zokos
|
|
July 11, 2014, 08:15:24 PM |
|
Is there new version that works with 14.7 RC
|
|
|
|
Ivanech
|
|
July 11, 2014, 09:20:55 PM |
|
Still waiting Linux version. Any hopes?
|
|
|
|
csa1234
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 289
Merit: 100
O2-Protocol.com Carbon Offset DeFi
|
|
July 12, 2014, 03:18:29 AM |
|
yes, linux miner version please!!! On windows i can only manage to get up to 5 x GPU, but with BAMT it recognizes all 6 x GPU on my same board, too bad i cant use BAMT to mine Cryptocoins
|
O2-Protocol.com Carbon Offset DeFi
|
|
|
bitwolf
|
|
July 12, 2014, 06:00:25 AM |
|
Is there a way to set different -a modes in one rig? I have one 290 and one 5850. I tried -a 23 and -a 2,3 - it gives me only mode 3 for all cards.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
July 12, 2014, 07:06:24 AM |
|
yes, linux miner version please!!! On windows i can only manage to get up to 5 x GPU, but with BAMT it recognizes all 6 x GPU on my same board, too bad i cant use BAMT to mine Cryptocoins
In progress...
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
July 12, 2014, 07:06:53 AM |
|
Is there a way to set different -a modes in one rig? I have one 290 and one 5850. I tried -a 23 and -a 2,3 - it gives me only mode 3 for all cards.
Ok, I will add this feature in next update.
|
|
|
|
onetwentyfive
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 12, 2014, 07:52:30 AM |
|
Is there a way to set different -a modes in one rig? I have one 290 and one 5850. I tried -a 23 and -a 2,3 - it gives me only mode 3 for all cards.
just speculation, could you run more than one instance of the program and disable cards with the '-di' flag ... so that way you could run the '-a' flags the way you wanted on multiple cards and they wouldn't interfere with each other?
|
|
|
|
cobaltskky
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
to make more better goodness
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:17:51 AM |
|
Can us Nivida folks get some luvin?
|
|
|
|
onetwentyfive
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 12, 2014, 12:46:54 PM |
|
Can us Nivida folks get some luvin? there is already a cuda miner.. can't recall the name because i have no use for it! search the 'Mining' subforum and i'm sure you will find it.
|
|
|
|
MacHead2006
Member
Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
|
July 12, 2014, 03:35:21 PM |
|
Can us Nivida folks get some luvin? Ccminer fork by tsiv Without dev fee btw. about 270h for 750ti
|
|
|
|
cobaltskky
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
to make more better goodness
|
|
July 12, 2014, 03:46:32 PM |
|
Thanks, guys!
|
|
|
|
MrJay
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
July 12, 2014, 04:46:16 PM |
|
I've tried 4.2 and 5.0 on my rigs, either the OS hangs or the application hangs and I have to physically restart them. Going back to 3.4 as I had zero trouble with that.
|
|
|
|
svetliopi44
|
|
July 12, 2014, 08:01:54 PM |
|
Can us Nivida folks get some luvin? Ccminer fork by tsiv Without dev fee btw. about 270h for 750ti yes, there are still decent people in this soap opera crypto world
|
|
|
|
cobaltskky
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
to make more better goodness
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:41:17 PM |
|
There are plenty good people over on the NXTForums.
|
|
|
|
Kablam
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:42:24 PM |
|
Can us Nivida folks get some luvin? there is already a cuda miner.. can't recall the name because i have no use for it! search the 'Mining' subforum and i'm sure you will find it. ccminer read all abouit it here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.0
|
|
|
|
|
atp1916
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:25:26 PM |
|
You people who even hint at reverse-engineering claymore's stuff don't deserve to even have a computer to mine with.
