gedeonodn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2019, 06:51:47 PM Last edit: May 22, 2019, 07:11:42 PM by gedeonodn |
|
Simplemining just implemented Rxboost on linux I am running Rxboost on ethOS (Linux), RX474 32.1mh/s , before 31.4mh/s Ubuntu 18.04, 19.10 - linux driver, use claymore 12.0. I prefer use bios modded cards and not see why realtime straps better, its only additional load time and crash risks on my mind. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5123724.0 - AMD Mem Tweak - tool, which give same result, as rxboost (see --ref parameter), but i can test result in realtime, without restart miner. I`ve recieve ~+0.4 MH/card (rx480/580) with 10...15 value. Claymore - best miner for me, for exammle, ethminer take +5 watt on Core (from 65W) with little low HR, but i`m change straps, overclock, underclock and downvolt with scripts, now tune memory. Change straps from miner for save some time with less control and understanding HiveOs, SimpleMiningOs - just ubuntu based distros, which using tools and scripts, created by other peoples, but have nothing unique. It costs some money, i think only reason - their web interface, but i prefer email and telegram notification (easy create with scripts), remote management via ssh.
|
|
|
|
samurai1907
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2019, 07:34:51 PM |
|
Hi everyone!
Correct me if Im wrong. If i have already modded cards ( modded-straped BIOS), then i should use only -rxboost 1 option, and dont need to use -strap ?
And if Ill use -strap i will crush the system ?
Best regards.
UPD. How mych speed do you get with rx 474 ?
So what about my question ? Any advice ? it does not crush, it depends on you, you can use your own straps or claymore's i am using claymore's. it has a little bit more hashrates
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
May 22, 2019, 07:48:33 PM |
|
Simplemining just implemented Rxboost on linux I am running Rxboost on ethOS (Linux), RX474 32.1mh/s , before 31.4mh/s Ubuntu 18.04, 19.10 - linux driver, use claymore 12.0. I prefer use bios modded cards and not see why realtime straps better, its only additional load time and crash risks on my mind. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5123724.0 - AMD Mem Tweak - tool, which give same result, as rxboost (see --ref parameter), but i can test result in realtime, without restart miner. I`ve recieve ~+0.4 MH/card (rx480/580) with 10...15 value. Claymore - best miner for me, for exammle, ethminer take +5 watt on Core (from 65W) with little low HR, but i`m change straps, overclock, underclock and downvolt with scripts, now tune memory. Change straps from miner for save some time with less control and understanding HiveOs, SimpleMiningOs - just ubuntu based distros, which using tools and scripts, created by other peoples, but have nothing unique. It costs some money, i think only reason - their web interface, but i prefer email and telegram notification (easy create with scripts), remote management via ssh. Thanks for info! Important thing that AMT uses signed ASUS IO driver for it's needs. Claymore uses it's own driver without sign, and this require secure boot disable... Now I will try AMT with Claymore.
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
|
May 22, 2019, 08:01:16 PM |
|
I think you should always define what you mean by stable - for me it is at least week without crash due to mem OC. It seem to me that people consider mining for hour or few hours as table, while I know from experience crash can occur even after two days of continuous mining due to high OC.
|
|
|
|
Marvell2
|
|
May 22, 2019, 09:03:38 PM |
|
Getting unknown option -rxboost 1
I downloaded the latested version , is it not copied correctly ? on the UI it stills says 14.0 beta
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
May 22, 2019, 10:09:12 PM |
|
Getting unknown option -rxboost 1
I downloaded the latested version , is it not copied correctly ? on the UI it stills says 14.0 beta
It's not latest version. Latest is 14.5 beta.
