Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[BogdanCo]

Hi community!

Please help me yo understand what am i doing wrong.

I decided to lower powereat of my rig. Before everything CM 14.7 shows something like 90W GPU power consumption. Totoal about 360 on 4 GPUs rig. Okey. Wattmeter show 620 Watt at the wall. 1st WTF.
After a lot of work and experiments i managed to lower core and memory waltages to about 850 , lowered mem clock and etc. Now CM shows 55-57 watt per GPU , it suits info that shows HWinfo about GPU chip power ( so lets say in miner should be "GPU chip power consumption"). BUT...... WTF at the wattmerer i see almost the same 600 Watt , in miner i see "Total GPUs power consumption: 225 Watts"

Where Am i wrong ?

Best Regards.

you should not expect to see proper power consumption numbers from software especially on AMD.

sorry, didin said cards type - rx 470 4g.  Isnt it a little to big power  consumption for only 4 cards and other suff ? i suppose 4*90=360+60 the rest+*1.1 PSU not efficiensy = 430 Watt.
It seems something wrong going on

You forgot to add the fan's of the video cards. In every software they are showing you the GPU consumption, but you have to add 30-50 W for the fans / each GPU. Now if you do the math again, it's there ~ 600W. A good kill-a-watt is never wrong

Well, your calcs is a little wrong. As written on each fan it consumes 12DC 0.5 A , so its 6 W each fan *3 fans = 18 Watt , on 4 GPUs rig it'll be about 80watt more to whole power eating. So its not 600 Watt overall.  There is something i miss.

Ok, 80+360 = 440 then you have CPU, then you have fan of the CPU, then you have RAM, MB and so on.... all these things burn around 80 W, more or less depending the settings, temperature, etc... and now comes the naysayers telling me it's not 80W.
I agree, you can fine tune it and maybe squeeze 50W or so but you will see it's not stable.

[1715184619]

1715184619

[Ursul0]

Hi community!

Please help me yo understand what am i doing wrong.

I decided to lower powereat of my rig. Before everything CM 14.7 shows something like 90W GPU power consumption. Totoal about 360 on 4 GPUs rig. Okey. Wattmeter show 620 Watt at the wall. 1st WTF.
After a lot of work and experiments i managed to lower core and memory waltages to about 850 , lowered mem clock and etc. Now CM shows 55-57 watt per GPU , it suits info that shows HWinfo about GPU chip power ( so lets say in miner should be "GPU chip power consumption"). BUT...... WTF at the wattmerer i see almost the same 600 Watt , in miner i see "Total GPUs power consumption: 225 Watts"

Where Am i wrong ?

Best Regards.

you should not expect to see proper power consumption numbers from software especially on AMD.

sorry, didin said cards type - rx 470 4g.  Isnt it a little to big power  consumption for only 4 cards and other suff ? i suppose 4*90=360+60 the rest+*1.1 PSU not efficiensy = 430 Watt.
It seems something wrong going on

running at around 850mv and producing 28-30MH (1090-1160MHz core and around 2000 mem) it should be consuming 120-125W per GPU. Also the system should bot be above 60W and could be as low as 20-30W if its 14nm, so your total should be about 540-550W. Use HWinfo to see what are the actual voltages and clocks applied
EDIT: 30W for the system if it's 14nm celeron

[RAKOT]

Hello people! Thank everyone for sharing thoughts and info. I think its more like the real power consumption is at 550W like Ursul0 said. Lowered to 850 mV 1100/2000 clocks eats 110 around each card. Plus 60-70 W the rest of rig. So, 110*4+70= 510. Correct it with 80 bronze PSU and vuala, its 560Watt. F.k , i dreamed to tune money saving rig .
For decide isnt wattmeter not lieing me,i ve measured the current on power cable and saw 2.47 A , well, 2.47*230= 568 Watt.
Thats it.
Again , thanks a lot.


P.S. maybe it make sense to look at 1066 ? I meen to save money on power cost ?

[dragonmike]

@claymore
Man i can't wait for you to update something on the XT.
On the edge of our seats man!

New version with Navi cards support is ready, I will release it when AMD releases DAG-fix drivers, it will be soon.

