slush (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
October 21, 2011, 12:29:30 AM
Last edit: October 21, 2011, 01:27:32 AM by slush |
|
Maybe you noticed short restart of backends. I pulled all backends to merged mining, so you should see much higher namecoin rewards since now. Many thanks to m0mchil who helped me with combining "merged mining patch" together with previous pool optimizations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TalkImg was created especially for hosting images on bitcointalk.org: try it next time you want to post an image
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
AniceInovation
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 446
Merit: 262
Interesting.
|
|
October 21, 2011, 01:23:59 AM |
|
api.bitcoin.cz
  |
|
|
|
|
|
AngelusWebDesign
|
|
October 21, 2011, 04:25:21 AM |
|
Maybe you noticed short restart of backends. I pulled all backends to merged mining, so you should see much higher namecoin rewards since now. Many thanks to m0mchil who helped me with combining "merged mining patch" together with previous pool optimizations.
Are you saying we're going to make more NMC per Mhash from now on? |
|
|
|
|
|
Bigpiggy01
|
|
October 21, 2011, 04:34:41 AM |
|
Slush, LUV YA |
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 21, 2011, 10:05:03 AM |
|
Are you saying we're going to make more NMC per Mhash from now on?
Yes, much more. Until now only weakest backends were merged mining. All backends were doing merged mining only for short period on the beginning, before I realized that it's crashing under high load. But now is 100% of pool power on NMC. Momchil is my hero. |
|
|
|
|
thehairymob
|
|
October 21, 2011, 01:17:23 PM |
|
Glad to be back Slush.  |
|
|
|
|
|
cosurgi
|
|
October 21, 2011, 02:50:59 PM |
|
wow, it feels like my NMC rewards have quadrupled!
|
|
|
|
|
sadpandatech
|
|
October 21, 2011, 03:33:02 PM |
|
wow, it feels like my NMC rewards have quadrupled!
Couple of nice, short NMC rounds certainly didn't hurt on top of Slush getting all the merged working. Good stuff, m8~ 'Variance' can also be a big ol bitch too. *grumbles, dirty lil tramp* |
If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system.
- GA
It is being worked on by smart people. -DamienBlack
|
|
|
|
Crypt_Current
|
|
October 21, 2011, 09:00:21 PM |
|
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude like I joined your pool!
Looks like it's alot more stable now! I want me some NMC dude! So all I had to do was put in my NMC wallet address right?
I'm liking your pool so far, enjoy my modest ~600 MH/s!!!! :-D
|
|
|
|
|
Crypt_Current
|
|
October 21, 2011, 09:28:25 PM |
|
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude like I joined your pool!
Looks like it's alot more stable now! I want me some NMC dude! So all I had to do was put in my NMC wallet address right?
I'm liking your pool so far, enjoy my modest ~600 MH/s!!!! :-D
OH BTW I forgot to ask about "Ntime rolling" ... I'm using the latest version of Phoenix with the phatk kernel under Linuxcoin... is there anything I have to do on the command line to enable this "Ntime rolling"? Also, what the heck is it?? :-D |
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
October 21, 2011, 10:04:11 PM |
|
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude like I joined your pool!
Looks like it's alot more stable now! I want me some NMC dude! So all I had to do was put in my NMC wallet address right?
I'm liking your pool so far, enjoy my modest ~600 MH/s!!!! :-D
OH BTW I forgot to ask about "Ntime rolling" ... I'm using the latest version of Phoenix with the phatk kernel under Linuxcoin... is there anything I have to do on the command line to enable this "Ntime rolling"? Also, what the heck is it?? :-D Nothing you need to do. It is handled for you. Ntime rolling allows the miner to re-use a getwork request by incrementing the timestamp locally for a rolling period of time. This reduces the amount of communication necessary between the pool and miner. |
|
|
|
|
|
Crypt_Current
|
|
October 21, 2011, 10:04:59 PM |
|
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude like I joined your pool!
Looks like it's alot more stable now! I want me some NMC dude! So all I had to do was put in my NMC wallet address right?
I'm liking your pool so far, enjoy my modest ~600 MH/s!!!! :-D
OH BTW I forgot to ask about "Ntime rolling" ... I'm using the latest version of Phoenix with the phatk kernel under Linuxcoin... is there anything I have to do on the command line to enable this "Ntime rolling"? Also, what the heck is it?? :-D Nothing you need to do. It is handled for you. Ntime rolling allows the miner to re-use a getwork request by incrementing the timestamp locally for a rolling period of time. This reduces the amount of communication necessary between the pool and miner. Jagged, thanks! |
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 22, 2011, 08:02:21 AM |
|
Nothing you need to do. It is handled for you. Ntime rolling allows the miner to re-use a getwork request by incrementing the timestamp locally for a rolling period of time. This reduces the amount of communication necessary between the pool and miner.
