Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2017, 07:16:07 PM *
News: If the forum does not load normally for you, please send me a traceroute.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Will you support Gavin's new block size limit hard fork of 8MB by January 1, 2016 then doubling every 2 years?
1.  yes
2.  no

Pages: « 1 ... 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 [1488] 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 ... 1559 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.  (Read 1904392 times)
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708


View Profile
August 03, 2015, 05:58:09 PM
 #29741

You guys/girls hold gold/silver as well as BTC?

not me. 

only a few ounces of silver and a couple grams of gold

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
12jh3odyAAaR2XedPKZNCR4X4sebuotQzN
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1495826167
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495826167

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495826167
Reply with quote  #2

1495826167
Report to moderator
inca
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


View Profile
August 03, 2015, 06:02:21 PM
 #29742

It is getting mighty tempting to liquidate my remaining equities and rotate over into pm's and cash.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
August 03, 2015, 06:02:45 PM
 #29743

You guys/girls hold gold/silver as well as BTC?

not me. 

only a few ounces of silver and a couple grams of gold

i still have my 2 small sleeves of Krugerands.  looks like miscreanity made the right decision not to take those off my hands 4 yrs ago.
Jdj1727
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336


View Profile
August 03, 2015, 06:44:34 PM
 #29744

You guys/girls hold gold/silver as well as BTC?

not me. 

only a few ounces of silver and a couple grams of gold

I'm holding a little of each as well.
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400



View Profile WWW
August 03, 2015, 07:39:12 PM
 #29745

Bitcoin won't get more expensive, fee-wise, if we bring on many, many more tx's onto the MAINchain that will help spread the costs and provide enough profit for mining to expand and grow.
It just goes to show how insane people are to suggest that Bitcoin transaction processing, with its very high fixed cost, should spread that fixed cost over a smaller number of transactions rather than a larger number of transactions.

I think any business plan that suggested such a strategy would spontaneously combust out of embarrassment before anyone could read it.
sickpig
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


View Profile
August 03, 2015, 07:49:48 PM
 #29746

justus, all

it seems that awareness of the need to introduce economic incentives for services provided by full nodes are rising among devs community, see this thread on the btc dev mailing list:

http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/009879.html

let's see how core devs will react to this idea.

Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
sgbett
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428



View Profile
August 03, 2015, 08:06:13 PM
 #29747

this can't be good:



I cut my exposure to equities by half today, AAPL was amongst those that got the chop!

Full Node: http://46.51.193.129 (BU) || http://haschinabannedbitcoin.com
"A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution" - Satoshi Nakamoto
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
August 03, 2015, 08:16:56 PM
 #29748

this can't be good:



I cut my exposure to equities by half today, AAPL was amongst those that got the chop!

So it was you!

BTW, your simplicity argument against complex, conceptual only layer 2 solutions was spot on.
thezerg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


View Profile
August 03, 2015, 08:27:45 PM
 #29749

justus, all

it seems that awareness of the need to introduce economic incentives for services provided by full nodes are rising among devs community, see this thread on the btc dev mailing list:

http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/009879.html

let's see how core devs will react to this idea.

How would this work if you issue (say) one txn per day on average?  I mean, wouldn't it take a month or even a year before the SPV client summed up enough use to make it worth committing the txn?  Are there risks to having a payment channel or LN connection open for these durations?
sgbett
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428



View Profile
August 03, 2015, 08:41:48 PM
 #29750


I cut my exposure to equities by half today, AAPL was amongst those that got the chop!

So it was you!

BTW, your simplicity argument against complex, conceptual only layer 2 solutions was spot on.

That would be some serious whale action to be able to move a market that big Smiley or maybe it was butterfly wings...

I thought the simplicity argument was self-evident and shouldn't need anyone to explain it! Somebody gotta try and cut through the crapflood though. I've tried really hard to try and see the opposing POV but I come up short every time, and I think that's because I can't understand the philosophy behind making BTC some elitist tool when it seemed right from the outset that it was anything but.

If that makes me part of the "free-shit" army, then so be it. I'm not (yet) so morally bankrupt that I think that my well being can only come at the expense of others. That's what cripplecoin sounds like, thats why I don't want any part of it.

