Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2024, 03:30:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 [1280] 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 ... 1411 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 6590793 times)
gedeonodn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 22, 2019, 06:51:47 PM
Last edit: May 22, 2019, 07:11:42 PM by gedeonodn
 #25581

Simplemining just implemented Rxboost on linux  Cool

I am running Rxboost on ethOS (Linux), RX474 32.1mh/s , before 31.4mh/s

Ubuntu 18.04, 19.10 - linux driver, use claymore 12.0. I prefer use bios modded cards and not see why realtime straps better, its only additional load time and crash risks on my mind.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5123724.0 -  AMD Mem Tweak - tool, which give same result, as rxboost (see --ref parameter), but i can test result in realtime, without restart miner. I`ve recieve ~+0.4 MH/card (rx480/580) with 10...15 value.

Claymore - best miner for me, for exammle, ethminer take +5 watt on Core (from 65W) with little low HR, but i`m change straps, overclock, underclock and downvolt with scripts, now tune memory. Change straps from miner for save some time with less control and understanding

HiveOs, SimpleMiningOs - just ubuntu based distros, which using tools and scripts, created by other peoples, but have nothing unique. It costs some money, i think only reason - their web interface, but i prefer email and telegram notification (easy create with scripts), remote management via ssh.
samurai1907
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 22, 2019, 07:34:51 PM
 #25582

Hi everyone!

Correct  me if Im wrong. If i have already modded cards ( modded-straped BIOS), then i should use only -rxboost 1 option, and dont need to use -strap ?

And if Ill use  -strap i will crush the system ?

Best regards.

UPD. How mych speed do you get with rx 474 ?

So what about my question ? Any advice ?

it does not crush, it depends on you, you can use your own straps or claymore's

i am using claymore's. it has a little bit more hashrates
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
May 22, 2019, 07:48:33 PM
 #25583

Simplemining just implemented Rxboost on linux  Cool

I am running Rxboost on ethOS (Linux), RX474 32.1mh/s , before 31.4mh/s

Ubuntu 18.04, 19.10 - linux driver, use claymore 12.0. I prefer use bios modded cards and not see why realtime straps better, its only additional load time and crash risks on my mind.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5123724.0 -  AMD Mem Tweak - tool, which give same result, as rxboost (see --ref parameter), but i can test result in realtime, without restart miner. I`ve recieve ~+0.4 MH/card (rx480/580) with 10...15 value.

Claymore - best miner for me, for exammle, ethminer take +5 watt on Core (from 65W) with little low HR, but i`m change straps, overclock, underclock and downvolt with scripts, now tune memory. Change straps from miner for save some time with less control and understanding

HiveOs, SimpleMiningOs - just ubuntu based distros, which using tools and scripts, created by other peoples, but have nothing unique. It costs some money, i think only reason - their web interface, but i prefer email and telegram notification (easy create with scripts), remote management via ssh.
Thanks for info!
Important thing that AMT uses signed ASUS IO driver for it's needs. Claymore uses it's own driver without sign, and this require secure boot disable... Now I will try AMT with Claymore.
evlo
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 4


View Profile
May 22, 2019, 08:01:16 PM
 #25584

I think you should always define what you mean by stable - for me it is at least week without crash due to mem OC. It seem to me that people consider mining for hour or few hours as table, while I know from experience crash can occur even after two days of continuous mining due to high OC.
Marvell2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 132


View Profile
May 22, 2019, 09:03:38 PM
 #25585

Getting unknown option -rxboost 1

I downloaded the latested version , is it not copied correctly ? on the UI it stills says 14.0 beta
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
May 22, 2019, 10:09:12 PM
 #25586

Getting unknown option -rxboost 1

I downloaded the latested version , is it not copied correctly ? on the UI it stills says 14.0 beta
It's not latest version. Latest is 14.5 beta.
rigspec
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
May 22, 2019, 10:16:33 PM
Last edit: May 23, 2019, 01:48:10 AM by rigspec
 #25587

Anyone test the power consumption difference with "rxboost" command? Also for those who are having trouble keeping it "rxboost" stable on windows, try -rxboost 30 .... seems to be the most stable for Windows and SMOS (rxboost -i 30) rigs without crashing systems. I've attached a chart for a mini farm we operate (SMOS - 4.0 Gh/s), and we noticed a 3.38% overall gain within the farm (approx. 135.74 Mh/s Increase overall). I attached a chart with details.

