Bitcoin Forum
July 05, 2020, 04:57:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 [78] 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 ... 238 »
  Print  
Author Topic: PhoenixMiner 5.0e: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux)  (Read 244172 times)
Mintycash
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 14


View Profile
April 17, 2018, 03:04:48 PM
 #1541

If this is the case, could you set your dev fee to mine something else with a smaller dag fee so the miner doesn't crash? Or can you change any parameters on the dev fee mining so it does not consumes so much memory?
How about RTFM?


Quote
 -coin <coin> Ethash coin to use for devfee to avoid switching DAGs:
     auto: Try to determine from the pool address (default)
     eth: Ethereum
     etc: Ethereum Classic
     exp: Expanse
     music: Musicoin
     ubq: UBIQ
     pirl: Pirl
     ella: Ellaism
     etp: Metaverse ETP
     pgc: Pegascoin
     akroma: Akroma
     whale: WhaleCoin
     vic: Victorium  
That was helpful! If not very polite!

Sorry for being on a rush and not reading the feaking manual! So many things to read in crypto...

Thanks in any case!

And congrats to the dev for the excellent miner!!!

People get tired of how lazy people are and they want instant answers without putting out any effort.
I think he was more polite than he had to be,

Lesson learnt!  Undecided But we are not all lazy. Life gets too complicated at times and you just miss things. Honest mistake.

Anyway I had a good look at the manual now. I might be able to help others if I can answer their questions.

(Random thought)  Grin
Funny thing is, as crypto becomes mainstream, we will have an infinite amount of noobs (Like me in this case) coming in and asking questions. There is no way out of it and we want those noobs for them to buy our coins and for crypto to grow. Get ready!

When you think that there is still people outhere in the world still literaly burning witches... but we want everyone to read the manual of our miner so they don't ask stupid questions when they have a break from burning witches...
 Grin
100% First Deposit Bonus Instant Withdrawals Best Odds 10+ Sports Since 2014 No KYC Asked Play Now
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1593925022
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1593925022

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1593925022
Reply with quote  #2

1593925022
Report to moderator
anbe2305
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 17, 2018, 05:10:45 PM
 #1542

These are my results:

Version 2.9e running very stable for 17 hours testing with :

GPU1 Nvidia GTX 1070, MICRON
GPU2 AMD RX 570 NITRO, MICRON
GPU3 Nvidia GTX 1070,MICRON

Power consumption 398W


*** 17:47 ***************************************************
Eth: Mining ETH on ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555 for 17:47
Eth speed: 96.655 MH/s, shares: 1534/0/0, time: 17:47
GPUs: 1: 32.608 MH/s (528) 2: 31.256 MH/s (470) 3: 32.791 MH/s (536)
Eth: Accepted shares 1534 (0 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.00%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 35.3 TH (!!!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 96.613 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 95.82 MH/s; at pool: 95.82 MH/s


About stale shares miner reports zero, but on pool ETHERMINE average max 1 or 2%....


Keep up the good work...






What kind of GTX1070s do you have man? I am currently thinking of buying a couple and want to be sure I don't mess up with the order Cheesy

GPU1 Gigabyte Windforce  TDP 51% , core clock +160, Memory +756 ( temp 45C fan 55%)  core can go over +200 and memory around +800 it can go much over 33MH ..
GPU3 MSI Armor TDP 52%, core clock +31 memory +772 (temp 54 fan 55%) core can go higher around +100 and memory around +800 it also can go higher then 33MH..


Both cards can get higher then 33 if power up  TDP, but then i get higher power consumption...

It does not matter which brand you would get just look which has more warranty, every GTX 1070 can go around 32 and 33 just need some time to test the settings...





