Bitcoin Forum
December 04, 2016, 04:30:27 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 [197] 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Armory - Discussion Thread  (Read 481685 times)
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316

Armory Developer


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 06:20:25 PM
 #3921

Hey everyone. I have some good news and bad news. The good news is that 0.92 has been released! Smiley The bad news is that the OS X build is borked. Sad I'm looking into it and think I know what happened. In the meantime, hang tight. We'll get a corrected build out ASAP. (As far as I know, the Linux and Windows builds are fine.)

Sorry about the botched launch. I'll look into solutions to ensure that this doesn't happen again. In the meantime, I just confirmed that the 0.91.99.11 build works. You can download it from here if you can't wait. It's 0.92 minus a few very small, last-minute changes.

would this include Ubuntu versions installed within a VM on a Mac?

You shouldn't be concerned

btcarmory.com
1480869027
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480869027

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480869027
Reply with quote  #2

1480869027
Report to moderator
1480869027
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480869027

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480869027
Reply with quote  #2

1480869027
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316

Armory Developer


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 06:22:54 PM
 #3922

Hey, I've just upgraded from 0.91.2 to 0.92. All my wallets are listed normally but the Transactions list are missing transactions and Maximum and Spendable funds just displays about 30% of my funds. I've tried restarting Armory and Rescan Databases but it didn't help.

Do you think Rebuild and Rescan Databases could help?
Do I need to reimport the wallets?
How else can I troubleshoot this issue?

Thanks

Make a ticket, add your log. Verify in the bottom left corner drop down list that "all wallets" is selected.

btcarmory.com
plethora
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83



View Profile
July 29, 2014, 06:28:55 PM
 #3923


I don't think reimporting the wallets should make a difference, but it can't hurt. Note that you can reimport a wallet without deleting it. It is never necessary to delete a wallet.
I wasn't able to reimport import the wallet. Armory says that there's already a wallet with the same ID loaded and that I first need to remove it before importing it again. Once I did that I was returned to the Restore Wallet window which I had to Cancel and now it just keeps reloading all other wallets (I can see all other .watchonly.wallet files being constantly rewritten in a loop). I'll make a ticket including logs.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
July 29, 2014, 06:29:35 PM
 #3924

Hey everyone. I have some good news and bad news. The good news is that 0.92 has been released! Smiley The bad news is that the OS X build is borked. Sad I'm looking into it and think I know what happened. In the meantime, hang tight. We'll get a corrected build out ASAP. (As far as I know, the Linux and Windows builds are fine.)

Sorry about the botched launch. I'll look into solutions to ensure that this doesn't happen again. In the meantime, I just confirmed that the 0.91.99.11 build works. You can download it from here if you can't wait. It's 0.92 minus a few very small, last-minute changes.

would this include Ubuntu versions installed within a VM on a Mac?

You shouldn't be concerned

in a typical installation, should the Bitcoin Install directory be in the .armory folder and the Bitcoin Home Directory be in the home directory?
doug_armory
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 255

Senior Developer - Armory


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 06:31:42 PM
 #3925

Hey everyone. I have some good news and bad news. The good news is that 0.92 has been released! Smiley The bad news is that the OS X build is borked. Sad I'm looking into it and think I know what happened. In the meantime, hang tight. We'll get a corrected build out ASAP. (As far as I know, the Linux and Windows builds are fine.)

Sorry about the botched launch. I'll look into solutions to ensure that this doesn't happen again. In the meantime, I just confirmed that the 0.91.99.11 build works. You can download it from here if you can't wait. It's 0.92 minus a few very small, last-minute changes.

would this include Ubuntu versions installed within a VM on a Mac?

No. That should be totally fine.

If anyone's curious, the OS X issue has to do with how we build Armory. It uses a totally separate process than Linux and Windows. It usually works fine. It does occasionally fail, unfortunately. I'm looking into ways to make this a thing of the past. Unfortunately, the only surefire way would require us to add ~300 MB worth of data to the repo. I'll see if I can figure out an alternative that Alan and others can use when building. In fact, sitting here just now, I think I figured out a solution. If I choose to implement it, the solution should make build failures like this a thing of the past.

Speaking of OS X, I have some good news for everybody. Last night, I finished some code that brings notifications back to OS X, at least if you're running 10.8 or higher. The code will also change the dock icon to green when in testnet mode, like BC Core does (along with the Linux and Windows versions of Armory). I don't know when the code will be merged in but it should be relatively soon. It may also need a bit of tweaking over the coming weeks but it seems reasonably solid at the moment.

