loshia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 16, 2013, 06:21:55 PM |
|
For what ever reason I've also the idea that on ozco.in i'm mining 'slower' than on BTCGuild / Slush. However, I'm not sure if there is a way to 'prove' that.
Calc your hash rate based on diff1 shsares to be 100% sure what your speed is. Folow my posts and kano replies in Lancelot thread around page 21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
server
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 892
Merit: 1002
1 BTC =1 BTC
|
|
April 16, 2013, 07:56:28 PM |
|
Can anyone tell me, if these are normal values for the avalon. HW error seems still pretty high. Updated to 20130410 (next-testing) firmware recently. Cgminer runs at 282M(Advance): [Elapsed] => 41011 [MHS av] => 67092.46 [Found Blocks] => 0 [Getworks] => 1495 [Accepted] => 9909 [Rejected] => 52 [Hardware Errors] => 827 [Utility] => 14.50 [Discarded] => 2785 [Stale] => 0 [Get Failures] => 0 Can there be anything else done? Am I loosing lots of coins due to that high error-rate? To compare my stats: [0] => SUMMARY [Elapsed] => 4149 [MHS av] => 70985.47 [Found Blocks] => 0 [Getworks] => 142 [Accepted] => 1949 [Rejected] => 1 [Hardware Errors] => 55 [Utility] => 28.19 [Discarded] => 267 [Stale] => 0 [Get Failures] => 0 [Local Work] => 75766 [Remote Failures] => 0 [Network Blocks] => 6 [Total MH] => 294514497.3527 [Work Utility] => 991.73
I'm running at Freq 300 and Temp1 = 24, Temp3 = 41. What's your temp1 & 3 ?
|
|
|
|
Sakdrissi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
April 16, 2013, 08:36:50 PM |
|
Thanks for your help guys. Opened it and checked the cables. Everything seems to be connected. Although I wanted it to run for some hours, cgminer restarted half an hour before. But anyway, same picture:
[Elapsed] => 2105 [MHS av] => 64931.87 [Found Blocks] => 0 [Getworks] => 84 [Accepted] => 499 [Rejected] => 1 [Hardware Errors] => 26 [Utility] => 14.22
Temp1: 26 Temp3: 47
Ambient temperature is about 23°C.
|
|
|
|
server
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 892
Merit: 1002
1 BTC =1 BTC
|
|
April 16, 2013, 09:03:24 PM Last edit: April 17, 2013, 10:51:46 AM by server |
|
Temp1: 26 Temp3: 47
Ambient temperature is about 23°C.
I don't know if 47 degrees temp3 is too high. Lower is always better in my opinion. Mine was 44 and I lowered it 3 degrees by making the PSU external. (HQ ENERMAX GOLD PSU BTW!! LOVE IT) Also I use an external ventilator to cool down the aluminium bottom plate since this is connected to the cooling sinks inside. Temp3 is now steady at 41.
|
|
|
|
Mikej0h
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 100
Life is short, play long
|
|
April 16, 2013, 09:56:15 PM |
|
For me: [Elapsed] => 1648 [MHS av] => 70381.65 [Found Blocks] => 0 [Getworks] => 282 [Accepted] => 446 [Rejected] => 1 [Hardware Errors] => 17 [Utility] => 16.24 [Discarded] => 199 [Stale] => 0 [Get Failures] => 0 [Local Work] => 30096 [Remote Failures] => 0 [Network Blocks] => 6 [Total MH] => 116002771.6707 [Work Utility] => 983.66 [Difficulty Accepted] => 26654.00000000 [Difficulty Rejected] => 64.00000000 [Difficulty Stale] => 0.00000000 [Best Share] => 10425
T1: 26, T2: -1, T3: 45 Also running @ 300mhz in Balance Mode @ ozco.in.