  

Runing 50 hours and still very stable no rejected shares and stale shares are the same as before

*** 50:01 ***************************************************
Eth: Mining ETH on ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555 for 50:01
Eth speed: 96.689 MH/s, shares: 4243/0/0, time: 50:01
GPUs: 1: 32.533 MH/s (1404) 2: 31.361 MH/s (1399) 3: 32.796 MH/s (1440)
Eth: Accepted shares 4243 (0 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.00%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 35.3 TH (!!!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 96.650 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 94.23 MH/s; at pool: 94.23 MH/s

Eth: New job #8bed6702 from ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555; diff: 4000MH
Eth speed: 96.687 MH/s, shares: 4243/0/0, time: 50:02
GPUs: 1: 32.532 MH/s (1404) 2: 31.360 MH/s (1399) 3: 32.796 MH/s (1440)
Eth: New job #04873144 from ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555; diff: 4000MH
Eth speed: 96.687 MH/s, shares: 4243/0/0, time: 50:02
GPUs: 1: 32.532 MH/s (1404) 2: 31.360 MH/s (1399) 3: 32.795 MH/s (1440)
GPU1: 44C 55%, GPU2: 43C 40%, GPU3: 54C 55%
Eth speed: 96.688 MH/s, shares: 4243/0/0, time: 50:02
GPUs: 1: 32.532 MH/s (1404) 2: 31.360 MH/s (1399) 3: 32.796 MH/s (1440)
Eth: New job #b3a786a1 from ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555; diff: 4000MH
Eth: New job #8e88f5ce from ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555; diff: 4000MH
Eth speed: 96.689 MH/s, shares: 4243/0/0, time: 50:02
GPUs: 1: 32.533 MH/s (1404) 2: 31.361 MH/s (1399) 3: 32.795 MH/s (1440)
Eth speed: 96.688 MH/s, shares: 4243/0/0, time: 50:02

Power from the wall reduced it from 398Watts to 392,3 Watts




nvidiademon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 05:56:45 AM
 #1543

Unbelievable!  2.9e has 0 stale shares.  I am shocked.  Went from 2.8 with around 6% at times to 0%!  Same start up bat settings.  Congratulations, you've built a near perfect miner, the best of what I have ever seen!
PhoenixMiner
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 255
Merit: 25


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 06:33:33 AM
 #1544

Hi. What about Linux version?
   Coming in the near future.


seems ok, but I encountered a problem, I use the remote manager of claymore, and works on everything, but with version 2.9e and only sees the AMD, the gtx says that they are not connected, instead turn quietly, you happen?

 Undecided Undecided
   Check if the port you are using for remote monitoring is free - you can't have more than one program on the same rig using the same port for remote management.


What are we still happy with phoenixminer 2.9.e the stale shares are back again, while it was with the 2.9 .d away the joy is so short-lived unfortunately.
   There are no changes that affect stale shares at 2.9e, so it must be bad luck (or pool issues). The internal stale shares in 2.9 are close to zero (less than 0.1% to be exact) and practically all stale shares are because of a) latency of your connection to the pool, and b) latency of the pool itself.


i'm back to 2.8C , i had better hashrate with that ! RX580 8Gb MSI Gameing X
   You may need to try -clkernel 2 and/or different -gt values to achieve optimal hashrate with the new kernels. Otherwise, you can go back to using the old kernels with -clnew 0.


Unfortunately still crashes after  CUDA errors with Nvidia gtx 1070 cards. The last one that restart well after CUDa errors is 2.7c for me.
   It would be very helpful if you could send as a log file of one of the crashes that doesn't restart the miner. 2.9e should catch all types of error and exceptions in the GPU threads and reboot instead of crashing. Perhaps one of the other threads has crashed but we can't know for sure without a log (just the last few pages before the crash).


Hi developers, is it possible to provide information about power usage? By rig and by a separate card. Or at least bu rig?
   Theoretically, the GPUs report some kind of power usage but we have observed that it is very far from the actual numbers (even when taking into account the efficiency of the PSUs). So, while we can report them, they are at best grossly incorrect, and at worst - misleading.


Hi guys, I would like to know, if you run two or more instances of Phoenix Miner, will the mining speed of those instances be reduced compared to running only on one instance? I am planning on running at least two instances of Phoenix Miner.

