splat44
|
 |
August 28, 2015, 10:16:26 PM |
|
Does this version supports gridseed asic miner 80 chip two blade?
I recall reading something on Version 3.7.2 which most reports indicate it has problem recognizing two blade or more!
It be great to know following settings inside *.bat file - recognizing two blade - scryp option
I am speaking of windows version!
|
|
|
|
|
|
You get merit points when someone likes your post enough to give you some. And for every 2 merit points you receive, you can send 1 merit point to someone else!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 1716
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
 |
August 28, 2015, 10:54:40 PM |
|
Does this version supports gridseed asic miner 80 chip two blade?
I recall reading something on Version 3.7.2 which most reports indicate it has problem recognizing two blade or more!
It be great to know following settings inside *.bat file - recognizing two blade - scryp option
I am speaking of windows version!
No altcoin support whatsoever in master cgminer.
|
|
|
|
splat44
|
 |
August 29, 2015, 09:00:22 AM |
|
Ok but which version from windows built that supports: - SCRYPT to mine altcoins - Gridseed asic scrypt 80 chip blades Would be great in knowing settings inside bat file: - stratum, server, user.work, pass - including other setting leading to recognize two bade for example and other kind of settings Does this version supports gridseed asic miner 80 chip two blade?
I recall reading something on Version 3.7.2 which most reports indicate it has problem recognizing two blade or more!
It be great to know following settings inside *.bat file - recognizing two blade - scryp option
I am speaking of windows version!
No altcoin support whatsoever in master cgminer.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 1716
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
 |
August 29, 2015, 09:26:35 AM |
|
Ok but which version from windows built that supports: - SCRYPT to mine altcoins - Gridseed asic scrypt 80 chip blades Would be great in knowing settings inside bat file: - stratum, server, user.work, pass - including other setting leading to recognize two bade for example and other kind of settings Does this version supports gridseed asic miner 80 chip two blade?
I recall reading something on Version 3.7.2 which most reports indicate it has problem recognizing two blade or more!
It be great to know following settings inside *.bat file - recognizing two blade - scryp option
I am speaking of windows version!
No altcoin support whatsoever in master cgminer. No altcoin support whatsoever in master cgminer.
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3557
Merit: 1081
Think for yourself
|
 |
August 29, 2015, 03:04:30 PM |
|
Ok but which version from windows built that supports: - SCRYPT to mine altcoins - Gridseed asic scrypt 80 chip blades
You need to post this in the alt coin section of the forums. You are in the Bitcoin section. There were some GCMiner forks that may do what your asking so go to the alt coin forum and ask there. Good Luck, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
 |
September 02, 2015, 12:39:13 AM |
|
So...outta the blue...Windows 10 preview( I know...I know..) has decided it found Trojan:win32/Skeeyah.C!plock , file:C\cgminer-4.9.2-windows\cgminer.exe process:pid5444,ProcessStart:130852590159391159 Sooo...is this the same file that usually gets picked on/up or did a new issue get put on the Naughty List during MS Defender definition update? Oh and yes, I got the zip from your index weeks ago, so I'm not sure why today cgminer.exe got Quarantined and not before.
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1458
Ruu \o/
|
 |
September 02, 2015, 12:53:43 AM |
|
So...outta the blue...Windows 10 preview( I know...I know..) has decided it found Trojan:win32/Skeeyah.C!plock , file:C\cgminer-4.9.2-windows\cgminer.exe process:pid5444,ProcessStart:130852590159391159 Sooo...is this the same file that usually gets picked on/up or did a new issue get put on the Naughty List during MS Defender definition update? Oh and yes, I got the zip from your index weeks ago, so I'm not sure why today cgminer.exe got Quarantined and not before.
