Have you managed any campaigns in the past? I am wondering if you are qualified or prepared to offer such a service. You seem to have a habit of promising more than you can deliver and your potential clients should be extremely interested in seeing some kind of portfolio or past experience in this area before they go giving you an overwhelming amount of responsibility.

Is there a limit on the amount of slots that you are allowing people to fill up? For such a cheap buy in, I almost can't help myself. I'll happily grab myself 5-slots, if that's acceptable. That should really get the raffle going. 0.00007 per ticket is practically nothing, count me in.

2
4
7
B
D

That post seems like pretty solid evidence to me that you are not even reading the replies within your own thread. If I were them and knew this to be true, then I wouldn't waste time explaining myself to a brick wall, either. Enjoy throwing your tantrum in the corner; whenever you are ready to come back and act like a person we will all be here waiting.

I wish I saw that these were available for such a low price, I would've snagged one for sure. $15 is an absolute steal if the knives are of any reasonable quality, for sure. If any of those knives from the previous auctions don't get paid for I'll definitely be on the lookout for when you re-post them up for auction. Consider me an interested party in the future production and sale of these. Shame that I didn't make it in time to grab one.

No. I have no reason to waste hours of my time explaining to you why your behavior is perceived the way it is. I suggest a therapist for something like that; I hear they are helpful for introspection and self-reflection of this manner.


Great, and it is the personal opinion of others that your posts make you a troll and untrustworthy.


Okay?


Yes, and most newbies asking for loans don't receive them, so how does anybody know they won't repay them?


It's called the Trust system, you do realize that, right? Thank you for your opinion, but it is irrelevant what you believe should and shouldn't happen when the system is based upon subjective personal criteria.


No, it is not. It doesn't matter if you've scammer anybody. There are tons of high ranking reputable members that haven't scammed anybody and they have a negative feedback. Scamming is not the sole-purpose or intention of the marketplace feedback system, nor is it the only criteria that it is contingent upon.

The question "Why did he tag me for trolling?", answers itself. If a user feels that your trolling deserves a negative trust, then a negative trust you will receive from that user. There are no rules about trust moderation, so why do you feel entitled to an explanation in the first place?

"This user continues to spread lies, harassing forum members, DT and moderators/stuff, running very shady law practice service which consist of trolling DT members and spreading lies all over the forum." That should answer the question of why they have tagged you with negative trust. Reporting a "troll" post to moderators will do nothing. Suggesting that as a course of action tells me that you have never even read through the moderation policy that is publicly available and stickied.

Marlboroza has answered your questions, but even if they didn't they are under no obligation to do so. You are acting entitled and are wishing the rules, moderation policy and DT inclusions were based around yourself. This is not going to happen.

That was my suspicion, when this newbie pops onto the forum and is advertising that they are hiring chat moderators, but then throws up a referral link to the gambling site. It just didn't seem like something that the staff would do, if they were interested in referrals they would probably acquire them organically and not through the application process of becoming moderator.

I think you will find that this list will become increasingly filled with Full Members, maybe more so than you'd be willing to keep track of. When this happens, it might be a good idea (or maybe even now) to switch the thread to only list Sr. Member and above, so that you do not overwhelm yourself with the sheer amount of Full Members you are bound to come across that fit your criteria. If you can keep up with it, then by all means, keep it going, but I would like to see someone from DT or a moderator putting this list to solid use; maybe once it becomes more extensive that might be the case.

Digaran, you continue to make these threads when we have laid out a very effective and clear plan of action for you to take if you are truly interested in making any changes within the DT network. I have a simply question; do you agree with any negative rating currently standing on your account? Do you understand why your actions have been perceived in a manner that is untrustworthy? You can continue to throw peas from your feeding chair like a toddler, or you can stand up with your back straight like a man and approach the problem with confidence, rationale and humility. If you set out to fix the problems of the world, clean your room first. Look in the mirror, there are changes that need to happen within yourself. Do you believe creating these threads is helping your situation? You are now just a fart in the wind amongst the other thousands of leeches and shitposters that cry around Meta and Reputation about their ratings. It is sad that this is how you are going to spend the rest of your days around the forum.

If you disagree with the ratings, and the member does not wish to remove it, then your only course of action is to contact their DT inclusion.

It's that user's "opinion", not their "option", to begin with. Aside from that, ThatRandom8543, was extremely reasonable and polite in the way that they presented what they had to say. You certainly didn't ask them directly for their "option", but you are publicly begging for money in an attempt to make yourself seem more trustworthy. Someone that lashes out defensively about trolling, when the user is simply explaining guidelines, rules and expectations that we all operate by is childish. They tried to warn you politely, you acted pedantic while ignoring their genuine information and now it has resulted in you receiving multiple negative trust from DT members. You've shown that you do not care about the rules, guidelines, expectations or other members of this forum through your actions. Continue to act like a toddler and you'll continue to be treated like one.

If I had to guess, Maurumedia is a new alt of KingKongBong and KingKongBong is attempting to build up some kind of reputation for his new alt. The only problem, is they didn't learn their lesson the first time they asked for a loan without collateral and got tagged on their other account. Now they're doing the same thing, convinced we're all trolling, meanwhile they're faking PMs, lying about transactions, and trying to prove their trustworthy by asking for money they do not need. Good one.

Funny that you cropped the username out of the picture of your "proof". Funny that your "proof" is an easily fake-able PM. Tell us who funded your loan publicly and share the TXID, otherwise there is no reason to pretend like you're telling the truth.

If you truly have received your loan successfully, then you are no longer in need of your loan. Please lock the thread, and I'm looking forward to see how much trust you've gained through this maneuver.