|
|
|
|
rigspec
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 1
|
|
May 22, 2019, 10:16:33 PM Last edit: May 23, 2019, 01:48:10 AM by rigspec |
|
Anyone test the power consumption difference with "rxboost" command? Also for those who are having trouble keeping it "rxboost" stable on windows, try -rxboost 30 .... seems to be the most stable for Windows and SMOS (rxboost -i 30) rigs without crashing systems. I've attached a chart for a mini farm we operate (SMOS - 4.0 Gh/s), and we noticed a 3.38% overall gain within the farm (approx. 135.74 Mh/s Increase overall). I attached a chart with details. Again our main concern is power consumption increasing (hopefully decrease? ) , as we currently don't have access to power readings due to farm being remotely located. We will test the power levels in person soon, but we would like to know a range for expectation purposes, if anyone already tested. Chart Showing Gains from 'rxboost -i 30' (SMOS):https://ibb.co/THyqpGP Disclosure: Rig 11 and 13 seem to have been 'underclocked' prior so try to refrain from using those as a we also fine tuned some timings on those on top of 'rxboost' https://www.RigSpec.io
|
|
|
|
tytanick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1096
Simplemining.net Admin
|
|
May 22, 2019, 10:35:48 PM |
|
Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" Something like: DOWNLOAD LINK (Windows): v14.x https://mega.nz/#F!O4YA2JgD!n2b4iSHQDruEsYUvTQP5_w (Linux) latest version is v12.x https://mega.nz/#F!O4YA2JgD!n2b4iSHQDruEsYUvTQP5_w What do You think ?
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
|
May 22, 2019, 11:05:06 PM |
|
Who achieved what speed on the claymore 14.5 on maps 1060 6gg (Samsung, micron). I have Samsung GPU0 26.806 Mh / s, GPU1 27.239 Mh / s, GPU2 26.377 Mh / s, GPU3 27.224 Mh / s, GPU4 27.171 Mh / s, micron GPU5 26.300 Mh / s, -strap 1 -sintensity 80 PO, core 1480, memory 4644-4706-4551-4704-4698 micron 4532, curvia 812v, PL80, firewood 391.24. (On new ones, the speed is 1-1.5 Mh / s lower). Who will share their settings.
Does someone other experience better hashrates with 391.24 then newer drivers?
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
May 22, 2019, 11:53:19 PM |
|
Anyone test the power consumption difference with "rxboost" command? Also for those who are having trouble keeping it "rxboost" stable on windows, try -rxboost 30 .... seems to be the most stable for Windows and SMOS (rxboost -i 30) rigs without crashing systems. I've attached a chart for a mini farm we operate (SMOS - 4.0 Gh/s), and we noticed a 3.38% overall gain withing the farm (approx. 135.74 Mh/s Increase overall). I attached a chart with details. Again our main concern is power consumption increasing (hopefully decrease? ) , as we currently don't have access to power readings due to farm being remotely located. We will test the power levels in person soon, but we would like to know a range for expectation purposes, if anyone already tested. Chart Showing Gains from 'rxboost -i 30' (SMOS):https://ibb.co/THyqpGP Disclosure: Rig 11 and 13 seem to have been 'underclocked' prior so try to refrain from using those as a we also fine tuned some timings on those on top of 'rxboost' https://www.RigSpec.ioMemory doesn't consumes so much power... Memory clock up to 2250 MHz on GDDR5 increases it a bit. But memory timings not so important to power, i think.
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
May 23, 2019, 12:06:46 AM |
|
Think again
|
|
|
|
MapleCircuit
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2019, 12:19:53 AM |
|
I'm seeing about a 1% power increase on my 8 card 570/580 rig with about 3% hashrate increase using rxboost.
|
|
|
|
SerpentXSF
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 5
|
|
May 23, 2019, 01:53:13 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
jeremyismer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2019, 03:08:11 AM |
|
Does rxboost require the Claymore driver install? I tried to run it last night and got a bunch of errors, but I hadn't run the driver install setting but wanted to check if I needed the driver before I tried other troubleshooting.
|
|
|
|
hustleman
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 6
|
|
May 23, 2019, 05:01:28 AM |
|
I'm only getting about a 2.2% increase on a 12gpu (9 580 and 3 570) rig with -rxboost and -strap 1. The -mclock OC setting I have for these cards were the most stable OC I could do on older versions of claymore miner. So my question is with the rxboost and -straps, do some card perform better with less OC with the miners new memory timings?
Example:
RX580 4gb -cclock 1150-cvddc 820 -mclock 2000 -mvddc 900 hashes at 29.7mhs (NO rxboost or strap)
Same card with same UV/OC with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1 now hashes at 30.2mhs.