Yeah someone else reported this today. It's definitely not a virus, just some stupid false positive again. Ever since cpu and gpu mining was removed from cgminer the false positives pretty much stopped completely. Cgminer was always the innocent bystander that was packaged with the actual trojan virus back then. Presumably an ancient version got tagged false positive again and they extended their tagging to the latest version.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
 |
September 02, 2015, 01:16:35 AM |
|
So...outta the blue...Windows 10 preview( I know...I know..) has decided it found Trojan:win32/Skeeyah.C!plock , file:C\cgminer-4.9.2-windows\cgminer.exe process:pid5444,ProcessStart:130852590159391159 Sooo...is this the same file that usually gets picked on/up or did a new issue get put on the Naughty List during MS Defender definition update? Oh and yes, I got the zip from your index weeks ago, so I'm not sure why today cgminer.exe got Quarantined and not before.
Yeah someone else reported this today. It's definitely not a virus, just some stupid false positive again. Ever since cpu and gpu mining was removed from cgminer the false positives pretty much stopped completely. Cgminer was always the innocent bystander that was packaged with the actual trojan virus back then. Presumably an ancient version got tagged false positive again and they extended their tagging to the latest version. Thanks, I was thinking this was the same file I saw flagged before but that was nearly 2 years ago, and the fact that I was looking at this rigs screen when it actually happened was pure accidental. At this point, my Win 8.1 pro and Win 7 pro rigs have not made the same determination yet.
|
|
|
|
CustomDesigned
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 02, 2015, 01:21:55 AM |
|
So I've been running, and just compiled 4.9.2 to hopefully get more than 3Gh from my new AntMiner U3 (which is a pod with a cage and fan, not a stick that is supposed to do 50Gh - 63 with overclocking). No compile errors. When I start it up, I get: [2015-09-01 21:12:45] No Stratum, GBT or Solo support in pool 0 http://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334 unable to use [2015-09-01 21:12:46] No Stratum, GBT or Solo support in pool 1 http://api.polmine.pl:8361 unable to use [2015-09-01 21:12:51] No Stratum, GBT or Solo support in pool 0 http://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334 unable to use [2015-09-01 21:12:52] No Stratum, GBT or Solo support in pool 1 http://api.polmine.pl:8361 unable to use etc etc Any ideas? Note, 3.12 runs the new AntMiner - but only at 3Gh/s
|
|
|
|
bmoscato
|
 |
September 02, 2015, 01:28:50 AM |
|
So I've been running, and just compiled 4.9.2 to hopefully get more than 3Ghz from my new AntMiner U3 (which is a pod with a cage and fan, not a stick that is supposed to do 50Gh - 63 with overclocking). No compile errors. When I start it up, I get: [2015-09-01 21:12:45] No Stratum, GBT or Solo support in pool 0 http://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334 unable to use [2015-09-01 21:12:46] No Stratum, GBT or Solo support in pool 1 http://api.polmine.pl:8361 unable to use [2015-09-01 21:12:51] No Stratum, GBT or Solo support in pool 0 http://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334 unable to use [2015-09-01 21:12:52] No Stratum, GBT or Solo support in pool 1 http://api.polmine.pl:8361 unable to use etc etc Any ideas? Can you post your configure file?
|
|
|
|
CustomDesigned
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 02, 2015, 01:30:57 AM |
|
{ "pools" : [ { "url" : " http://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334", "user" : "1Dxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "pass" : "none" }, { "url" : " http://api.polmine.pl:8361", "user" : "CustomDesigned11427pogoplug", "pass" : "XXXXXXXXXX" } ], "text-only" : true, "no-submit-stale" : true, "api-listen" : true, "api-port" : "4028", "api-allow" : "W:192.168.10.0/24,W:127.0.0.1" }
|
|
|
|
bmoscato
|
 |
September 02, 2015, 01:37:58 AM |
|
{ "pools" : [ { "url" : " http://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334", "user" : "1Dxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "pass" : "none" }, { "url" : " http://api.polmine.pl:8361", "user" : "CustomDesigned11427pogoplug", "pass" : "XXXXXXXXXX" } ], "text-only" : true, "no-submit-stale" : true, "api-listen" : true, "api-port" : "4028", "api-allow" : "W:192.168.10.0/24,W:127.0.0.1" } Can you get it to work with a batch file like this: cgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 -u 14LxDWtRRdQAbnJdd4Ew5jwag8Bx9UfNRd -p x --au3-volt 830 --au3-freq 250 --hotplug 600 --api-listen --api-allow w:10.0.0/24
|
|
|
|
CustomDesigned
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 02, 2015, 01:45:54 AM |
|
I changed the urls to use stratum+tcp instead of http. That is apparently a config format change. Now getting 60Gh/s with no further config changes (includes 5Gh/s from older miners).