The best part is that this delivery will build a permanent bridge between Armory and the Objective-C language, which you must use to access certain OS X features. If Armory adds features that require Objective-C on OS X, feature parity should be achieved eventually. (Obviously, I won't promise anything right now. Every feature has its own set of requirements.)

Senior Developer -  Armory Technologies, Inc.
plethora
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83



View Profile
July 29, 2014, 06:37:06 PM
 #3926



Verify in the bottom left corner drop down list that "all wallets" is selected.

haha this is embarrassing  Cheesy
I've never seen that drop down before. It was set to My Wallets but didn't display all my wallets anyway. However after changing to All Wallets and then back to My Wallets again all is fine  Tongue

I'll try to import a wallet once more to see if I'll get that other issue again.
Thanks!
CircusPeanut
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123

Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 06:38:08 PM
 #3927


I don't think reimporting the wallets should make a difference, but it can't hurt. Note that you can reimport a wallet without deleting it. It is never necessary to delete a wallet.
I wasn't able to reimport import the wallet. Armory says that there's already a wallet with the same ID loaded and that I first need to remove it before importing it again. Once I did that I was returned to the Restore Wallet window which I had to Cancel and now it just keeps reloading all other wallets (I can see all other .watchonly.wallet files being constantly rewritten in a loop). I'll make a ticket including logs.

Are you sure that you are running 0.92? Only older versions of Armory ask you to remove the wallet with the same ID before restoring it.
plethora
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83



View Profile
July 29, 2014, 07:10:39 PM
 #3928

Yes, I downloaded and installed 0.92 using Armory's Secure Downloader.

CircusPeanut
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123

Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 07:26:41 PM
 #3929

Yes, I downloaded and installed 0.92 using Armory's Secure Downloader.



Hmm, we must be restoring differently...



How are you restoring the wallet?

EDIT: I see now that you must have been restoring a digital backup. I think we need to make sure that Armory gives the same response regardless of how a wallet is restored.
plethora
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83



View Profile
July 29, 2014, 07:32:17 PM
 #3930

Ah, I'm using "Import digital backup or watching-only wallet".
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400



View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 07:34:42 PM
 #3931

What would cause Armory to fail to recognize that new blocks have arrived?

In this case, bitcoind is running on a separate machine, with NFS used to share the blockchain directory and socat used to tunnel Armory's connection requests to 127.0.0.1:8333 to the appropriate interface.

Indexing the blockchain works just fine, sending transactions works just fine, and Armory does notice incoming unconfirmed transactions.

However the block count in the lower-right corner never increment, requiring a restart in order to notice that new blocks have arrived.
etotheipi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 07:41:57 PM
 #3932

What would cause Armory to fail to recognize that new blocks have arrived?

In this case, bitcoind is running on a separate machine, with NFS used to share the blockchain directory and socat used to tunnel Armory's connection requests to 127.0.0.1:8333 to the appropriate interface.

Indexing the blockchain works just fine, sending transactions works just fine, and Armory does notice incoming unconfirmed transactions.

However the block count in the lower-right corner never increment, requiring a restart in order to notice that new blocks have arrived.

It sounds like it's finding the block files fine on startup, but sees them staying the same size after that..  Armory reads new blocks by observing the last block file changing size or the creation of a new blk file.  Perhaps NFS is not allowing up to date access to that info.

Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc.
Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing cold storage to the average user!
Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223)

Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here!    (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
July 29, 2014, 08:59:45 PM
 #3933

where do i paste ".bitcoin" and it's full blockchain so that Armory will find it during a new installation?  Ubuntu within a VM on a mac os. IOW, where is the default location where Armory looks to find this?
doug_armory
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 255

Senior Developer - Armory


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 09:26:13 PM
 #3934

where do i paste ".bitcoin" and it's full blockchain so that Armory will find it during a new installation?  Ubuntu within a VM on a mac os. IOW, where is the default location where Armory looks to find this?

All info is here. In the particular case of Linux, /home/<username>/.bitcoin is where Armory looks by default.

Senior Developer -  Armory Technologies, Inc.
chrisrico
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 496


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 10:18:50 PM
 #3935

Hey everyone. I have some good news and bad news. The good news is that 0.92 has been released! Smiley The bad news is that the OS X build is borked. Sad I'm looking into it and think I know what happened. In the meantime, hang tight. We'll get a corrected build out ASAP. (As far as I know, the Linux and Windows builds are fine.)

