Bitcoin Forum
November 14, 2024, 11:37:11 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 [118] 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 225030 times)
z0n0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 06:31:56 AM
 #2341

Sorry noobs here. Can you run this in Zen cash instead of zcash?  Thank you

Sure you can, it's the same algo!
PickAxe131
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 07:42:30 AM
 #2342

I tried switching from ewbf to dstm for the 2nd time yesterday. Initially it started out 5-10% faster than ewbf which is awesome, however after about 10-15 minutes it slowed more & more to the point where it was as much as 40% slower than ewbf, at which point I switched back.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.

I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?

Platinum or Gold Certified PSU? I noticed difference in performance when I compared my Gold EVGA with my Platinum EVGA's. Now I only go for Platinums as they are more stable and give better performance for me.
siforek
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 08:21:27 AM
 #2343

I tried switching from ewbf to dstm for the 2nd time yesterday. Initially it started out 5-10% faster than ewbf which is awesome, however after about 10-15 minutes it slowed more & more to the point where it was as much as 40% slower than ewbf, at which point I switched back.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.

I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?

Platinum or Gold Certified PSU? I noticed difference in performance when I compared my Gold EVGA with my Platinum EVGA's. Now I only go for Platinums as they are more stable and give better performance for me.

It's not the PSUs.
pubix
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 08:47:49 AM
 #2344

I tried switching from ewbf to dstm for the 2nd time yesterday. Initially it started out 5-10% faster than ewbf which is awesome, however after about 10-15 minutes it slowed more & more to the point where it was as much as 40% slower than ewbf, at which point I switched back.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.

I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?

Platinum or Gold Certified PSU? I noticed difference in performance when I compared my Gold EVGA with my Platinum EVGA's. Now I only go for Platinums as they are more stable and give better performance for me.

That's kinda obvious, don't you think so?
Platinum>Gold

But not sure that's PSU issue. Gold are still way enough to get the job done.
Atronoss
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 09:52:34 AM
 #2345

Charging 2% here from all profits is just ridiculous , this guy is making millions monthly yet he hides behind anonymity and brilliant "customer service" (yes, you are paying him).
This pretty much.
Here its a working program for fee remove
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2800586.0
I DO hope you can get it working under Windows 10. Cheers  Kiss
Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner??? 
Yes, standard 1080 FE, running 0.9V(85% TDP), can get ez 2000MHz, but doing 1974MHz, watercooled, keeping it at about 37C, XOC bios(may affect sols in a negative way), +550 on mems.
Doing 570Sols with EKWB. DSTM is not good for GDDR5X cards(1080, 1080Ti).
If you can do 570 with EKWB with 0 fee, why would u do 570 x 0.98 (2% fee)= 558.6 with DSTM? Doesnt make sense.

Fecker, don't you wanna get the "feck" out of here, please? And oh BTW, it is not EKWB, it is EWBF miner you are using, so use it and stop bitching at DSTM thread about fees again and again... EKWB is company that makes watercooling solution.
NoOneLt
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 11:27:02 AM
 #2346

Fecker, don't you wanna get the "feck" out of here, please? And oh BTW, it is not EKWB, it is EWBF miner you are using, so use it and stop bitching at DSTM thread about fees again and again... EKWB is company that makes watercooling solution.

Whats your problem stupido? Did he insult someone? He stated the truth, EWBF performs better or at least the same on GDDR5X cards, but takes no fee...

Who is whiner here?
PickAxe131
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:35:02 PM
 #2347

Fecker, don't you wanna get the "feck" out of here, please? And oh BTW, it is not EKWB, it is EWBF miner you are using, so use it and stop bitching at DSTM thread about fees again and again... EKWB is company that makes watercooling solution.

Whats your problem stupido? Did he insult someone? He stated the truth, EWBF performs better or at least the same on GDDR5X cards, but takes no fee...

Who is whiner here?

EWBF has 2% fee with lower hashrate. If you use -nodevfee option you lose approx. 5% performance. There is no "free miners" fyi.
PickAxe131
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:36:53 PM
 #2348

I tried switching from ewbf to dstm for the 2nd time yesterday. Initially it started out 5-10% faster than ewbf which is awesome, however after about 10-15 minutes it slowed more & more to the point where it was as much as 40% slower than ewbf, at which point I switched back.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.

