Bitcoin Forum
January 26, 2021, 03:38:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 [207] 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Armory - Discussion Thread  (Read 521359 times)
Sc@rF@c3
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 29, 2014, 12:17:09 AM
Last edit: September 29, 2014, 12:54:38 AM by Sc@rF@c3
 #4121

Hi there,

Are there any plans to add a Multi-wallet function?
By this I mean adding cold storage for the popular coins, BTC, LTE, DOGE etc.

Maybe a coin type plugin system?
I anticipate that blockchain files could be large for the watch only client, therefore I suggest install the wallets one requires.
I am guessing that the codes will be similar for all wallets, so this is why I am suggesting this.

Thank you for the great product.
1611632305
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1611632305

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1611632305
Reply with quote  #2

1611632305
Report to moderator
1611632305
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1611632305

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1611632305
Reply with quote  #2

1611632305
Report to moderator
1611632305
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1611632305

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1611632305
Reply with quote  #2

1611632305
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1611632305
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1611632305

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1611632305
Reply with quote  #2

1611632305
Report to moderator
segeln
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 30, 2014, 05:33:36 PM
 #4122


You can update your online computer without touching the offline computer if you install 0.91.2 online. 

However, all the offline transaction formats changed to accommodate multisig with 0.92+, so if you upgrade your online computer to that, you'll have to do the same offline.
but,in case I do not want to use multisig,,do I have to update the offline Computer?
segeln
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 30, 2014, 05:40:02 PM
 #4123


You can update your online computer without touching the offline computer if you install 0.91.2 online. 

is 0.91.2 typo?
should it not be 0.92 + ??
flipperfish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 251


Dolphie Selfie


View Profile
September 30, 2014, 08:10:27 PM
 #4124


You can update your online computer without touching the offline computer if you install 0.91.2 online. 

is 0.91.2 typo?
should it not be 0.92 + ??

v0.91.2 is the last version, that supports the old format for offline signing (the .unsigned.tx and .signed.tx files). Newer versions create unsigned transactions in a new format. If the offline computer is not updated to a version newer (or equal) than 0.92, it does not understand the new format.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
September 30, 2014, 08:19:48 PM
 #4125

when will 0.92.2 be out of testing?
globe-biz
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 163
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 01, 2014, 07:21:33 AM
 #4126

Hello, I am here tonight to see if you can help with a thought I have. I want to download Armory but I have worries that it will require me to download the blockchain again. I remember the 60 hours I spent waiting to download blockchain before with the qt client I think  it is called.

My question is this:

If I download the Armory wallet and synch it, will it take more than...20 minutes?
Electrum looks good because it does not require a full download of the blockchain

Thank you
SimonBelmond
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 01, 2014, 11:21:47 AM
 #4127

Hello, I am here tonight to see if you can help with a thought I have. I want to download Armory but I have worries that it will require me to download the blockchain again. I remember the 60 hours I spent waiting to download blockchain before with the qt client I think  it is called.

My question is this:

If I download the Armory wallet and synch it, will it take more than...20 minutes?
Electrum looks good because it does not require a full download of the blockchain

Thank you

If you already have a Bitcoin core installtion, Armory will go on top of it. For me armory takes about 5 min untill the DB is built and the wallet is online once the Blockchain has finished catching up. So yes it does require a full blckchain downlad, but you can use the one you have already.
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1006



View Profile
October 01, 2014, 07:40:15 PM
 #4128

I managed to create a situation where Armory 0.92.1 will perform a full blockchain scan every time the program is loaded.

I run bitcoind on a different (virtual) machine than Armory.

When I use NFS to share the blockchain directory, everything works.

Since both the bitcoind VM and the Armory VM are running on the same host, I tried moving the blockchain directory to the host and sharing it with both via 9pfs. The bitcoind VM gets read-write access, and the Armory VM gets read-only access.

Armory will perform a successful scan of the blockchain.

When I close it and open it up again, I get a

"Block file is in the wrong network!  MagicBytes: 00000000" error and it starts over from the beginning.
pitiflin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 507



View Profile
October 01, 2014, 09:07:05 PM
 #4129

Stupid (maybe not) question.

I want to update Armory, should I update Bitcoin Core as well?


       █
      ██
     ██
   ██ ██
 █ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██

       █
      ██
     ██
   ██ ██
 █ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
  B

          ▄▄▄▄▄▄
     ▄▄████████████▄▄
   ▄█████▀▀    ▀▀█████▄
  ████▀            ▀████
 ████                ████
▐███                  ███▌
███▌                  ▐███
▐███           ▄▄     ███▌
 ████         ▀███▄  ▐███
  ████▄         ▀███▄███
   ▀█████▄▄     ▄█████▀
     ▀▀████████████▀▀
          ▀▀▀▀▀▀
T 
.Better. Quick..

.Transparent....






             ▄████▄▄   ▄
█▄          ██████████▀▄
███        ███████████▀
▐████▄     ██████████▌
▄▄██████▄▄▄▄█████████▌
▀████████████████████
  ▀█████████████████
  ▄▄███████████████
   ▀█████████████▀
    ▄▄█████████▀
▀▀██████████▀
    ▀▀▀▀▀






▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████▀       ████
██████████████      ▄▄▄████
██████████████    ▐████████
██████████████    ▐████████
██████████            ▐████
██████████            █████
██████████████    ▐████████
██████████████    ▐████████
██████████████    ▐████████
▀█████████████    ▐███████▀






                   ▄▄████
              ▄▄████████▌
         ▄▄█████████▀███
    ▄▄██████████▀▀ ▄███▌
▄████████████▀▀  ▄█████
▀▀▀███████▀   ▄███████▌
      ██    ▄█████████
       █  ▄██████████▌
       █  ███████████
       █ ██▀ ▀██████▌
       ██▀     ▀████
                 ▀█▌
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1058



View Profile WWW
October 01, 2014, 09:20:33 PM
 #4130

Stupid (maybe not) question.

