Bitcoin Forum
January 19, 2017, 04:32:21 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.2  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 [207] 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Armory - Discussion Thread  (Read 486368 times)
megashira1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 745



View Profile
September 05, 2014, 06:23:58 PM
 #4121

Hi, I recently withdrew about 5btc into my offline Armory wallet about a week ago. Transaction was completed and I could see funds sitting there. I recently restarted Armory and the funds are now missing with the transaction history missing?



try to rescan database

Problem fixed ty

Lisk.
    Develop Decentralized Applications & Sidechains in JavaScript with Lisk!
    Website | Blog | BTT Thread | Chat - Be part of the decentralized application movement!
1484800341
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1484800341

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1484800341
Reply with quote  #2

1484800341
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Wusolini
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784

Ruler of the planet Bitcoin Persei 8


View Profile
September 05, 2014, 06:31:21 PM
 #4122

Hi, I recently withdrew about 5btc into my offline Armory wallet about a week ago. Transaction was completed and I could see funds sitting there. I recently restarted Armory and the funds are now missing with the transaction history missing?

try to rescan database

Problem fixed ty

np, I had similar issue while ago  Cheesy

RustyNomad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile WWW
September 06, 2014, 02:02:15 PM
 #4123

Love Armory but will be, unfortunately, switching to Electrum today.

Been waiting now for close on an hour now for Bitcoin Core to update the last 80 odd blocks.

I'm not a frequent user meaning that I often have a couple of hundred blocks to update when I open Armory. My ISP seems to be seriously trotting P2P traffic due to torrent downloads and this seems to have a direct effect on the updating of Armory/Bitcoin Core as the updating takes ages, even if just a hundred blocks.

I understand that this is no fault attributable to Armory so actually sad as I loved it but these updates are killing me. Would love to see a Armory 'thin client' in the future even if a scaled down version used only to do quick checks.




etotheipi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2014, 03:49:01 PM
 #4124

Love Armory but will be, unfortunately, switching to Electrum today.

Been waiting now for close on an hour now for Bitcoin Core to update the last 80 odd blocks.

I'm not a frequent user meaning that I often have a couple of hundred blocks to update when I open Armory. My ISP seems to be seriously trotting P2P traffic due to torrent downloads and this seems to have a direct effect on the updating of Armory/Bitcoin Core as the updating takes ages, even if just a hundred blocks.

I understand that this is no fault attributable to Armory so actually sad as I loved it but these updates are killing me. Would love to see a Armory 'thin client' in the future even if a scaled down version used only to do quick checks.


Who knows how long it will be, but I know that Core is going to eventually implement parallel downloading of blocks.  The problem right now is that Core only downloads from one peer at a time, and if that peer happens to be slow, it takes forever.  It's an epic weakness in a program that requires handling many gigabytes of data, and they apparently have a test branch that solves it.  But I don't know how long it will be before that is released.  When they finish that, we will remove the torrent feature from Armory, as the new Core feature will essentially obsolete the benefits of a separate tor downloader (gmaxwell has written about being able to saturate his bandwidth with the new parallel downloader).  Until then, I'm not sure there's much we can do.  I appreciate that you understand it's not directly attributable to use, and maybe when they get that in there, catching up won't be so difficult anymore.

On the other hand, I just leave Armory running.  Can use File-->Minimize to keep it hidden.  It shouldn't require much in terms of resources, and then is instantly available whenever you need it.  But I understand not everyone wants to do that (or might be resource-limited)


Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc.
Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing cold storage to the average user!
Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223)

Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here!    (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)
Ente
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890



View Profile
September 07, 2014, 06:05:14 PM
 #4125

On the other hand, I just leave Armory running.  Can use File-->Minimize to keep it hidden.  It shouldn't require much in terms of resources, and then is instantly available whenever you need it.  But I understand not everyone wants to do that (or might be resource-limited)

As yet another way, I have bitcoind (of bitcoin-core) in autostart. As it itself has no GUI, I won't even see it. The blockchain is always up-to-date this way, and whenever I run Armory, it's all ready in less than a minute.
Also, that way I help the Bitcoin network with a semi-always online node (with portforwarding).

Ente
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400



View Profile WWW
September 07, 2014, 06:51:49 PM
 #4126

Until then, I'm not sure there's much we can do
You could let Armory download blocks from the node it connects to as a peer instead of requiring direct file access to the blockchain so that we aren't limited to using Armory with Bitcoin Core.
RustyNomad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile WWW
September 07, 2014, 06:54:57 PM
 #4127

Until then, I'm not sure there's much we can do.... 

Thanks for the information. I'll keep an eye open for that. I will however try what you and others suggest in keeping core/Armory running in the background and see how that goes over the next week. Seems to be the solution.
Newar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


https://gliph.me/hUF


View Profile
September 09, 2014, 05:30:47 AM
 #4128

On the other hand, I just leave Armory running.  Can use File-->Minimize to keep it hidden.  It shouldn't require much in terms of resources, and then is instantly available whenever you need it.  But I understand not everyone wants to do that (or might be resource-limited)

As yet another way, I have bitcoind (of bitcoin-core) in autostart. As it itself has no GUI, I won't even see it. The blockchain is always up-to-date this way, and whenever I run Armory, it's all ready in less than a minute.