I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?

Platinum or Gold Certified PSU? I noticed difference in performance when I compared my Gold EVGA with my Platinum EVGA's. Now I only go for Platinums as they are more stable and give better performance for me.

That's kinda obvious, don't you think so?
Platinum>Gold

But not sure that's PSU issue. Gold are still way enough to get the job done.

Yes its obvious but I had similar problem with instability with my Gold PSU on 1080ti, problems disappeared after switching to Platinums. Just a thought.
pubix
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:38:29 PM
 #2349

Fecker, don't you wanna get the "feck" out of here, please? And oh BTW, it is not EKWB, it is EWBF miner you are using, so use it and stop bitching at DSTM thread about fees again and again... EKWB is company that makes watercooling solution.

Whats your problem stupido? Did he insult someone? He stated the truth, EWBF performs better or at least the same on GDDR5X cards, but takes no fee...

Who is whiner here?

EWBF has 2% fee with lower hashrate. If you use -nodevfee option you lose approx. 5% performance. There is no "free miners" fyi.

I'm not so sure if that's true. My hash speed is the same with fee or without it.
Smoreno
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 03:15:15 PM
 #2350

Hi, i'm a total newby in mining, so i need some reference about performance.

I'm using my workstation an old Precision Dell T7500 Xeon 6Core 24gb 1xPNY-GTX-1070, mining at miningpoolhub. This weekend i'm going to build a rig with 4xGB-GTX1070

This are my rig numbers, working with Equihas-dstm (zm.exe) :

485 sol/s 3.84 sol/w
Are this numbers good enough?

AfterBurner OC settings:

Core + 190(GPU-Z 1830 Avg)
Memory + 775 (GPU-Z 2288 Avg)
PW 84%
Temp. 57ºC

Thanks






 
PickAxe131
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 04:14:27 PM
 #2351

Fecker, don't you wanna get the "feck" out of here, please? And oh BTW, it is not EKWB, it is EWBF miner you are using, so use it and stop bitching at DSTM thread about fees again and again... EKWB is company that makes watercooling solution.

Whats your problem stupido? Did he insult someone? He stated the truth, EWBF performs better or at least the same on GDDR5X cards, but takes no fee...

Who is whiner here?

EWBF has 2% fee with lower hashrate. If you use -nodevfee option you lose approx. 5% performance. There is no "free miners" fyi.

I'm not so sure if that's true. My hash speed is the same with fee or without it.

EWBF Clearly stated it under the option.
NoOneLt
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 05:52:28 PM
 #2352

EWBF Clearly stated it under the option.

It is so sad so many dumb people got into mining these days... EWBF dont have "-nodevfee" option, EWBF does not made any statements about 5% less hash... It is sad some people are dumb enough not to distinguish one miner from another but "smart" enough to buy a pack of GPU and call themself miners...
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 729
Merit: 114



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 06:02:18 PM
 #2353

Fecker, don't you wanna get the "feck" out of here, please? And oh BTW, it is not EKWB, it is EWBF miner you are using, so use it and stop bitching at DSTM thread about fees again and again... EKWB is company that makes watercooling solution.

Whats your problem stupido? Did he insult someone? He stated the truth, EWBF performs better or at least the same on GDDR5X cards, but takes no fee...

Who is whiner here?

EWBF has 2% fee with lower hashrate. If you use -nodevfee option you lose approx. 5% performance. There is no "free miners" fyi.

I'm not so sure if that's true. My hash speed is the same with fee or without it.

EWBF Clearly stated it under the option.

You've mistaken it with claymore i guess.
poby
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 104


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 08:49:44 PM
 #2354

EWBF has a fee that can be turned off but hashrate will be reduced.

See https://cryptoyeti.com/ewbf-zcash-cuda-miner/

Similar to the Claymore miner (which does not currently support Zcash mining under Windows), the EWBF miner contains a 2% developer fee which can be turned off in the batch file. It is noted in the thread that disabling the fee will slightly reduce hashing power, similar to that same behavior with Claymore’s miner.
anyreason.ua
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 09:44:30 PM
 #2355

Who else want to tell us his extremly important opinion about devfee?

