captaindiptoad
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
December 17, 2017, 04:37:37 PM Last edit: December 17, 2017, 09:23:35 PM by captaindiptoad |
|
Hoping some of these logs/info help some of you out. All cards running on Nvidia 388.59 All cards running on 0.5.7 Mining on Flypool US server The 1080Ti and the 1060 are in my every day gaming rig with decent airflow. the 1080Ti has a back-plate attached. The 1080 is in my wifes computer, decent airflow. The 980Ti is on a test bench and kept in a fairly cool spare bedroom, the new 1080 will be going into my wifes computer and the old founders edition onto the testbench.
ASUS ROG STRIX GeForce GTX 1080 TI 11GB +150GPU +500mem 120% power target 100% fan speed 61c AVG 769.9Sol/s 2.71Sol/w Memory appears to help with the hash-rate up to +500, after that the gain is minimal.
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition 8GB +40GPU +300mem 90% power target 90% fan speed 64c AVG 524.6Sol/s 3.25Sol/w
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1060 AMP Edition 6GB +150GPU +500mem 120% power target 100% fan speed 54c AVG 329.7Sol/s 2.69Sol/w Memory appears to have almost no effect by itself, however at +150GPU and no memory overclock it is unstable, it only becomes stable when I add in the memory overclock.
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB FTW +50GPU +400mem 115% power target 100% fan speed 58c AVG 495.4Sol/s 1.95Sol/w The memory response appears the same as the 1060 whereas it doesn't seem to directly have an influence, but is needed for a stable GPU overclock. For some reason I can no longer adjust the memory overclock.
I have an EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 SC GAMING ACX 3.0, 8GB on order aswell.
|
|
|
|
BtOrNotBt
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Mbr BtC/AtC
|
|
December 17, 2017, 05:00:57 PM |
|
Excuse-me, but i attempt to run into Debian Sid... it can't be run... because libssl, and libcrypto versions are 1.0.2! # dpkg -l | grep ssl ii libcurl4-openssl-dev:amd64 7.57.0-1 amd64 development files and documentation for libcurl (OpenSSL flavour) ii libflac8:amd64 1.3.2-1 amd64 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtime C library ii libio-socket-ssl-perl 2.052-1 all Perl module implementing object oriented interface to SSL sockets ii libnet-smtp-ssl-perl 1.04-1 all Perl module providing SSL support to Net::SMTP ii libnet-ssleay-perl 1.80-1+b2 amd64 Perl module for Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) ii libssl1.0.2:amd64 1.0.2n-1 amd64 Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - shared libraries ii libssl1.1:amd64 1.1.0g-2 amd64 Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - shared libraries ii libwavpack1:amd64 5.1.0-2 amd64 audio codec (lossy and lossless) - library ii openssl 1.1.0g-2 amd64 Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - cryptographic utility ii perl-openssl-defaults:amd64 3 amd64 version compatibility baseline for Perl OpenSSL packages
I link libssl-1.0.2 to libssl-1.0.0 and egual for libcrypto. and i export LD_LIBRARY_PATH, as: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$(pwd):/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" But, when i execute zm, the terminal return: /zminer ./zm: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by ./zm) ./zm: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by ./zm)
An idea?
|
Hi, I'm: "BT: Or Not BT!"
|
|
|
anhhoanggl
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
December 18, 2017, 12:32:03 PM |
|
How restart tool if it error Excuse-me, but i attempt to run into Debian Sid... it can't be run... because libssl, and libcrypto versions are 1.0.2! # dpkg -l | grep ssl ii libcurl4-openssl-dev:amd64 7.57.0-1 amd64 development files and documentation for libcurl (OpenSSL flavour) ii libflac8:amd64 1.3.2-1 amd64 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtime C library ii libio-socket-ssl-perl 2.052-1 all Perl module implementing object oriented interface to SSL sockets ii libnet-smtp-ssl-perl 1.04-1 all Perl module providing SSL support to Net::SMTP ii libnet-ssleay-perl 1.80-1+b2 amd64 Perl module for Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) ii libssl1.0.2:amd64 1.0.2n-1 amd64 Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - shared libraries ii libssl1.1:amd64 1.1.0g-2 amd64 Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - shared libraries ii libwavpack1:amd64 5.1.0-2 amd64 audio codec (lossy and lossless) - library ii openssl 1.1.0g-2 amd64 Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - cryptographic utility ii perl-openssl-defaults:amd64 3 amd64 version compatibility baseline for Perl OpenSSL packages
I link libssl-1.0.2 to libssl-1.0.0 and egual for libcrypto. and i export LD_LIBRARY_PATH, as: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$(pwd):/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" But, when i execute zm, the terminal return: /zminer ./zm: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by ./zm) ./zm: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by ./zm)
An idea?
