azhago
|
|
June 17, 2014, 06:57:02 AM |
|
24 hours test :
1100H/s with CPU on minergate : ~3 XMR 2400H/s with GPUs on Wolf pool : ~3.4 XMR weird.
I understand the dev fee thing, but i hope we will be able to mine with a real username and not a wallet address someday.
|
|
|
|
ivcelmik
|
|
June 17, 2014, 07:14:20 AM |
|
24 hours test :
1100H/s with CPU on minergate : ~3 XMR 2400H/s with GPUs on Wolf pool : ~3.4 XMR weird.
I understand the dev fee thing, but i hope we will be able to mine with a real username and not a wallet address someday.
What Gpu's do u have?
|
|
|
|
drr0ss
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 17, 2014, 07:20:24 AM |
|
As I said in the my last post, I have some observations, and one of the assumptions is that for some reason, opencl sees no real configured virtual memory in Windows. OpenCL see less than configured.
|
|
|
|
Cr@zyheo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2014, 08:21:24 AM Last edit: June 17, 2014, 08:47:38 AM by Cr@zyheo |
|
The 2.1 version seems to be broken for me also. Miner is mining and shows no problems but nothing happening in the pool.
Same here. Miner stop submit share. Back to 2.0 and waitting next update version.
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
June 17, 2014, 08:25:34 AM |
|
24 hours test :
1100H/s with CPU on minergate : ~3 XMR 2400H/s with GPUs on Wolf pool : ~3.4 XMR weird.
I understand the dev fee thing, but i hope we will be able to mine with a real username and not a wallet address someday.
What Gpu's do u have? one rig with 5 x 280X (1930H/s) + a rig with 1x 280x + 1x 5970 : 540H/s = ~2400H/s
|
|
|
|
ivcelmik
|
|
June 17, 2014, 08:32:27 AM |
|
24 hours test :
1100H/s with CPU on minergate : ~3 XMR 2400H/s with GPUs on Wolf pool : ~3.4 XMR weird.
I understand the dev fee thing, but i hope we will be able to mine with a real username and not a wallet address someday.
What Gpu's do u have? one rig with 5 x 280X (1930H/s) + a rig with 1x 280x + 1x 5970 : 540H/s = ~2400H/s i've one rig with 6 x 280x (only 1930H/s) with 8Gb of Ram and after one hour i receive error with virtual memory
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
June 17, 2014, 08:39:34 AM |
|
24 hours test :
1100H/s with CPU on minergate : ~3 XMR 2400H/s with GPUs on Wolf pool : ~3.4 XMR weird.
I understand the dev fee thing, but i hope we will be able to mine with a real username and not a wallet address someday.
What Gpu's do u have? one rig with 5 x 280X (1930H/s) + a rig with 1x 280x + 1x 5970 : 540H/s = ~2400H/s i've one rig with 6 x 280x (only 1930H/s) with 8Gb of Ram and after one hour i receive error with virtual memory I have 16GB + virtual memory @ 16GB on my 5x280X rig, i don't have you problem. 280x are occed @ 1170MHz.
|
|
|
|
hahaerer01
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2014, 09:56:14 AM |
|
Can I mine bbr with this miner?
|
|
|
|
Palad1n
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
June 17, 2014, 10:57:14 AM |
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Durgar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2014, 11:37:27 AM |
|
As others have already pointed out, v2.1 stops submitting shares after a random amount of time, and unlike previous version that stopped functioning only on my 280x's not 290's, this one stops working with all cards in a random amount of time (sometimes it won't even make it 10 minutes) Not only does it stop submitting shares, but it leaves the clocks at high powered state, i.e. it's drawing same amount as if it was mining, yet nothing happens. Sometimes -wd 1 kills the tasks, sometimes it doesn't. Cmd box shows last share submitted msg and nothing else after that. No error messages, gpu drivers haven't crashed, and the miner client is still responsive, but does not generate any msgs - no "new job received etc, nothing, nada, zilch (pools also show zero hash rate) In this sate basically all it does is piss away electricity at full speed, like a locomotive with no driver and no destination.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 17, 2014, 11:38:02 AM |
|
v2.2 is available:
- Fixed bugs.
|
|
|
|
MrJay
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
June 17, 2014, 11:56:30 AM |
|
v2.2 is available:
- Fixed bugs.
Thanks for the updated miner, is there a way to swap back to the primary pool once it becomes active again?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 17, 2014, 12:00:19 PM |
|
v2.2 is available:
- Fixed bugs.
Thanks for the updated miner, is there a way to swap back to the primary pool once it becomes active again? I can add option to disconnect from current pool and try to connect to first pool in the list every hour.
|
|
|
|
MrJay
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
June 17, 2014, 12:02:53 PM |
|
v2.2 is available:
- Fixed bugs.
Thanks for the updated miner, is there a way to swap back to the primary pool once it becomes active again? I can add option to disconnect from current pool and try to connect to first pool in the list every hour. Something like that, similar to cg/sgminer and check to see if it is primary pool is alive and auto switch back without dropping any hashes.
|
|
|
|
Cr@zyheo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2014, 12:40:38 PM |
|
v2.2 is available:
- Fixed bugs.
I'm running test
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 17, 2014, 02:11:17 PM |
|
Is it possible to add support for Minergate style pool? Where user connects to pool with username and password, not with wallet address?
|
|
|
|
Shrikez
|
|
June 17, 2014, 02:30:06 PM |
|
I keep getting complaints by the miner to up my pagefile settings to at least 16 GB while it is already set to 32 GB for 4 x 280x.
This happens with 2.2 beta as well as with older versions. It runs fine for a while and then drops out with the above complaint.
Any hints? thank you
|
Die Würde des Menschen ist unantastbar
|
|
|
Vanderi
|
|
June 17, 2014, 02:32:16 PM |
|
v2.2 is available:
- Fixed bugs.
Thanks for the updated miner, is there a way to swap back to the primary pool once it becomes active again? I can add option to disconnect from current pool and try to connect to first pool in the list every hour. Considering the state of the pools right now atleast, it would be cool to have this happen
|
|
|
|
Vanderi
|
|
June 17, 2014, 02:33:44 PM |
|
I keep getting complaints by the miner to up my pagefile settings to at least 16 GB while it is already set to 32 GB for 4 x 280x.
This happens with 2.2 beta as well as with older versions. It runs fine for a while and then drops out with the above complaint.
Any hints? thank you
What amd driver? Do you have a robust enough rig to your 280's? Free cpu threads and enough ram. I have these, with 16GB DDR3 and have not encountered any such problems
|
|
|
|
Shrikez
|
|
June 17, 2014, 02:50:18 PM |
|
I keep getting complaints by the miner to up my pagefile settings to at least 16 GB while it is already set to 32 GB for 4 x 280x.
This happens with 2.2 beta as well as with older versions. It runs fine for a while and then drops out with the above complaint.
Any hints? thank you
What amd driver? Do you have a robust enough rig to your 280's? Free cpu threads and enough ram. I have these, with 16GB DDR3 and have not encountered any such problems Thanks for your reply. It's a classical scrypt mining rig with 4 x 280x Vapor-Xs driver is 13.12, RAM is 8 GB. The CPU is a little weak, it's an Intel G3220 at 3.0 GHz. PSUs are 1000 W + 800 W Platinum Fractal Design (certainly not the cause for an error about virtual memory though) Rig has been running all kinds of Algos, from Scrypt to X13 for 7 months without any issues at all. I will upgrade the memory and see what happens. I am about to deploy CN mining on the other 20 GPUs so I'd like to weed out all issues first.
|
Die Würde des Menschen ist unantastbar
|
|
|
|