Lastly, when running another instance of Phoenix Miner, what is the best practice, should I just create another batch file in the same folder or create a new folder with a another executable file of Phoenix Miner? I am currently using two batch files with one executable file in a single folder and it is working fine.

Thank you in advance for any replies. Smiley
   There shouldn't be any noticeable performance decrease from running few instances but the memory usage will be higher and the chance for stale shares may be elevated slightly due to all instances receiving new job(s) at about the same time. It is best to copy the program at two different folders (if nothing else, at least you will be able to clearly separate the log files this way) and use different config.txt and epools.txt files. You can place the options in the config.txt and the pools in epools.txt. Then the bat files will contain just:
Code:
PhoenixMiner.exe
pause


Looks like 2.9e on 6 GTX-1070 is less profitable then 2.8c.

My params are the following

-nvidia -cdm 2 -cdmport 3333 -cdmpass <password> -minRigSpeed 188 -rmode 2 -tstop 65 -tstart 40

PM 2.8c gives me 191.65MH and costs 750W (1MH costs 3.913W)
PM 2.9e gives me 192.5MH and costs 760W (1MH costs 3.948W)

It is not critical, of course, but...

Good news: PM 2.9e provides more stable hashrate then PM 2.8c or any Claymore or any Ethminer.
I have 0 stale shares during 1:25 (1 hour, 25 minutes).
  The deceased stale shares alone should be more than enough to offset the power difference. You can still use -nvnew 0 to revert to the old CUDA kernels but this will increase stale shares significantly.


Tested 2.9e for one day and here's my results:

x6 RX 580 4GB Sapphire (Stable 188mh/s - same hashrate as 2.8c)
x6 RX 570 4GB Armor (Very unstable 185mh/s - lower hashrate than 2.8c and it was more stable compared to 2.9e)
x6 RX 570 8GB Sapphire (Stable 193mh/s - lower hashrate than 2.8c)

Experiencing high stale shares on my RX 570 Armor Rig which wasn't the case in version 2.8c

Hopefully next update will be better.
  The lower hashrates are probably because you have to use different -gt values with the new kernles (or try -clkernel 2). The higher stale shares are definitely caused by something outside the miner, as in 2.9 the internal stale shares are practically eliminated.


My phoenixminer 2.9e always freeze when the miner trying to connect ethermine for dev fee mining. Anyone else experiencing the same?
  What coin you are mining? Most probably the miner can't determine it automatically and then it defaults to ETH for devfee. If you GPU(s) don't have enough memory for ETH DAG, the miner can crash. To avoid this, use the -coin command-line option to specify the coin that you are mining and PhoenixMiner will use it for devfee, avoiding the expensive DAG regeneration.


Help Me!

I have a 1060 6gb card running with 2.8c then it's normal. MSI: Pow 65 core -400 mem 700. But when using 2.9e with MSI as above it error:

Code:
2018.04.17:03:23:55.234: GPU5 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : an illegal instruction was encountered (715)
2018.04.17:03:23:55.243: GPU5 GPU5 search error: an illegal instruction was encountered
2018.04.17:03:23:55.254: GPU6 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:124 : an illegal instruction was encountered (715)
2018.04.17:03:23:55.254: GPU6 GPU6: Failed to initialize search buffers: an illegal instruction was encountered
2018.04.17:03:23:55.254: GPU6 GPU6 initMiner error: Unable to initialize CUDA miner
2018.04.17:03:23:55.271: GPU4 CUDART error in CudaProgram.cu:127 : an illegal instruction was encountered (73)
2018.04.17:03:23:55.271: GPU3 CUDART error in CudaProgram.cu:127 : an illegal instruction was encountered (73)
2018.04.17:03:23:55.271: GPU3 GPU3 initMiner error: an illegal instruction was encountered
2018.04.17:03:23:55.271: GPU4 GPU4 initMiner error: an illegal instruction was encountered
2018.04.17:03:23:55.271: GPU1 CUDART error in CudaProgram.cu:127 : an illegal instruction was encountered (73)
2018.04.17:03:23:55.271: GPU1 GPU1 initMiner error: an illegal instruction was encountered
2018.04.17:03:23:55.272: GPU2 CUDART error in CudaProgram.cu:127 : an illegal instruction was encountered (73)
2018.04.17:03:23:55.272: GPU2 GPU2 initMiner error: an illegal instruction was encountered
2018.04.17:03:23:55.518: wdog Thread(s) not responding. Restarting.

