-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4452
Merit: 1664
Ruu \o/
|
 |
October 13, 2015, 08:03:58 PM |
|
-ck, Did you know that Firefox is now blocking your web pages?
No I did not  Some fucking moron has confused legit mining software with trojans packing ancient versions of cgminer as the innocent bystander. Unfortunately getting someone ONTO this list is easy and getting off it is annoying. FFS...
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
maximcmd
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 13, 2015, 09:29:42 PM |
|
I use U3 on Mac desktop with OSX and Oracle VB with Windows XP... and it works perfect - no dups, no stales, all the day about 62-63 GH/s. I also have non-static IP and cgminer reset U3 everytime my IP changed. The problems appear when I move U3 to netbook Lenovo S9. Hardware is good enough for one U3, but its configuration and cutted bios make me crazy... I think the problem is in the netbook and BUS structure which I cannot change without extra soft or full BIOS... I do not understand why the same settings are OK on one machine and useless on another... All USB ports with plugged devices are USB 2.0... U3 recognized as 1.1 (((( I do travel a lot and like to take my toy with me, that's why I need to set cgminer on the small netbook instead of the desktop.
|
|
|
|
p3yot33at3r
|
 |
October 14, 2015, 09:50:14 PM |
|
Greetings -ck & kano, Wasn't sure where to ask, so thought I'd try here. Are there any plans afoot for one of your legendary firmware/binaries for the S7, a-la the S3? I'd love to use them on p2pool, but the stability/hash rate is crap/unstable with the borked bitmain software.....  Thanks for all your work guys - top notch 
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4676
Merit: 1858
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
 |
October 15, 2015, 04:30:41 AM |
|
Well supposedly I'm getting an S7 - so it would be soon after that if it happens.
|
|
|
|
p3yot33at3r
|
 |
October 15, 2015, 11:50:21 AM |
|
Well supposedly I'm getting an S7 - so it would be soon after that if it happens.
Hi kano, A little birdy told me that Yoshi was going to contact you about the S7 actually - maybe drop him a line to remind him? He does forget things sometimes.... 
|
|
|
|
kenshirothefist
|
 |
October 15, 2015, 06:12:21 PM |
|
Well supposedly I'm getting an S7 - so it would be soon after that if it happens.
Hi kano, A little birdy told me that Yoshi was going to contact you about the S7 actually - maybe drop him a line to remind him? He does forget things sometimes....  I'm wondering why is Bitmantech hiding the dirivers/cgminer source code for the newer miners. The dirivers/cgminer source code for AntMiner S5 was the last one released to public. Maybe Bitmaintech is hiding something, or does not wan't for the drivers to be ported back to S5 (from S5+)? Since cgminer is licensed under GPL V3 I would expect Bitmaintech to release their modified code publicly, since they are selling it in a commercial product.
|
|
|
|
p3yot33at3r
|
 |
October 15, 2015, 06:38:57 PM |
|
Well supposedly I'm getting an S7 - so it would be soon after that if it happens.
Hi kano, A little birdy told me that Yoshi was going to contact you about the S7 actually - maybe drop him a line to remind him? He does forget things sometimes....  I'm wondering why is Bitmantech hiding the dirivers/cgminer source code for the newer miners. The dirivers/cgminer source code for AntMiner S5 was the last one released to public. Maybe Bitmaintech is hiding something, or does not wan't for the drivers to be ported back to S5 (from S5+)? Since cgminer is licensed under GPL V3 I would expect Bitmaintech to release their modified code publicly, since they are selling it in a commercial product. I couldn't agree more. I have no idea why bitmain don't just work closer with the cgminer devs, allow them to code the driver etc for their hardware & integrate it into the main cgminer branch. That way everyone can contribute & be able to update their bitmain gear easily to the latest & greatest cgminer version. Bitmains firmware has always been terrible & their cgminer fork really sucks the big one - it simply doesn't make any sense why they refuse to cooperate, it can only be beneficial to everyone if they did. Then again, bitmain do have a history of not "towing the line", both as a company & as a pool, so I suppose it's to be expected - but it does grind my gears. Vote kano & ck for president. 
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4452
Merit: 1664
Ruu \o/
|
 |
October 15, 2015, 10:57:22 PM |
|
-ck, Did you know that Firefox is now blocking your web pages?