Wonder when soon is soon. If it's SQRL-style SoonTM we're gonna have to be patient... Veeeeery patient!

[NefariousFool]

.......
For RX570's with Hynix in Windows environment - i suggest running this

-eres 1 -mode 2 -asm 2 -rxboost 21 -POL8H1@2200 -mvddc 875 -cclock 1200 -mvddc 880 -lidag 2
.........

what?

-eres 1 -mode 2 -asm 2 -rxboost 21 -POL8H1@2200 -mvddc 875 -cclock 1200 -cvddc 880 -lidag 2

second one should be a cvddc sorry typo

And what about the Micron? Also is this for the 4gb or 8gb?

I've been doing this for my 8gb Micron and get ~27.5 @ 88w:
Core 1000
Memory 2000
mvddc 900
cvddc 900

My Hynix gets ~27.4 @ 84w

If I'm not mistaken...
Micron you set to strap 3
Hynix you set to strap 1
... for an extra ~5% more.

The user was asking about Hynix.
This is the chart for how the strap work with each memory

Strap 1 - hynix
Strap 2 - Samsung
Strap 3 - Micron / Elpida

Depending on lottery
Strap 4 - Hynix
Strap 5 - Samsung / Micron / Elpida
Strap 6 - * in 14.6 worked with micron and elpida but starting in 14.7 this errors.


Regadless of the RAM 4 or 8 GB the strap doesn't matter, its about the memory type not the size of the memory.


At core 1000 and memory 2000 you are WAY over voltaging your cards at 900 you can push that all the way down to 835 if not even  825 and sae yourself about 6 to 8 watts.

[Binary100100]

.......
For RX570's with Hynix in Windows environment - i suggest running this

-eres 1 -mode 2 -asm 2 -rxboost 21 -POL8H1@2200 -mvddc 875 -cclock 1200 -mvddc 880 -lidag 2
.........

what?

-eres 1 -mode 2 -asm 2 -rxboost 21 -POL8H1@2200 -mvddc 875 -cclock 1200 -cvddc 880 -lidag 2

second one should be a cvddc sorry typo

And what about the Micron? Also is this for the 4gb or 8gb?

I've been doing this for my 8gb Micron and get ~27.5 @ 88w:
Core 1000
Memory 2000
mvddc 900
cvddc 900

My Hynix gets ~27.4 @ 84w

If I'm not mistaken...
Micron you set to strap 3
Hynix you set to strap 1
... for an extra ~5% more.

The user was asking about Hynix.
This is the chart for how the strap work with each memory

Strap 1 - hynix
Strap 2 - Samsung
Strap 3 - Micron / Elpida

Depending on lottery
Strap 4 - Hynix
Strap 5 - Samsung / Micron / Elpida
Strap 6 - * in 14.6 worked with micron and elpida but starting in 14.7 this errors.


Regadless of the RAM 4 or 8 GB the strap doesn't matter, its about the memory type not the size of the memory.


At core 1000 and memory 2000 you are WAY over voltaging your cards at 900 you can push that all the way down to 835 if not even  825 and sae yourself about 6 to 8 watts.

Thanks for the tip!

I had tried 850 and it would run for about an hour and then crash. Not sure what's going on. Is that for the memory, core or both?
But I have four of each card (Hynix and Micron) so perhaps I can try strap 4 and 5 instead of 1 and 3 with 850 again.

EDIT:
You know what... I bet that it's because I have my powerlimit at -20%. I'll try removing that and set my voltage to 825 and see if that makes much difference.

[UnclWish]

Regadless of the RAM 4 or 8 GB the strap doesn't matter, its about the memory type not the size of the memory.

It's not good, cause hynix 4Gb is AJR memory, but 8Gb - MJR memory. Both types needs it's own straps.

[Binary100100]

Regadless of the RAM 4 or 8 GB the strap doesn't matter, its about the memory type not the size of the memory.

It's not good, cause hynix 4Gb is AJR memory, but 8Gb - MJR memory. Both types needs it's own straps.

Hmm.
Okay. So which would be appropriate for 8gb Hynix and 8gb Micron? (RX 570)

[NefariousFool]

Regadless of the RAM 4 or 8 GB the strap doesn't matter, its about the memory type not the size of the memory.

