Bitcoin Forum
October 23, 2017, 10:02:20 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 [834] 835 836 837 838 839 »
  Print  
Author Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.10.0  (Read 5569335 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
silverkamote
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
June 19, 2017, 05:38:12 AM
 #16661

thank you bro. ill try to install and use it my windows 10 pc. hopping that i can mine bitcoin on my own. how much bitcoin in can mine in  a day 24hrs? im planning to buy also a spare pc just for mining and then using a jumper for the electricity.
1508752940
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508752940

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508752940
Reply with quote  #2

1508752940
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508752940
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508752940

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508752940
Reply with quote  #2

1508752940
Report to moderator
1508752940
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508752940

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508752940
Reply with quote  #2

1508752940
Report to moderator
mutluit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
June 21, 2017, 03:28:54 AM
 #16662

cgminer version 4.10.0 - Started: [2017-06-21 05:06:52.165]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):308.8M (1m):353.5M (5m):316.0M (15m):199.4M (avg):334.8Mh/s
 A:0  R:0  HW:1  WU:5.6/m | ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 1  LW: 522  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to (null) diff 712G without LP as user xxxxx

I have the above output. I think the "connected to" is a bug in this version
as the connection to the local bitcoind server works fine.
And I'm not sure about LP (longpolling), but the bitcoind I've running is the
latest git version, so IMO it should have LP available.

Btw, what do the outputs MH0...MH10 mean?

Bitmea123
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51


View Profile
June 21, 2017, 04:58:30 PM
 #16663

Please help me because I do not know what to do anymore.

I made you a small video with CAMTASIA and you can see it from here; https://streamable.com/44t8f

If you can not see it then you can download it from here; https://ufile.io/fjdd3

That way you will understand my problem well. I've just put everything you need to know including the cgminer version and my video card.

I hope so much that you can help me

I look for answers as soon as possible

Thank you
 Sad Sad Sad
mutluit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
June 21, 2017, 08:50:42 PM
 #16664

Please help me because I do not know what to do anymore.

I made you a small video with CAMTASIA and you can see it from here; https://streamable.com/44t8f

If you can not see it then you can download it from here; https://ufile.io/fjdd3

That way you will understand my problem well. I've just put everything you need to know including the cgminer version and my video card.

I hope so much that you can help me

I look for answers as soon as possible

Thank you
 Sad Sad Sad

I think video cards are not supported anymore in latest cgminer.
My tip: learn it first with a cheap USB stick miner (333 MH/s) --> configure with the parameter --enable-icarus
The method is similar with the bigger machines.

os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240


Think for yourself


View Profile
June 21, 2017, 10:29:44 PM
 #16665

I think video cards are not supported anymore in latest cgminer.

No need to think about it.

Video Cards have not been supported for years now.  Please read the top post, or the readme that comes with the software.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
mutluit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
June 27, 2017, 07:23:53 AM
 #16666

I think there is a big bug in cgminer's driver-icarus.c:

ICARUS_UNUSED_SIZE is defined as 16. IMO this should be 20.
ICARUS_WORK_DATA_OFFSET is defined as 64. IMO this should be 68.
(there are maybe even more wrong values)

Can you verify/confirm this?

So, have all the miners who use cgminer with icarus devices been misled?

BTW. the source code of this program is really a PITA to study :-(
Larz952002
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
July 02, 2017, 04:43:48 AM
 #16667

I am a total noob when I comes to this miner, I tried to follow the instructions to the best of my ability but it tells me it is a 32bit program and I have win10 and 64 bit.  does anyone have this program completed and runs on a 64bit
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 02, 2017, 04:45:14 AM
 #16668

I am a total noob when I comes to this miner, I tried to follow the instructions to the best of my ability but it tells me it is a 32bit program and I have win10 and 64 bit.  does anyone have this program completed and runs on a 64bit
All 32 bit programs run on 64 bit windows.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Dropwise
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10


View Profile
July 02, 2017, 02:02:05 PM
 #16669

Dear CK,

I am experiencing a Segmentation Fault (core dumped) error when trying to write config file in version 4.10.0.   (I do not have this error with version 4.9.2).  

(it seems to write over cgminer.conf with an empty file, then crash)

I am running on R-PI, ARCH.    

Any advice?

Thanks!
mutluit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
July 05, 2017, 11:29:09 PM
 #16670

I need to compile the recent version to be run on AntMiner S1.
On the S1 there is not much space and also no gcc compiler installed.
I can compile it on the PC, but then I wonder if I need a cross-compiler since the target HW seems to be MIPS?

