Bitcoin Forum
August 20, 2017, 02:26:35 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Will you support Gavin's new block size limit hard fork of 8MB by January 1, 2016 then doubling every 2 years?
1.  yes
2.  no

Pages: « 1 ... 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 [1457] 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 ... 1558 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.  (Read 1954009 times)
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


Support SEGWIT on 8/1/17 https://github.com/UASF


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2015, 11:31:15 PM
 #29121


30 seconds on the The Google is sufficient to ascertain the fact HF made the the first 3rd gen 28nm BTC mining ASIC.

'cuz everything one reads after looking for 30 seconds on the internet is totally 100% true, right?

I didn't make any claims about the truth value of "everything one reads after looking for 30 seconds on the internet."

I said "30 seconds on the The Google is sufficient to ascertain the fact HF made the the first 3rd gen 28nm BTC mining ASIC."

If you're going run away from the specific fact in question, retreat into generalities, and play baby games like solipsism, I'm done with you.

The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy.  David Chaum 1996
"Monero" : { Private - Auditable - 100% Fungible - Flexible Blocksize - Wild & Free® - Intro - Core GUI - Podcats - Roadmap - Dice - Blackjack - Github - Android }
MoneroForCash.com  |  Buy and sell XMR near you  |  Easymonero.com  |  Bitsquare.io - Decentralized XMR Exchange  |  Buy XMR with fiat
Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect.  Adam Back 2014

Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016
Blocks must necessarily be full for the Bitcoin network to be able to pay for its own security.  davout 2015
Blocksize is an intentionally limited resource, like the 21e6 BTC limit.  Changing it degrades the surrounding economics, creating negative incentives.  Jeff Garzik 2013


The raison d'être of bitcoin is trustlessness. - Eric Lombrozo 2015
It is an Engineering Requirement that Bitcoin be “Above the Law”  Paul Sztorc 2015
Resiliency, not efficiency, is the paramount goal of decentralized, non-state sanctioned currency -Jon Matonis 2015

Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016

Technology tends to move in the direction of making surveillance easier, and the ability of computers to track us doubles every eighteen months. - Phil Zimmerman 2013

The only way to make software secure, reliable, and fast is to make it small. Fight Features. - Andy Tanenbaum 2004
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1503195996
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503195996

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503195996
Reply with quote  #2

1503195996
Report to moderator
1503195996
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503195996

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503195996
Reply with quote  #2

1503195996
Report to moderator
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240


View Profile
July 21, 2015, 11:50:14 PM
 #29122


30 seconds on the The Google is sufficient to ascertain the fact HF made the the first 3rd gen 28nm BTC mining ASIC.

'cuz everything one reads after looking for 30 seconds on the internet is totally 100% true, right?

I didn't make any claims about the truth value of "everything one reads after looking for 30 seconds on the internet."

I said "30 seconds on the The Google is sufficient to ascertain the fact HF made the the first 3rd gen 28nm BTC mining ASIC."

If you're going run away from the specific fact in question, retreat into generalities, and play baby games like solipsism, I'm done with you.

Adios Amigo


majamalu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652



View Profile WWW
July 22, 2015, 12:07:04 AM
 #29123

This fits here:

https://twitter.com/jgarzik/status/623542542148214784

http://elbitcoin.org - Bitcoin en español
http://mercadobitcoin.com - MercadoBitcoin
WhatsBitcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


View Profile
July 22, 2015, 12:48:27 AM
 #29124



Peter Todd is right. Comically low fees isn't a promise Bitcoin made in the first place.

Quote
@jgarzik Any announcement like that would be giving the impression that we're in control of the system, which simply isn't true. The Bitcoin protocol itself has always obviously had a transaction rate limit and associated economic consequences. We've done a bad job in communicating that fact to the general public, but doing that correctly requires a very different message than "we've changing a policy which previously meant txs were cheap, and now will mean they're expensive" - we simply don't have that level of control because Bitcoin is a decentralized system.

tl;dr: Don't try to blame the Bitcoin Core developers for a fundamental property of the Bitcoin protocol itself.