It's not good, cause hynix 4Gb is AJR memory, but 8Gb - MJR memory. Both types needs it's own straps.

AND yet...
 -etha 1 -asm 2 -y compute -mode 2 -estale 1 -showdiff 1 -ftime 10 -rxboost 21 -strap POL4E3@2190,POL8M2@2215,POL8H1@2215,POL8H1@2200,POL8H1@2250 -mvddc 900 -cclock 1215,1300,1250,1235,1235 -cvddc 900 -estale 1 -mode 1 -lidag 3

is the following results...

AMD Cards available: 5
GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 4096 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 1:0:0)
GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #1: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 590 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 2:0:0)
GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #2: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 8192 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 4:0:0)
GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #3: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 5:0:0)
GPU #3 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #4: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 6:0:0)
GPU #4 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
POOL/SOLO version

GPU# 0 strap "POL4E3" is applied successfully, mclock 2190MHz
GPU# 0 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 1 strap "POL8M2" is applied successfully, mclock 2215MHz
GPU# 1 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 2 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2215MHz
GPU# 2 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 3 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2200MHz
GPU# 3 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 4 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2250MHz
GPU# 4 -rxboost option is applied successfully

ETH: GPU0 33.125 Mh/s, GPU1 33.531 Mh/s, GPU2 33.381 Mh/s, GPU3 33.120 Mh/s, GPU4 33.531 Mh/s
GPU0 t=58C fan=59% P=68W, GPU1 t=49C fan=45% P=89W, GPU2 t=55C fan=49% P=76W, GPU3 t=53C fan=49% P=99W, GPU4 t=54C fan=39% P=71W

AND....
-mode 1 -asm 2 -estale 1 -showdiff 1 -gser 2 -etha 1 -rxboost 15,21 -strap POL8M2@2115,POL8H1@2150,POL4H1@2075,POL8S2@2150,POL8H4@2100 -mvddc 875 -cclock 1250 -cvddc 900 -lidag 3
Nets the following....

23:11:45:269   2308   AMD Cards available: 5
23:11:45:269   2308   GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 1:0:0)
23:11:45:270   2308   GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:271   2308   GPU #1: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 5:0:0)
23:11:45:279   2308   GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:280   2308   GPU #2: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 4096 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 6:0:0)
23:11:45:295   2308   GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:299   2308   GPU #3: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 7:0:0)
23:11:45:300   2308   GPU #3 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:301   2308   GPU #4: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 8:0:0)
23:11:45:301   2308   GPU #4 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:302   2308   POOL/SOLO version

23:11:50:932   2308   GPU# 0 strap "POL8M2" is applied successfully, mclock 2115MHz
23:11:50:959   2308   GPU# 0 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:054   2308   GPU# 1 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2150MHz
23:11:51:092   2308   GPU# 1 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:189   2308   GPU# 2 strap "POL4H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2075MHz
23:11:51:199   2308   GPU# 2 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:305   2308   GPU# 3 strap "POL8S2" is applied successfully, mclock 2150MHz
23:11:51:315   2308   GPU# 3 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:413   2308   GPU# 4 strap "POL8H4" is applied successfully, mclock 2100MHz
23:11:51:421   2308   GPU# 4 -rxboost option is applied successfully

13:26:36:944   1550   ETH - Total Speed: 161.160 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4901, Rejected: 0, Time: 86:14
13:26:36:946   1550   ETH: GPU0 31.769 Mh/s, GPU1 32.496 Mh/s, GPU2 32.005 Mh/s, GPU3 33.046 Mh/s, GPU4 31.844 Mh/s

I bolded the 4 GB cards the first set is Elpida and the second set is Hynix.  As you can see the clock speeds turned down in whole group still gets above 32 Mhs. If i run the cards individually it'll go and hold 33/34 Mhs at 2200 and 2250.

[UnclWish]

Regadless of the RAM 4 or 8 GB the strap doesn't matter, its about the memory type not the size of the memory.

It's not good, cause hynix 4Gb is AJR memory, but 8Gb - MJR memory. Both types needs it's own straps.