Sorry about the botched launch. I'll look into solutions to ensure that this doesn't happen again. In the meantime, I just confirmed that the 0.91.99.11 build works. You can download it from here if you can't wait. It's 0.92 minus a few very small, last-minute changes.

I haven't tested everything but I finally upgraded my Pi to 0.92 and I can confirm it starts and the multipart backup feature works, though I think there are a couple of bugs in the install script.
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2014, 11:43:24 PM
 #3936

I'm pretty disappointed to see the criminal foundation on https://bitcoinarmory.com/donation-match-list/

disgusting

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  OpenVPN 2GB Free  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
chrisrico
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 496


View Profile
July 29, 2014, 11:48:00 PM
 #3937

I'm pretty disappointed to see the criminal foundation on https://bitcoinarmory.com/donation-match-list/

disgusting

Oh yeah, those criminals! Putting on conferences, promoting bitcoin, and providing legal guidance... what nefarious schemes will they come up with next!? Thanks for volunteering for my ignore list.
etotheipi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2014, 12:00:33 AM
 #3938

I'm pretty disappointed to see the criminal foundation on https://bitcoinarmory.com/donation-match-list/

disgusting

We support the goal/mission of the Foundation, even if there is controversy around the actual execution and transparency to achieve that goal.  We try hard to remain totally apolitical and are simply offering to match donations if others support them.  Most importantly, we really wanted to support the Core developers, and bitcoin.org insists that donations for Core development go to the Bitcoin Foundation.  I discussed with some folks on the bitcoin-dev IRC channel (including Wladimir) about other ways to contribute to Core development, but agreed that the BF is still the best way, even if it is indirect.

If people don't want to support the BF, then do not match the donations.   Even if there is a lot to dislike about them, they are still paying some core dev salaries, maintaining the website, lobbying for Bitcoin, and serve as [one] public face of Bitcoin.  They also put on a really good conference in Amsterdam that we saw as extremely positive for Bitcoin.

If no one supports them anymore, then no one will offer to match.   But if a lot of people who support us also support the BF, then we will support them, too.


Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc.
Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing cold storage to the average user!
Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223)

Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here!    (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)
etotheipi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2014, 06:28:36 AM
 #3939

Just re-released 0.92 as 0.92.1.  We tested the OSX build this time, and also found a bug in the private key sweeping just after we releasing 0.92.  Both should be resolved!  (there was nothing unsafe about 0.92, just

We don't have an automatic process to update the website, but my release scripts spit out these pretty formatted forum links.  As always, we recommend you use the secure downloader within Armory.  Use the links below if you are still running a version older than 0.91. 

Armory 0.92.1 Installers:

  Armory 0.92.1 for Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8+ (32- and 64-bit)
  Armory 0.92.1 for MacOSX 10.7+ (64bit)
  Armory 0.92.1 for Ubuntu 12.04+ (32bit)
  Armory 0.92.1 for Ubuntu 12.04+ (64bit)
  Armory 0.92.1 for RaspberryPi  (armhf)

Armory 0.92.1 Offline Bundles:
  Armory 0.92.1 Offline Bundle for Ubuntu 12.04 exact (32bit)
  Armory 0.92.1 Offline Bundle for Ubuntu 12.04 exact (64bit)
  Armory 0.92.1 Offline Bundle for RaspberryPi  (armhf)

GPG Verification Data:
  Armory 0.92.1: Signed hashes of all installers


@chrisrico:  it's a bit late to ask what went wrong with the RPi build, but whatever it was, I'll make sure it makes it into the next release.  If it's a dependency issue, I might need some help figuring it out.  If it's a script execution bug, should be easy to fix it.

Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc.
Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing cold storage to the average user!
Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223)

Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here!    (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)
picobit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 547


Decor in numeris


View Profile
July 30, 2014, 07:55:42 AM
 #3940

Just re-released 0.92 as 0.92.1. 

Do I understand correctly that upgrading from 0.91 would require upgrading the offline wallets too?  If that is the case, please put a warning on the website, upgrading the offline Armory may be significant work depending on the setup.  I for one plan to wait till the dust has settled.  I know that no new changes are expected in the communication protocol, but there will probably be many bug fixes.
Pages: « 1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 [197] 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!