An (even more) optimized version of cpuminer (pooler's cpuminer, CPU-only)

[Remember remember the 5th of November]

Adding curses to the miner will make it seem more like cgminer and I don't think he wants to make "another" cgminer.

libcurses isnt an invention of cgminer!

Yes, it isn't. But it utilizes it, and since cgminer is based on cpuminer from which this cpuminer is based. He might think it will become a "cgminer". Of course, I do not represent his wishes or anything. Whatever he decides, is his own choice.

[K1773R]

Adding curses to the miner will make it seem more like cgminer and I don't think he wants to make "another" cgminer.

libcurses isnt an invention of cgminer!

Yes, it isn't. But it utilizes it, and since cgminer is based on cpuminer from which this cpuminer is based. He might think it will become a "cgminer". Of course, I do not represent his wishes or anything. Whatever he decides, is his own choice.

so? just because a old fork uses a library dosnt mean another fork cant use it?

[gigica viteazu`]

@Remember come on dude, forget it, no need to make such a big deal, it`s pooler decision what he is gonna use

[muqali]

Could you not just record those stats in a few variables and from time to time, 5s or so echo them to stdout? Maybe have a moving average of some of them.

[gigica viteazu`]

Could you not just record those stats in a few variables and from time to time, 5s or so echo them to stdout? Maybe have a moving average of some of them.

+1

[pooler]

something like: total hashrate,

At present this is printed when a share is submitted. I could add an option so that it is printed every N seconds instead.

running time,

I'm curious... what for?

server ip/port,

I don't think that would make sense, since it's the user himself who supplies the information. It does make sense in cgminer as cgminer can handle multiple providers.

blocks found (if any) etc.

Could be done, but wouldn't it be a bit useless?

[K1773R]

something like: total hashrate,

At present this is printed when a share is submitted. I could add an option so that it is printed every N seconds instead.

running time,

I'm curious... what for?

server ip/port,

I don't think that would make sense, since it's the user himself who supplies the information. It does make sense in cgminer as cgminer can handle multiple providers.

blocks found (if any) etc.

Could be done, but wouldn't it be a bit useless?

1. already implimented if you dont use the quiet option.
2. same
3. same
4. you cant distinguish a 1dif share on a pool with a real, therefore it would be inaccurate at all.

[gigica viteazu`]

hmm, already implemented you say, ok ... how much is my total hash rate based on the image below ?



kind of hard to read, huh ?


in this case information is free and at hand, why not show it ?

[muqali]

hmm, already implemented you say, ok ... how much is my total hash rate based on the image below ?
kind of hard to read, huh ?

in this case information is free and at hand, why not show it ?

Odd, mine shows it relatively often.

Code:

[2012-10-22 16:01:42] thread 8: 403344 hashes, 6.76 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 0: 691404 hashes, 11.57 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 5: 402024 hashes, 6.73 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 3: 400524 hashes, 6.68 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 2: 403548 hashes, 6.70 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 4: 402060 hashes, 6.67 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:44] thread 6: 398976 hashes, 6.51 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:56] thread 7: 154992 hashes, 11.68 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:56] accepted: 341/341 (100.00%), 70.04 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:09] thread 7: 144936 hashes, 11.46 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:09] accepted: 342/342 (100.00%), 69.82 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:18] thread 4: 235908 hashes, 6.73 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:18] accepted: 343/343 (100.00%), 69.88 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:39] thread 7: 366624 hashes, 11.97 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:39] accepted: 344/344 (100.00%), 70.38 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 4: 168276 hashes, 7.16 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 6: 383928 hashes, 6.63 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 3: 400992 hashes, 6.72 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 5: 403536 hashes, 6.74 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:43] thread 2: 402228 hashes, 6.72 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:43] thread 1: 403956 hashes, 6.67 khash/s

[K1773R]

hmm, already implemented you say, ok ... how much is my total hash rate based on the image below ?
kind of hard to read, huh ?

in this case information is free and at hand, why not show it ?

Odd, mine shows it relatively often.

