Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2016, 08:39:16 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 [195] 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Armory - Discussion Thread  (Read 481814 times)
Searinox
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100

Do you like fire? I'm full of it.


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 07:57:38 AM
 #3881

Where is version 0.9.2? The changelog page says yesterday it was released. https://bitcoinarmory.com/download/changelog-versions/
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480927156
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480927156

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480927156
Reply with quote  #2

1480927156
Report to moderator
1480927156
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480927156

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480927156
Reply with quote  #2

1480927156
Report to moderator
1480927156
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480927156

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480927156
Reply with quote  #2

1480927156
Report to moderator
plethora
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 10:13:56 AM
 #3882

How about Sean's Outpost?
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 02:53:32 PM
 #3883

Quote
Here's some ideas:

    Bitcoin Foundation
    Electronic Frontier Foundation
    Let's Talk Bitcoin webcast (Adam Levine, et al)
    XKCD Web Comic  (not exactly a charity, but who doesn't love his work? http://xkcd.com/538/)
    Cryptocat
    Freenet
    LibreOffice
    Linux Mint (this is my primary OS, so I'm a bit biased towards them!)
    The Tor project

Open Transactions. http://opentransactions.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page

doug_armory
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 255

Senior Developer - Armory


View Profile WWW
July 17, 2014, 06:53:38 PM
 #3884

Hello. Just curious, what would you all like to see in the next version of Armory (0.93, although the exact number could change)? We have a lot of things we're working on. We also have a little free time when we like to think of cool stuff that users might like. Here's a small, incomplete list of features I'm considering including in 0.93. I know others are planning to work on things like the "Dust-B-Gone" plugin, so please don't consider this to be a comprehensive list. Wink

-Further armoryd improvements (exact list TBD).
-Restore notifications to OS X. If only you knew the hoops I'll have to jump through to make such a simple feature happen....
-Fix a cosmetic bug where, when Armory starts in testnet mode, the dock icon doesn't turn green. (This is, believe it or not, tied to the notification feature.)
-Upgrade the OS X build to be high-resolution (i.e., "Retina") capable.
-Get Armory to the point where it builds cleanly on Yosemite, unlike the shaky house of cards it is right now. This may take awhile but hopefully the most painful changes (e.g., the long-in-the-making Qt stability patch I just added) were made during the 10.8 -> 10.9 transition.

Thanks for all your support!

Senior Developer -  Armory Technologies, Inc.
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 07:15:56 PM
 #3885

Extended character set on the passphrase entry software keyboard

Vires in numeris
TimS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247


View Profile WWW
July 17, 2014, 08:33:21 PM
 #3886

Hello. Just curious, what would you all like to see in the next version of Armory (0.93, although the exact number could change)? We have a lot of things we're working on. We also have a little free time when we like to think of cool stuff that users might like.
A way to hide addresses that have been generated. I tend to play around with my Bitcoin stuff without actually using the addresses generated, which ends up making a lot of addresses that will always have 0 tx, unless I do something semi-manual with them. I see a way to generate more addresses, but not a way to "un"generate addresses (I know there's a cache of ~100 more than are shown, and I don't mind those being there...I just don't want irrelevant addresses to be shown, taking up space).
"Un"generated addresses would be returned to the pool in their location, so the next time Armory needs to generate an address, it may pick one of these addresses.
(sure it's minor, but it's something that would add to the friendliness of the app, IMO)
Only downside I see is that it's a bit easier to reduce anonymity by reusing an address...but this only matters if anyone else is ever sending money to the address.
etotheipi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
July 17, 2014, 09:32:42 PM
 #3887

