1701
|
Economy / Marketplace / Would you buy Bitcoin Apparel? (Shirts, Hoodies, etc.)
|
on: June 07, 2018, 01:07:51 PM
|
Been designing some shirts, sweaters, hoodies, tank-tops and other apparel. I have quite a ways to go, but I just want some general discussion on the topic to see what kind of interest(s) is there. I'm aware that everyone is going to want to see the designs before they can give a definitive answer. I'm just wondering if any of you are willing to part with your coin for some apparel designed by yours truly and support a start-up business that would be taken seriously. I want to build something up that the community also wants to exist, else I'll be working against rather than in collaboration with the community. I'm planning on basing the designs off of the "buzzwords" of Bitcoin's original whitepaper, the common sayings surrounding our "culture" like "HODL" "vires in numeris", the idea of decentralization, freedom and other things I believe to be relevant to the mindset most of us share. I'm open to ideas, looking for graphic designers to help me out and I'll answer whatever questions I have the ability to. Store Open : https://teespring.com/stores/bill-gator-apparelFirst designs have launched, grab yours now, and let me know what you think!
|
|
|
1702
|
Economy / Digital goods / Re: WTB KYC docs for Gate.io - $200
|
on: June 07, 2018, 12:53:17 PM
|
I would need to look into the situation more, but if verification of an ID is the only thing standing between $900 then consider me interested. I would want complete control over the account in such a way that it is no longer recoverable. If I can manage to secure the account in a way that it is no longer recoverable, then I would consider placing my KYC documents on the account to make a withdrawal possible. I would only be willing to pay you out of the $900 that I would be withdrawing from the account, rather than out of pocket, since I am already taking the risk of putting my documents and identity out there.
I'm not sure there is a safe way to do this, but if there is then I would be open to the idea. I don't want to assist in any fraudulence though, is there anything legally violating about what you are attempting to do?
|
|
|
1703
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: List of ShitPoster (Full Member or above only) [2 Legendary] [Updated- 05/06/18]
|
on: June 07, 2018, 12:43:46 PM
|
Random thought : In the title, it says that you have updated this thread 05/06/18 and this is a bit misleading. Maybe it might be more effective to simple state the month outright June 5th, 2018 or even 5th June, 2018. The way it is currently, makes me as an American, read it as though it hasn't been updated for over a month. We write our dates differently, might give some people the impression that you don't maintain the thread and discourage them from taking place in it.
|
|
|
1707
|
Other / Archival / Re: Abuse of DT power by actmyname!
|
on: June 06, 2018, 11:23:08 PM
|
Why do you care what I do with negative trust ratings?
You're criticizing the trust system and the actions of those within it; this makes your actions and opinions about the trust system up for scrutiny. I don't particularly care, but I am curious for an explanation if you're willing to give one. you should question those who are on DT and are doing whatever they want.
I don't need to, they give a perfectly acceptable explanation with reference links attached to their ratings. I don't need them to repeat information they've already provided. I'm just asking for an explanation from you, because I'd like to hear it, don't know why you're taking it so negatively. giving actmyname DT2 status and leaving him to do whatever he wants is the definition of irresponsibility.
" irresponsibility - lack of a proper sense of responsibility." Funny, I don't see "actmyname" anywhere in there. If "whatever he wants" makes his DT1 includers feel he no longer belongs on the DT network then they will remove him. actmyname does not have immunity and cannot act with impunity; there would be a similar reaction if they were to do as you have done to put yourself into the situation you're in. me giving them negative trust means jack for them.
I never said otherwise. you seem to be dismissing this case and base your judgement only on my actions.
I am dismissing this case, it is based on my judgement of your actions and my understanding of the marketplace trust system. There has been DT members that have tagged reputable members for holding religious beliefs, yet they were not removed and quite honestly nobody cared. The trust system is not exclusive to scamming; if a user deems you untrustworthy for any or no reason then they have ever right to make that public through feedback. That's exactly what it is designed for. you seem to forget that actmyname or any other DT2 members are harassing me with their default trust power.