Full Node: http://46.51.193.129 (BU) || http://haschinabannedbitcoin.com
"A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution" - Satoshi Nakamoto
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
August 03, 2015, 08:48:22 PM
 #29751

uh oh, Blockstream pissing off some of the most important early adopters in the space:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3fhik9/mike_hearn_outlines_the_most_compelling_arguments/ctosiaz

i smell doom.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
August 03, 2015, 08:51:01 PM
 #29752

priceless:

[–]WinkleviBitcoinTrust 6 points 23 hours ago

Sure I can imaging it. I just don't feel like supporting those block cock blocking devs.

    permalink
    embed
    save
    parent
    report
    give gold
    replied
brg444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks


View Profile
August 03, 2015, 08:53:26 PM
 #29753

uh oh, Blockstream pissing off some of the most important early adopters in the space:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3fhik9/mike_hearn_outlines_the_most_compelling_arguments/ctosiaz

i smell doom.

 Huh

is this a joke

"I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash." Hal Finney, Dec. 2010
lunarboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 544



View Profile
August 03, 2015, 08:57:26 PM
 #29754

priceless:

[–]WinkleviBitcoinTrust 6 points 23 hours ago

Sure I can imaging it. I just don't feel like supporting those block cock blocking devs.

 


could be time for a new Zhou Tong remix....... Chemical brothers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MaU5qkQJ1e4
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
August 03, 2015, 09:09:37 PM
 #29755

uh oh, Blockstream pissing off some of the most important early adopters in the space:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3fhik9/mike_hearn_outlines_the_most_compelling_arguments/ctosiaz

i smell doom.

 Huh

is this a joke

no, you're the joke.
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392


View Profile
August 03, 2015, 09:17:49 PM
 #29756


Uh... you do realize this is just some jo dad with a stupid reddit user name, not the Winklevii.
sickpig
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


View Profile
August 03, 2015, 09:24:01 PM
 #29757

justus, all

it seems that awareness of the need to introduce economic incentives for services provided by full nodes are rising among devs community, see this thread on the btc dev mailing list:

http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/009879.html

let's see how core devs will react to this idea.

How would this work if you issue (say) one txn per day on average?  I mean, wouldn't it take a month or even a year before the SPV client summed up enough use to make it worth committing the txn?  Are there risks to having a payment channel or LN connection open for these durations?

I agree that implementation of such payment system has to be carefully crafted. that said I'm not knowledgeable enough to evaluate which solution are better. (1)
 
I just want to say that even at current level of adoption there's enough SPV traffic to support a  market based on supply and demand.

e.g. 1 txn per day per SVP client, supposedly half a million of active SPV clients would generate:

500000÷(3600×24) ~ 5.7tx/s

clearly we are not there since 5 tx/s per second is above the actual network capacity, but it is not so far fetched to estimate at least 500K SPV clients once we gain a wider users base.

(1) fwiw I'm following LN mailing list and it seems to me that keeping a channel open even for long period of time is not impossible.

Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
August 03, 2015, 09:24:14 PM
 #29758


Uh... you do realize this is just some jo dad with a stupid reddit user name, not the Winklevii.

if so, the jokes on me.

evidence?
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392


View Profile
August 03, 2015, 09:26:45 PM
 #29759


Uh... you do realize this is just some jo dad with a stupid reddit user name, not the Winklevii.

if so, the jokes on me.

evidence?

[–]WinkleviBitcoinTrust 29 points 1 month ago
I saw a headline somewhere else on Reddit when the price dipped below $200 in January. That's what got me interested in BTC, and I have been buying ever since. I could cash out now for a modest gain, but why would I do that when we are going to the moon?
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
August 03, 2015, 09:33:24 PM
 #29760


Uh... you do realize this is just some jo dad with a stupid reddit user name, not the Winklevii.

if so, the jokes on me.

evidence?

[–]WinkleviBitcoinTrust 29 points 1 month ago
I saw a headline somewhere else on Reddit when the price dipped below $200 in January. That's what got me interested in BTC, and I have been buying ever since. I could cash out now for a modest gain, but why would I do that when we are going to the moon?

ok, sorry brg444.
Pages: « 1 ... 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 [1488] 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 ... 1559 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!