AND yet...
 -etha 1 -asm 2 -y compute -mode 2 -estale 1 -showdiff 1 -ftime 10 -rxboost 21 -strap POL4E3@2190,POL8M2@2215,POL8H1@2215,POL8H1@2200,POL8H1@2250 -mvddc 900 -cclock 1215,1300,1250,1235,1235 -cvddc 900 -estale 1 -mode 1 -lidag 3

is the following results...

AMD Cards available: 5
GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 4096 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 1:0:0)
GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #1: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 590 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 2:0:0)
GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #2: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 8192 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 4:0:0)
GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #3: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 5:0:0)
GPU #3 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #4: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 6:0:0)
GPU #4 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
POOL/SOLO version

GPU# 0 strap "POL4E3" is applied successfully, mclock 2190MHz
GPU# 0 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 1 strap "POL8M2" is applied successfully, mclock 2215MHz
GPU# 1 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 2 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2215MHz
GPU# 2 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 3 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2200MHz
GPU# 3 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 4 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2250MHz
GPU# 4 -rxboost option is applied successfully

ETH: GPU0 33.125 Mh/s, GPU1 33.531 Mh/s, GPU2 33.381 Mh/s, GPU3 33.120 Mh/s, GPU4 33.531 Mh/s
GPU0 t=58C fan=59% P=68W, GPU1 t=49C fan=45% P=89W, GPU2 t=55C fan=49% P=76W, GPU3 t=53C fan=49% P=99W, GPU4 t=54C fan=39% P=71W

AND....
-mode 1 -asm 2 -estale 1 -showdiff 1 -gser 2 -etha 1 -rxboost 15,21 -strap POL8M2@2115,POL8H1@2150,POL4H1@2075,POL8S2@2150,POL8H4@2100 -mvddc 875 -cclock 1250 -cvddc 900 -lidag 3
Nets the following....

23:11:45:269   2308   AMD Cards available: 5
23:11:45:269   2308   GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 1:0:0)
23:11:45:270   2308   GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:271   2308   GPU #1: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 5:0:0)
23:11:45:279   2308   GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:280   2308   GPU #2: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 4096 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 6:0:0)
23:11:45:295   2308   GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:299   2308   GPU #3: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 7:0:0)
23:11:45:300   2308   GPU #3 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:301   2308   GPU #4: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 8:0:0)
23:11:45:301   2308   GPU #4 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:302   2308   POOL/SOLO version

23:11:50:932   2308   GPU# 0 strap "POL8M2" is applied successfully, mclock 2115MHz
23:11:50:959   2308   GPU# 0 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:054   2308   GPU# 1 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2150MHz
23:11:51:092   2308   GPU# 1 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:189   2308   GPU# 2 strap "POL4H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2075MHz
23:11:51:199   2308   GPU# 2 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:305   2308   GPU# 3 strap "POL8S2" is applied successfully, mclock 2150MHz
23:11:51:315   2308   GPU# 3 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:413   2308   GPU# 4 strap "POL8H4" is applied successfully, mclock 2100MHz
23:11:51:421   2308   GPU# 4 -rxboost option is applied successfully

13:26:36:944   1550   ETH - Total Speed: 161.160 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4901, Rejected: 0, Time: 86:14
13:26:36:946   1550   ETH: GPU0 31.769 Mh/s, GPU1 32.496 Mh/s, GPU2 32.005 Mh/s, GPU3 33.046 Mh/s, GPU4 31.844 Mh/s

I bolded the 4 GB cards the first set is Elpida and the second set is Hynix.  As you can see the clock speeds turned down in whole group still gets above 32 Mhs. If i run the cards individually it'll go and hold 33/34 Mhs at 2200 and 2250.

I'm talking only about hynix memory. I just know that straps from 4Gb AJR memory didn't work properly on 8GB MJR memory.
Maybe Claymore make different straps on 4 and 8Gb cards with hynix memory. I didn't know. Just pointed...

On my 8Gb hynix memory cards no one strap from Claymore miner didn't give high speed with stability. Even 1st strap can hang all system, but speed is low. Good speed on 3-4 straps, but no stability at all.

[NefariousFool]

Regadless of the RAM 4 or 8 GB the strap doesn't matter, its about the memory type not the size of the memory.

It's not good, cause hynix 4Gb is AJR memory, but 8Gb - MJR memory. Both types needs it's own straps.