Get sick. Get well.
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


Support SEGWIT on 8/1/17 https://github.com/UASF


View Profile WWW
July 22, 2015, 01:35:54 AM
 #29125



Peter Todd is right. Comically low fees isn't a promise Bitcoin made in the first place.

Quote
@jgarzik Any announcement like that would be giving the impression that we're in control of the system, which simply isn't true. The Bitcoin protocol itself has always obviously had a transaction rate limit and associated economic consequences. We've done a bad job in communicating that fact to the general public, but doing that correctly requires a very different message than "we've changing a policy which previously meant txs were cheap, and now will mean they're expensive" - we simply don't have that level of control because Bitcoin is a decentralized system.

tl;dr: Don't try to blame the Bitcoin Core developers for a fundamental property of the Bitcoin protocol itself.



Nice to see PT, L-JR, DRAK, and especially Davout rekking the Gavincoiner Free Shit Army.


The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy.  David Chaum 1996
"Monero" : { Private - Auditable - 100% Fungible - Flexible Blocksize - Wild & Free® - Intro - Core GUI - Podcats - Roadmap - Dice - Blackjack - Github - Android }
MoneroForCash.com  |  Buy and sell XMR near you  |  Easymonero.com  |  Bitsquare.io - Decentralized XMR Exchange  |  Buy XMR with fiat
Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect.  Adam Back 2014

Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016
Blocks must necessarily be full for the Bitcoin network to be able to pay for its own security.  davout 2015
Blocksize is an intentionally limited resource, like the 21e6 BTC limit.  Changing it degrades the surrounding economics, creating negative incentives.  Jeff Garzik 2013


The raison d'être of bitcoin is trustlessness. - Eric Lombrozo 2015
It is an Engineering Requirement that Bitcoin be “Above the Law”  Paul Sztorc 2015
Resiliency, not efficiency, is the paramount goal of decentralized, non-state sanctioned currency -Jon Matonis 2015

Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016

Technology tends to move in the direction of making surveillance easier, and the ability of computers to track us doubles every eighteen months. - Phil Zimmerman 2013

The only way to make software secure, reliable, and fast is to make it small. Fight Features. - Andy Tanenbaum 2004
Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile
July 22, 2015, 01:48:17 AM
 #29126



Peter Todd is right. Comically low fees isn't a promise Bitcoin made in the first place.

Quote
@jgarzik Any announcement like that would be giving the impression that we're in control of the system, which simply isn't true. The Bitcoin protocol itself has always obviously had a transaction rate limit and associated economic consequences. We've done a bad job in communicating that fact to the general public, but doing that correctly requires a very different message than "we've changing a policy which previously meant txs were cheap, and now will mean they're expensive" - we simply don't have that level of control because Bitcoin is a decentralized system.

tl;dr: Don't try to blame the Bitcoin Core developers for a fundamental property of the Bitcoin protocol itself.

so leave it to the market, it wasn't ever agreed developers could manipulate the protocol to adjust fees to a level they dreamed appropriate, that's a Comical idea.

as pointed out many times by many people transaction fees are subsidized by block rewards, fees will increase when the reword drops enough, and the rewards are necessary to grow the network. Who could argue what the correct fare for a taxi should be if somewhere between 100% and 96% of the fee was subsidized by the cab company.  

Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
pleaseexplainagain
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115


View Profile
July 22, 2015, 02:02:31 AM
 #29127


[/quote]

so leave it to the market, it wasn't ever agreed developers could manipulate the protocol to adjust fees to a level they dreamed appropriate, that's a Comical idea.

as pointed out many times by many people transaction fees are subsidized by block rewards, fees will increase when the reword drops enough, and the rewards are necessary to grow the network, who could argue what the correct fare for a taxi should be if 99% of the fee is subsidized by the cab company.  
[/quote]

very apt analogy
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


Support SEGWIT on 8/1/17 https://github.com/UASF


View Profile WWW
July 22, 2015, 02:39:51 AM
 #29128

Quote
so leave it to the market, it wasn't ever agreed developers could manipulate the protocol to adjust fees to a level they dreamed appropriate, that's a Comical idea.

as pointed out many times by many people transaction fees are subsidized by block rewards, fees will increase when the reword drops enough, and the rewards are necessary to grow the network, who could argue what the correct fare for a taxi should be if 99% of the fee is subsidized by the cab company.  

very apt analogy

We're getting at the crux at the issue here, and thus now in danger of productive discourse occurring.