|
|
|
|
|
grunoff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
|
|
December 18, 2017, 10:23:05 PM |
|
What 1060 you have? What`s your OC setting? That you have 350 with 60 degrees? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Den81
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
December 18, 2017, 10:34:04 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
donmarkon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
December 19, 2017, 10:39:47 AM |
|
Why do i have impression that my hashrate reported on pool is more inconsistent per worker with latest dstm's miner 0.5.7 anyone experiencing that ?
|
|
|
|
pixel8or
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
December 19, 2017, 02:23:54 PM |
|
Hey all, newb here. I decided to try sticking my toes in the water with this cryptomining thing on my desktop PC. Started out with a single GTX 1050 Ti and Zcash on EWBF and flypool. That went smooth so I grabbed another 1050 Ti off ebay for $135 and plugged it into the second PCIe slot on my old mobo and switched to dstm. I like what I'm getting so far. https://s19.postimg.org/4op7vohfn/Dstm_Zscreen001.jpgI'm going the Zcash to Litecoin route through ShapeShift and then to Coinbase. Just made my first $20 transfer to my bank account a couple days ago. I'm honestly surprised how easy this is. Seriously thinking about trying a budget 1050 Ti x6 mining rig on Linux. Thank you dstm and everyone else here for the great work and all the info.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
December 19, 2017, 03:14:04 PM |
|
@dstmIt seems to be there is a problem that might be related to the miner code. Sometimes the latency would just jump and the router hang: GPU0 60C Sol/s: 469.0 Sol/W: 3.15 Avg: 465.0 I/s: 249.3 Sh: 2.49 1.00 10141 + GPU1 65C Sol/s: 466.1 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 464.2 I/s: 248.2 Sh: 1.49 0.67 40 ========== Sol/s: 935.1 Sol/W: 3.15 Avg: 929.1 I/s: 497.6 Sh: 3.99 0.88 5090 GPU0 61C Sol/s: 466.0 Sol/W: 3.16 Avg: 465.1 I/s: 249.4 Sh: 2.14 1.00 10141 GPU1 65C Sol/s: 464.5 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 464.2 I/s: 248.1 Sh: 1.71 0.75 43 + ========== Sol/s: 930.6 Sol/W: 3.15 Avg: 929.3 I/s: 497.6 Sh: 3.84 0.90 5092 GPU0 61C Sol/s: 463.7 Sol/W: 3.15 Avg: 464.9 I/s: 249.5 Sh: 2.24 1.00 40 + GPU1 65C Sol/s: 457.1 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 463.3 I/s: 248.3 Sh: 2.24 0.83 41 ++ ========== Sol/s: 920.8 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 928.3 I/s: 497.8 Sh: 4.48 0.92 40 GPU0 61C Sol/s: 455.1 Sol/W: 3.15 Avg: 463.8 I/s: 249.4 Sh: 2.33 1.00 41 + GPU1 65C Sol/s: 458.9 Sol/W: 3.12 Avg: 462.8 I/s: 248.3 Sh: 2.32 0.86 41 + This happens to me only when using ZMiner (using flypool to mine). It can happen 1-2 times per day and would stop router to work properly - making the whole LAN unusable. I have called to ISP service and they said during this break, the router would spam their equipment with errors. I am not 100% sure ZM causes this though. I can only say, that using other miners/scripts/pools doesn't create this kind of problem - only happens while using ZM and flypool. If you're on 0.5.6 pls try 0.5.7 - some routers seemed to have issues with multiple pool connections 0.5.6 was using. If you're on 0.5.7: this is very unlikely to be related to zm, it uses a very low bandwidth tpc/ip connection - there is nothing special about it.
|
|
|
|
ezfox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
December 19, 2017, 06:56:06 PM |
|
I get more then 1% rejected shares because of: "GPU0 rejected share: [21,"Stale job!"]" Pool is eu1-zcash.flypool.org.
Can i do something to fix or mitigate ?
greetz, ezfox
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
December 19, 2017, 07:14:27 PM |
|
Hi!
Could I get GPU name via API? I have red help and didn't found it. At start gpu's models are printing, but not in response. Are there magic JSON key? Thank you.