AND yet...
 -etha 1 -asm 2 -y compute -mode 2 -estale 1 -showdiff 1 -ftime 10 -rxboost 21 -strap POL4E3@2190,POL8M2@2215,POL8H1@2215,POL8H1@2200,POL8H1@2250 -mvddc 900 -cclock 1215,1300,1250,1235,1235 -cvddc 900 -estale 1 -mode 1 -lidag 3

is the following results...

AMD Cards available: 5
GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 4096 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 1:0:0)
GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #1: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 590 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 2:0:0)
GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #2: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 8192 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 4:0:0)
GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #3: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 5:0:0)
GPU #3 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #4: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 6:0:0)
GPU #4 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
POOL/SOLO version

GPU# 0 strap "POL4E3" is applied successfully, mclock 2190MHz
GPU# 0 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 1 strap "POL8M2" is applied successfully, mclock 2215MHz
GPU# 1 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 2 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2215MHz
GPU# 2 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 3 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2200MHz
GPU# 3 -rxboost option is applied successfully
GPU# 4 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2250MHz
GPU# 4 -rxboost option is applied successfully

ETH: GPU0 33.125 Mh/s, GPU1 33.531 Mh/s, GPU2 33.381 Mh/s, GPU3 33.120 Mh/s, GPU4 33.531 Mh/s
GPU0 t=58C fan=59% P=68W, GPU1 t=49C fan=45% P=89W, GPU2 t=55C fan=49% P=76W, GPU3 t=53C fan=49% P=99W, GPU4 t=54C fan=39% P=71W

AND....
-mode 1 -asm 2 -estale 1 -showdiff 1 -gser 2 -etha 1 -rxboost 15,21 -strap POL8M2@2115,POL8H1@2150,POL4H1@2075,POL8S2@2150,POL8H4@2100 -mvddc 875 -cclock 1250 -cvddc 900 -lidag 3
Nets the following....

23:11:45:269   2308   AMD Cards available: 5
23:11:45:269   2308   GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 1:0:0)
23:11:45:270   2308   GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:271   2308   GPU #1: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 5:0:0)
23:11:45:279   2308   GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:280   2308   GPU #2: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 4096 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 6:0:0)
23:11:45:295   2308   GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:299   2308   GPU #3: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 7:0:0)
23:11:45:300   2308   GPU #3 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:301   2308   GPU #4: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 580 Series), 8192 MB available, 36 compute units (pci bus 8:0:0)
23:11:45:301   2308   GPU #4 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
23:11:45:302   2308   POOL/SOLO version

23:11:50:932   2308   GPU# 0 strap "POL8M2" is applied successfully, mclock 2115MHz
23:11:50:959   2308   GPU# 0 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:054   2308   GPU# 1 strap "POL8H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2150MHz
23:11:51:092   2308   GPU# 1 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:189   2308   GPU# 2 strap "POL4H1" is applied successfully, mclock 2075MHz
23:11:51:199   2308   GPU# 2 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:305   2308   GPU# 3 strap "POL8S2" is applied successfully, mclock 2150MHz
23:11:51:315   2308   GPU# 3 -rxboost option is applied successfully
23:11:51:413   2308   GPU# 4 strap "POL8H4" is applied successfully, mclock 2100MHz
23:11:51:421   2308   GPU# 4 -rxboost option is applied successfully

13:26:36:944   1550   ETH - Total Speed: 161.160 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4901, Rejected: 0, Time: 86:14
13:26:36:946   1550   ETH: GPU0 31.769 Mh/s, GPU1 32.496 Mh/s, GPU2 32.005 Mh/s, GPU3 33.046 Mh/s, GPU4 31.844 Mh/s

I bolded the 4 GB cards the first set is Elpida and the second set is Hynix.  As you can see the clock speeds turned down in whole group still gets above 32 Mhs. If i run the cards individually it'll go and hold 33/34 Mhs at 2200 and 2250.

I'm talking only about hynix memory. I just know that straps from 4Gb AJR memory didn't work properly on 8GB MJR memory.
Maybe Claymore make different straps on 4 and 8Gb cards with hynix memory. I didn't know. Just pointed...