Vouch copies are Free not $2 off the price you charge everyone else. Their purpose is to allow someone to review your method/book so that others can get some assurance that they will get their money-worth. If you are interested in actually participating in the process, increasing your sales flow and allowing your potential customers to feel confident in their purchase I would happily review the e-book. There are many others that would happily do the same. I will not allow your negative trust, poor English or breaking forum-rules into consideration when I evaluate what the method has to offer in terms of it's ability to profit.

I already posted in your other thread, to alert you that you are breaking the rules in case you were unaware. For anyone else that is interested in the other thread, it can be found here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3944310 . OP, please lock one of your threads, and once you post a new "bump" post, it is common courtesy to delete your old "bump" posts. This way your thread doesn't get cluttered with nonsense.

Also, your signature claims that a moderator flagged you, because you attempted to sell your account, but this false. It was not a moderator, and what do you mean by "clean"?

First of all, you have broken the forum rules by double-posting your thread. The content is slightly different, but it the same exact thing you are pushing.
See here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3906330.0 . Then you say that there are already too many people using this method, when someone asked you about saturation. Now you're mentioning that you only need a few more "partners" and this gives me pause, because how would the people purchasing your e-book be in any way your partner? The sales pitch here is very unclear and very unattractive, simultaneously.

I've never used telegram before in my life, but if you paying decently for the amount of time that it would require for me to do the work you are asking then I would have no problem jumping into it. I find it strange that you are hiring a dozen people, but not publicly disclosing the rate of pay which you are promising. This makes it almost seem like you are just trying to grow the telegram group, by getting a certain kind of person interested in joining.

Regardless, I would happily accept more information about this opportunity and if it is worth it you would have a great participant on your hand. What is the weekly payment? What is the telegram group based upon? Are you comfortable using any of the escrows listed in the typical escrow list? How much writing will need to be done daily/weekly?

We need more information, or else you are just going to get people contacting you that are mostly disinterested and simply want an easy buck.

Your thread leaves me with a few questions. I'd appreciate if you would answer them, either through PM, but preferably publicly.

How low is ?

 If you are asking for volunteers, that is one thing, but you should maybe disclose what you mean by "very low". Plus, there is a chance that your moderators will never see an increase in their pay should your gambling site prove unprofitable for whatever reason. How can your moderators have any verification of when your profits do or do not increase? There needs to be a more concrete arrangement than, "we'll pay you very low, and maybe raise it once something happens that you can't verify."

Oh, and why are you using a referral link to point at your own website?

e - bill gator , here we go, I just need a BTC coin and I'll have quite the little collection coming from your giveaways.

58x58 is a much more attractive size, in my personal opinion. These quilts all looks extremely "crisp", as you put it. I may have asked my question in the incorrect thread, because it was in one of your auction threads rather than this discussion thread (which I forgot was still being maintained). Anyways, I'm wondering if there is any possibility for extremely small versions of the Cryptocurrency quilts? Something like 8" x 10", 5" x 7" or 11" x 14". I'm trying to think of anyway that I could get my hands on one of these and feel good about it.

Congratulations on getting your hands on another one of these beautifully made quilts. I'm honestly pretty jealous, because I've been wanting one of these quilts since I first saw the finished product of the first one. It's a shame that I don't have a spare .05 to grab one of these bad boys.

Would there be any chance at a comically small version of the quilts for a low price? Maybe one that would even fit in a picture frame. That might help drive more sales and interest, with the buy-in price being more accessible.

If I hit a Bitcoin Lottery, I promise I'll buy a full-size version.

Well, reading through your post history it seems evident to me that your posts are not entirely your own. There is certainly more than one person writing posts for your account. I do not know if this means your account is shared, sold, if you plagiarize or if someone else is writing some of your posts. There might be an entirely separate explanation altogether, but whatever the case is I would suggest you stop it.


Fair enough, thanks for letting me know so that I don't feel like a crazy person.


Your intentions seem to be in the right place, so I'm not going to come down on you too hard. The posts you provided are good examples of helpful contributions to the community. There's nothing wrong with that, but looking through your recent posts and even just reading these submissions carefully let's me know that you should work on your English skills. Your posts are all extremely choppy, and quite honestly a little difficult to read. Sometimes I have to think more than I should have to in order to understand what you are trying to say. My biggest suggestion would be to work on your English skills, refrain from getting involved in drama, and try to elaborate/clarify your thoughts more clearly. Don't get lazy when it comes to typing, because if what you have to say is important or helpful then it is worth the few extra keystrokes and seconds.


It is primarily focused around newbies, and people that are seeking to improve their posting habits. That was the original intention of my thread anyways, along with finding interesting topics to get involved in. Now that I've removed the merit incentive, it unfortunately seems like most of the interest has drifted away. It's possible that moving it from Services to this board also makes it much less "visible" to most users around the forum. I doubt this board gets as much traffic.

Funny enough I actually already read that thread the other day when you originally posted it. It's actually on my watchlist, and it provoked some decent amount of thought on the subject. As for the quality of your posts, I'm not sure what I can offer in order for you to improve your posting behavior. You don't seem to force posts out simply to get a +1 post, or whatever else would be the goal. When you have an interesting or intelligible thought you present it in a very cohesive and palatable manner. You don't spam around and you don't stretch your posts unnecessarily, so overall I'd say just keep doing your thing.

That was what I meant went I was originally telling you to test them. Maybe I was being a bit unclear and I could have communicated that better. When you are testing, I would always try to plug it directly into the board, rather than relying on the riser cables. The riser cables could be broke, or not seated properly. It adds an entirely new dimension to the issue that you can avoid through testing it directly. Since you got the one card working and you are bringing the last for repair, then does that mean that your problem is "solved"?

Bump