Again our main concern is power consumption increasing (hopefully decrease?  Cheesy) , as we currently don't have access to power readings due to farm being remotely located. We will test the power levels in person soon, but we would like to know a range for expectation purposes, if anyone already tested.


Chart Showing Gains from 'rxboost -i 30' (SMOS):

https://ibb.co/THyqpGP



Disclosure: Rig 11 and 13 seem to have been 'underclocked' prior so try to refrain from using those as a we also fine tuned some timings on those on top of 'rxboost'



https://www.RigSpec.io
tytanick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1096


Simplemining.net Admin


View Profile WWW
May 22, 2019, 10:35:48 PM
 #25588

Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? Cheesy
I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" Tongue

Something like:


DOWNLOAD LINK
(Windows): v14.x https://mega.nz/#F!O4YA2JgD!n2b4iSHQDruEsYUvTQP5_w
(Linux) latest version is v12.x https://mega.nz/#F!O4YA2JgD!n2b4iSHQDruEsYUvTQP5_w

What do You think ?

Manage your GPU farm the easy way with Mining OS (30 days free):  SimpleMining.net
Support available at Discord: https://simplemining.net/page/discord and admin@simplemining.net
Bitcointalk thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1541084.0
evlo
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 4


View Profile
May 22, 2019, 11:05:06 PM
 #25589

Who achieved what speed on the claymore 14.5 on maps 1060 6gg (Samsung, micron).
I have Samsung GPU0 26.806 Mh / s, GPU1 27.239 Mh / s, GPU2 26.377 Mh / s, GPU3 27.224 Mh / s, GPU4 27.171 Mh / s, micron GPU5 26.300 Mh / s, -strap 1 -sintensity 80
PO, core 1480, memory 4644-4706-4551-4704-4698 micron 4532, curvia 812v, PL80, firewood 391.24. (On new ones, the speed is 1-1.5 Mh / s lower). Who will share their settings.
Does someone other experience better hashrates with 391.24 then newer drivers?
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
May 22, 2019, 11:53:19 PM
 #25590

Anyone test the power consumption difference with "rxboost" command? Also for those who are having trouble keeping it "rxboost" stable on windows, try -rxboost 30 .... seems to be the most stable for Windows and SMOS (rxboost -i 30) rigs without crashing systems. I've attached a chart for a mini farm we operate (SMOS - 4.0 Gh/s), and we noticed a 3.38% overall gain withing the farm (approx. 135.74 Mh/s Increase overall). I attached a chart with details.

Again our main concern is power consumption increasing (hopefully decrease?  Cheesy) , as we currently don't have access to power readings due to farm being remotely located. We will test the power levels in person soon, but we would like to know a range for expectation purposes, if anyone already tested.


Chart Showing Gains from 'rxboost -i 30' (SMOS):

https://ibb.co/THyqpGP



Disclosure: Rig 11 and 13 seem to have been 'underclocked' prior so try to refrain from using those as a we also fine tuned some timings on those on top of 'rxboost'



https://www.RigSpec.io
Memory doesn't consumes so much power... Memory clock up to 2250 MHz on GDDR5 increases it a bit. But memory timings not so important to power, i think.
laik2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 652
Merit: 266



View Profile WWW
May 23, 2019, 12:06:46 AM
 #25591

Think again Smiley

Miners Mining Platform [ MMP OS ] - https://app.mmpos.eu/
MapleCircuit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 12:19:53 AM
 #25592

I'm seeing about a 1% power increase on my 8 card 570/580 rig with about 3% hashrate increase using rxboost.
SerpentXSF
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 5


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 01:53:13 AM
 #25593

-Only for 1080 Ti Graphics Cards-

When enabling command "-strap 1" after correct setup and running as administrator. While using the ETH largement Pill, you will possibly get a crash or the following. However, this is to be expected as that is two programs attempting to modify memory timings.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/579834089448800258/580934350531592217/20190522_193835.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/579834089448800258/580934486456533002/20190522_212209.jpg

If above image didn't work...

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/579834089448800258/580934350531592217/20190522_193835.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/579834089448800258/580934486456533002/20190522_212209.jpg
jeremyismer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 03:08:11 AM
 #25594

Does rxboost require the Claymore driver install? I tried to run it last night and got a bunch of errors, but I hadn't run the driver install setting but wanted to check if I needed the driver before I tried other troubleshooting.
hustleman
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 6


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 05:01:28 AM
 #25595

I'm only getting about a 2.2% increase on a 12gpu (9 580 and 3 570) rig with -rxboost and -strap 1.  The -mclock OC setting I have for these cards were the most stable OC I could do on older versions of claymore miner.  So my question is with the rxboost and -straps, do some card perform better with less OC with the miners new memory timings? 

