Biggen1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 05, 2018, 07:12:35 PM |
|
There ya go. These things are beasts. I love them.
Low wattage, low noise, low heat, high hash.
Yeah, I love these guys. It's amazing how quiet they are. My two PSU fans make more noise than all 8 of the GPU fans put together!
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 05, 2018, 09:08:49 PM |
|
Off-topic but important. I highly encourage you to inform yourself about the recent published CPU-vulnerabilities Meltdown & Spectre and evaluate how they affect your wallet security.
|
|
|
|
koinli
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 05, 2018, 09:16:11 PM |
|
400 Sols/s no low for a a 1070TI if it takes 80 w or less, for efficiency, but mining income is quite high these times, and hash rate is more important,
i prefer a 1070ti that takes 200 w but gives me 550-600 sol/s,
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4438
Merit: 3913
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 05, 2018, 10:36:08 PM Last edit: January 05, 2018, 11:40:02 PM by vapourminer |
|
Off-topic but important. I highly encourage you to inform yourself about the recent published CPU-vulnerabilities Meltdown & Spectre and evaluate how they affect your wallet security.
yeah pretty nasty. ms has a patch out for meltdown but it can slow your machine down. wonderful. but trezor or ledger nano s for the win. or fire up that old pentium 2 or 3 ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) although i think the jury is still out on whether those are immune. or maybe olde skoole: S-100 or CP/M anyone?
|
|
|
|
hogito
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 05, 2018, 10:38:36 PM |
|
Hi, guys here's my rig info, just to compare
# gpu pwr temp sm mem enc dec mclk pclk # Idx W C % % % % MHz MHz 0 126 68 100 87 0 0 4151 1784 1 125 70 100 87 0 0 4151 1822 2 80 67 100 74 0 0 4068 1771 3 76 61 100 71 0 0 4068 1695
(TDP limit 0-1 125W 2-3 80W)
GPU 0: GeForce GTX 1070 8GB GPU 1: GeForce GTX 1070 8GB GPU 2: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB GPU 3: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
GPU0 70C Sol/s: 459.8 Sol/W: 3.70 Avg: 460.6 I/s: 247.1 Sh: 1.90 1.00 55 GPU1 71C Sol/s: 462.7 Sol/W: 3.74 Avg: 465.3 I/s: 249.3 Sh: 1.91 1.00 50 GPU2 68C Sol/s: 277.8 Sol/W: 3.53 Avg: 281.4 I/s: 150.8 Sh: 1.22 1.00 56 GPU3 63C Sol/s: 281.3 Sol/W: 3.46 Avg: 275.9 I/s: 147.8 Sh: 1.42 1.00 49
zm O.5.8, Ubuntu 16.04.3, nvidia Driver: 387.34
Thanks for posting the info! I'm understanding most settings, but not seeing what % Power you clocked your 1060's down to. I have a big fleet of 1060 3gb cards and haven't found the perfect power setting yet. Are your set to 74% and 71% for GPU 2 & 3?
|
|
|
|
GustETH
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 05, 2018, 10:39:46 PM |
|
at least 1 time a day dstm stops working, hastrate 0, in the logs it does not say any reason. some help? latest version 0.5.8 windows 10 pro use ETHcontrol (last version) It has happened to me in 2 different rigs
4:34:59 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU2 52C Sol/s: 503.9 Sol/W: 3.54 Avg: 497.1 I/s: 266.3 Sh: 1.84 0.99 1184 +++ 4:35:02 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU4 54C Sol/s: 475.5 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 469.7 I/s: 251.6 Sh: 1.69 0.99 1819 ++ 4:35:05 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU3 55C Sol/s: 465.6 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 469.5 I/s: 251.3 Sh: 1.75 0.99 164 4:35:05 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU1 51C Sol/s: 488.8 Sol/W: 3.54 Avg: 497.7 I/s: 266.8 Sh: 1.75 0.99 582 4:35:07 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU0 51C Sol/s: 470.5 Sol/W: 3.49 Avg: 472.6 I/s: 253.2 Sh: 1.78 0.99 166 + 4:35:08 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU5 51C Sol/s: 466.9 Sol/W: 3.49 Avg: 471.6 I/s: 252.5 Sh: 1.66 0.99 343 + 4:35:08 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : ========== Sol/s: 2871.2 Sol/W: 3.50 Avg: 2878.2 I/s: 1541.6 Sh: 10.47 0.99 709 4:35:09 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU2 52C Sol/s: 495.7 Sol/W: 3.54 Avg: 497.1 I/s: 266.0 Sh: 1.84 0.99 1184 4:35:09 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU4 53C Sol/s: 474.2 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 