Hello. Just curious, what would you all like to see in the next version of Armory (0.93, although the exact number could change)? We have a lot of things we're working on. We also have a little free time when we like to think of cool stuff that users might like.
A way to hide addresses that have been generated. I tend to play around with my Bitcoin stuff without actually using the addresses generated, which ends up making a lot of addresses that will always have 0 tx, unless I do something semi-manual with them. I see a way to generate more addresses, but not a way to "un"generate addresses (I know there's a cache of ~100 more than are shown, and I don't mind those being there...I just don't want irrelevant addresses to be shown, taking up space).
"Un"generated addresses would be returned to the pool in their location, so the next time Armory needs to generate an address, it may pick one of these addresses.
(sure it's minor, but it's something that would add to the friendliness of the app, IMO)
Only downside I see is that it's a bit easier to reduce anonymity by reusing an address...but this only matters if anyone else is ever sending money to the address.

There is a "hide unused" button when in the wallet properties window.  That at least will hide them from view when browsing, though it doesn't actually change anything internally.  Since there is no limit on the number of addresses you can generate deterministically, we have no reason to complicate the interface by trying to allow the user to specify certain addresses to "suppliable" again with the "Receive Bitcoins" button.  No extra work for the user, and they are guaranteed a fresh address every time.  If you want to use one of those old addresses, then next time you need it, go to one of those unused addresses and right-click-copy it to the payer. 

Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc.
Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing cold storage to the average user!
Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223)

Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here!    (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)
TimS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247


View Profile WWW
July 17, 2014, 11:05:55 PM
 #3888

Hello. Just curious, what would you all like to see in the next version of Armory (0.93, although the exact number could change)? We have a lot of things we're working on. We also have a little free time when we like to think of cool stuff that users might like.
A way to hide addresses that have been generated. I tend to play around with my Bitcoin stuff without actually using the addresses generated, which ends up making a lot of addresses that will always have 0 tx, unless I do something semi-manual with them. I see a way to generate more addresses, but not a way to "un"generate addresses (I know there's a cache of ~100 more than are shown, and I don't mind those being there...I just don't want irrelevant addresses to be shown, taking up space).
"Un"generated addresses would be returned to the pool in their location, so the next time Armory needs to generate an address, it may pick one of these addresses.
(sure it's minor, but it's something that would add to the friendliness of the app, IMO)
Only downside I see is that it's a bit easier to reduce anonymity by reusing an address...but this only matters if anyone else is ever sending money to the address.

There is a "hide unused" button when in the wallet properties window.  That at least will hide them from view when browsing, though it doesn't actually change anything internally.  Since there is no limit on the number of addresses you can generate deterministically, we have no reason to complicate the interface by trying to allow the user to specify certain addresses to "suppliable" again with the "Receive Bitcoins" button.  No extra work for the user, and they are guaranteed a fresh address every time.  If you want to use one of those old addresses, then next time you need it, go to one of those unused addresses and right-click-copy it to the payer. 
I suppose that's good enough, although there's a part of me that will be bothered by the nonsequential numbers. I knew I must've been missing something simple.
helgabutters
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
July 18, 2014, 10:20:11 PM
 #3889

Just a few things I thought of that I'd like to see.

-Allow other denominations besides just BTC (mbit, bit, etc)
-Enable the "Add this wallet to the ignore list" feature. I see it is there but just not enabled (unless there is some configuration I'm missing).
-If possible, a way to query specific blocks / information in the blockchain. This would be really nice to check transactions without needing to go out to a third party such as blockchain.info
-A way to view the priority of a transaction you would be sending. Idealy it would give a notice if the priority is high enough that the transaction can be sent with no fee
helgabutters
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
July 19, 2014, 02:20:59 AM
 #3890

-Ability to send from multiple wallets at once with full coin control.
-Addition column in the transactions where you can put in the cost at the time. It would be even better if this could be extended to automatically calculate the price based on the coinbase price at the time. This would help a lot for taxes.
plethora
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83



View Profile
July 19, 2014, 10:15:09 AM
 #3891

I'd like to see an address book. I'm often sending bitcoin to a couple of addresses and currently I have to look them up every time. These are Mycelium Android wallets so they use the same address for every transaction.
Muhammed Zakir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


Bit-x.com - Fast & Easy Trade with Low Fees!