I want to update Armory, should I update Bitcoin Core as well?

You don't have to but latest core is more critical than latest armory

pitiflin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 507



View Profile
October 01, 2014, 09:45:02 PM
 #4131

Stupid (maybe not) question.

I want to update Armory, should I update Bitcoin Core as well?

You don't have to but latest core is more critical than latest armory

Thanks Smiley


       █
      ██
     ██
   ██ ██
 █ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██

       █
      ██
     ██
   ██ ██
 █ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
  B

          ▄▄▄▄▄▄
     ▄▄████████████▄▄
   ▄█████▀▀    ▀▀█████▄
  ████▀            ▀████
 ████                ████
▐███                  ███▌
███▌                  ▐███
▐███           ▄▄     ███▌
 ████         ▀███▄  ▐███
  ████▄         ▀███▄███
   ▀█████▄▄     ▄█████▀
     ▀▀████████████▀▀
          ▀▀▀▀▀▀
T 
.Better. Quick..

.Transparent....






             ▄████▄▄   ▄
█▄          ██████████▀▄
███        ███████████▀
▐████▄     ██████████▌
▄▄██████▄▄▄▄█████████▌
▀████████████████████
  ▀█████████████████
  ▄▄███████████████
   ▀█████████████▀
    ▄▄█████████▀
▀▀██████████▀
    ▀▀▀▀▀






▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████▀       ████
██████████████      ▄▄▄████
██████████████    ▐████████
██████████████    ▐████████
██████████            ▐████
██████████            █████
██████████████    ▐████████
██████████████    ▐████████
██████████████    ▐████████
▀█████████████    ▐███████▀






                   ▄▄████
              ▄▄████████▌
         ▄▄█████████▀███
    ▄▄██████████▀▀ ▄███▌
▄████████████▀▀  ▄█████
▀▀▀███████▀   ▄███████▌
      ██    ▄█████████
       █  ▄██████████▌
       █  ███████████
       █ ██▀ ▀██████▌
       ██▀     ▀████
                 ▀█▌
segeln
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 02, 2014, 11:02:55 AM
 #4132

when will 0.92.2 be out of testing?
I ask this question again
Hope I and cypherdoc get an answer
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1058



View Profile WWW
October 02, 2014, 11:06:21 AM
 #4133

when will 0.92.2 be out of testing?
I ask this question again
Hope I and cypherdoc get an answer

I don't think there's bugs so it doesn't really matter. Armory just likes to call everything testing.

justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1006



View Profile
October 02, 2014, 12:14:45 PM
 #4134

http://www.wired.com/2014/10/code-published-for-unfixable-usb-attack/

https://github.com/adamcaudill/Psychson
segeln
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 02, 2014, 12:17:00 PM
 #4135

when will 0.92.2 be out of testing?
I ask this question again
Hope I and cypherdoc get an answer

I don't think there's bugs so it doesn't really matter. Armory just likes to call everything testing.
Thanks,hope you are right
segeln
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 02, 2014, 12:24:26 PM
 #4136

are only USB sticks right from the factory affected or old used ones as well?
As I understand it,USB Sitcks in use cannot get compromised
chrisrico
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 496
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 02, 2014, 01:29:04 PM
 #4137

are only USB sticks right from the factory affected or old used ones as well?
As I understand it,USB Sitcks in use cannot get compromised

Nope, the whole reason why this is such a bad exploit is that most USB devices (not just flash drives) can have their firmware reprogrammed via software.
Perlover
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 159
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 02, 2014, 02:17:50 PM
 #4138

I don't know somebody wrote to here or not.
But i think the Armory and other programs could have a potential vulnerability.

For example what if your computer with installed Armory (watch-only wallet mode) is infected and trojan/virus which modifies a receiving address in Armory's interface? How can i trust to my online watch-only computer that all generated addresses are my addresses? What if trojan/virus modifies installed DLLs/Shared libraries of Armory and substitute watch-only generated addresses or seed to hacker things? If i will send to money to generated address how can i sure that this address is my address for private key at offline computer? :-/

What do developers think about this?
segeln
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 02, 2014, 02:58:29 PM
 #4139

are only USB sticks right from the factory affected or old used ones as well?
As I understand it,USB Sitcks in use cannot get compromised

Nope, the whole reason why this is such a bad exploit is that most USB devices (not just flash drives) can have their firmware reprogrammed via software.
that is indeed a bad exploit.
What about antimalware/antiviruses programs like Norton,kaspersky,avira.Mc affee?
Could they detect those malicious software,when they are widespread and known ?
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1006



View Profile
October 02, 2014, 03:11:35 PM
 #4140

What about antimalware/antiviruses programs like Norton,kaspersky,avira.Mc affee?
Could they detect those malicious software,when they are widespread and known ?
No.

USB firmware exploits happen outside the control of the CPU and any software that may be running on it.

For now, you should probably use CD-Rs to move unsigned transactions across the air gap discard them after each use.

There might not be any exploitable CD drive firmware vulnerabilities that can be triggered by malicious data on a disc. Maybe.
Pages: « 1 ... 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 [207] 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!