469.7 I/s: 251.5 Sh: 1.69 0.99 703 + 4:35:10 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU3 55C Sol/s: 468.7 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 469.5 I/s: 251.6 Sh: 1.75 0.99 164 4:35:11 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU1 51C Sol/s: 506.2 Sol/W: 3.54 Avg: 497.7 I/s: 266.3 Sh: 1.75 0.99 582 + 4:36:21 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # zm 0.5.8 4:36:22 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 1:0 4:36:23 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU1 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 2:0 4:36:24 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU2 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 3:0 4:36:25 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU3 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 5:0 4:36:26 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU4 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 6:0 4:36:26 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU5 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 7:0 4:36:27 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : 4:36:28 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # telemetry server started 4:36:29 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 4:36:35 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # server set difficulty to: 0004189374bc6a7ef9db22d0... 4:36:56 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU0 41C Sol/s: 481.0 Sol/W: 3.56 Avg: 481.0 I/s: 257.4 Sh: 0.00 . . 4:36:57 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU1 41C Sol/s: 498.9 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 498.9 I/s: 270.5 Sh: 2.98 1.00 204 + 4:36:59 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU2 42C Sol/s: 498.0 Sol/W: 3.64 Avg: 498.0 I/s: 270.0 Sh: 0.00 . . 4:37:01 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU3 48C Sol/s: 475.9 Sol/W: 3.62 Avg: 475.9 I/s: 256.4 Sh: 0.00 . . 4:37:03 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU4 45C Sol/s: 478.7 Sol/W: 3.63 Avg: 478.7 I/s: 255.6 Sh: 3.00 1.00 922 + 4:37:05 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU5 43C Sol/s: 480.3 Sol/W: 3.67 Avg: 480.3 I/s: 256.6 Sh: 2.99 1.00 141 + 4:37:06 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : ========== Sol/s: 2912.8 Sol/W: 3.62 Avg: 2912.8 I/s: 1566.3 Sh: 8.97 1.00 422
|
|
|
|
aquavici
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 12:43:55 AM |
|
Hi, guys here's my rig info, just to compare
# gpu pwr temp sm mem enc dec mclk pclk # Idx W C % % % % MHz MHz 0 126 68 100 87 0 0 4151 1784 1 125 70 100 87 0 0 4151 1822 2 80 67 100 74 0 0 4068 1771 3 76 61 100 71 0 0 4068 1695
(TDP limit 0-1 125W 2-3 80W)
GPU 0: GeForce GTX 1070 8GB GPU 1: GeForce GTX 1070 8GB GPU 2: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB GPU 3: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
GPU0 70C Sol/s: 459.8 Sol/W: 3.70 Avg: 460.6 I/s: 247.1 Sh: 1.90 1.00 55 GPU1 71C Sol/s: 462.7 Sol/W: 3.74 Avg: 465.3 I/s: 249.3 Sh: 1.91 1.00 50 GPU2 68C Sol/s: 277.8 Sol/W: 3.53 Avg: 281.4 I/s: 150.8 Sh: 1.22 1.00 56 GPU3 63C Sol/s: 281.3 Sol/W: 3.46 Avg: 275.9 I/s: 147.8 Sh: 1.42 1.00 49
zm O.5.8, Ubuntu 16.04.3, nvidia Driver: 387.34
Thanks for posting the info! I'm understanding most settings, but not seeing what % Power you clocked your 1060's down to. I have a big fleet of 1060 3gb cards and haven't found the perfect power setting yet. Are your set to 74% and 71% for GPU 2 & 3? On linux nvidia-smi use absolute watt amount for over/under powering, GPU 1070/1060 are 150w/120w stock I set them to 125w/80w respectively. I think perfect setting depends on electricity cost, just try to adjust until you find a Sol/W that make affordable your earning & expending. Scientific method is the rule here i.e. trial&errors ;-)
|
|
|
|
aquavici
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 12:51:17 AM |
|
at least 1 time a day dstm stops working, hastrate 0, in the logs it does not say any reason. some help? latest version 0.5.8 windows 10 pro use ETHcontrol (last version) It has happened to me in 2 different rigs