|
|
|
|
zero-asic
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
April 17, 2013, 12:55:08 AM |
|
[Elapsed] => 289927 [MHS av] => 66558.83 [Found Blocks] => 0 [Getworks] => 12656 [Accepted] => 98268 [Rejected] => 388 [Hardware Errors] => 3129 [Utility] => 20.34 [Discarded] => 24241 [Stale] => 0 [Get Failures] => 0 [Local Work] => 4720592 [Remote Failures] => 0 [Network Blocks] => 560 [Total MH] => 19297167797.3573 [Work Utility] => 929.86 [Difficulty Accepted] => 4447635.00000000 [Difficulty Rejected] => 18411.00000000 [Difficulty Stale] => 0.00000000 [Best Share] => 16788986
Temp 1 - 35 Temp 2 - 46 282M Running on Ozcoin for 3d 8h 34m 34s with failover to BTCGuild
|
|
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
|
April 17, 2013, 04:42:47 AM |
|
[Elapsed] => 32527 [MHS av] => 71271.75 [Found Blocks] => 0 [Getworks] => 1204 [Accepted] => 16934 [Rejected] => 52 [Hardware Errors] => 554 [Utility] => 31.24 [Discarded] => 2227 [Stale] => 0 [Get Failures] => 0 [Local Work] => 596178 [Remote Failures] => 0 [Network Blocks] => 69 [Total MH] => 2318234367.2799 [Work Utility] => 995.65 [Difficulty Accepted] => 541888.00000000 [Difficulty Rejected] => 1664.00000000 [Difficulty Stale] => 0.00000000 [Best Share] => 774866
Temp 22 and 44 Running at 300 Stats are based on a 9 hr running session.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
April 17, 2013, 04:59:24 AM |
|
Temp 22 and 44 Running at 300 Stats are based on a 9 hr running session. Yep that's what that elapsed figure means: 32527 / 3600 = 9.035hrs
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632
Ruu \o/
|
|
April 17, 2013, 05:03:26 AM |
|
Utility depends entirely on what difficulty your pool is asking you to mine at. It is no indicator of how well your device is working.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
|
|
spiccioli
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
April 19, 2013, 08:29:48 PM |
|
thanks xempew, I had forgot the wiki. Big changes, it seems. Has anyone here already tested it? spiccioli
|
|
|
|
zero-asic
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
April 19, 2013, 09:33:38 PM |
|
thanks xempew, I had forgot the wiki. Big changes, it seems. Has anyone here already tested it? spiccioli I have it up and running on two machines. So far it seems good.
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew N. Wright
Untrustworthy
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
|
|
April 20, 2013, 02:33:55 PM |
|
Will this firmware be included already in Batch 3?
|
|
|
|
Mikej0h
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 100
Life is short, play long
|
|
April 20, 2013, 02:55:43 PM |
|
Firmware development goes pretty fast. I would guess the development continues, and there is a different version when batch 3 is send out. Anyways; upgrading the Avalon takes literally less then a minute. Steps to upgrade: - Login to the web-ui - Click on "System" - Click on "Backup / Flash Firmware" - Click on "Browse..." (see screenshot: http://postimg.org/image/yeqww5n3h/) - Click on "Flash image" ... And a few seconds later you get the login screen back, and your firmware has been upgraded.
|
|
|
|
spiccioli
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
April 20, 2013, 03:05:38 PM |
|
Hi
A new firmware released(Version: 20130419), please update your Avalon to latest firmware
Hi xiangfu, I've just updated my units, but I still cannot mine on p2pool without using --fix-protocol which has to be added by hand to /etc/init.d/cgminer Is this the way it is supposed to be? Shouldn't p2pool mining be working with stratum when using latest cgminer? spiccioli
|
|
|
|
irritant
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 473
Merit: 250
Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol
|
|
April 20, 2013, 11:12:40 PM |
|
Hi
A new firmware released(Version: 20130419), please update your Avalon to latest firmware
Hi xiangfu, I've just updated my units, but I still cannot mine on p2pool without using --fix-protocol which has to be added by hand to /etc/init.d/cgminer Is this the way it is supposed to be? Shouldn't p2pool mining be working with stratum when using latest cgminer? spiccioli NOTE: The best performance the small handful of users who got this working have reported is still about 25-30% DOA against P2Pool (versus the usual DOA of 8-15% or so.) So it's close to desired, but be aware that getting things working in this state currently requires command-line skills and the ability to check-out branches from p2pool's git repository. For the moment, your most efficient options are solo-mining with local pool software, or just using one of the online pools.
|
|
|
|
loshia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 21, 2013, 12:58:56 PM |
|
xiangfu, Working like charm with latest FW:
Elapsed:4h 13m 31s Difficulty Accepted:259,204.00 1022.43/m 73188.66
2ghs+ improvement. I can be sure after 24 hours though, because of the diff variation but it works better compared to old FW for sure!
|
|
|
|
spiccioli
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
April 21, 2013, 08:54:33 PM |
|
What firmware is it running? Old ones did not start hashing if a ntpd server could not be contacted. This is the first thing that comes to my mind. spiccioli
|
|
|
|
|