https://imgur.com/a/ViuWr

Please help me adjust the MSI so that I get the highest productivity on the 2.9e. Thanks very much!
   You may need to decrease the memory overclock. The new CUDA kernels are utilizing the GPU more fully, which may lead to such problems when the overclocks are on the edge of stability. Another possible remedy is to try and force the cards to be in P0 performance state instead of P2, which by some accounts makes them more stable at high overclocks.

Jbodz83
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 124
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 08:05:44 AM
 #1545

Unbelievable!  2.9e has 0 stale shares.  I am shocked.  Went from 2.8 with around 6% at times to 0%!  Same start up bat settings.  Congratulations, you've built a near perfect miner, the best of what I have ever seen!

can you share a screen shot of your RIG pool results? would love to see this 0% stale shares
Digital_Seytan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 159
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 08:53:39 AM
 #1546

http://www.resimag.com/p1/d469489381.jpeg

it is unbelievable, from the 2.8 to 2.9.e is amazing difference with the same start bat 0 stale shares on the screen some stale shares on the pool screen but still much and much less, so go through phoenix developer.

Mintycash
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 14


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 09:24:20 AM
 #1547



So, you're a smart-ass too I see.
I didn't say everyone was lazy, just you in particular.
And, we don't need lectures about witches and noobs. Just do some basic research before you post. I know that's a lot to ask.


Apologies again. Not my intention, I am just weird.

I am sincere in this... I will take your advice!
sandbagger
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 12:01:31 PM
 #1548

Thanks again Phoenix

updated from 2.8 to 2.9e and went from about 418.9 to 421.3(at the pool)      stales dropped from 2-3% down to 1% (at the pool )

keep up the good work
rboer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 02:54:43 PM
 #1549

https://preview.ibb.co/nxOgbn/Capture.png

Getting good results from 2.9e. thank you dev team

lesjokolat
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 3


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 03:21:19 PM
Last edit: April 18, 2018, 07:16:21 PM by lesjokolat
 #1550

Hey if any of you re interested check out

ETH.ethertrench.com

FREE mining pool. No pool fees.  Low latency(few stales). If I compare my overall returns for the same hashrate as I had when I was on Supernova the payouts are almost double!!!

Pays out very quickly no hassles, also pays for valid uncle shares(stales) as well.

its a smaller pool so finds less often but has large miners come and go that help frequency of finds.

i ve used Phoenix on here for the last few weeks and its been great.

FYI disclosure. I have no affiliation to anyone running or on the pool.

Enjoy!
bitcoin.dbi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 260
Merit: 11


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 08:01:46 PM
Last edit: April 18, 2018, 08:15:54 PM by bitcoin.dbi
 #1551

Does 2,9e work with 1063 or still no?
Mintycash
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 14


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 08:14:50 PM
 #1552

Does 2,9e works with 1063 or still no?
Sorry I can't understand you well. If you mean if it works with a nvidia 1060 3gb, the answer is yes! Although not sure it can do ethereum anymore, but still good for other ethash coins.
In the bat file you are going to have to add the command:
-coin pgc

I use that one to mine Callisto and it doesn't matter that it is not the same coin I am mining.

This is because by default, the dev fee mines ethereum, which might use too much memory and crash the miner.