4:34:59 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU2 52C Sol/s: 503.9 Sol/W: 3.54 Avg: 497.1 I/s: 266.3 Sh: 1.84 0.99 1184 +++ 4:35:02 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU4 54C Sol/s: 475.5 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 469.7 I/s: 251.6 Sh: 1.69 0.99 1819 ++ 4:35:05 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU3 55C Sol/s: 465.6 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 469.5 I/s: 251.3 Sh: 1.75 0.99 164 4:35:05 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU1 51C Sol/s: 488.8 Sol/W: 3.54 Avg: 497.7 I/s: 266.8 Sh: 1.75 0.99 582 4:35:07 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU0 51C Sol/s: 470.5 Sol/W: 3.49 Avg: 472.6 I/s: 253.2 Sh: 1.78 0.99 166 + 4:35:08 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU5 51C Sol/s: 466.9 Sol/W: 3.49 Avg: 471.6 I/s: 252.5 Sh: 1.66 0.99 343 + 4:35:08 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : ========== Sol/s: 2871.2 Sol/W: 3.50 Avg: 2878.2 I/s: 1541.6 Sh: 10.47 0.99 709 4:35:09 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU2 52C Sol/s: 495.7 Sol/W: 3.54 Avg: 497.1 I/s: 266.0 Sh: 1.84 0.99 1184 4:35:09 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU4 53C Sol/s: 474.2 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 469.7 I/s: 251.5 Sh: 1.69 0.99 703 + 4:35:10 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU3 55C Sol/s: 468.7 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 469.5 I/s: 251.6 Sh: 1.75 0.99 164 4:35:11 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : GPU1 51C Sol/s: 506.2 Sol/W: 3.54 Avg: 497.7 I/s: 266.3 Sh: 1.75 0.99 582 + 4:36:21 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # zm 0.5.8 4:36:22 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 1:0 4:36:23 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU1 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 2:0 4:36:24 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU2 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 3:0 4:36:25 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU3 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 5:0 4:36:26 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU4 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 6:0 4:36:26 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # GPU5 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 7:0 4:36:27 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : 4:36:28 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # telemetry server started 4:36:29 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 4:36:35 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : # server set difficulty to: 0004189374bc6a7ef9db22d0... 4:36:56 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU0 41C Sol/s: 481.0 Sol/W: 3.56 Avg: 481.0 I/s: 257.4 Sh: 0.00 . . 4:36:57 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU1 41C Sol/s: 498.9 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 498.9 I/s: 270.5 Sh: 2.98 1.00 204 + 4:36:59 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU2 42C Sol/s: 498.0 Sol/W: 3.64 Avg: 498.0 I/s: 270.0 Sh: 0.00 . . 4:37:01 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU3 48C Sol/s: 475.9 Sol/W: 3.62 Avg: 475.9 I/s: 256.4 Sh: 0.00 . . 4:37:03 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU4 45C Sol/s: 478.7 Sol/W: 3.63 Avg: 478.7 I/s: 255.6 Sh: 3.00 1.00 922 + 4:37:05 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : > GPU5 43C Sol/s: 480.3 Sol/W: 3.67 Avg: 480.3 I/s: 256.6 Sh: 2.99 1.00 141 + 4:37:06 p. m. viernes, 5 de enero de 2018 : ========== Sol/s: 2912.8 Sol/W: 3.62 Avg: 2912.8 I/s: 1566.3 Sh: 8.97 1.00 422
Something similar is happening to me on linux. Maybe the same?? 2018-01-05 11:49:23 PM| ========== Sol/s: 1452.2 Sol/W: 3.75 Avg: 1440.7 I/s: 772.4 Sh: 4.94 1.00 53 2018-01-05 11:49:25 PM|> GPU1 70C Sol/s: 458.3 Sol/W: 3.75 Avg: 465.8 I/s: 249.7 Sh: 1.53 1.00 50 + 2018-01-05 11:49:28 PM|> GPU2 65C Sol/s: 276.2 Sol/W: 3.54 Avg: 282.1 I/s: 151.1 Sh: 0.95 1.00 47 + 2018-01-05 11:49:32 PM|# connection closed by server r:0 2018-01-05 11:49:32 PM|# exiting 2018-01-05 11:49:37 PM|# zm 0.5.8
|
|
|
|
jpl
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 11
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 05:13:12 AM |
|
Off-topic but important. I highly encourage you to inform yourself about the recent published CPU-vulnerabilities Meltdown & Spectre and evaluate how they affect your wallet security.
