HellDiverUK
|
|
May 22, 2013, 12:46:15 PM |
|
Difficulty just means you get bigger chunks to work on, which means you've less network bandwidth in use.
|
|
|
|
stslimited
|
|
May 22, 2013, 01:09:53 PM |
|
Difficulty just means you get bigger chunks to work on, which means you've less network bandwidth in use.
is there somewhere I can read more about this
|
|
|
|
|
goatmonkey
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2013, 01:38:58 PM |
|
You rock Slush. Glad you're okay.
|
|
|
|
nottm28
|
|
May 22, 2013, 01:39:37 PM |
|
Nice
|
donations not accepted
|
|
|
demigo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2013, 01:44:23 PM |
|
18141 2013-05-22 02:50:08 2:18:08 17604905 664 0.00269354 237286 59.82222506 awesome rate with an awesome block at an awesome time duration. now if only we could have this every single time strange. will be invalid, I guess
|
|
|
|
Miracek
|
|
May 22, 2013, 01:53:50 PM |
|
18141 2013-05-22 02:50:08 2:18:08 17604905 664 0.00269354 237286 59.82222506 awesome rate with an awesome block at an awesome time duration. now if only we could have this every single time strange. will be invalid, I guess Not sure why you think it will be Invalid were Slush said he modified that block due to an earlier block that was missed.
|
|
|
|
Miracek
|
|
May 22, 2013, 01:54:41 PM |
|
Pool skipped storing the block #237278, unfortunately the monitoring didn't woke me up at night. To fix it and be as fair as possible, I added the block reward into round 18141 (closed by block #237286) and recalculated block rewards. That's the reason for such high block value of #237286 ...
just quoting where Slush explained why the payout is higher on this block
|
|
|
|
nottm28
|
|
May 22, 2013, 01:55:05 PM |
|
18141 2013-05-22 02:50:08 2:18:08 17604905 664 0.00269354 237286 59.82222506 awesome rate with an awesome block at an awesome time duration. now if only we could have this every single time strange. will be invalid, I guess From the stats page, click on the block number and you will see that it's takes you to blockchain info confirming block is slush's. Since the bitcoind patch we haven't had any invalids. [EDIT] whereas if you click on the block number for an invalid, the blockchain info site states - Block Not Found - we haven't seen this since the patch - good job that man
|
donations not accepted
|
|
|
Lucko
|
|
May 22, 2013, 02:16:20 PM |
|
Nice Yes but in this case Google search doesn't return what you are looking... pool difficulty setting would...
|
|
|
|
autonomous42
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2013, 02:44:29 PM |
|
can someone explain pool difficulty to me?
I have 12963MH/s from my one worker, and I set 9-16gh/s from the pool's dropdown menu and it says difficulty 8
my stratum proxy says also says
"proxy getwork_listener._on_submit # [0ms] Share from 'worker1' accepted, diff 8"
can someone explain what the benefit of this is? vs a difficulty of 1?
how does this effect my payout, how does it help the pool, pros cons etc
See: The adjustable difficulty is really for [high hashing devices] because those high-throughput devices would clog the server. By setting a higher difficulty, the machine deals with fewer shares but they are worth n*1 shares in [the pool's] stats.
|
|
|
|
HellDiverUK
|
|
May 22, 2013, 02:50:28 PM |
|
Nice Yes but in this case Google search doesn't return what you are looking... pool difficulty setting would... Heh, google.com gives different results to google.co.uk - go figure. First hit on .co.uk was the answer using that same search.
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
|
May 22, 2013, 02:58:20 PM |
|
Heh, google.com gives different results to google.co.uk - go figure. First hit on .co.uk was the answer using that same search.
Yes google customises results of the searches according to the state and user. I hate this "new" option...
|
|
|
|
sgbullion
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2013, 03:26:59 PM |
|
Heh, google.com gives different results to google.co.uk - go figure. First hit on .co.uk was the answer using that same search.
Yes google customises results of the searches according to the state and user. I hate this "new" option... Thats why I don't use Google.
|
|
|
|
Paulizei
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
May 22, 2013, 03:33:47 PM |
|
Thats why I don't use Google.
You could use https://startpage.com/ instead. Google results but 'neutral'...
|
|
|
|
|
Psyrick
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2013, 03:55:24 PM |
|
Weather cut the power on my machine while I'm at work. Happened yesterday aswell. Will have to wait until day's end to restart
|
|
|
|
bobsmoke
|
|
May 22, 2013, 04:29:24 PM |
|
Pool skipped storing the block #237278, unfortunately the monitoring didn't woke me up at night. To fix it and be as fair as possible, I added the block reward into round 18141 (closed by block #237286) and recalculated block rewards. That's the reason for such high block value of #237286 ...
Thank you Slush!
|
|
|
|
nottm28
|
|
May 22, 2013, 04:30:25 PM |
|
Weather cut the power on my machine while I'm at work. Happened yesterday aswell. Will have to wait until day's end to restart Might be worth getting a UPS - will keep you up for half an hour or so - maybe enough to see you through short outages...
|
donations not accepted
|
|
|
haveagr8day
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 22, 2013, 04:30:55 PM |
|
I noticed every once in a while (like the last block) there will be almost 10BTC worth of transfer fees! I think it's awesome but does anyone know why that happens? a typo when someone did a transfer? or are people just being very nice to miners The transaction that really fattened up that block was this one: http://blockchain.info/tx/4b596c0fde12b98bad2cc8bb8d5b985ab3fdd7b986c49b231d85d7751dad4b40It had a 9 BTC transaction fee associated with it.
|
|
|
|
|