This is a crypto-community, right? Not a challenge to find the most greedy person?

Just pay the fee or go and write your own miner, what could be easier to understand?
PickAxe131
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 25, 2018, 01:09:23 AM
 #2356

EWBF Clearly stated it under the option.

It is so sad so many dumb people got into mining these days... EWBF dont have "-nodevfee" option, EWBF does not made any statements about 5% less hash... It is sad some people are dumb enough not to distinguish one miner from another but "smart" enough to buy a pack of GPU and call themself miners...

Its so sad people like you try to use invalid arguments. The 5% is approximation made by the users that used -nofee on EWBF. Here is a link for your illiterate dumbfuck https://cryptoyeti.com/ewbf-zcash-cuda-miner/ or read his readme, --help
jimmykl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 349
Merit: 102


View Profile
January 25, 2018, 03:33:36 AM
 #2357

<quietly leaves the room>
NoOneLt
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 25, 2018, 07:01:00 AM
 #2358

EWBF Clearly stated it under the option.

It is so sad so many dumb people got into mining these days... EWBF dont have "-nodevfee" option, EWBF does not made any statements about 5% less hash... It is sad some people are dumb enough not to distinguish one miner from another but "smart" enough to buy a pack of GPU and call themself miners...

Its so sad people like you try to use invalid arguments. The 5% is approximation made by the users that used -nofee on EWBF. Here is a link for your illiterate dumbfuck https://cryptoyeti.com/ewbf-zcash-cuda-miner/ or read his readme, --help

Are you disabled or what, maybe you have some text understanding problems? If you are dumb enough again to use "--nofee on EFWB" and expect there will be no fee - go ahead Cheesy

Where is that users " The 5% is approximation made by the users" in the link? Who is that users? What they "approximated"?
Canosgmk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 25, 2018, 07:29:34 AM
 #2359

wow guys.  Good job in the name calling and everything. 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2007661.0

there is a clear conversion that you can turn off the devfee and there is proof that if you look in the 'devfee' string log the miner will still mine on the developer's pool. 

So:
yes, you can turn the devfee off.
yes, if you do, you will mine slower.  reason - IAW the devfee string log, it will mine in the dev's pool.  It just will not deposit the coin.

at the end, we didn't make the program.  Give credit where due.  if you don't want to pay the dev fee, then try to learn to write your own. 

I have no issues paying a fee.  I think 1% is more reasonable, but im not a coder and can't complete with them.

https://www.reddit.com/r/zec/comments/7iwhgh/how_does_dev_fee_work_on_ewbf_cuda_miner/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV67ZJ_5quk

http://ethereumfaq.org/disable-miner-fee-in-ewbf-miner-0691/

5mins of google search...
NoOneLt
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 25, 2018, 07:51:10 AM
 #2360

So:
yes, you can turn the devfee off.
yes, if you do, you will mine slower.  reason - IAW the devfee string log, it will mine in the dev's pool.  It just will not deposit the coin.

at the end, we didn't make the program.  Give credit where due.  if you don't want to pay the dev fee, then try to learn to write your own.  

I have no issues paying a fee.  I think 1% is more reasonable, but im not a coder and can't complete with them.


Hey, this "discussion" has started from GDDR5X card performance on DSTM vs. EWBF, and one of the users stated (and was instantly insulted by a dumbass in this thread) that in current DSTM performance state EWBF outperforms it on GDDR5X cards + you can turn off fee or set to 1% if you see it is more reasonable.

From my side this was not question about fee itself but performance, and why someone must pay fee on less performing miner...

Currently i am running 6x1080 rig on flypool on EWBF for 24 hrs and will switch to DSTM to check real situation in GDDR5X EWBF vs. DSTM

Fee or not to fee is not the question, though 1% to me also would be prefferable, if you make 100K or 50K per day i dont see big difference, i would live with 10K per day....

If dev see that this is his lifetime opportunity to build a "fortune" that is his choice. We as users still have choice of different miners/algos/pools etc.
Pages: « 1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 [118] 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!