Continuing with the semi-apt metaphor of Uber's now-canonical salient example of Disruption, let us note Uber, Lyft, and Sidecar are burning copious amounts of VC funding to subsidize their ridesharing customers/drivers, so great is their fetish for market share.

Their question is to what extent is it rational to subsidize rides in order to gain market share, and our own is to what extent their model should be emulated.

(If I knew how to calculate that, I'd be too busy making big bucks programming high-frequency option trading bots to post here...)

But Bitcoin's equivalents of VC largess (block reward subsidizes and charitable community good will) do not operate on the same ROI calculus, so the metaphor breaks down quickly and catastrophically.

And thus our community cleaves (perhaps fatally) into two halves, one favoring even more generous user subsidies for the sake of Metcalfe's Law, and the other (asshole Libertarians all), who object on principle to charging less that what the market will bear for the miraculous services Bitcoin offers.

The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy.  David Chaum 1996
"Monero" : { Private - Auditable - 100% Fungible - Flexible Blocksize - Wild & Free® - Intro - Core GUI - Podcats - Roadmap - Dice - Blackjack - Github - Android }
MoneroForCash.com  |  Buy and sell XMR near you  |  Easymonero.com  |  Bitsquare.io - Decentralized XMR Exchange  |  Buy XMR with fiat
Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect.  Adam Back 2014

Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016
Blocks must necessarily be full for the Bitcoin network to be able to pay for its own security.  davout 2015
Blocksize is an intentionally limited resource, like the 21e6 BTC limit.  Changing it degrades the surrounding economics, creating negative incentives.  Jeff Garzik 2013


The raison d'être of bitcoin is trustlessness. - Eric Lombrozo 2015
It is an Engineering Requirement that Bitcoin be “Above the Law”  Paul Sztorc 2015
Resiliency, not efficiency, is the paramount goal of decentralized, non-state sanctioned currency -Jon Matonis 2015

Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016

Technology tends to move in the direction of making surveillance easier, and the ability of computers to track us doubles every eighteen months. - Phil Zimmerman 2013

The only way to make software secure, reliable, and fast is to make it small. Fight Features. - Andy Tanenbaum 2004
OROBTC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232



View Profile
July 22, 2015, 03:12:48 AM
 #29129

...

iCEBREAKER

I must be an Asshole Libertarian (because that's just kinda the way I am), but even lil ol moi thinks that security and health of the Bitcoin Ecosystem might require the occasional *tweak* now and then.  As in my idea posted a couple of weeks or so ago re minimum BTC amounts (sayBTC0.001) and/or minimum fees (say, BTC0.0003) to fight off the spammers...

I don't mind paying a bit more for my BTC payment to go through.  And, really, who needs micropayments?  (Oh...., was that an ominous silence I just heard in here?)

*   *   *

(Hear you re getting rich programming if I could do really advanced calculations)
Erdogan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770



View Profile
July 22, 2015, 03:26:44 AM
 #29130

OROBTC:

I think you nailed the essence of the two views. But there is consequences for the current users:

With high capacity, more people will be able to use bitcoin, which is a clear advantage for the current users, because the bitcoins we have will be more liquid, and possibly higher priced.

With low capacity, there is a lower max limit to how many users there can be, because the higher fees will detract some use cases. Bluntly said, in the low capacity/high fee scenario, I might want to trade with someone that is not already a user, I have to suggest bitcoin to him, teach him everything, and if he becomes a new user, someone else is pressed out by the high fees.

