Bitcoin Forum
August 20, 2017, 04:21:17 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 [175] 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 ... 232 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Armory - Discussion Thread  (Read 508466 times)
po0kie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23


View Profile
April 01, 2014, 08:15:17 PM
 #3481

Yes it is in 0.90.99.5

But ocurred before (some days ago as far as I can remember)
1503202877
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503202877

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503202877
Reply with quote  #2

1503202877
Report to moderator
1503202877
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503202877

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503202877
Reply with quote  #2

1503202877
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582

Armory Developer


View Profile
April 01, 2014, 08:23:23 PM
 #3482

Yes it is in 0.90.99.5

But ocurred before (some days ago as far as I can remember)

Did it ever happen with 0.90? The same ledger snafu in .5 is present in .4

po0kie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23


View Profile
April 01, 2014, 08:28:24 PM
 #3483

I am using the dev-branch 0.91 since february. (and 0.90 was not really in testing mode never on my envoirement)
As now I am not sure if it ocurred since 0.90.99.5, the previous version which was deployed was 0.90.99.2
Next time I will note better this small details.  Undecided
Roy Badami
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 562


View Profile
April 06, 2014, 07:37:47 PM
 #3484

Could someone tell me where to get the signed hash for the Mac version of 0.91?  It seems to be missing from the download page.

Thanks

roy
etotheipi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
April 06, 2014, 07:41:53 PM
 #3485

Could someone tell me where to get the signed hash for the Mac version of 0.91?  It seems to be missing from the download page.

Thanks

roy

Sorry, my new release script forgot to pull it from the offline computer.  It will be posted to the website shortly.  Until then:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/bitcoinarmory-media/armory_0.91-beta_sha256.txt.asc

Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc.
Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing cold storage to the average user!
Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223)

Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here!    (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)
Roy Badami
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 562


View Profile
April 06, 2014, 08:13:59 PM
 #3486

Thanks for the quick response, Alan!  Signature and hash verify fine.

Thanks again

roy
btc123
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31


View Profile
April 07, 2014, 06:59:33 AM
 #3487

I don't see a Linux version for 0.91 yet.  Also is there any compelling reason to update Armory on my offline computer (currently running 0.90).
QuantumQrack
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 339


View Profile
April 08, 2014, 12:54:46 PM
 #3488

Do Armory users need to stop using and/or upgrade any files in regard to heartbleed?
etotheipi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
April 08, 2014, 10:35:08 PM
 #3489

Do Armory users need to stop using and/or upgrade any files in regard to heartbleed?

Nope!  Armory actually uses Crypto++, not OpenSSL.  Though even if we did, offline computers would be unaffected (as far I can tell from the little I've read about -- I've been at a conference all day and haven't had time to dig into the specifics of the heartbleed stuff).

Speaking of the conference, check this out -- I was on Bloomberg TV!

http://www.businessweek.com/videos/2014-04-07/why-are-people-so-excited-about-bitcoin

Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc.
Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing cold storage to the average user!
Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223)

Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here!    (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)
PRab
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 97


View Profile
April 09, 2014, 01:02:10 AM
 #3490

Will you be using the new announcements feature to prompt people to upgrade to 0.9.1 now that is out? I am not using any parts of Bitcoin Core that are effected and would like to see it work, so I am willing to wait a couple of days for the update.
ihaveaquestion
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 107


View Profile
April 09, 2014, 07:23:56 AM
 #3491

I downloaded the version 0.88 of Armory, and it automatically updated to "Armory 0.90-beta". It runs with BitcoinQT 0.8.6.  Would it improve my system to download Bitcoin Core?? If so, i have to uninstall completely Bitcoin QT and then download BitcoinCore, is that correct? Would Armory be affected, as it has been synchronized with BitcoinQT and not Bitcoin Core? Maybe i will have to uninstall and install again Armory?
rottenchris
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46


View Profile
April 09, 2014, 12:23:05 PM
 #3492

Hi,

the link on the armory website to the 64bit version of 0.91-beta for Ubuntu also points to the 32bit version. Maybe this should be fixed... :-)

Best,
 chris

jojo69
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770



View Profile
April 09, 2014, 05:02:30 PM
 #3493

Do Armory users need to stop using and/or upgrade any files in regard to heartbleed?

