Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[LFC_Bitcoin]

This presidential 'debate' - two incompetent guys being chaired by an incompetent chair, arguing incompetently to try to persuade incompetent people that they would make a competent president. All the time ignoring the fact that an incompetent president is exactly what the real wielders of power want.

Arise young Hero Member, it is done.

[1715282316]

1715282316

[1715282316]

1715282316

[1715282316]

1715282316

[El duderino_]

This debate is total cringe.

God help us all.

[JayJuanGee]

How are all you CoinClowns and BagHodlers doing today?   You duped enough naive people ready for your next round of the BTC ponzi scheme?

Ironic seeing you here, jonoiv.... especially a bitter no coiner like ur lil selfie, and pity the fool like you who was actually watching the BTC price in mid-March 2020 and surely had opportunities to buy back some or all of the BIG stash (.5BTC-ish) of coins that you sold at $6k-ish in April/May 2019.

Strange also that you still have hopium in current times....

I will concede that your wishes for DOWN are not impossible, but the odds seem to be growing more and more against you with the passage of time, sorry to say.. that.. sucks to be uie.

Maybe you did not get the memo?

It has been pretty rare that bitcoin prices go below its 200-Week moving average.

In April/May 2019 when you sold your BTC stash at $6k, the 200-week moving average was just getting up to $3,600, so you did have some arguable chance of being able to buy those BTC back at or below that $6k selling price, but part of the difficulty that came thereafter was a continued movement of the BTC price up through the following months.. and BTC price just continued to be reluctant to fall, even below $7,000 for any kind of meaningful amount of time.

Surely, you got a lucky break in March 2020, but you did not appreciate such lucky break.

In March 2020 BTC's 200 week moving average was merely approaching $5,500, so when the BTC price actually dipped down below that $5,500 at various times for close to a whole week - with even close to an hour below $4,400 and a few minutes dipping to $3,850, you did have a chance to buy back because admittedly, you were watching the BTC price during that time... but part of the problema was that you were waiting for more and MOre and MOAR... and more did not come.

In recent times, BTC's prices are tending to gravitate up.

We also have an issue of the longest streak ever in BTC prices closing above 10k on the daily and over 65 days now.

Furthermore, BTC's 200 week moving average is starting to approach moving up nearly $100 per week, and as I type this post BTC's 200 week moving average is getting close to $6,800 - so becoming more and more difficult for you to buy back your sold coins for anything close to your $6k-ish sales price.

If you want to get out of your no coiner status and share with some of us coiners in the hedging and other likely upcoming profits that come with HODLing bitcoin, you may need to buy some or all of those sold BTC back at a higher price than $6k prices, and seriously, the truth of the matter is that you may even have difficulties getting those coins for 4 digit prices - though surely quite a bit better odds of getting 4 digit BTC prices than hoping for anything approaching $6k and moreso below $6k.

I am thinking also that you may be better served to change your already clown-ish looking avatar, soon.

Something like the below, might be an illustrative upgrade.. - a kind of bitter and sweet all rolled into one:

[OutOfMemory]

This presidential 'debate' - two incompetent guys being chaired by an incompetent chair, arguing incompetently to try to persuade incompetent people that they would make a competent president. All the time ignoring the fact that an incompetent president is exactly what the real wielders of power want.

Arise young Hero Member, it is done.

Most heroes wear caps, though  
(and hodl bitcoin)

[Elwar]

Big news coming Sunday gents.

Bag hodlers, pack your bags.

#ThisIsGentlemen

[Toxic2040]

This presidential 'debate' - two incompetent guys being chaired by an incompetent chair, arguing incompetently to try to persuade incompetent people that they would make a competent president. All the time ignoring the fact that an incompetent president is exactly what the real wielders of power want.

Arise young Hero Member, it is done.

+1 WOsMerit

congrats strawbs!



-----

This debate is total cringe.

God help us all.