This is my bat:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
PhoenixMiner.exe -pool YOURPOOL -wal YOURADDRESS -coin pgc -gpow 95 -lidag 1

The 2 last commands are to reduce gpu use so I can use windows at the same time and to make the miner more stable when it loads the dag file.
bitcoin.dbi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 260
Merit: 11


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 08:18:40 PM
 #1553

Does 2,9e works with 1063 or still no?
Sorry I can't understand you well. If you mean if it works with a nvidia 1060 3gb, the answer is yes!
In the bat file you are going to have to add the command:
-coin pgc

1063 problem is dag file for ETH on windows10. Claymore fixed this problem  for few next epochs. So my question: is it possible to mine eth on 2.9e with 1063 on windows 10 or no? Huh
Mintycash
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 14


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 08:22:45 PM
 #1554

I am not sure! Why dont you just give it a try!

I didn't have a problem with other older miners in win 10 provided the 1060 3gb was not the main graphic card with a monitor connected. With a monitor the graphic memory usage goes too high.
cmd_whoami
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 08:36:38 PM
 #1555

@PheonixMiner

Still having issue with 2.9e with Nvidia 1070 not rebooting with reboot .bat when miner crashes



2018.04.18:12:26:33.440: gps0 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:168 : unknown error (999)
2018.04.18:12:26:33.440: GPU1 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unknown error (999)
2018.04.18:12:26:33.446: GPU1 GPU1 search error: unknown error
2018.04.18:12:26:33.462: GPU8 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unknown error (999)
2018.04.18:12:26:33.462: GPU8 GPU8 search error: unknown error
2018.04.18:12:26:33.462: GPU7 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unknown error (999)
2018.04.18:12:26:33.462: GPU7 GPU7 search error: unknown error
2018.04.18:12:26:33.468: GPU9 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unknown error (999)
2018.04.18:12:26:33.468: GPU9 GPU9 search error: unknown error
2018.04.18:12:26:33.482: GPU3 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unknown error (999)
2018.04.18:12:26:33.482: GPU3 GPU3 search error: unknown error
2018.04.18:12:26:33.482: GPU6 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unknown error (999)
2018.04.18:12:26:33.482: GPU6 GPU6 search error: unknown error
2018.04.18:12:26:33.494: GPU5 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unknown error (999)
2018.04.18:12:26:33.494: GPU5 GPU5 search error: unknown error
2018.04.18:12:26:33.495: GPU2 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unknown error (999)
2018.04.18:12:26:33.495: GPU2 GPU2 search error: unknown error
2018.04.18:12:26:33.535: GPU4 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unknown error (999)
2018.04.18:12:26:33.535: GPU4 GPU4 search error: unknown error
2018.04.18:12:26:34.158: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

2018.04.18:12:26:34.204: wdog Thread(s) not responding. Restarting.
2018.04.18:12:26:34.296: eths Eth: Received: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x8cc4101785c8e5f40e72a0abf5651c3711a3cafd57475f8ba5c2059146633adc","0x5683748fa7f53897f1e1a80a8a321d3693761838135be37d1d132c0cd3d7d937","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
human75
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 08:46:02 PM
 #1556

Hey if any of you re interested check out

ETH.ethertrench.com

FREE mining pool. No pool fees.  Low latency(few stales). If I compare my overall returns for the same hashrate as I had when I was on Supernova the payouts are almost double!!!

Pays out very quickly no hassles, also pays for valid uncle shares(stales) as well.

its a smaller pool so finds less often but has large miners come and go that help frequency of finds.

i ve used Phoenix on here for the last few weeks and its been great.

FYI disclosure. I have no affiliation to anyone running or on the pool.

Enjoy!
what is your bat file for phoenix miner? standard commands wont work.thx in advance
ibizastyler
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 08:53:46 PM
 #1557

Hi Guys,

can someone of you please assist?
My rig doesn't run stable at all.

sys:
win 10 pro
8x GTX 1070 from msi, evga and palit
2x PSU - 1000W and 850W
page file is set to min. 17000MB and max to 57000MB.