EDIT:
Ok, I finally figured it out: one of the methods is by using qemu and starting a linux mips distribution therein, and then the usual steps to build the binary...
Since qemu is an emulator, everything runs much slower, but no problem, I'm currently compiling it...

mutluit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
July 06, 2017, 08:03:05 PM
 #16671

Hi,
while solo mining I got this log entry:

 [2017-07-06 12:14:52] Share submissions: 1
 [2017-07-06 12:14:52] Accepted shares: 0
 [2017-07-06 12:14:52] Rejected shares: 1
 [2017-07-06 12:14:52] Accepted difficulty shares: 0
 [2017-07-06 12:14:52] Rejected difficulty shares: 708659466230

At 2017-07-06 19:56 UTC:
$ bin/bitcoin-cli getdifficulty
  708659466230.332

Does it mean I missed it by the decimals??? :-(


UPDATE: today again such a case happened:

Summary of runtime statistics:
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Started at [2017-07-09 17:04:34]                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Pool: http://37.139.71.2:8332                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Runtime: 0 hrs : 27 mins : 6 secs                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Average hashrate: 177583.4 Mhash/s                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Solved blocks: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Best share difficulty: 26.5K                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Share submissions: 1                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Accepted shares: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Rejected shares: 1                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Accepted difficulty shares: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Rejected difficulty shares: 708659466230                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Reject ratio: 100.0%                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Hardware errors: 30                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Utility (accepted shares / min): 0.00/min                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Work Utility (diff1 shares solved / min): 2480.90/min
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Stale submissions discarded due to new blocks: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Unable to get work from server occasions: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Work items generated locally: 69978                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] New blocks detected on network: 2
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Summary of per device statistics:
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] S1A0 (30s):180.8G (avg):177.6Gh/s | A:0 R:708659466230 HW:30 WU:2480                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41]                     


# cat share.log
1499619895,reject:high-hash,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000308d010000000000000000,http://37.139.71.2:8332,S1A0,0,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,200000020829b3bff0c10fd348e41756aea13ad0d504ba28003d3b630000000000000000af3e784c5bfedc4b79b6f07c32e663759b2a9fc9755887d283e893ba5d7343ea5962622618018d3000000000000000800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


Can the author or anybody else please tell me why and what's going on here? Thx

-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 09, 2017, 09:15:24 PM
 #16672

while solo mining I got this log entry:

At 2017-07-06 19:56 UTC:
$ bin/bitcoin-cli getdifficulty
  708659466230.332

Does it mean I missed it by the decimals??? :-(

Summary of runtime statistics:
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Started at [2017-07-09 17:04:34]                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Pool: http://37.139.71.2:8332                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Runtime: 0 hrs : 27 mins : 6 secs                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Average hashrate: 177583.4 Mhash/s                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Solved blocks: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Best share difficulty: 26.5K                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Share submissions: 1                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Accepted shares: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Rejected shares: 1                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Accepted difficulty shares: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Rejected difficulty shares: 708659466230                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Reject ratio: 100.0%                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Hardware errors: 30                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Utility (accepted shares / min): 0.00/min                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Work Utility (diff1 shares solved / min): 2480.90/min
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Stale submissions discarded due to new blocks: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Unable to get work from server occasions: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Work items generated locally: 69978                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] New blocks detected on network: 2
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] Summary of per device statistics:
                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41] S1A0 (30s):180.8G (avg):177.6Gh/s | A:0 R:708659466230 HW:30 WU:2480                   
 [2017-07-09 17:31:41]                     


# cat share.log
1499619895,reject:high-hash,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000308d010000000000000000,http://37.139.71.2:8332,S1A0,0,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,200000020829b3bff0c10fd348e41756aea13ad0d504ba28003d3b630000000000000000af3e784c5bfedc4b79b6f07c32e663759b2a9fc9755887d283e893ba5d7343ea5962622618018d3000000000000000800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


Can the author or anybody else please tell me why and what's going on here? Thx


You are always mining at the current network diff when solo mining so any "shares" submitted are effectively considered the network diff so any rejects will be shown to be at the network diff as well. "Diff shares" is number of shares (in this case 1) multiplied by the difficulty you're mining at (in this case network diff). You definitely didn't even get close to the network diff but the software decided to try submitting a share anyway and it got rejected. You can see what your best share was, it was only 26,500 when network diff is 708 billion.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
mutluit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
July 09, 2017, 11:11:31 PM
 #16673

You are always mining at the current network diff when solo mining so any "shares" submitted are effectively considered the network diff so any rejects will be shown to be at the network diff as well. "Diff shares" is number of shares (in this case 1) multiplied by the difficulty you're mining at (in this case network diff). You definitely didn't even get close to the network diff but the software decided to try submitting a share anyway and it got rejected. You can see what your best share was, it was only 26,500 when network diff is 708 billion.