+1 WOsMerit


------

-snip-

+1 WOsMerit



---------

some afternoon charts

#dyor
As so eloquently and thoroughly stated up thread...bitcoin continues sideways with moar up than down for the most part as of late. Steady as she goes.
1h


4h

#stronghands

[strawbs]

This presidential 'debate' - two incompetent guys being chaired by an incompetent chair, arguing incompetently to try to persuade incompetent people that they would make a competent president. All the time ignoring the fact that an incompetent president is exactly what the real wielders of power want.

Arise young Hero Member, it is done.

+1 WOsMerit

congrats strawbs!

Hey, thanks guys (esp. LFC_Bitcoin and The Dude). If I had a cape I'd wear it right now! I wonder if I hold the record for the highest Time Active on the WO : Achieving Hero Status ratio?

Rest assured that my periods of greater activity on the WO have an unfeasibly high correlation with periods of CCMF. Hold on to your hats  

[Hueristic]

Hey, thanks guys (esp. LFC_Bitcoin and The Dude). If I had a cape I'd wear it right now! I wonder if I hold the record for the highest Time Active on the WO : Achieving Hero Status ratio?

Rest assured that my periods of greater activity on the WO have an unfeasibly high correlation with periods of CCMF. Hold on to your hats  

Long overdue!

[cAPSLOCK]

In March 2020 BTC's 200 week moving average was merely approaching $5,500, so when the BTC price actually dipped down below that $5,500 at various times for close to a whole week - with even close to an hour below $4,400 and a few minutes dipping to $3,850, you did have a chance to buy back because admittedly, you were watching the BTC price during that time... but part of the problema was that you were waiting for more and MOre and MOAR... and more did not come.

His Loquaciousness is certainly correct about the above... and I remember the combination of pain and pleasure of that day in March.

It's probably a bad idea to post this...  but what the hell... YOLO...

[cAPSLOCK]

Big news coming Sunday gents.

Bag hodlers, pack your bags.

#ThisIsGentlemen

I REALLY like mysteriously bullish Elwar.

[JayJuanGee]

In March 2020 BTC's 200 week moving average was merely approaching $5,500, so when the BTC price actually dipped down below that $5,500 at various times for close to a whole week - with even close to an hour below $4,400 and a few minutes dipping to $3,850, you did have a chance to buy back because admittedly, you were watching the BTC price during that time... but part of the problema was that you were waiting for more and MOre and MOAR... and more did not come.

His Loquaciousness is certainly correct about the above... and I remember the combination of pain and pleasure of that day in March.

It's probably a bad idea to post this...  but what the hell... YOLO...

You are killing it... capital no capital.....  well surpassing a .21BTC threshold - a kind of ball hogging - which is surely more than the world average.. all in one buy.  1/100,000,000 of the total BTC supply.   

Further, I was becoming envious that nullius was getting so much of the word-counting attention, but I am glad that you reserved a wee bit attention for yours truly.   

[Toxic2040]

the evening wall report

#dyor
cats dancing in the moonlight
1h



the sparrow hodls the key
4h



surely each bitcoin is worth more than a BRK-A         I dont think $366kish a unreasonable peak price estimate for the next parabolic rise
W




#stronghands

[jojo69]

If it is indeed their fault, I'll name and shame them wherever possible. Most notably here.

 

[Toxic2040]

[cAPSLOCK]

In March 2020 BTC's 200 week moving average was merely approaching $5,500, so when the BTC price actually dipped down below that $5,500 at various times for close to a whole week - with even close to an hour below $4,400 and a few minutes dipping to $3,850, you did have a chance to buy back because admittedly, you were watching the BTC price during that time... but part of the problema was that you were waiting for more and MOre and MOAR... and more did not come.

His Loquaciousness is certainly correct about the above... and I remember the combination of pain and pleasure of that day in March.

It's probably a bad idea to post this...  but what the hell... YOLO...

You are killing it... capital no capital.....  well surpassing a .21BTC threshold - a kind of ball hogging - which is surely more than the world average.. all in one buy.  1/100,000,000 of the total BTC supply.   

Further, I was becoming envious that nullius was getting so much of the word-counting attention, but I am glad that you reserved a wee bit attention for yours truly.   