Will this card perform any better with different -mclock or strap variable??? Or do you believe this card is maxed out at 30.2mhs due to rxboost 1 and strap 1 being most memory intensive.
|
|
|
|
Er0l
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2019, 06:00:14 AM |
|
I'm only getting about a 2.2% increase on a 12gpu (9 580 and 3 570) rig with -rxboost and -strap 1. The -mclock OC setting I have for these cards were the most stable OC I could do on older versions of claymore miner. So my question is with the rxboost and -straps, do some card perform better with less OC with the miners new memory timings?
Example:
RX580 4gb -cclock 1150-cvddc 820 -mclock 2000 -mvddc 900 hashes at 29.7mhs (NO rxboost or strap)
Same card with same UV/OC with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1 now hashes at 30.2mhs.
Will this card perform any better with different -mclock or strap variable??? Or do you believe this card is maxed out at 30.2mhs due to rxboost 1 and strap 1 being most memory intensive.
Give more mem clock I am running rx470 4Gb 1180 vore 2150 mem 32.7mh/s
|
|
|
|
Blooregardqcazoo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 1
|
|
May 23, 2019, 06:28:34 AM |
|
Same here.. Seems to have happened after using -rxboost 1 while trying different -strap values. My RX580 hangs after starting the miner now. In fact, it hangs with any other miner as well. Tried -driver uninstall, and the driver was apparently uninstalled, but the card still hangs. Not sure what to do now.
Guys.. for the record, this turns out to be unrelated to Claymore's miner. My USB riser died while I was testing this version, and I didn't realize that right away, as Windows seemed to still see the card but saying that the card was reporting problems. I verified the card works well on another machine and narrowed it down to the faulty riser. Sorry about the noise.
|
|
|
|
RAKOT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 8
|
|
May 23, 2019, 06:34:25 AM |
|
Simplemining just implemented Rxboost on linux I am running Rxboost on ethOS (Linux), RX474 32.1mh/s , before 31.4mh/s Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost Please share wit us command line options and GPU OC settings ? I have a lot of different 474's and cant get more then 30.8 with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
May 23, 2019, 06:34:54 AM |
|
Anyone test the power consumption difference with "rxboost" command? Also for those who are having trouble keeping it "rxboost" stable on windows, try -rxboost 30 .... seems to be the most stable for Windows and SMOS (rxboost -i 30) rigs without crashing systems. I've attached a chart for a mini farm we operate (SMOS - 4.0 Gh/s), and we noticed a 3.38% overall gain withing the farm (approx. 135.74 Mh/s Increase overall). I attached a chart with details. Again our main concern is power consumption increasing (hopefully decrease? ) , as we currently don't have access to power readings due to farm being remotely located. We will test the power levels in person soon, but we would like to know a range for expectation purposes, if anyone already tested. Chart Showing Gains from 'rxboost -i 30' (SMOS):https://ibb.co/THyqpGP Disclosure: Rig 11 and 13 seem to have been 'underclocked' prior so try to refrain from using those as a we also fine tuned some timings on those on top of 'rxboost' https://www.RigSpec.ioMemory doesn't consumes so much power... Memory clock up to 2250 MHz on GDDR5 increases it a bit. But memory timings not so important to power, i think. You are correct that the memory chips don't consume that much power with better straps but the GPU compute part of the graphic card actually does use more power overall. Think of it this way. The GPU compute is actually idle alot because there is a bottle-neck in the memory, when the memory is faster the GPU compute is idle less and overall there is more power consumption. This is why back in 2017, it was very popular to dual mine coins with ETH because most of the time the memory is busy while the GPU compute part of the video card stays inactive and does nothing.
|
|
|
|
Er0l
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2019, 06:42:49 AM |
|
Simplemining just implemented Rxboost on linux I am running Rxboost on ethOS (Linux), RX474 32.1mh/s , before 31.4mh/s Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost Please share wit us command line options and GPU OC settings ? I have a lot of different 474's and cant get more then 30.8 with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1 I am running rx470 4Gb 1180 core 2150 mem 32.7mh/s with phoenixminer + rxboost on Linux
|
|
|
|
|