View Profile WWW
July 19, 2014, 10:26:37 AM
 #3892

I'd like to see an address book. I'm often sending bitcoin to a couple of addresses and currently I have to look them up every time. These are Mycelium Android wallets so they use the same address for every transaction.

That would be great. So that we can see most frequently used addresses. Till it come, you can add 'a' in front of the label, so that it can be seen very easily. Smiley
Kindly,
          MZ

bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
July 19, 2014, 11:34:36 AM
 #3893

Wow I never noticed there's no address book

It's bad practice though, always get it again and check the last few digits

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  OpenVPN 2GB Free  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
idoB
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
July 19, 2014, 05:17:21 PM
 #3894

If I have signed a transaction on an offline computer - can I take the signed file and broadcast it from any Armory installation that's online, or must it be from the one that initiated the transaction?

doug_armory
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 255

Senior Developer - Armory


View Profile WWW
July 19, 2014, 05:35:21 PM
 #3895

If I have signed a transaction on an offline computer - can I take the signed file and broadcast it from any Armory installation that's online, or must it be from the one that initiated the transaction?

AFAIK, any online Armory can broadcast it, although it may tell you it doesn't control the accompanying public key and then ask if you want to proceed. Somebody else will have to confirm.

Senior Developer -  Armory Technologies, Inc.
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316

Armory Developer


View Profile
July 19, 2014, 10:37:10 PM
 #3896

If I have signed a transaction on an offline computer - can I take the signed file and broadcast it from any Armory installation that's online, or must it be from the one that initiated the transaction?

AFAIK, any online Armory can broadcast it, although it may tell you it doesn't control the accompanying public key and then ask if you want to proceed. Somebody else will have to confirm.

My understanding is that to broadcast the signed tx, you need to load Armory with at least a WO copy of the corresponding wallet

btcarmory.com
idoB
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 12:12:41 PM
 #3897



My understanding is that to broadcast the signed tx, you need to load Armory with at least a WO copy of the corresponding wallet

Why is a WO copy of the corresponding wallet needed? Isn't it identical to a situation where I have a signed check and I can cash it in any branch? Is it security related?
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
July 20, 2014, 12:19:48 PM
 #3898



My understanding is that to broadcast the signed tx, you need to load Armory with at least a WO copy of the corresponding wallet

Why is a WO copy of the corresponding wallet needed? Isn't it identical to a situation where I have a signed check and I can cash it in any branch? Is it security related?


I'm guessing because the inputs must be pre scanned to make sure they're still valid

Why don't you just export as raw and broadcast on blockchain

Safe even on the most infected computer

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  OpenVPN 2GB Free  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
TimS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247


View Profile WWW
July 20, 2014, 12:27:05 PM
 #3899

I'm guessing because the inputs must be pre scanned to make sure they're still valid
That shouldn't be a good reason. Validating the inputs is done by every node as it's transmitted across the network. This is why Bitcoin Core has a UTXO database and the gettxout command: so you can check if it's possible to spend a txout for any address - including those you aren't particularly following.
etotheipi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
July 20, 2014, 01:25:25 PM
 #3900

I'm guessing because the inputs must be pre scanned to make sure they're still valid
That shouldn't be a good reason. Validating the inputs is done by every node as it's transmitted across the network. This is why Bitcoin Core has a UTXO database and the gettxout command: so you can check if it's possible to spend a txout for any address - including those you aren't particularly following.

FYI, I think .11 has a fix that allows you to load, review, and broadcast any Armory transaction regardless of its relationship to your wallets.  Use the offline transactions if it's an Armory sigcollect block, or Tools->Broadcast Raw Tx if it's a regular hex transaction.

Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc.
Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing cold storage to the average user!
Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223)

Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here!    (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)
Pages: « 1 ... 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 [195] 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!