Thanks a lot in advance!!

thats my command line:

:restart
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

PhoenixMiner.exe -nvidia -rmode 1 -wdog 1 -pool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -pool2 eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999 -wal wallet.worker/email -pass x -ftime 10
goto :restart

--- Error message:

2018.04.18:22:35:18.778: eths Eth: Send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0xfb36ccc","0x833075af975ab8559540aabf67696685bcb2ef98724ba75a312e1b545c049307"]}

2018.04.18:22:35:18.815: eths Eth: Received: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xaadf04a2431360f4228b2d28ab2fec416f0f508c514f75a095dc22e41a5aa0d3","0x5683748fa7f53897f1e1a80a8a321d3693761838135be37d1d132c0cd3d7d937","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
2018.04.18:22:35:19.387: main Eth speed: 263.421 MH/s, shares: 17/0/0, time: 0:06
2018.04.18:22:35:19.387: main GPUs: 1: 32.685 MH/s (3) 2: 32.685 MH/s (3) 3: 32.677 MH/s (2) 4: 32.686 MH/s (1) 5: 32.684 MH/s (0) 6: 32.676 MH/s (3) 7: 34.652 MH/s (1) 8: 32.677 MH/s (4)
2018.04.18:22:35:24.466: main Eth speed: 263.422 MH/s, shares: 17/0/0, time: 0:06
2018.04.18:22:35:24.466: main GPUs: 1: 32.685 MH/s (3) 2: 32.687 MH/s (3) 3: 32.676 MH/s (2) 4: 32.686 MH/s (1) 5: 32.685 MH/s (0) 6: 32.676 MH/s (3) 7: 34.651 MH/s (1) 8: 32.677 MH/s (4)
2018.04.18:22:35:25.426: eths Eth: Received: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x169cf1c7d1e89f771cc626178603a4c89647bdd91bf2c762b63cce1cf1e0eca4","0x5683748fa7f53897f1e1a80a8a321d3693761838135be37d1d132c0cd3d7d937","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
2018.04.18:22:35:25.426: eths Eth: New job #169cf1c7 from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999; diff: 10000MH
2018.04.18:22:35:26.163: GPU3 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.18:22:35:26.173: GPU3 GPU3 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.18:22:35:26.185: GPU1 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.18:22:35:26.185: GPU1 GPU1 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.18:22:35:26.200: GPU7 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.18:22:35:26.200: GPU7 GPU7 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.18:22:35:26.201: GPU5 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.18:22:35:26.201: GPU5 GPU5 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.18:22:35:26.216: GPU4 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.18:22:35:26.216: GPU4 GPU4 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.18:22:35:26.216: GPU6 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.18:22:35:26.216: GPU6 GPU6 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.18:22:35:26.232: GPU8 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.18:22:35:26.232: GPU8 GPU8 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.18:22:35:26.263: GPU2 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.18:22:35:26.263: GPU2 GPU2 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.18:22:35:26.404: wdog Thread(s) not responding. Restarting.
2018.04.18:22:35:28.779: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}
FlexiN
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 08:57:51 PM
 #1558

Hi first time i try to switch from claymore for mining CLO (Callisto) (Ethash algorythm) and impossible to connected to the pool apparently...

Here's my logs :

