasions that it takes a bit extra time (like 10-15sec) for my workers to resync. I wonder if my poor performance is due to me using the the proxy or it was just a slow network or some other fluke...
|
|
|
|
gbx
|
|
May 11, 2013, 05:35:36 AM |
|
Woot... we're really cooking now!!!!!
|
|
|
|
valladex
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
May 11, 2013, 07:23:02 AM |
|
9285.081 Ghash/s all that hashing power just came and went, did a large pool go down or is that just "pool hoppers"?
|
|
|
|
KNK
|
|
May 11, 2013, 07:27:48 AM |
|
9285.081 Ghash/s all that hashing power just came and went, did a large pool go down or is that just "pool hoppers"?
10% difference can well be because of luck spike and will stay for exactly 30min
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
May 11, 2013, 07:48:53 AM |
|
9285.081 Ghash/s all that hashing power just came and went, did a large pool go down or is that just "pool hoppers"?
10% difference can well be because of luck spike and will stay for exactly 30min Wait, what? I'm not sure I know what you mean there, but I must say I'm intrigued to find out.
|
|
|
|
valladex
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
May 11, 2013, 07:53:59 AM |
|
9285.081 Ghash/s all that hashing power just came and went, did a large pool go down or is that just "pool hoppers"?
10% difference can well be because of luck spike and will stay for exactly 30min please excuse my ignorance, i'm a newbie, but are you saying luck increases the hash power, i noticed it went up the other (exceptional) day, i put this down to more people joining the pool.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
May 11, 2013, 07:58:49 AM |
|
9285.081 Ghash/s all that hashing power just came and went, did a large pool go down or is that just "pool hoppers"?
10% difference can well be because of luck spike and will stay for exactly 30min please excuse my ignorance, i'm a newbie, but are you saying luck increases the hash power, i noticed it went up the other (exceptional) day, i put this down to more people joining the pool. If that's what he's saying then he's so very wrong. We're not talking about the network here. We know how many shares are contributed, so we have a very good estimation of the hashrate. If the variable difficulty shares were set to extremely high difficulty levels (close to the current network difficulty) then maybe this would be the case and it would be hard to judge the pool's hashrate. But they're not so it isn't.
|
|
|
|
|