Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2018, 06:33:59 PM
 News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 Home Help Search Donate Login Register
 Pages: 1 ... 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 [158] 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 ... 232
justusranvier
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1006

 January 13, 2014, 07:16:38 PM

Is connecting to a non-local bitcoind something that's coming soon?

Not any time soon, but possibly
Note that what I really want to do is run Armory with btcd instead of bitcoind.

Doesn't work now though because they use a different blockchain database format.

If you made Armory without direct file access to the blockchain then I presume it would no longer care whether or not the peer it's talking to is the reference implementation or not, but if it would be easier to make Armory understand btcd's "entire-blockchain-in-leveldb" format that would be great too.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
plethora
Member

Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 10

 January 14, 2014, 09:07:30 PM

I had Armory running today and got tons of error messages about clicking a "bitcoin: link" when stopping the screensaver. I didn't touch the keyboard or mouse for hours so I haven't clicked any links. I also had Firefox open on bitcoinwisdom.com, code.google.com and a couple of other pages. Not sure what this is about but no coins are missing of course  I don't have any NSPlayer installed that I know of. Just wanted to let you know and be aware about it.

Logs:
Quote
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br> Z     6,         :                4           (CONNECT_DATA=(COMMAND=version))
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>      MMS                       N S P l a y e r / 9 . 0 . 0 . 2 9 8 0 ;   { 0 0 0 0 A A 0 0 - 0 A 0 0 - 0 0 a 0 - A A 0 A - 0 0 0 0 A 0 A A 0 A A 0 }   m_
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>:   /     @  =            /         @
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>DmdT           
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>  
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>TNMP   TNME  
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>0 
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>default

2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>l
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>   SMBr    @              @    PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0 MICROSOFT NETWORKS 1.03 MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0 LANMAN1.0 LM1.2X002 Samba NT LANMAN 1.0 NT LM 0.12
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>  S  O ?G,~ {Ֆw<=on  (  
f   e d c b a `           
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>HELP

2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>   
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>          versionbind   
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>  (r          |
2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>OPTIONS / RTSP/1.0

2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>OPTIONS / HTTP/1.0

2014-01-14 16:54 (ERROR) -- ArmoryQt.py:1577 - It looks like you just clicked a "bitcoin:" link, but that link is malformed.  The raw URI string is:<br><br>GET / HTTP/1.0

goatpig
Moderator
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1096

Armory Developer

 January 14, 2014, 09:24:55 PM

This is pretty weird, it looks like it is catching non bitcoin: URIs for some reason. Gotta investigate.

omegaflare
Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 345
Merit: 250

 January 16, 2014, 06:55:18 AM

Every time I tried to send bitcoins, Armory crashes and it's rampant. Seriously, when are you going to fix it?! And every time it crash, it takes 20 minutes for bitcoin to scan transaction history - it's a fuking waste of time.

goatpig
Moderator
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1096

Armory Developer

 January 16, 2014, 07:00:28 AM

Every time I tried to send bitcoins, Armory crashes and it's rampant. Seriously, when are you going to fix it?! And every time it crash, it takes 20 minutes for bitcoin to scan transaction history - it's a fuking waste of time.

Are you using an older version of Armory that you create offline transactions from? The rescan on crash is fixed for 0.91

omegaflare
Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 345
Merit: 250

 January 16, 2014, 07:06:31 AM

========================================

Version 0.90-beta for Windows Vista, 7, 8 (Both 32- and 64-bit)
Version 0.90-beta: Signed hashes of all installers .  Verify against our offline signing key (098832223).
[for WindowsXP, use 0.88.1-beta or wait for the 0.91-beta release]
In addition to the first-time Bitcoin-Qt/bitcoind synchronization step, Armory will also build its own set of databases the first time.   This will take between 30 min and 3 hours depending on your system.  It is recommended you do not interrupt this step.  After it completes, subsequent loads of Armory will usually be under 30 seconds.

=========================================

omegaflare
Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 345
Merit: 250

 January 16, 2014, 07:14:33 AM

Every time I tried to send bitcoins, Armory crashes and it's rampant. Seriously, when are you going to fix it?! And every time it crash, it takes 20 minutes for bitcoin to scan transaction history - it's a fuking waste of time.