I know...  nearly a whole quarter corn!  But I hadn't really thought about the fact I did a 21 themed buy that day... Thing is I don't really ever buy it that often anymore... but that day?  What a sale!

[bitebits]

https://www.microstrategy.com/en/bitcoin

[BobLawblaw]

https://twitter.com/whale_alert/status/1311558945253851140

[LFC_Bitcoin]

https://twitter.com/whale_alert/status/1311558945253851140

[vroom]

I'm testing the new cryptowatch desktop app and I'm pretty impressed. It's available for Windows, OS X and Linux : https://cryptowat.ch/apps/desktop

I have an early access invite code to give away. Just reply to this message and I will send the code to the first person who is interested.

[600watt]

bitcoins invention had such a deep impact on everything a proper IT guy was holding as true that it confused the shit out of everyone that went down the rabbit hole in the first place. how to wrap one's head around this beast?

the easiest structural thing to identify of this new kid on the block was its database structure. man, what mess could have been saved if they would have just called it TIMECHAIN and not fkn stupid BLOCKCHAIN. bitcoin was such a weird and unknown beast that the best strategy seemed to be to start with understanding why it uses a timechain.

somehow this approach started to become so dominant that people started to refer to the timechain being "the tech that enables bitcoin". this was a lazy and stupid approach, but it helped explaining how in an "append-only" database, if you do wrap the data in "blocks" and connect them via a hash consecutively in a time wise order, that this data is now unpenetrateably sealed into the database.

so plausible, so catchy - and not wrong at all. but for fuck sake not THAT relevant either. the consensus algorithm with validating nodes, the difficulty adjustment, the game theory of competing miners getting a reward (block reward), the torrent-like distribution of the database, the collective git-process of open source software development, the ten minute global sync time (block time), the hard cap, the fee structure, the emission schedule (halving)

all them are important delicately enginereed details of the bitcoin tech that make that boat float.

to say that blockchain is the tech that enables bitcoin is like saying it is the order of the tires that is the tech behind a car. sure placing the 4 tires in a correct manner is important if you want to build a car. but you still need a fkn motor, steering, a brake, and a body.

that a misunderstood buzzword could create this biggest shitpile of lies and deception and fraud and scam in tech history is a phenomenon on its own. and boy it did become alive and is a beast of its own now.

bitcoin dominance at 55% percent shines a light on the amount of sheer stupidity. IT and marketing "blockchain-not-bitcoin" farts glorifying "blockchain" as the new global next big thing in tech (check out the blockchain strategic papers of the BIG FOUR global accounting firms Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG, PricewaterhouseCoopers - them managing 85% of global companies, they hail the blockchain the same way lunatic hardcore Christians hail the last coming of the messiah) is a joke unfortunately only maximalists seem getting.

this one little misunderstanding of timechain has created two separate multi billion grave nuthouses that have their own life now.

1)
6999 shitcoins (aka "products") with no use case other than scamming (or like in ETH case, the use case is enabling scamming in different layers (ERC20, DEFI, NFT) on one side. people get scammed to buy tokens that should have never been sold for money. in bitcoins case a market had to be established to facilitate price finding and distribution. how on earth did that emerge as a model to straightforwardly sell vaporware to "investors"?  looking at you coinmarketcap and at you - exchanges. why would you sell digital gold on one side and 6999 fake gold shit on the other?

2)
5 years of billions invested of global consortiums of the biggest global players (looking at you, CORDA) in all kinds of "blockchain" products that never saw the light. hundreds of conferences, thousands of marketing suits, spitting out the same "blockchain is the future" sheit year after year after year - and to this day NOTHING, NADA, NULL, ZERO use cases.

how doesn't anybody see the strange asymmetry between two industries both working on "blockchain" - one side has 6999 products with no use case and the other is the plethora of existing companies desperately searching for products. why don't they just team up?

because their concept is laughably incorrect, they can't merge since blockchain is no tech. both sides derailed from real IT to a mere buzzword. trying to build industries on it.

what a shitshow.