Thanks for the tip!
|
|
|
|
bmoscato
|
 |
September 02, 2015, 01:51:45 AM |
|
Glad you figured it out. I have three U3s and trying to keep them running is becoming a chore. I split them up on different computers tonight and set different frequencies to see if I can avoid high error rates hopefully get more than 12 hours of run time out of them. So far it seems that 225 is better for me than 250, I'm still running 830 volts.
|
|
|
|
goodgryphon
Member

Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
 |
September 03, 2015, 06:52:49 PM |
|
I use M's moniter..but when I updated cgminer in my s3 to 4.9.2.. M's will not pull the info from my s3.. anyone know whats up?
|
|
|
|
Mikestang
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 03, 2015, 07:32:47 PM |
|
I use M's moniter..but when I updated cgminer in my s3 to 4.9.2.. M's will not pull the info from my s3.. anyone know whats up?
If you dig back a few pages to around when 4.9.2 was release there is discussion concerning this. I'd find it for you, but am a bit short on time at the moment.
|
|
|
|
CustomDesigned
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 03, 2015, 10:21:19 PM |
|
Once my Antminer U3 has been running for a bit, it gets this about every 10 seconds: [2015-09-03 18:09:24] AU3 1: No valid hashes for over 2 secs, attempting to reset [2015-09-03 18:09:24] AU3 1 attempted reset got err:(0) LIBUSB_SUCCESS [2015-09-03 18:09:24] AU3 1: No valid hashes for over 2 secs, attempting to reset [2015-09-03 18:09:24] AU3 1 attempted reset got err:(0) LIBUSB_SUCCESS Despite this, the hashrate manages to stay around 60 - (about 5Gh/s worth of old erupters and antminers), dipping briefly after each reset. Is it possible that the AU3 is simply getting hot and taking a break? Is there something I should tune to make it work a little less hard (and reduce the log file entries)? I am using all defaults. I see people are tuning voltage and freq.
|
|
|
|
Mikestang
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 03, 2015, 10:25:16 PM |
|
Once my Antminer U3 has been running for a bit, it gets this about every 10 seconds:
Try a different USB cable, but that's pretty normal operations for the U3.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 1716
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
 |
September 03, 2015, 11:09:50 PM |
|
I use M's moniter..but when I updated cgminer in my s3 to 4.9.2.. M's will not pull the info from my s3.. anyone know whats up?
Update the monitor. Edit: ah OK - you meant it was getting "no information", not that some of the information was missing. Yeah as you said elsewhere, the api-allow was the problem.
|
|
|
|
Stormwalker
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 04, 2015, 02:45:58 PM |
|
I also posted this in the general mining software forum... Anyone have information to share?
Cgminer ( ver 4.9.0 ) never says accepted, it only tells me the block height changes. If I turn on verbose, I get lots of "share above target" notifications and an occasional Hashrate report ( same information that is in the header ). I am hashing at about 50 GH/s with an Antminer U3 so I am sure it needs to be optimized, however, I have seen it peak around 65 when I was mining in a pool.
My question is this: Is this reporting normal? I have tried to find a post about what solo reporting looks like online, but have not been able to find anything. I am okay with it not providing the information, as long as it is mining.
Cgminer is happy with the set-up ( no reported errors ) but not very informative..
Thanks,
Storm
|
|
|
|
|