|
Vanderi
|
 |
June 20, 2014, 03:37:39 PM |
|
*edit same thing with 3.1, k1a failed -52 error
PM me full log. Hey really appreciated for the fast response Claymore. I sent the full log from trying 3.0 - this was what I had in the folder. Let me know if you want the log for 3.1 - maybe I tested it on my other rig, I have two. Remotely operated, from my vacation location nonetheless. Log for 3.1 from the other rig PM'd aswell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the
subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The
subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pepi
|
|
June 20, 2014, 03:42:52 PM |
|
3.1 uses less power but compared on my card dropped from 370 ---> 357 H/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
kqpahv
|
|
June 20, 2014, 03:51:04 PM |
|
what was wrong with 3.0  My 280x's were 48-52C, I wouldnt call that hot  |
|
|
|
|
superresistant
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1120
|
|
June 20, 2014, 03:57:33 PM |
|
what was wrong with 3.0 My 280x's were 48-52C, I wouldnt call that hot Watercooling ? |
|
|
|
|
Palad1n
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:02:12 PM |
|
Claymore is the best coder  Respect! 335 h/s on r9 270x, very very nice... Now test the speed r9 290.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vanderi
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:04:25 PM |
|
*edit same thing with 3.1, k1a failed -52 error
PM me full log. Hey really appreciated for the fast response Claymore. I sent the full log from trying 3.0 - this was what I had in the folder. Let me know if you want the log for 3.1 - maybe I tested it on my other rig, I have two. Remotely operated, from my vacation location nonetheless. Log for 3.1 from the other rig PM'd aswell To whom it might concern, Claymore sent me several PM's and one alternative beta miner of V3.x. For now he suspects that me activating my miners remotely ("RDC'ing") from my vacation location actually might be the fault for the k1a-error code. Will update if anything happens |
|
|
|
|
|
sk00t3r
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:06:26 PM |
|
what was wrong with 3.0 My 280x's were 48-52C, I wouldnt call that hot Watercooling ? OC'ed to 1100/1500 and my max temp on stock air cooling is 55c. PowerColor 280x ~468h/s 3.0 miner. |
|
|
|
|
|
pepi
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:07:19 PM |
|
what was wrong with 3.0 My 280x's were 48-52C, I wouldnt call that hot Watercooling ? My 270x is on 60°C ( open case) OC to 1.18GHz fan set manual to 50% |
|
|
|
|
|
goodluck0319
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:09:00 PM |
|
Claymore is the best coder Respect! 335 h/s on r9 270x, very very nice... Now test the speed r9 290. what is ur setting for your video card? I cannot get it to mine with 270x. |
|
|
|
|
|
pepi
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:15:38 PM |
|
Claymore is the best coder Respect! 335 h/s on r9 270x, very very nice... Now test the speed r9 290. Only 335? what clock of GPU/mem? |
|
|
|
|
gregor12
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:16:44 PM |
|
1844hash on 3x 290x stock engine/mem, nice!
|
|
|
|
|
|
HardwarePal
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:19:12 PM |
|
2585h/s on 4xR9-290s 937/1250 (stock 947/1250)
1960h/s on 3xR9-290s 937/1250 (stock 947/1250)
havent tested on my R9-280x's
3.1 is 7C cooler and less power draw
|
|
|
|
|
|
kqpahv
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:21:08 PM |
|
what was wrong with 3.0 My 280x's were 48-52C, I wouldnt call that hot Watercooling ? OC'ed to 1100/1500 and my max temp on stock air cooling is 55c. PowerColor 280x ~468h/s 3.0 miner. Yeah, no watercooling  MSI Gaming cards with fans @ 50%. I do run them on 950Mhz @ 0.9v as they are super energy efficient on those clocks and I only loose about 5-7% performance compared to 1080Mhz. Still even at 1080Mhz they wouldnt be any higher than 60c. |
|
|
|
|
scottlilo
Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:24:46 PM |
|
Great new miner Please add minergate support soon  I'd love that. |
Poloniex Moderator
|
|
|
Palad1n
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
June 20, 2014, 04:26:04 PM |
|
2044 h/s on x3 r9 290.
681 h/s each.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vanderi
|
|
June 20, 2014, 05:05:21 PM |
|
2044 h/s on x3 r9 290.
681 h/s each.
Do you know if you have hynix or elpida memory? |
|
|
|
|
manipogo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 05:56:33 PM |
|
I thought I would share some stats for those who are running 7950's. With 3x7950 @1.1v 1100/1500:
Version 1.2 ~890 h/s
Version 2.2 ~1013 h/s
Version 3.1 ~1227 h/s
For all versions I am drawing 530w from the wall and the gpu's temps are about 68C. GPU_MAX set to 80 (85 was about the same). For me, XMR mining is 10-15 degrees cooler and draws about a third less power than scrypt or scrypt-n. No longer heating my basement!
|
|
|
|
|
|
ozzy1926
|
|
June 20, 2014, 05:59:49 PM |
|
sometimes, i get this error  |
|
|
|
|
|
incognitoworker
|
|
June 20, 2014, 06:00:01 PM |
|
if OC, do i up both core and mem?
290 and 290 x :-)
|
|
|
|
superresistant
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1120
|
|
June 20, 2014, 06:04:11 PM |
|
sometimes, i get this error
PM'ed. |
|
|
|
|
|