Nope!  Armory actually uses Crypto++, not OpenSSL. 

exactly the information I was looking for

thank you for the clarification

This is not some pseudoeconomic post-modern Libertarian cult, it's an un-led, crowd-sourced mega startup organized around mutual self-interest where problems, whether of the theoretical or purely practical variety, are treated as temporary and, ultimately, solvable.
Censorship of e-gold was easy. Censorship of Bitcoin will be… entertaining.
po0kie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23


View Profile
April 12, 2014, 05:09:33 PM
 #3494

Hi!

Is there some function (which I dont find at this moment in the armoryengine) where to check for a Input
if its "redeemed" or "Not yet redeemed"?

some function around which we can implement to armoryd?

(the point is we have some transactions, just a few, which are not getting to the bitcoin network, and it seems that sometimes
armoryd is spending some inputs which are not yet in the network, or at least which are not listed in the blockchain)

thats why I am asking for the redeemed and not yet redeemed funcionality.

Best regards.
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582

Armory Developer


View Profile
April 12, 2014, 05:15:50 PM
 #3495

Try the --nospendzeroconfchange switch to prevent that. Otherwise check the amount on of confirmations the transactions has, or the block it was mined in.

CircusPeanut
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123


View Profile
April 12, 2014, 05:18:03 PM
 #3496

Is there some function (which I dont find at this moment in the armoryengine) where to check for a Input
if its "redeemed" or "Not yet redeemed"?
some function around which we can implement to armoryd?
(the point is we have some transactions, just a few, which are not getting to the bitcoin network, and it seems that sometimes
armoryd is spending some inputs which are not yet in the network, or at least which are not listed in the blockchain)
thats why I am asking for the redeemed and not yet redeemed funcionality.

Look for getUnspentTxOutsForAddr160List in armoryengine\Transaction.py. There are a lot of options, and as Goat Pig mentioned you can use --nospendzeroconfchange command line argument.
po0kie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23


View Profile
April 12, 2014, 05:46:03 PM
 #3497

Ok perfect will have a look into it.

Have you already some date in prevision when to start with revision of armoryd?
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582

Armory Developer


View Profile
April 12, 2014, 06:15:37 PM
 #3498

Ok perfect will have a look into it.

Have you already some date in prevision when to start with revision of armoryd?

Sorry to say but there are 2 items in front of armoryd on the priority list currently. CircusPeanut, who maintains armoryd, is going over our unit tests right now so he won't be dealing with it yet.

The other priority is multisig, and it makes sense for us to first polish multisig and p2sh, then fix armoryd, and add multisig support with it.

shoesman
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54

ill be back


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 06:41:22 PM
 #3499

got a huge proplem , ive just upgraded to armory 0.91 and bitcoin core x64 0.91 , and armory wont detect bitcoin core x64 0.91 , hell ive tried with the 32bit version of bitcoin core 0.91 ,  same thing , armory still wont detect bitcoin core 0.91 running , all it shows is armory is offline , i really need this fixed , since i use the bitcoin-qt.exe aka the GUI version of bitcoin core to connect through tor per proxy in bitcoin-qts proxy settings and thus have

armory connect through tor as well since it uses the bitcoin-qt.exe as well usually by detecting it atleast thats how it used to work , wich is broken as of now , please fix this id appreciate it alot i need this for enhanced security

btw why is there no seperate x64 version of armory anymore , bitcoin-qt has it and the 0.88.1 version of armory had it so why not the newer builds
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582

Armory Developer


View Profile
April 13, 2014, 07:37:40 PM
 #3500

You can force the Bitcoin core installation path, going to File -> Settings

Pages: « 1 ... 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 [175] 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 ... 232 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!