How about a solution like amule / amuled? The daemon runs in the background and the GUI only connects when needed.
http://wiki.amule.org/wiki/FAQ_amulegui

OTC rating | GPG keyid 1DC91318EE785FDE | Gliph: lightning bicycle tree music | Mycelium, a swift & secure Bitcoin client for Android | LocalBitcoins
picobit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 547


Decor in numeris


View Profile
September 09, 2014, 08:34:18 AM
 #4129

What is the recommended offline bundle for a Raspberry Pi?  The 0.92.1 on the website; the 0.92.2-testing version posted here; or a newer version?  I plan to set up a new offline computer for long-term storage.
etotheipi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2014, 01:48:46 PM
 #4130

What is the recommended offline bundle for a Raspberry Pi?  The 0.92.1 on the website; the 0.92.2-testing version posted here; or a newer version?  I plan to set up a new offline computer for long-term storage.

For a non-OSX offline computer, it doesn't make a difference.  0.92.2 is basically just a bugfix release for OSX and some privacy issues with online computers (and will be "official" very soon)

Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc.
Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing cold storage to the average user!
Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223)

Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here!    (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)
Newar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


https://gliph.me/hUF


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 05:57:13 PM
 #4131

I think it'd be good if you made the offline version of Armory to work with Lubuntu.  As most people use older hardware for offline machines plus the latest Lubuntu 14.04 is an LTS version.  [...]

I installed on Lubuntu 14.04 (works for others too). It's not that hard to do: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=777625.0

OTC rating | GPG keyid 1DC91318EE785FDE | Gliph: lightning bicycle tree music | Mycelium, a swift & secure Bitcoin client for Android | LocalBitcoins
GodHatesFigs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 149


View Profile
September 14, 2014, 12:57:37 PM
 #4132

If I forget my encryption phrase, can I restore my wallet from an unencrypted paper backup?

BTC: 12Xd3fCWjdYfPyzpgUTXaGJQkr1w4TbeZR
Ente
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890



View Profile
September 14, 2014, 01:06:40 PM
 #4133

If I forget my encryption phrase, can I restore my wallet from an unencrypted paper backup?

Yes, that's the point! :-)
Also, I encourage everyone to at least have one unencrypted, physical paperwallet.

Ente
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


View Profile
September 17, 2014, 11:14:27 AM
 #4134

Any eta on when you will be working on hardware wallets?

btc: 3M2GmgnRKW41R3i6pfmjTUMnkuz85TcvNM | Join xbt.social for live trading advice / discussion
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372

Armory Developer


View Profile
September 17, 2014, 02:19:24 PM
 #4135

Any eta on when you will be working on hardware wallets?

Trezor support at best in the next release, that's late October/early November if everything goes according to plan.

btcarmory.com
jl2012
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


View Profile
September 18, 2014, 04:14:07 AM
 #4136

Any eta on when you will be working on hardware wallets?

Trezor support at best in the next release, that's late October/early November if everything goes according to plan.

Does it mean Armory will support the long awaited BIP32 (deterministic wallet) and 39 (Mnemonic code)? I guess it has to or it won't work with Trezor.

Donation address: 1CiZPrEJdN4FJcqdLdgVLzT8tgCXxT5ion
PGP: D3CC 1772 8600 5BB8 FF67 3294 C524 2A1A B393 6517
Bitcoin Wizards Wiki: https://8333.info/
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400



View Profile WWW
September 18, 2014, 04:16:24 AM
 #4137

Any eta on when you will be working on hardware wallets?

Trezor support at best in the next release, that's late October/early November if everything goes according to plan.

Does it mean Armory will support the long awaited BIP32 (deterministic wallet) and 39 (Mnemonic code)? I guess it has to or it won't work with Trezor.
Don't forget BIP43 and BIP44
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


View Profile
September 18, 2014, 10:58:29 AM
 #4138

Any eta on when you will be working on hardware wallets?

Trezor support at best in the next release, that's late October/early November if everything goes according to plan.

so im assuming that after trezor support is included in armory, its going to be easy to implement other hardware wallets, since the ground work has been done, am i correct?

btc: 3M2GmgnRKW41R3i6pfmjTUMnkuz85TcvNM | Join xbt.social for live trading advice / discussion
Ente
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890



View Profile
September 18, 2014, 11:11:23 AM
 #4139

Any eta on when you will be working on hardware wallets?

Trezor support at best in the next release, that's late October/early November if everything goes according to plan.

so im assuming that after trezor support is included in armory, its going to be easy to implement other hardware wallets, since the ground work has been done, am i correct?

BIP0032, 0038, 0039 are nice things. As we all are techies and most of us like it, those might become the "standard" fast. When several clients use them, other hardwarewallets likely will follow them too. Then Armory doesn't need any, or only small changes to support those future hardware-wallets.

I like!

Ente
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372

Armory Developer


View Profile
September 18, 2014, 03:22:54 PM
 #4140

so im assuming that after trezor support is included in armory, its going to be easy to implement other hardware wallets, since the ground work has been done, am i correct?

Not necessarily. There are 4 steps to integrating a hardware wallet:

1) Implement the standard. That's a one time cost, but there's no knowing which BIPs future hardware wallets will require.
2) Communication layer. With Trezor that part is overly simple (for us, we use Python on the front end), but again, no guarantee other wallets will go down that path.
3) UI integration. A portion of the Trezor code can be recycled for new wallets, but maybe not as large as we hope.
4) Unit tests. Depending on how many features the hardware wallet supports and its API, this can take its sweet time.

The good side is that we will most likely release support for these devices in the form of plugins, so it won't have to wait for a major release.

btcarmory.com
Pages: « 1 ... 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 [207] 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!