You moral crusaders are more irritating than insects. This is a question of ethicality and simply doing the right thing. We haven't even addressed the morals of IP theft yet. Selling your services to the xmr botnet owners and also receiving a stolen copy of dga's xmr miner source code to make your xmr miner work makes you nothing more than a hack/thief with zero ethics. You're a disgrace, both as a "dev" and as a member of the crypto community. First, I don't know what you've heard, but I NEVER got a stolen copy of dga's work. It was given to me by the very person he sold it to - to improve upon it. Not only did I do that, when I open sourced it, I credited him and even sent him BTC. EDIT: It'd be nice if people told me these wild stories they hear so I can tell them what really happened. Interesting how as soon as I set the record straight, he doesn't say shit. Not, "sorry I spread a rumor slandering you," or anything. What? I am not about to turn this thread into a debate on the ethicality of unauthorized open-sourcing. Dga did not authorize you to open-source any code from his xmr miner, period. He sold it to someone else, not you. He did not authorize his code ending up in your miner. Now the record is straight. Nothing else to say.
|
|
|
|
atp1916
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:32:21 PM |
|
You people who even hint at reverse-engineering claymore's stuff don't deserve to even have a computer to mine with.
You moral crusaders are more irritating than insects. This is a question of ethicality and simply doing the right thing. We haven't even addressed the morals of IP theft yet. Selling your services to the xmr botnet owners and also receiving a stolen copy of dga's xmr miner source code to make your xmr miner work makes you nothing more than a hack/thief with zero ethics. You're a disgrace, both as a "dev" and as a member of the crypto community. First, I don't know what you've heard, but I NEVER got a stolen copy of dga's work. It was given to me by the very person he sold it to - to improve upon it. Not only did I do that, when I open sourced it, I credited him and even sent him BTC. EDIT: It'd be nice if people told me these wild stories they hear so I can tell them what really happened. Interesting how as soon as I set the record straight, he doesn't say shit. Not, "sorry I spread a rumor slandering you," or anything. What? I am not about to turn this thread into a debate on the ethicality of unauthorized open-sourcing. Dga did not authorize you to open-source any code from his xmr miner, period. He sold it to someone else, not you. He did not authorize his code ending up in your miner. Now the record is straight. Nothing else to say. The person he sold it to - who had the rights to it - told me to open source it. If dga sells the rights to his code to someone, and that person authorizes its release, then there is nothing wrong with it. Face it - you heard some rumor that was basically a bunch of slanderous lies, and took it as fact, and now that I can defend myself you want to twist it to make it fit. Liars will be liars.
|
|
|
|
atp1916
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:38:17 PM |
|
You people who even hint at reverse-engineering claymore's stuff don't deserve to even have a computer to mine with.
You moral crusaders are more irritating than insects. This is a question of ethicality and simply doing the right thing. We haven't even addressed the morals of IP theft yet. Selling your services to the xmr botnet owners and also receiving a stolen copy of dga's xmr miner source code to make your xmr miner work makes you nothing more than a hack/thief with zero ethics. You're a disgrace, both as a "dev" and as a member of the crypto community. First, I don't know what you've heard, but I NEVER got a stolen copy of dga's work. It was given to me by the very person he sold it to - to improve upon it. Not only did I do that, when I open sourced it, I credited him and even sent him BTC. EDIT: It'd be nice if people told me these wild stories they hear so I can tell them what really happened. Interesting how as soon as I set the record straight, he doesn't say shit. Not, "sorry I spread a rumor slandering you," or anything. What? I am not about to turn this thread into a debate on the ethicality of unauthorized open-sourcing. Dga did not authorize you to open-source any code from his xmr miner, period. He sold it to someone else, not you. He did not authorize his code ending up in your miner. Now the record is straight. Nothing else to say. The person he sold it to - who had the rights to it - told me to open source it. If dga sells the rights to his code to someone, and that person authorizes its release, then there is nothing wrong with it. Face it - you heard some rumor that was basically a bunch of slanderous lies, and took it as fact, and now that I can defend myself you want to twist it to make it fit. Liars will be liars. Oh, and you know I'm lying how? Right, because your source is impeccable, I'm sure. Who was it? The voice in your head after too much vodka? You have no evidence for any of your claims - you're making shit up to attack me. Dga himself. You know what you did. I just laid it out. I'm done replying to you.
|
|
|
|
lolek12345
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:58:00 PM |
|
Sorry but performance for 5850 are very slow....on scrypt are like twice slower than 290 (two 5850 for one 290), and here are four times slower(four 5850 for one 290). Just sayin'
thanks
|
|
|
|
|