No I did not  Some fucking moron has confused legit mining software with trojans packing ancient versions of cgminer as the innocent bystander. Unfortunately getting someone ONTO this list is easy and getting off it is annoying. FFS... Trying to resolve this is almost futile... Talking to "google" is like SETI. If I get a response it will be a fucking miracle when everything is done on such a grand scale without any human involvement. If this keeps up my only choice will be to drop windows support entirely. The worst part of this by far is that google is now actively blocking the only official download site: http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer from its searches so they're unintentionally leading people to sites that might actually contain malicious versions of cgminer instead. This is a disaster. I've removed all windows .zip versions from the site now, leaving only the .7z versions since by default windows wouldn't be able to extract those versions unless you also install 7zip in a desperate attempt to get the malicious warning removed. Here is the discussion trying to get someone to help resolve the issue but instead I only got the usual level of "well bad luck" type response: https://productforums.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/webmasters/TjHFe7gjBS8/Qu1xw1LQcR4J
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
p3yot33at3r
|
 |
October 15, 2015, 11:10:26 PM |
|
That's strange, I can access your site no problem with Waterfox - which is a 64bit version of Firefox, & my AV (Comodo) has never flagged cgminer..... Google being evil again 
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4452
Merit: 1664
Ruu \o/
|
 |
October 15, 2015, 11:13:09 PM |
|
That's strange, I can access your site no problem with Waterfox - which is a 64bit version of Firefox, & my AV (Comodo) has never flagged cgminer..... Google being evil again  Yeah I'm not sure which versions of firefox are affected. On one PC it's fine but on another here (newer version) it comes up with the malicious warning. Try searching for cgminer in google as well and see if the site even shows up now.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
p3yot33at3r
|
 |
October 15, 2015, 11:39:55 PM |
|
That's strange, I can access your site no problem with Waterfox - which is a 64bit version of Firefox, & my AV (Comodo) has never flagged cgminer..... Google being evil again  Yeah I'm not sure which versions of firefox are affected. On one PC it's fine but on another here (newer version) it comes up with the malicious warning. Try searching for cgminer in google as well and see if the site even shows up now. Your github page shows up top on all my search engines, but not your website http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/And you're right, google are showing numerous dodgy sites for your software - unbelievable! Edit: Apparently, these guys handle suspected malware sites for google & a few other search engines: https://www.stopbadware.org/request-reviewGive them a go 
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4452
Merit: 1664
Ruu \o/
|
 |
October 15, 2015, 11:44:54 PM |
|
I've bashed their request page repeatedly and had the same kind of ignoring from them. EDIT: The basic problem is there is no way to appeal against files that are flagged as malware. All the official channels for review have no scope for you to argue that case.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
p3yot33at3r
|
 |
October 15, 2015, 11:56:59 PM |
|
The basic problem is there is no way to appeal against files that are flagged as malware. All the official channels for review have no scope for you to argue that case.
Yup, Google are a law unto themselves. But it's strange that it's not a blanket ban, which is usually the case. I get the feeling there's more to this than meets the eye....... I don't know what to suggest - apart from a mass of email complaints from all cgminer users......now that would be something 
|
|
|
|
Mikestang
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1001
|
 |
October 16, 2015, 06:36:04 AM |
|
Yeah I'm not sure which versions of firefox are affected. On one PC it's fine but on another here (newer version) it comes up with the malicious warning. Try searching for cgminer in google as well and see if the site even shows up now.
I can access http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/ on my XP machine running firefox 41.0.2, but like others have mentioned a google search for "cgminer" only shows the github page, and "cgminer download" shows a bunch of garbage. How frustrating.
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4452
Merit: 1664
Ruu \o/
|
 |
October 16, 2015, 09:02:50 AM |
|
So deleting the zip versions of the cgminer archives was enough to appease the stupid google system into not seeing the files that it was complaining were malware. Only .7z archives for windows binaries are now available for download. Now the firefox warning should have gone away, though the google search is yet to show the correct cgminer site.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1099
Think for yourself
|
 |
October 16, 2015, 09:25:50 AM |
|
So deleting the zip versions of the cgminer archives was enough to appease the stupid google system into not seeing the files that it was complaining were malware. Only .7z archives for windows binaries are now available for download. Now the firefox warning should have gone away, though the google search is yet to show the correct cgminer site.
Yep, Firefox 41.0.1 for Windoze is happy, for now.
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
Mikestang
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1001
|
 |
October 16, 2015, 05:16:18 PM |
|
though the google search is yet to show the correct cgminer site.
It appears to be fixed now (Windows 7, Firefox 41.0.1), probably just took some time to re-propagate out across the interwebs: 
|
|
|
|
cameloid
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 1
|
 |
October 17, 2015, 01:12:18 AM |
|
I have a simple question regarding cgminer that I failed to find an answer to in README and other sources.
I'm experimenting with my hobby project with the following setup of 7 ASICs:
- ASICMINER Block Erupter (x4); - Avalon Nano3 (x1); - Antminer U3 (x2).
All these devices are supported by the same driver (icarus). However, I would like to use different driver options (like timing) for each specific vendor. Do I have to run three different instances of cgminer (manually restricting each of them with --usb option), or it is possible to specify separate set of options for each group of devices within one instance?
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1099
Think for yourself
|
 |
October 17, 2015, 01:29:49 AM |
|
I have a simple question regarding cgminer that I failed to find an answer to in README and other sources.
I'm experimenting with my hobby project with the following setup of 7 ASICs:
- ASICMINER Block Erupter (x4); - Avalon Nano3 (x1); - Antminer U3 (x2).
All these devices are supported by the same driver (icarus). However, I would like to use different driver options (like timing) for each specific vendor. Do I have to run three different instances of cgminer (manually restricting each of them with --usb option), or it is possible to specify separate set of options for each group of devices within one instance?
--icarus-timing <arg> Set how the Icarus timing is calculated - one setting/value for all or comma separated
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4452
Merit: 1664
Ruu \o/
|
 |
October 17, 2015, 01:32:12 AM |
|
I have a simple question regarding cgminer that I failed to find an answer to in README and other sources.
I'm experimenting with my hobby project with the following setup of 7 ASICs:
- ASICMINER Block Erupter (x4); - Avalon Nano3 (x1); - Antminer U3 (x2).
All these devices are supported by the same driver (icarus). However, I would like to use different driver options (like timing) for each specific vendor. Do I have to run three different instances of cgminer (manually restricting each of them with --usb option), or it is possible to specify separate set of options for each group of devices within one instance?
Whatever reason you want to use timing is wrong. You almost certainly do not want to adjust timing. Any options you are likely to really want to adjust for different devices are device specific anyway (like --au3-freq). Trust me, whatever reason you think you want to use for timing is misguided.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
|