Are you using an older version of Armory that you create offline transactions from? The rescan on crash is fixed for 0.91

You need to address your issue with software update.. it's taking too long.

goatpig
Moderator
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1096

Armory Developer

 January 16, 2014, 08:04:14 AM

You need to address your issue with software update.. it's taking too long.

That's in the 0.91-dev branch on github. Still a few weeks until we release this officially. The team is in the process of fixing the known comon bugs in this branch.

bitpop
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1022

https://keybase.io/bitpop

 January 16, 2014, 08:42:19 AM

Every time I tried to send bitcoins, Armory crashes and it's rampant. Seriously, when are you going to fix it?! And every time it crash, it takes 20 minutes for bitcoin to scan transaction history - it's a fuking waste of time.

Are you using an older version of Armory that you create offline transactions from? The rescan on crash is fixed for 0.91

You need to address your issue with software update.. it's taking too long.

Maybe you should donate

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJu
Full Member

Offline

Activity: 164
Merit: 100

Im not 1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJusN455paPH

 January 16, 2014, 11:10:32 AM

Has anyone successful changed Armory's appdata path on windows?

"If you do this, then you will need to start Armory with the exact same path in satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location."

"satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location" : ignores the path and scans the db to default
"-satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location" : error: ArmoryQt.exe: error: no such option: -s

bitpop
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1022

https://keybase.io/bitpop

 January 16, 2014, 11:25:48 AM

Has anyone successful changed Armory's appdata path on windows?

"If you do this, then you will need to start Armory with the exact same path in satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location."

"satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location" : ignores the path and scans the db to default
"-satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location" : error: ArmoryQt.exe: error: no such option: -s

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJu
Full Member

Offline

Activity: 164
Merit: 100

Im not 1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJusN455paPH

 January 16, 2014, 11:49:45 AM

Has anyone successful changed Armory's appdata path on windows?

"If you do this, then you will need to start Armory with the exact same path in satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location."

"satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location" : ignores the path and scans the db to default
"-satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location" : error: ArmoryQt.exe: error: no such option: -s

This worked.
bitpop
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1022

https://keybase.io/bitpop

 January 16, 2014, 12:46:50 PM

Has anyone successful changed Armory's appdata path on windows?

"If you do this, then you will need to start Armory with the exact same path in satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location."

"satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location" : ignores the path and scans the db to default
"-satoshi-datadir=C:\path\to\new\location" : error: ArmoryQt.exe: error: no such option: -s

This worked.

Thanks, the docs are fucked up. No clue where I even learned that.

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1096

Armory Developer

 January 16, 2014, 06:35:19 PM

https://github.com/etotheipi/BitcoinArmory/blob/0.91-dev/armoryengine/ArmoryUtils.py#L45

You can see all the current active (and unactive) command line args here, with their associated help comments.

bitpop
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1022

https://keybase.io/bitpop

 January 17, 2014, 12:27:07 AM

https://github.com/etotheipi/BitcoinArmory/blob/0.91-dev/armoryengine/ArmoryUtils.py#L45

You can see all the current active (and unactive) command line args here, with their associated help comments.

Perfect

So there's 3 directories to be aware of.
And 3 connections, files, peer and rpc.

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
QuantumQrack
Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 339
Merit: 250

 January 17, 2014, 02:16:47 PM

So, I know the Armory developers are working on Trezor integration, etc.  But I was wondering if stealth addresses and CoinJoin via the Armory client are in any sort of planning stage?  Rather than doing these things manually, which is a hassle, it would be nice if it was EZ button type of implementation.

Appreciate all the hard work on Armory!
bitpop
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1022

https://keybase.io/bitpop

 January 17, 2014, 02:39:35 PM

So, I know the Armory developers are working on Trezor integration, etc.  But I was wondering if stealth addresses and CoinJoin via the Armory client are in any sort of planning stage?  Rather than doing these things manually, which is a hassle, it would be nice if it was EZ button type of implementation.

Appreciate all the hard work on Armory!

Coinjoin requires networking code which they avoid.

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
Peter Todd
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000

 January 18, 2014, 12:41:44 AM

So, I know the Armory developers are working on Trezor integration, etc.  But I was wondering if stealth addresses and CoinJoin via the Armory client are in any sort of planning stage?  Rather than doing these things manually, which is a hassle, it would be nice if it was EZ button type of implementation.