On my 8Gb hynix memory cards no one strap from Claymore miner didn't give high speed with stability. Even 1st strap can hang all system, but speed is low. Good speed on 3-4 straps, but no stability at all.

Strap 1 on hynix should be the most stable, check your frequency on the memory setting. rather than using gpuz i run strap on 1 to find out the memory cause its faster not sure why you'd be having problems crashing unless you're pushing it too hard. If its the memory on the cards giving you an issue, remember Strap 4 is the higher intensity for Strap 1. It might? run better with that for some reason?

Make sure to watch your voltages. and DO NOT run Afterburner or wattman after setting the strap. Set the speed in the command line. Changing the speeds while Claymore is running you will enduce crashing as its not designed to work with on the fly like that. Its designed for you to change the straps and frequencies without rebooting, not without shuttind down the miner. I've seen many MANY people thinking on the fly means while the miner is running not within windows w/out rebooting.

Keep me posted. I am interested in your status on this.

@luke..... did those settings work for you?

[WhackOBill]

Does anyone know which is the last good Polaris driver version before they destroyed performance when re-writing for the 5700XT?

[UnclWish]

Strap 1 on hynix should be the most stable, check your frequency on the memory setting. rather than using gpuz i run strap on 1 to find out the memory cause its faster not sure why you'd be having problems crashing unless you're pushing it too hard. If its the memory on the cards giving you an issue, remember Strap 4 is the higher intensity for Strap 1. It might? run better with that for some reason?

Make sure to watch your voltages. and DO NOT run Afterburner or wattman after setting the strap. Set the speed in the command line. Changing the speeds while Claymore is running you will enduce crashing as its not designed to work with on the fly like that. Its designed for you to change the straps and frequencies without rebooting, not without shuttind down the miner. I've seen many MANY people thinking on the fly means while the miner is running not within windows w/out rebooting.

Keep me posted. I am interested in your status on this.

I'm long time use my own straps. They work stable and fast for me. But we talking about Claymore miner straps.
I returned original vbios to check Claymore straps. And didn't used OC or UV, to check them. And my notices:
1. 1st strap is almost stable, but low speed.
2. 2nd less stable, speed is still low.
3. 3-4 straps are fast enough, but BSODs can happen in any time even after several seconds after launch.

Closing miner can hang sustem 50/50% even with strap 1. I think it's cause of miner returns old straps to card when closing.
I even tried to use my strap via string in command - all works fine, but closing miner can hang system too.
I repeat - all test maded with original cards bioses without any OC or voltage changing.
So I just flashed my straps and all goes normal.

It's all with hynix 8Gb MJR memory. It's very capricious.

[NefariousFool]

Does anyone know which is the last good Polaris driver version before they destroyed performance when re-writing for the 5700XT?

Destroyed performance? I'm running 19.8.1 on all my rigs and my performance is uneffected, if anything they're more stable across 15 Polaris model cards, 580's, 570's, 8GB and 4GB....

Not sure where you're getting the hit.

As for the hanging on closing the miner mentioned above... I've seen that when under volting the cards, or trying to push the clock to high, however I do not experience hanging of the miner that often.

I have 4 of my own rigs, and have provided support on well over 25 others... and that ranges on memory through all memory types.

Very interesting you're experiencing it consistently.

[UnclWish]

As for the hanging on closing the miner mentioned above... I've seen that when under volting the cards, or trying to push the clock to high, however I do not experience hanging of the miner that often.

I have 4 of my own rigs, and have provided support on well over 25 others... and that ranges on memory through all memory types.

Very interesting you're experiencing it consistently.

I writes original vbioses and didn't touched clocks and voltages to test. And if I set straps via miner taken from miner or my own via string, after closing miner system can hang. About 50% chance of this. And when system hangs often a visual glitches stays on screen.
Myabe it because one of my cards have monitor connected. Maybe something else. I sure that it causes by returning straps back when miner closes.
Hynix MJR 8Gb memory - is a pain...

[WhackOBill]

Does anyone know which is the last good Polaris driver version before they destroyed performance when re-writing for the 5700XT?

Destroyed performance? I'm running 19.8.1 on all my rigs and my performance is uneffected, if anything they're more stable across 15 Polaris model cards, 580's, 570's, 8GB and 4GB....