yeah pretty nasty. ms has a patch out for meltdown but it can slow your machine down. wonderful. but trezor or ledger nano s for the win. or fire up that old pentium 2 or 3 ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) although i think the jury is still out on whether those are immune. or maybe olde skoole: S-100 or CP/M anyone? Not sure I believe Intel after they laid off over 14000 employees last year. I bet they are just looking for a jump in their stock. We will see I guess. .. btw.. how can a processor hold passwords?.. is there ram in there?
|
|
|
|
malthrax
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 06:21:28 AM |
|
Not sure I believe Intel after they laid off over 14000 employees last year. I bet they are just looking for a jump in their stock. We will see I guess. .. btw.. how can a processor hold passwords?.. is there ram in there?
Yes, actually, there is. Its called "cache memory", and its directly wired into the CPU.
|
|
|
|
NoOneLt
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 07:21:45 AM |
|
@dstm
Is there any space for change requests? How about adding %subvendor% of the card in output, maybe turned on by parameter.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Atronoss
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 08:23:06 AM |
|
Not sure I believe Intel after they laid off over 14000 employees last year. I bet they are just looking for a jump in their stock. We will see I guess. .. btw.. how can a processor hold passwords?.. is there ram in there?
Yes, actually, there is. Its called "cache memory", and its directly wired into the CPU. And not only one, for example my Core i7-4790 has three Levels of cache, two L1 (both 32 KBytes), one L2 (256KBytes) and one L3 (8 MBytes). Anyway altough they say that OS patch for Meltdown may decrease performance, it is only in very specific cases, normal users should not be affected. More info at https://meltdownattack.com/
|
|
|
|
milicic
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 09:48:56 AM |
|
Could anyone please tell me what cuda is the best for this miner?
|
|
|
|
YinYangQi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 10:18:44 AM |
|
Got my 6 giga 1070 ti rig done today, 70% TDP, works like a charm, love it. Have more risers and cards on the way ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) GPU0 58C Sol/s: 515.7 Sol/W: 4.05 Avg: 509.8 I/s: 272.9 Sh: 1.82 0.99 277 GPU2 64C Sol/s: 515.1 Sol/W: 4.05 Avg: 508.4 I/s: 272.3 Sh: 1.93 0.98 286 + GPU1 62C Sol/s: 509.4 Sol/W: 4.04 Avg: 506.7 I/s: 271.4 Sh: 1.89 0.99 270 GPU4 58C Sol/s: 515.4 Sol/W: 4.04 Avg: 507.6 I/s: 272.2 Sh: 1.94 0.99 284 GPU3 54C Sol/s: 511.1 Sol/W: 4.05 Avg: 508.1 I/s: 272.9 Sh: 1.73 0.99 273 GPU5 64C Sol/s: 514.0 Sol/W: 4.02 Avg: 504.0 I/s: 270.4 Sh: 1.71 0.98 298 + ========== Sol/s: 3080.7 Sol/W: 4.04 Avg: 3044.5 I/s: 1632.2 Sh: 11.03 0.99 281
|
|
|
|
akuci
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 10:54:40 AM |
|
I have a problem on one of my rigs since I started using 0.5.8. The miner crashes every like 2 days. So, what info can I provide to you so you can check it out? It was stable on 0.5.7 since it was released.
|
|
|
|
cTnko
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 12:29:03 PM |
|
For people that are wondering about the "Meltdown" security patch performance decrease on their mining rigs on Windows 10 From the one miner that i have which is running Intel G4400 and 8 GPUs (1x 980ti, 7x 1060 3GB).
The performance on 0.5.8 before the patch = 2597 h/s Performance after Meltdown security patch = 2565 h/s
So about 1.23% decrease in hashrate.