I clearly favor the high capacity scenario on these grounds. Not here taking into account the risk of modifying the system.

Erdogan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770



View Profile
July 22, 2015, 03:36:51 AM
 #29131

And by "the risk of modifying the system", i mean the actual programming. I regard the current limit, or any programmed limit, as a form of defensive programming. Not as a rule inherent in the bitcoin system, as advised in the whitepaper.

cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
July 22, 2015, 04:07:57 AM
 #29132

Gold down already tonite.  Dow futures also down -73; that's not good:

cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
July 22, 2015, 04:09:41 AM
 #29133

the once powerful Barrick Gold.  everything PM is looking sick:

cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
July 22, 2015, 04:10:51 AM
 #29134

this one's lookin' good, eh' tvbcof?:

iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


Support SEGWIT on 8/1/17 https://github.com/UASF


View Profile WWW
July 22, 2015, 04:16:54 AM
 #29135

...

iCEBREAKER

I must be an Asshole Libertarian (because that's just kinda the way I am), but even lil ol moi thinks that security and health of the Bitcoin Ecosystem might require the occasional *tweak* now and then.  As in my idea posted a couple of weeks or so ago re minimum BTC amounts (sayBTC0.001) and/or minimum fees (say, BTC0.0003) to fight off the spammers...

I don't mind paying a bit more for my BTC payment to go through.  And, really, who needs micropayments?  (Oh...., was that an ominous silence I just heard in here?)

*   *   *

(Hear you re getting rich programming if I could do really advanced calculations)

Well, I was the *first* libertarian asshole who objected on principle to charging less that what the market will bear for the miraculous services Bitcoin offers.  OK maybe not literally first, but at least I'm obnoxiously pushy and outspoken... Tongue

Yep, micropayments are very much a theoretical problem in search of an on-chain solution.  (Reddit's admittedly nifty BitcoinTip thingy notwithstanding.)

I say we work out macropayments, and in the process obsolete the BIS and its subordinate TBTF bail-out munching zombies, then worry about getting paid 2 satoshis for some snarky comment about Kim Kardashian.

Meanwhile, I support the original min tx fee of 0.01 BTC, for reasons Sunny King described starting here.

The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy.  David Chaum 1996
"Monero" : { Private - Auditable - 100% Fungible - Flexible Blocksize - Wild & Free® - Intro - Core GUI - Podcats - Roadmap - Dice - Blackjack - Github - Android }
MoneroForCash.com  |  Buy and sell XMR near you  |  Easymonero.com  |  Bitsquare.io - Decentralized XMR Exchange  |  Buy XMR with fiat
Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect.  Adam Back 2014

Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016
Blocks must necessarily be full for the Bitcoin network to be able to pay for its own security.  davout 2015
Blocksize is an intentionally limited resource, like the 21e6 BTC limit.  Changing it degrades the surrounding economics, creating negative incentives.  Jeff Garzik 2013


The raison d'être of bitcoin is trustlessness. - Eric Lombrozo 2015
It is an Engineering Requirement that Bitcoin be “Above the Law”  Paul Sztorc 2015
Resiliency, not efficiency, is the paramount goal of decentralized, non-state sanctioned currency -Jon Matonis 2015

Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016

Technology tends to move in the direction of making surveillance easier, and the ability of computers to track us doubles every eighteen months. - Phil Zimmerman 2013

The only way to make software secure, reliable, and fast is to make it small. Fight Features. - Andy Tanenbaum 2004
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512



View Profile
July 22, 2015, 04:39:34 AM
 #29136

Meanwhile, I support the original min tx fee of 0.01 BTC, for reasons Sunny King described starting here.

If I'm not mistaken PPC burns the transaction fee. That's a function that doesn't exist in Bitcoin. I'm surprised that Sunny King didn't make the distinction in his otherwise insightful posts there.

iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


Support SEGWIT on 8/1/17 https://github.com/UASF


View Profile WWW
July 22, 2015, 05:03:07 AM
 #29137

Meanwhile, I support the original min tx fee of 0.01 BTC, for reasons Sunny King described starting here.

