Bigpiggy01
|
|
December 07, 2011, 02:19:47 AM |
|
This is really weird but both those emails just ticked in. They must have gotten stuck somehow though I can't think of how or why.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 07, 2011, 02:29:41 AM |
|
I didn't touch anything and all emails were sent by the server, so it was somewhere on the way. Strange...
|
|
|
|
tnkflx
|
|
December 07, 2011, 08:35:16 AM |
|
This is really weird but both those emails just ticked in. They must have gotten stuck somehow though I can't think of how or why.
Email is not instant ;-)
|
| Operating electrum.be & us.electrum.be |
|
|
|
btcex
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2011, 08:22:16 AM |
|
Why are there so many invalid Namcoin Blocks in a row?
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 12, 2011, 01:02:18 PM |
|
Why are there so many invalid Namcoin Blocks in a row?
Pool is using namecoin's blockexplorer to cross-check if blocks are matured and accepted by the rest of the network. Unfortunately blockexplorer gets broken, there are not new blocks since yesterday. I reported it right now, after they fix it, pool will recalculate all namecoin blocks again and everything will be fine.
|
|
|
|
trilby
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
December 14, 2011, 07:15:22 PM |
|
Slush just a quick question on the pool luck calculation. Does this calculation take in to account the difficulty of the past blocks or does it only work using the current difficulty
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 14, 2011, 07:20:57 PM |
|
It uses difficulty from the time when block was found. So it should be +/- correct.
|
|
|
|
trilby
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
December 14, 2011, 07:46:00 PM |
|
It uses difficulty from the time when block was found. So it should be +/- correct.
Thanks I don't know why I find the pool luck display really interesting but i cant stop checking it
|
|
|
|
notawake
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
December 14, 2011, 08:52:00 PM |
|
Why are there so many invalid Namcoin Blocks in a row?
Pool is using namecoin's blockexplorer to cross-check if blocks are matured and accepted by the rest of the network. Unfortunately blockexplorer gets broken, there are not new blocks since yesterday. I reported it right now, after they fix it, pool will recalculate all namecoin blocks again and everything will be fine. Has this been resolved?
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 14, 2011, 08:53:23 PM |
|
Has this been resolved?
NMC block explorer is now working correctly, I'll find a time to recalculate nmc rewards during tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
bz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 15, 2011, 05:19:06 AM Last edit: December 15, 2011, 05:54:48 AM by bz |
|
Should BTC for bock 157519 be recalculated?
# Block found Duration Total shares BTC reward NMC reward Block # 9376 2011-12-14 20:03:48 0:55:03 824609 0.18219482 0.28743400 157529 9375 2011-12-14 19:08:40 0:46:21 711990 0.01990589 0.03148287 157519
EDIT: Fixed block number in question
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 15, 2011, 10:57:40 AM |
|
What's your expected block reward? I don't see anything wrong with those blocks. Should BTC for bock 157519 be recalculated?
|
|
|
|
bz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 15, 2011, 11:35:05 AM |
|
What's your expected block reward? I don't see anything wrong with those blocks. Should BTC for bock 157519 be recalculated?
I can't see what it was at the time of block 157519, but typically (like right now) it is about 0.18284650 BTC. When I compare the two blocks listed in my post, I see that duration and shares between the two are proportionately closer than BTC reward. I thought I should see something more like 0.18 not 0.019.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 15, 2011, 04:08:05 PM |
|
NMC block explorer is now working correctly, I'll find a time to recalculate nmc rewards during tomorrow.
NMC reward is fixed now.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 15, 2011, 04:10:12 PM |
|
I can't see what it was at the time of block 157519, but typically (like right now) it is about 0.18284650 BTC. When I compare the two blocks listed in my post, I see that duration and shares between the two are proportionately closer than BTC reward. I thought I should see something more like 0.18 not 0.019.
I checked those two rounds, but don't see anything wrong. It looks like your miners disconnected for some time, so your block reward was lower than usual.
|
|
|
|
bz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 16, 2011, 03:16:37 AM |
|
I can't see what it was at the time of block 157519, but typically (like right now) it is about 0.18284650 BTC. When I compare the two blocks listed in my post, I see that duration and shares between the two are proportionately closer than BTC reward. I thought I should see something more like 0.18 not 0.019.
I checked those two rounds, but don't see anything wrong. It looks like your miners disconnected for some time, so your block reward was lower than usual. I see I have a few (very few) shares on my backup pool so some of the shares probably shifted over there but what seems strange is that I was getting about the same shares per minute and yet the reward was so different: Duration Total shares Shares/Minute BTC reward Block # 0:55:03 824609 14984 0.18219482 157529 0:46:21 711990 15367 0.01990589 157519 I haven't seen this kind of difference before so I'll just keep an eye on it to see how things run in the future. Thanks for looking into it.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 16, 2011, 03:27:47 AM |
|
Duration Total shares Shares/Minute BTC reward Block # 0:55:03 824609 14984 0.18219482 157529 0:46:21 711990 15367 0.01990589 157519
Wait, what's "shares per minute"? It's calculated for total shares of the pool, right? So if your miner had a short outage, this value don't change...
|
|
|
|
naypalm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1272
Merit: 1012
howdy
|
|
December 16, 2011, 05:59:41 AM |
|
I wish my machine could do that many shares per minute
|
|
|
|
bz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 16, 2011, 04:05:56 PM |
|
Duration Total shares Shares/Minute BTC reward Block # 0:55:03 824609 14984 0.18219482 157529 0:46:21 711990 15367 0.01990589 157519
Wait, what's "shares per minute"? It's calculated for total shares of the pool, right? So if your miner had a short outage, this value don't change... My bad, thanks for the correction. I'm getting my stats messed up, different pools, etc. Is there a historical perspective on how many shares I got per block?
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 16, 2011, 09:57:50 PM Last edit: December 16, 2011, 11:39:38 PM by slush |
|
Today it's exactly a year when I open the pool for public. Happy first birthday :-)
|
|
|
|
|