Appreciate all the hard work on Armory!

I can't speak for the Armory devs, but one nice thing about implementing stealth addresses in Armory is that it already has the machinery to scan the blockchain; you could easily use stealth at the highest privacy level where any stealth tx that's sent could be going to you. (zero-filtering)

It's something to consider about Armory in general: because it can work so easily with a local full-node you always have excellent privacy with regard to the contents of your wallet. All the queries are local, so info on what coins are in your wallet never leaves your machine. That's much better than SPV clients like Android Wallet where every peer you connect to learns statistical info narrowing down your addresses to within about one in 10,000 or so, or Electrum which currently just tells peers what addresses are in your wallet.

Anyway, as something I myself would use, I'll offer a 1BTC bounty to get stealth address support in Armory. Contact me if you're interested in making it happen and we'll work out the specifics between myself and the Armory devs. (they're eligible too of course)

etotheipi
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001

Core Armory Developer

 January 18, 2014, 01:00:22 AM

So, I know the Armory developers are working on Trezor integration, etc.  But I was wondering if stealth addresses and CoinJoin via the Armory client are in any sort of planning stage?  Rather than doing these things manually, which is a hassle, it would be nice if it was EZ button type of implementation.

Appreciate all the hard work on Armory!

I can't speak for the Armory devs, but one nice thing about implementing stealth addresses in Armory is that it already has the machinery to scan the blockchain; you could easily use stealth at the highest privacy level where any stealth tx that's sent could be going to you. (zero-filtering)

It's something to consider about Armory in general: because it can work so easily with a local full-node you always have excellent privacy with regard to the contents of your wallet. All the queries are local, so info on what coins are in your wallet never leaves your machine. That's much better than SPV clients like Android Wallet where every peer you connect to learns statistical info narrowing down your addresses to within about one in 10,000 or so, or Electrum which currently just tells peers what addresses are in your wallet.

I'm very interested in this feature.  It's just that it still sounds very theoretical at the moment.  I'm also concerned about how much computation it will be to track the addresses ... ECDH calculations aren't cheap.  I guess I'm still in a waiting mode, implementing other things while I wait for this to be ironed out (I don't have much to contribute to the discussion, though I have spent a lot of time thinking about how to get the same benefits without all the ECDH calcs).

Peter:  Btw, I'm working on P2SH support right now.  You will be able to test it on 0.91-dev in the next couple days.  In fact, it seems to be working right now, on the p2shout branch -- you can try it right now, though I wouldn't do anything other than testnet.

As part of the update, I modified the PyTxDistProposal::createFromTxOutSelection() method to take any arbitrary list of script-value pairs, instead of just hash160 values.  Right now, it will error out if you supply it something other than an P2PubKeyHash or P2SH, but that could be modified locally to create a tx with any arbitrary output scripts.  As long as all the inputs are standard UTXOs, you can create such a tx and sign it no problem (have fun getting it mined, though).

Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc.
Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing cold storage to the average user!
Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223)

Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here!    (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)
po0kie
Newbie

Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0

 January 20, 2014, 11:19:08 AM

Hi!

First of all: Amazing work done by Armory Dev's!

I am working with the Daemon (extending it at moment to support Tx Offline Signing, and Broadcasting)

And i got a Little problem at the moment, maybe some of the Devs can point me to the right direction to get it working.

The Broadcast is nearly ready to use in ArmoryD, the problem I got is:
New Transaction Requests  over the same SourceAddress  of the previous Tx  will fail until the BDM gets notified about Confirmations
from BitcoinD.

Its like he want to spent the same TxInputs and then the Tx will fail in Broadcast. I saw  ArmoryQT  maintaining a combinedLedger.
(appending ZeroConf Ledger Entries to the combinedLedger)
But I have not see any relation to the BDM with the combinedLedger (maybe i am missing something, Its the first Project i am touching python.)

Or How ArmoryQT get it working to not fail on next Txs when the previous Txs isnt already +1 Confirmation?
It seems to me that ArmoryQt makes in some way a manual sync to be able to realize a next TX.

Any point to direct me where I can follow the needs?

Thanks!

 Pages: 1 ... 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 [158] 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 ... 232
 « previous topic next topic »