If I'm not mistaken PPC burns the transaction fee. That's a function that doesn't exist in Bitcoin. I'm surprised that Sunny King didn't make the distinction in his otherwise insightful posts there.

Sunny's weekly updates are intended for the PPC community.  So TYVM for that important point of information.  I'll retire to my Mind Palace and reconsider previous conclusions.  Unlike some people, I do that when my initial assumptions are updated.

The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy.  David Chaum 1996
"Monero" : { Private - Auditable - 100% Fungible - Flexible Blocksize - Wild & Free® - Intro - Core GUI - Podcats - Roadmap - Dice - Blackjack - Github - Android }
MoneroForCash.com  |  Buy and sell XMR near you  |  Easymonero.com  |  Bitsquare.io - Decentralized XMR Exchange  |  Buy XMR with fiat
Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect.  Adam Back 2014

Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016
Blocks must necessarily be full for the Bitcoin network to be able to pay for its own security.  davout 2015
Blocksize is an intentionally limited resource, like the 21e6 BTC limit.  Changing it degrades the surrounding economics, creating negative incentives.  Jeff Garzik 2013


The raison d'être of bitcoin is trustlessness. - Eric Lombrozo 2015
It is an Engineering Requirement that Bitcoin be “Above the Law”  Paul Sztorc 2015
Resiliency, not efficiency, is the paramount goal of decentralized, non-state sanctioned currency -Jon Matonis 2015

Bitcoin is intentionally designed to be ungovernable and governance-free.  luke-jr 2016

Technology tends to move in the direction of making surveillance easier, and the ability of computers to track us doubles every eighteen months. - Phil Zimmerman 2013

The only way to make software secure, reliable, and fast is to make it small. Fight Features. - Andy Tanenbaum 2004
Wexlike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 943



View Profile
July 22, 2015, 11:04:50 AM
 #29138

...

iCEBREAKER

I must be an Asshole Libertarian (because that's just kinda the way I am), but even lil ol moi thinks that security and health of the Bitcoin Ecosystem might require the occasional *tweak* now and then.  As in my idea posted a couple of weeks or so ago re minimum BTC amounts (sayBTC0.001) and/or minimum fees (say, BTC0.0003) to fight off the spammers...

I don't mind paying a bit more for my BTC payment to go through.  And, really, who needs micropayments?  (Oh...., was that an ominous silence I just heard in here?)

*   *   *

(Hear you re getting rich programming if I could do really advanced calculations)

And this thinking would drive all the markets that infact need the bitcoin ecosystem, either to offchain solutions or cryptocurrencies with a lower fee.

I am talking about the unbanked and poor economies.
zenitzz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560


View Profile
July 22, 2015, 11:11:49 AM
 #29139

Well, if they drive the price down to sub 1,000  no worries , it will be just for a while and is good for you buy gold again take it benefit with this situation

cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
July 22, 2015, 11:24:34 AM
 #29140

...

iCEBREAKER

I must be an Asshole Libertarian (because that's just kinda the way I am), but even lil ol moi thinks that security and health of the Bitcoin Ecosystem might require the occasional *tweak* now and then.  As in my idea posted a couple of weeks or so ago re minimum BTC amounts (sayBTC0.001) and/or minimum fees (say, BTC0.0003) to fight off the spammers...

I don't mind paying a bit more for my BTC payment to go through.  And, really, who needs micropayments?  (Oh...., was that an ominous silence I just heard in here?)

*   *   *

(Hear you re getting rich programming if I could do really advanced calculations)

And this thinking would drive all the markets that infact need the bitcoin ecosystem, either to offchain solutions or cryptocurrencies with a lower fee.

I am talking about the unbanked and poor economies.

Bitcoin should want to include those who need it most for its own protection aka decentralization.
Pages: « 1 ... 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 [1457] 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 ... 1558 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!