2018.04.18:22:54:36.527: main Phoenix Miner 2.9e Windows/msvc - Release
2018.04.18:22:54:36.527: main Cmd line:
2018.04.18:22:54:36.527: main config.txt: -pool clo.2miners.com:3030 -wal 0x4C79A838Eb620E22218A77a2bDc5651b549ea77e.RX480
2018.04.18:22:54:36.527: main No CUDA driver found
2018.04.18:22:54:38.593: main Available GPUs for mining:
2018.04.18:22:54:38.593: main GPU1: Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics (pcie 1), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
2018.04.18:22:54:38.593: main GPU2: Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics (pcie 3), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
2018.04.18:22:54:38.593: main GPU3: Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics (pcie 4), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
2018.04.18:22:54:38.593: main GPU4: Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics (pcie 5), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
2018.04.18:22:54:38.593: main GPU5: Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics (pcie 6), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
2018.04.18:22:54:38.593: main GPU6: Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics (pcie 7), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
2018.04.18:22:54:38.681: main ADL library initialized
2018.04.18:22:54:39.035: main Listening for CDM remote manager at port 3333 in read-only mode
2018.04.18:22:54:39.035: main Eth: the pool list contains 2 pools
2018.04.18:22:54:39.035: main Eth: primary pool: clo.2miners.com:3030
2018.04.18:22:54:39.035: main Starting GPU mining
2018.04.18:22:54:39.035: main Matched GPU1 to ADL adapter index 64 (method 1)
2018.04.18:22:54:39.262: main GPU1: Created ADL monitor for adapter 64; overdrive version: 7
2018.04.18:22:54:39.262: main GPU1: using AMD driver ver 18.3.4
2018.04.18:22:54:39.262: main Matched GPU2 to ADL adapter index 16 (method 1)
2018.04.18:22:54:39.431: main GPU2: Created ADL monitor for adapter 16; overdrive version: 7
2018.04.18:22:54:39.431: main GPU2: using AMD driver ver 18.3.4
2018.04.18:22:54:39.431: main Matched GPU3 to ADL adapter index 32 (method 1)
2018.04.18:22:54:39.528: main GPU3: Created ADL monitor for adapter 32; overdrive version: 7
2018.04.18:22:54:39.528: main GPU3: using AMD driver ver 18.3.4
2018.04.18:22:54:39.529: main Matched GPU4 to ADL adapter index 48 (method 1)
2018.04.18:22:54:39.615: main GPU4: Created ADL monitor for adapter 48; overdrive version: 7
2018.04.18:22:54:39.615: main GPU4: using AMD driver ver 18.3.4
2018.04.18:22:54:39.615: main Matched GPU5 to ADL adapter index 80 (method 1)
2018.04.18:22:54:39.692: main GPU5: Created ADL monitor for adapter 80; overdrive version: 7
2018.04.18:22:54:39.692: main GPU5: using AMD driver ver 18.3.4
2018.04.18:22:54:39.692: main Matched GPU6 to ADL adapter index 0 (method 1)
2018.04.18:22:54:39.785: main GPU6: Created ADL monitor for adapter 0; overdrive version: 7
2018.04.18:22:54:39.785: main GPU6: using AMD driver ver 18.3.4
2018.04.18:22:54:39.786: wdog Starting watchdog thread
2018.04.18:22:54:39.786: main Eth: Connecting to ethash pool clo.2miners.com:3030 (proto: EthProxy)
2018.04.18:22:54:39.872: eths Eth: Connected to ethash pool clo.2miners.com:3030 (95.213.255.168)
2018.04.18:22:54:39.872: eths Eth: Send: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitLogin","worker":"eth1.0","params":["0x4C79A838Eb620E22218A77a2bDc5651b549ea77e.RX480"]}

2018.04.18:22:54:39.940: eths Eth: Received: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":null,"error":{"code":-1,"message":"Invalid login"}}
2018.04.18:22:54:39.940: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

2018.04.18:22:54:39.940: eths Eth: Connection closed by the pool
2018.04.18:22:54:39.940: eths Eth: Reconnecting in 20 seconds...
2018.04.18:22:54:39.987: main GPU1: 31C 66%, GPU2: 32C 66%, GPU3: 40C 73%, GPU4: 30C 66%, GPU5: 34C 66%, GPU6: 32C 66%


And this is my BAT start file :

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

PhoenixMiner.exe -pool clo.2miners.com:3030 -wal 0x4C79A838Eb620E22218A77a2bDc5651b549ea77e.RX480 -pass x -coin etc

Any help would be appreciated

Thanks.

 
bitcoin.dbi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 260
Merit: 11


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 09:03:46 PM
 #1559

I am not sure! Why dont you just give it a try!

I didn't have a problem with other older miners in win 10 provided the 1060 3gb was not the main graphic card with a monitor connected. With a monitor the graphic memory usage goes too high.
Tested. It still not work with 1063 on win10, Sad.
murgorx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 11


View Profile
April 18, 2018, 09:43:54 PM
 #1560

Mining with 2.9e since the release and having 157mh/s reports by the miner and the pool so far, no crashes no nothing! Great work man!
Pages: « 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 [78] 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 ... 238 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!