Negative feedback based on your actions, false promises and extortion attempts is not harassment. They wouldn't say a word about you or to you if you hadn't dragged them into these slanderous and sad threads. you'd dismiss their actions and would say that they have the right to tag me red as scammer,
They didn't tag you as a scammer. They do have the "right" to tag you. Their actions are valid. this is what it says on my profile, it says trade with extreme caution, why? I have never scammed anybody. what kind of a fucked up system is this? it allows a few selected rogue individuals to decide whether I'm trustworthy or not and their trust is visible by default, that means whatever they want should be, whatever they say is the decision of the whole community while that is not the case. I disagree and I am trying to defend myself. marlboroza changed his feedback but actmyname tagged me for the same reason.
I certainly would like to hear your suggestion for a better system. You don't seem to understand the purpose of the marketplace trust system; please go back into some old threads and read previous discussions on the topic.
|
|
|
1708
|
Other / Archival / Re: Abuse of DT power by actmyname!
|
on: June 06, 2018, 07:31:46 PM
|
Each day, you do something that makes your opinions/conclusions about the trust network and particular DT members increasingly irrelevant. Taking a look at your recently sent feedback, you are now giving people temporary feedback for various reasons. This makes me wonder why after 90-days these people would warrant a removal of that feedback; can you help me understand how exclusively 90-days of waiting makes them more trustworthy? You don't seem to understand the long-term effects of your actions; how they mould the perception of your trustworthiness in the eyes of others. How many times do I need to repeat this?
I thought once was enough, personally. We happen to disagree, but I (and presumably everyone involved) am not confused about your position so it need not be repeated. Making multiple threads about the same issue, and refusing to use your avenues of recourse simply drag the situation out longer is not helpful or efficient; you are not coming out looking good in this one, digaran. It doesn't make sense to prolong this idiotic drama.
|
|
|
1710
|
Economy / Games and rounds / Re: [DAILY FREE RAFFLE]JUST BECAUSE I AM STILL IN A GOOD MOOD 34.0 ETHEREUM COIN
|
on: June 06, 2018, 06:57:52 PM
|
I'm broke when it comes to merit, but once my coin(s) start to arrive I will happily leave you a feedback. Certainly makes you more trustworthy to give away coins every day for 30+ days, and everything else you've done around here. If I had merit though, I would go throw you a couple. I had that thought initially, but haven't earned any in a while and I usually send them very liberally.
Congratulations on the win, thank you for another raffle my man!
|
|
|
1712
|
Economy / Digital goods / Re: I have 50x 100$ coupons from bitmain will sell cheap
|
on: June 05, 2018, 05:36:06 PM
|
How many $100 coupons can be applied to a single miner's price? I read everything I could on their site, but I might be too illiterate too figure it out. I'd be willing to buy some if I can apply multiple to a single s-91, but for some reason I doubt that is the case.
|
|
|
1713
|
Economy / Collectibles / Re: [AUCTION] Kialara Labyrinth Silver Balls #290
|
on: June 05, 2018, 05:24:27 PM
|
I would be buying this if I hadn't just blown .04 on a raffle towards a Kialara I didn't win. I have nightmares every night now. Spazzer is going to get a hell of a deal if nobody else jumps in on this. I have a big chunk of change in escrow right now, else I still might consider bidding on this; I don't want to take too long on payment though, if I bid and escrow takes a bit.
|
|
|
1714
|
Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] CS:GO Case Keys - 340+ Keys in Stock! $2/ea
|
on: June 05, 2018, 04:43:36 PM
|
No worries, we all have things that keep our attention away from things like this. In all honesty, I would've forgotten too, but I left the tab open literally since you last replied and just now noticed. I am not too keen about searching for buyers, because most people looking to trade for my skin are just scammers. The only $ or BTC offers I have received have been for average market value for an average butterfly knife fade FN, well I received some good Paypal offers, but Paypal is gross; mine is unique, full-fade and extremely rare so I want more than I could get on the steam market. I think this is a reasonable stance, so outside of that your key offer seems pretty fair by comparison. I'm not looking to trade out of desperation or ignorance, I just want a fair trade and you're someone I know will be able to provide that, unlike most.
To be clear though, you do expect to get more keys in the near(ish) future and you are still interested, is that right?
|
|
|
1715
|
Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] CS:GO Case Keys - 340+ Keys in Stock! $2/ea
|
on: June 05, 2018, 04:33:25 PM
|
It's been about two weeks since we've last discussed this, so I'm wondering if you still have interest in the knife and if there has been a restock on your keys. Should I still be holding my breathe or should I search for a new buyer? I'm in no rush, just don't want to be waiting for something that isn't going to happen, so I'd like to re-open communication and negotiation.
|
|
|
|