But why did the software do that? Isn't that a bug?

-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 09, 2017, 11:17:55 PM
 #16674

You are always mining at the current network diff when solo mining so any "shares" submitted are effectively considered the network diff so any rejects will be shown to be at the network diff as well. "Diff shares" is number of shares (in this case 1) multiplied by the difficulty you're mining at (in this case network diff). You definitely didn't even get close to the network diff but the software decided to try submitting a share anyway and it got rejected. You can see what your best share was, it was only 26,500 when network diff is 708 billion.

But why did the software do that? Isn't that a bug?


A harmless bug, but a bug yes. Are you running the current version?

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
mutluit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
July 10, 2017, 02:27:29 AM
 #16675

You are always mining at the current network diff when solo mining so any "shares" submitted are effectively considered the network diff so any rejects will be shown to be at the network diff as well. "Diff shares" is number of shares (in this case 1) multiplied by the difficulty you're mining at (in this case network diff). You definitely didn't even get close to the network diff but the software decided to try submitting a share anyway and it got rejected. You can see what your best share was, it was only 26,500 when network diff is 708 billion.

But why did the software do that? Isn't that a bug?


A harmless bug, but a bug yes. Are you running the current version?

It's cgminer version 4.7.1
Is there a newer openwrt opkg version available?

-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 10, 2017, 02:31:38 AM
 #16676

It's cgminer version 4.7.1
Is there a newer openwrt opkg version available?


Well that would explain the breakage then. No idea about opkg versions, but additionally I don't believe any of the antminer forks remotely tried to stay in sync with the master cgminer.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
mutluit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
July 10, 2017, 06:53:07 AM
 #16677

It's cgminer version 4.7.1
Is there a newer openwrt opkg version available?


Well that would explain the breakage then. No idea about opkg versions, but additionally I don't believe any of the antminer forks remotely tried to stay in sync with the master cgminer.

Maybe you got me wrong: I mean whether there is a newer binary version of cgminer available for the openwrt platform, ie. as a opkg-package.

-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 10, 2017, 06:54:58 AM
 #16678

It's cgminer version 4.7.1
Is there a newer openwrt opkg version available?


Well that would explain the breakage then. No idea about opkg versions, but additionally I don't believe any of the antminer forks remotely tried to stay in sync with the master cgminer.

Maybe you got me wrong: I mean whether there is a newer binary version of cgminer available for the openwrt platform, ie. as a opkg-package.


And as I said, I have no idea about opkg packages. I have nothing to do with their maintenance.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
bgibso01
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1048


GET IN - Smart Ticket Protocol - Live in market!


View Profile
July 10, 2017, 05:32:54 PM
 #16679

Anyone happen to know if I run CGMiner solo (w/ btc address) and point to a pruned node without a wallet, would the miner still receive the block rewards or is it based on bitcoind wallet address?


               ████
             ███  ███
           ████     ███
         ███  ███    ███
       ████     ███    ███
     ███  ███     ███    ███
   ████     ███     ███   ██
 ███  ███     █████████████████
███     ███     ███           ██
 ███      ███     ██          ██
   ███      ██████████      ███
     ███      ██████      ███
       ███      ██      ███
         ███          ███
           ███      ███
             ███  ███
               ████

GUTS
    ███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
   
smart-ticket protocol for events
live product with market traction!
    ███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
   
  BTC ANN
  WEBSITE
  BLOG
   
  SANDBOX
  WHITEPAPER
  BOUNTY
   
mutluit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
July 10, 2017, 05:53:46 PM
 #16680

It's cgminer version 4.7.1
Is there a newer openwrt opkg version available?


Well that would explain the breakage then. No idea about opkg versions, but additionally I don't believe any of the antminer forks remotely tried to stay in sync with the master cgminer.

Maybe you got me wrong: I mean whether there is a newer binary version of cgminer available for the openwrt platform, ie. as a opkg-package.


And as I said, I have no idea about opkg packages. I have nothing to do with their maintenance.

Ah, it seems that the said cgminer version for openwrt was created some years ago with this fork: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer/tree/ants1-4.9.1c-e6ad32a
as was announced then here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1249569.0

Pages: « 1 ... 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 [834] 835 836 837 838 839 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!