GPU-name isn't reported via json-rpc currently, I'll add this information.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
December 19, 2017, 07:15:33 PM |
|
I am getting higher sysloads in ethOS after upgrading to 0.5.7... for 8x GTX 1080 and 8x GTX 1080ti rigs. Any work being done to fix this? With 8x 1060 and 8x 1070 the load is a little lower. There must be something wrong. 0.5.7 contains changes which reduce it's cpu-load on all systems. Could you pls provide more information, the output of the 'top' command of both versions would be very helpful.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
December 19, 2017, 07:16:40 PM |
|
if tool error i want restart tool, i will set config is --noreconnect ? There are multiple errors which may occur, the 'noreconnect' options disables automatic reconnection on connection drops/errors.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
December 19, 2017, 07:19:11 PM |
|
Excuse-me, but i attempt to run into Debian Sid... it can't be run... because libssl, and libcrypto versions are 1.0.2! # dpkg -l | grep ssl ii libcurl4-openssl-dev:amd64 7.57.0-1 amd64 development files and documentation for libcurl (OpenSSL flavour) ii libflac8:amd64 1.3.2-1 amd64 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtime C library ii libio-socket-ssl-perl 2.052-1 all Perl module implementing object oriented interface to SSL sockets ii libnet-smtp-ssl-perl 1.04-1 all Perl module providing SSL support to Net::SMTP ii libnet-ssleay-perl 1.80-1+b2 amd64 Perl module for Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) ii libssl1.0.2:amd64 1.0.2n-1 amd64 Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - shared libraries ii libssl1.1:amd64 1.1.0g-2 amd64 Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - shared libraries ii libwavpack1:amd64 5.1.0-2 amd64 audio codec (lossy and lossless) - library ii openssl 1.1.0g-2 amd64 Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - cryptographic utility ii perl-openssl-defaults:amd64 3 amd64 version compatibility baseline for Perl OpenSSL packages
I link libssl-1.0.2 to libssl-1.0.0 and egual for libcrypto. and i export LD_LIBRARY_PATH, as: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$(pwd):/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" But, when i execute zm, the terminal return: /zminer ./zm: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by ./zm) ./zm: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0: version `OPENSSL_1.0.0' not found (required by ./zm)
An idea? The openssl situation is more complicated than it should be. Ubuntu still uses the old (openssl 1.0.0) version and doesn't provide newer openssl versions (openssl 1.1) in their packages - newer ubuntu lts versions seems finally to include openssl 1.1. Sid provides openssl 1.0.2 but doesn't include symbols for 1.0.0. Openssl 1.0.0 is still the most compatible across the distributions - this is why zm uses it. I don't want to link openssl statically - since you won't get security updates this way. You can always compile openssl yourself it this situations. If this becomes an issue - I'll provide two zm versions (compiled against 1.0.0 and 1.1)
|
|
|
|
PickAxe131
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
December 19, 2017, 07:19:34 PM |
|
I just wanted to add that I did a little experiment with drivers with the latest release. 0.5.7 is unstable with NVidia 388.xx drivers. It instant crashes for me and never restarts. I want to add that new games like PUBG did the same.
So I tried older drivers, I found that 384.94 works flawless with 0.5.7 and earlier release + I got increased hashrate compared to 388.xx drivers. This was tested for my 3 rigs with 1080ti and 1070 on windows 10 with latest updates.
I'm using the latest 388.xx drivers on windows 10 with a mix of 1070 and 1070ti and it's been running for days without a hitch. Weird that different people have such different outcomes. I forgot to mention that my 1080ti are overclocked with +200 mem and core. 1070 are overclocked with +100 mem and core. My post was more directed towards users that overclock and uses DTSM miner. My 1070ti's are overclocked with +200 core and +700 mem and my 1070's are overclocked with +120 core and +650 mem. I am using DSTM 5.7 and have found it slightly better in every way than the excellent 5.6 I run a total of 17 cards. 8 1070ti and 8 1070 in rigs, and one 1070 in a laptop. All running DSTM 24/7 and so far have not had any crashes or stability issues with DSTM. Whats your powerlimit? Mines 78%
|
|
|
|
pixel8or
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
December 19, 2017, 07:58:16 PM |
|
I get more then 1% rejected shares because of: "GPU0 rejected share: [21,"Stale job!"]" Pool is eu1-zcash.flypool.org.
I get the same thing. No idea what % it might be, or if it's limited to only 1 of the 2 gpus in my minimalist rig. I just happen to notice it now and then. I've been thinking it's just something that hangs up on the pool's end and simply gets terminated after a certain time.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
December 19, 2017, 08:37:03 PM |
|
Hello everyone!
Sorry for being an absolute idiot but I don't know how to configure my zm file. I'm very new to this. I know my wallet address but if someone could tell me how to configure the file and recommend a good pool to mine I'd appreciate it. I'm running one 1070ti.
If you're on windows you can use the provided 'start.bat' file as an example. All you need to change is the '--user ...' option in that file. Change the example wallet address which follows the '--user' option with yours. That way you'll mine to your wallet using flypool. You can also check the documentation provided by the pools, they often include examples how to setup different mining software.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
December 19, 2017, 08:38:32 PM |
|
I get more then 1% rejected shares because of: "GPU0 rejected share: [21,"Stale job!"]" Pool is eu1-zcash.flypool.org.
Can i do something to fix or mitigate ?
greetz, ezfox
More than 1% - that's a significant value. After what time do you get this results/stats? - it shouldn't be that high after 24h. What pool are you using?
|
|
|
|
95do
|
|
December 19, 2017, 10:55:06 PM |
|
I really like ewbf miner but I am having so many crashes with exit codes and I have been trying for 2 days to fix it. So today i will try this miner and see how it goes
|
|
|
|
|