NTime is great improvement of network layer, however current (latest) phoenix still doesn't support it. AFAIk only poclbm and maybe cgminer is using NTime rolling; jedi95 promised NTime rolling for next phoenix release. |
|
|
|
|
relmeas
|
|
October 22, 2011, 10:22:59 AM |
|
0.4 btc per 24 hours on deepbit with near 0% 24-hour luck and 0.27 btc plus uncounted amount of NMC here...
so basically either the pool is super unlucky atm or mm is not as harmless as is was promised to be. we'll see in a few more days just to exclude the possibility of extreme unluck...
|
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 22, 2011, 12:11:12 PM
Last edit: October 22, 2011, 12:53:09 PM by slush |
|
0.4 btc per 24 hours on deepbit with near 0% 24-hour luck and 0.27 btc plus uncounted amount of NMC here...
so basically either the pool is super unlucky atm or mm is not as harmless as is was promised to be. we'll see in a few more days just to exclude the possibility of extreme unluck...
What's your stale ratio? And yes, there were two 6+ hours in last 24 hours, so you're right. It's just a "luck". Btw what's "uncounted amount"? or mm is not as harmless as it was promised to be No, MM is definitely not an issue :-) |
|
|
|
|
relmeas
|
|
October 22, 2011, 01:04:24 PM |
|
I just lazily did not count NMC per day, there is only a btc per day graph available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
thehairymob
|
|
October 22, 2011, 01:12:06 PM |
|
Since merged mining began on site I've found my system has become unstable when mining btc. Is seems fine on my backup site for mining. I also have found that I keep getting connection problems. I am only mining btc and haven't set up a wallet for namecoins and with the instablility issues when mining recently at your site I'm not sure I want to. Recently you said the whole network is used though for merged mining could this be causing issues for those of us that aren't interested in namecoins? If it is why not offer an opt out from merged mining for those of us that don't wish to mine namecoins?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bigpiggy01
|
|
October 22, 2011, 01:24:46 PM |
|
Since merged mining began on site I've found my system has become unstable when mining btc. Is seems fine on my backup site for mining. I also have found that I keep getting connection problems. I am only mining btc and haven't set up a wallet for namecoins and with the instablility issues when mining recently at your site I'm not sure I want to. Recently you said the whole network is used though for merged mining could this be causing issues for those of us that aren't interested in namecoins? If it is why not offer an opt out from merged mining for those of us that don't wish to mine namecoins? Try using all polcmb and cgminers. It's running rock solid for me and I have just about the crappiest most unstable connection imaginable. BTW Slush, Would it be possible with a further increase in the NMC limit? Just so we can keep it to 1 payment a day? Having a ton of different payments come in during a day is confusing. I realize that you aren't a bank but plz |
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 22, 2011, 01:26:33 PM |
|
Since merged mining began on site I've found my system has become unstable when mining btc. Is seems fine on my backup site for mining.
Of course there was big problems with connectivity due to DDoS attacks. Not sure if you counted it. There was also few issues with backends two weeks back when pool started with merged mining, but then I disconnected problematic pools and thanks to recent update of backends, merged mining does not affect mining at all; now it's definitely not an issue. Thanks to my pool monitoring I can tell that now is pool in excellent condition. Recently you said the whole network is used though for merged mining could this be causing issues for those of us that aren't interested in namecoins? If it is why not offer an opt out from merged mining for those of us that don't wish to mine namecoins?
Merged mining, when done properly, cannot affect "non-namecoin" users. And I'm absolutely sure that merged mining is working great. Technically merged mining is only small patch for bitcoin backend, nothing what you can 'opt out'. If you're not interested in namecoin, it won't affect you at all and you even don't need to know that your hashrate is 'used for merged mining'. However if you claim your namecoin address, you'll get bunch of coins on top of your bitcoin income. |
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 22, 2011, 01:27:36 PM |
|
Would it be possible with a further increase in the NMC limit? Just so we can keep it to 1 payment a day? Having a ton of different payments come in during a day is confusing. I realize that you aren't a bank but plz Currently that threshold limit is 100NMC. Still not high enough? :-) |
|
|
|
|