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4438
Merit: 3913
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 04:35:45 PM |
|
yeah pretty nasty. ms has a patch out for meltdown but it can slow your machine down. wonderful. but trezor or ledger nano s for the win. or fire up that old pentium 2 or 3 ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) although i think the jury is still out on whether those are immune. or maybe olde skoole: S-100 or CP/M anyone? Not sure I believe Intel after they laid off over 14000 employees last year. I bet they are just looking for a jump in their stock. We will see I guess. .. btw.. how can a processor hold passwords?.. is there ram in there? meltdown can allow other programs on the machine (even in other VMs) to read the processor cache (fast ram built into the cpu for fast access to data/instructions it thinks it will need next compared to going out to main memory). its possible (guessing here) that network share passwords and credentials may be there on occasion. if you have those, your network is compromised. although other malware would have to work in concert with it to do that. at least as far as i understand it. keep in mind im no expert, but i do take my rigs and network seriously. this treat seems more serious for cloud computing then home users but hey additional security is additional security. every little bit helps.
|
|
|
|
bogesman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 04:55:31 PM |
|
How exactly can I use the json-rpc? I've enabled the telemetry. If i load IP:port in browser i see the page. So for json-rpc i tried different options with postman and failed on all. Is there something that i'm missing? https://i.imgur.com/qgF7EVj.png
|
|
|
|
aidonaks
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 06:55:08 PM Last edit: January 06, 2018, 07:23:45 PM by aidonaks |
|
<snip> Version 0.5.7 <snip>
Hi, Thanks for this, I find this version much more stable compared to 0.5.4 which I'd last tried on my Windows 10, Nvidia rig (2 x 1070, 1 x 1080) and also 6-7% better performance than EWBF. I wanted to ask how to get email notifications whenever there are updates? The forum only offers notifications for the entire post/all new replies and I don't want that. Let me know if there's a way to do that. Thanks! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) @DSTM - I'm still using ver 0.5.7 and gratefully paying the 2% devfee, but I have a question/suggestion - Why does the console output keep changing the order of the GPU stats it displays. It starts out as GPU0 onwards in order, but after an hour or two or three, it appears to randomize the order. See screenshot #1 linked below. This makes it quite confusing (and annoying) while viewing the console output to gauge real-time changes. https://imgur.com/PiGsRTVAlso, the apparently random order itself keeps changing every so often, making it even more confusing to view. See screenshot #2 linked below. https://imgur.com/pfcEKb0Ensuring that the GPU rank/order is maintained would make it much easier to gauge real-time performance changes with a quick glance at the console, esp while tweaking for better performance. (This is on Flypool. GPU0 & GPU1 are GTX 1080's, GPU2 and GPU3 and GTX 1070's. Driver ver 388.31. Using Windows 10 64-bit. Intel i5-4690k - this is my main PC, so..) p.s. Also - re: the versioning updates question - can't you put this up on Github or somewhere similar so we can get push notifs for updated versions? This is a very minor issue though, the above issue is higher priority, at least for me. The randomized ordered display of GPUs is quite annoying
|
|
|
|
pileto3
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 06, 2018, 09:34:49 PM |
|
Got my 6 giga 1070 ti rig done today, 70% TDP, works like a charm, love it. Have more risers and cards on the way ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) GPU0 58C Sol/s: 515.7 Sol/W: 4.05 Avg: 509.8 I/s: 272.9 Sh: 1.82 0.99 277 GPU2 64C Sol/s: 515.1 Sol/W: 4.05 Avg: 508.4 I/s: 272.3 Sh: 1.93 0.98 286 + GPU1 62C Sol/s: 509.4 Sol/W: 4.04 Avg: 506.7 I/s: 271.4 Sh: 1.89 0.99 270 GPU4 58C Sol/s: 515.4 Sol/W: 4.04 Avg: 507.6 I/s: 272.2 Sh: 1.94 0.99 284 GPU3 54C Sol/s: 511.1 Sol/W: 4.05 Avg: 508.1 I/s: 272.9 Sh: 1.73 0.99 273 GPU5 64C Sol/s: 514.0 Sol/W: 4.02 Avg: 504.0 I/s: 270.4 Sh: 1.71 0.98 298 + ========== Sol/s: 3080.7 Sol/W: 4.04 Avg: 3044.5 I/s: 1632.2 Sh: 11.03 0.99 281 Hi what about your clock settings? 200/600 core/memory or something other?
|
|
|
|
|