Not sure where you're getting the hit.

As for the hanging on closing the miner mentioned above... I've seen that when under volting the cards, or trying to push the clock to high, however I do not experience hanging of the miner that often.

I have 4 of my own rigs, and have provided support on well over 25 others... and that ranges on memory through all memory types.

Very interesting you're experiencing it consistently.

19.4.3 runs fine for me but 19.8.1 runs about 8% lower hash.  I know there was a 19.5.2 in there somewhere, not sure if it gets the same degradation.  There was talk of lower gaming performance on Polaris with the newer Radeon drivers when Navi support was introduced.  It was assumed that it would get worked out.  I see the same on my rig using Claymore 14.7 in Win10 1903.  Are you running under Windows?  Also on mine, the strap and rxboost commands don't work.  They say they work, but the values are unchanged and so is the hash rate.  So I still have to run a modded BIOS with the straps burned in.

[mu_enrico]

I want to tell you about my experience today, well it might be helpful for those who experienced the same issue. My Windows 10 OS has been updated into the newest patch, thus made the AMD hashrate drop significantly. The workaround is straightforward. Press "y"-key at the initialization process to switch all cards to compute mode, reboot, and you are done!

[NefariousFool]

Does anyone know which is the last good Polaris driver version before they destroyed performance when re-writing for the 5700XT?

Destroyed performance? I'm running 19.8.1 on all my rigs and my performance is uneffected, if anything they're more stable across 15 Polaris model cards, 580's, 570's, 8GB and 4GB....

Not sure where you're getting the hit.

As for the hanging on closing the miner mentioned above... I've seen that when under volting the cards, or trying to push the clock to high, however I do not experience hanging of the miner that often.

I have 4 of my own rigs, and have provided support on well over 25 others... and that ranges on memory through all memory types.

Very interesting you're experiencing it consistently.

19.4.3 runs fine for me but 19.8.1 runs about 8% lower hash.  I know there was a 19.5.2 in there somewhere, not sure if it gets the same degradation.  There was talk of lower gaming performance on Polaris with the newer Radeon drivers when Navi support was introduced.  It was assumed that it would get worked out.  I see the same on my rig using Claymore 14.7 in Win10 1903.  Are you running under Windows?  Also on mine, the strap and rxboost commands don't work.  They say they work, but the values are unchanged and so is the hash rate.  So I still have to run a modded BIOS with the straps burned in.

I heard about issues with the Linux drives from AMD, heard they were complete garbage after 19.4.3.

yes i run windows 10 x64 with all the latest updates and patches. I try to purposefully break things in windows with the patches and windows security crap. To ensure i have answers for our discord members when it comes to Claymore. However i am not a Linux guy. lol sorry.

[Wcryan]

Hi I’ve been browsing these threads for a little before I posted but it is a lot to sift through. Having trouble with 14.7. Using AMD 19.4.3 all in compute mode.  Whenever I put -strap 1 in start bat I get “driver is in use, try -driver uninstall”.  I added driver uninstall but need to do it in administrator.  I start in administrator but ethminer start.bat opens for like a split second and then closes.  I’ve tried different drivers, added folder pathway to start.bat.  I’m at a loss right now.  If anyone knows PM me or post.  I will pay PayPal also to the person who helps me solve this

[RAKOT]

Hi I’ve been browsing these threads for a little before I posted but it is a lot to sift through. Having trouble with 14.7. Using AMD 19.4.3 all in compute mode.  Whenever I put -strap 1 in start bat I get “driver is in use, try -driver uninstall”.  I added driver uninstall but need to do it in administrator.  I start in administrator but ethminer start.bat opens for like a split second and then closes.  I’ve tried different drivers, added folder pathway to start.bat.  I’m at a loss right now.  If anyone knows PM me or post.  I will pay PayPal also to the person who helps me solve this

Hi!

You should run command prompt( Administrator) - its if you are in W10. Then navigate to folder there miner is. run EthDcrMiner64.exe -driver uninstall. Then reboot
Next - also run command promt  (Administrator) - navigate to miner folder and run start bat wih straps option. Thats it.

Next time you can run start.bat not with admin rights, cause drivers allready been installed.