Example:

RX580 4gb -cclock 1150-cvddc 820 -mclock 2000 -mvddc 900 hashes at 29.7mhs (NO rxboost or strap)

Same card with same UV/OC with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1 now hashes at 30.2mhs.

Will this card perform any better with different -mclock or strap variable??? Or do you believe this card is maxed out at 30.2mhs due to rxboost 1 and strap 1 being most memory intensive.

 
Er0l
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 06:00:14 AM
 #25596

I'm only getting about a 2.2% increase on a 12gpu (9 580 and 3 570) rig with -rxboost and -strap 1.  The -mclock OC setting I have for these cards were the most stable OC I could do on older versions of claymore miner.  So my question is with the rxboost and -straps, do some card perform better with less OC with the miners new memory timings? 

Example:

RX580 4gb -cclock 1150-cvddc 820 -mclock 2000 -mvddc 900 hashes at 29.7mhs (NO rxboost or strap)

Same card with same UV/OC with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1 now hashes at 30.2mhs.

Will this card perform any better with different -mclock or strap variable??? Or do you believe this card is maxed out at 30.2mhs due to rxboost 1 and strap 1 being most memory intensive.

 

Give more mem clock

I am running rx470 4Gb 1180 vore 2150 mem 32.7mh/s
Blooregardqcazoo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 06:28:34 AM
 #25597

Same here.. Seems to have happened after using -rxboost 1 while trying different -strap values. My RX580 hangs after starting the miner now. In fact, it hangs with any other miner as well. Tried -driver uninstall, and the driver was apparently uninstalled, but the card still hangs. Not sure what to do now.

Guys.. for the record, this turns out to be unrelated to Claymore's miner. My USB riser died while I was testing this version, and I didn't realize that right away, as Windows seemed to still see the card but saying that the card was reporting problems. I verified the card works well on another machine and narrowed it down to the faulty riser. Sorry about the noise.
RAKOT
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 152
Merit: 8


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 06:34:25 AM
 #25598

Simplemining just implemented Rxboost on linux  Cool

I am running Rxboost on ethOS (Linux), RX474 32.1mh/s , before 31.4mh/s

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

Please share wit us command line options and GPU OC settings ?

I have a lot of different 474's and cant get more then 30.8 with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 06:34:54 AM
 #25599

Anyone test the power consumption difference with "rxboost" command? Also for those who are having trouble keeping it "rxboost" stable on windows, try -rxboost 30 .... seems to be the most stable for Windows and SMOS (rxboost -i 30) rigs without crashing systems. I've attached a chart for a mini farm we operate (SMOS - 4.0 Gh/s), and we noticed a 3.38% overall gain withing the farm (approx. 135.74 Mh/s Increase overall). I attached a chart with details.

Again our main concern is power consumption increasing (hopefully decrease?  Cheesy) , as we currently don't have access to power readings due to farm being remotely located. We will test the power levels in person soon, but we would like to know a range for expectation purposes, if anyone already tested.


Chart Showing Gains from 'rxboost -i 30' (SMOS):

https://ibb.co/THyqpGP



Disclosure: Rig 11 and 13 seem to have been 'underclocked' prior so try to refrain from using those as a we also fine tuned some timings on those on top of 'rxboost'



https://www.RigSpec.io
Memory doesn't consumes so much power... Memory clock up to 2250 MHz on GDDR5 increases it a bit. But memory timings not so important to power, i think.


You are correct that the memory chips don't consume that much power with better straps but the GPU compute part of the graphic card actually does use more power overall.

Think of it this way. The GPU compute is actually idle alot because there is a bottle-neck in the memory, when the memory is faster the GPU compute is idle less and overall there is more power consumption. This is why back in 2017, it was very popular to dual mine coins with ETH because most of the time the memory is busy while the GPU compute part of the video card stays inactive and does nothing.
Er0l
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 23, 2019, 06:42:49 AM
 #25600

Simplemining just implemented Rxboost on linux  Cool

I am running Rxboost on ethOS (Linux), RX474 32.1mh/s , before 31.4mh/s

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

Please share wit us command line options and GPU OC settings ?

I have a lot of different 474's and cant get more then 30.8 with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1


I am running rx470 4Gb 1180 core 2150 mem 32.7mh/s with phoenixminer + rxboost on Linux
Pages: « 1 ... 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 [1280] 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 ... 1411 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!