Code:

[2012-10-22 16:01:42] thread 8: 403344 hashes, 6.76 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 0: 691404 hashes, 11.57 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 5: 402024 hashes, 6.73 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 3: 400524 hashes, 6.68 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 2: 403548 hashes, 6.70 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 4: 402060 hashes, 6.67 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:44] thread 6: 398976 hashes, 6.51 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:56] thread 7: 154992 hashes, 11.68 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:56] accepted: 341/341 (100.00%), 70.04 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:09] thread 7: 144936 hashes, 11.46 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:09] accepted: 342/342 (100.00%), 69.82 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:18] thread 4: 235908 hashes, 6.73 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:18] accepted: 343/343 (100.00%), 69.88 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:39] thread 7: 366624 hashes, 11.97 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:39] accepted: 344/344 (100.00%), 70.38 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 4: 168276 hashes, 7.16 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 6: 383928 hashes, 6.63 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 3: 400992 hashes, 6.72 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 5: 403536 hashes, 6.74 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:43] thread 2: 402228 hashes, 6.72 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:43] thread 1: 403956 hashes, 6.67 khash/s

correctly, that simple. learn to use the scrollbar lol

[gigica viteazu`]

@muqali i believe that is only valid if you are pool mining, i`m solo mining...

i`ll send my logs to @K1773R so he can show us some scrollbar magic, right dude?

[muqali]

@muqali i believe that is only valid if you are pool mining, i`m solo mining...

i`ll send my logs to @K1773R so he can show us some scrollbar magic, right dude?

Sorry, didn't realize that.

[K1773R]

@muqali i believe that is only valid if you are pool mining, i`m solo mining...

i`ll send my logs to @K1773R so he can show us some scrollbar magic, right dude?

then u have to wait until u find a block to get the neat "accepted: */* (100.00%), * khash/s (yay!!!)" message

lets see what poolers is coming up with, or do you want to submit patches? (if you can)

[K1773R]

can somone be as kind as to tell me how to setup cgminer to mine using my cpu for ltc please

am reading through this thread and understand nothing and they are no hlep files to put in comnads for bat etc

what do i need to change in this

cgminer -o http://url -u worker1 -p xxx -I 14 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-memclock 300

any ideas plz or do  i need to download files from here and replace etc thx

NO! ur in the wrong thread!

[MooC Tals]

Can anyone put my anxiety at ease here.

I dl the new cpuminer and this is what came up after the 4th hash



I trust spybot and it never failed me to date. I know some things can be accidentally added to DB's However this has never come up with these miners.

This one is the first miner program that has done this.

[K1773R]

Can anyone put my anxiety at ease here.

I dl the new cpuminer and this is what came up after the 4th hash



I trust spybot and it never failed me to date. I know some things can be accidentally added to DB's However this has never come up with these miners.

This one is the first miner program that has done this.

check the MD5 from the github dowload and compare it with urs, if its the same then its a false positive, otherwise u maybe got a problem

[btharper]

Can anyone put my anxiety at ease here.

I dl the new cpuminer and this is what came up after the 4th hash



I trust spybot and it never failed me to date. I know some things can be accidentally added to DB's However this has never come up with these miners.

This one is the first miner program that has done this.

Botnets are a great source of computing power, bitcoin miners are a great way to capitalize on computing power, and I have heard some about these being distributed in such a manner but I'm not sure how common that actually is.

[MooC Tals]

I have Downloaded this from

Binaries for Windows:
https://github.com/downloads/pooler/cpuminer/pooler-cpuminer-2.2.3-win32.zip (32-bit)

From the Original Post.

Its the minerd.exe   Microsoft essentials checks out ok
Spybot sd has flagged it twice and has deleted it  immediately so I downloaded it and
I put it though an online virus scanner....




WTF is going on here?

Someone else please verify Thanks

[Simran]

I have Downloaded this from

Binaries for Windows:
https://github.com/downloads/pooler/cpuminer/pooler-cpuminer-2.2.3-win32.zip (32-bit)

From the Original Post.

Its the minerd.exe   Microsoft essentials checks out ok
Spybot sd has flagged it twice and has deleted it  immediately so I downloaded it and
I put it though an online virus scanner....




WTF is going on here?

Someone else please verify Thanks

Botnets.

[MooC Tals]

Can anyone put my anxiety at ease here.

I dl the new cpuminer and this is what came up after the 4th hash



I trust spybot and it never failed me to date. I know some things can be accidentally added to DB's However this has never come up with these miners.

This one is the first miner program that has done this.

check the MD5 from the github dowload and compare it with urs, if its the same then its a false positive, otherwise u maybe got a problem

I really don't know how to check MD5 from github. I'm pretty sure I'm safe.