Bitcoin Forum
November 16, 2025, 12:35:44 AM *
News: Pumpkin contest voting
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 497 »
  Print  
Author Topic: PhoenixMiner 6.2c: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux)  (Read 785593 times)
terrya
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 07:45:23 AM
 #1441

The connection issue still persist.
if you reboot router with dynamid ip
the miner cant connect to ethermine.org pool
you need to manual close and relaunch the program to connect
70-80% of rigs have this problem occur
while some can connect after router reboot


i'm agree... The connection issue still persist.

I did observe this problem when my dynamic IP changed by the ISP. However in my case Phoenix 2.8c auto-recovered from the situation on its own.
It attempted to connect to the main pool several times waiting 20 sec in between and then after 3 or so failed attempts successfully connected to the next pool from my epools.txt.

Possible workaround: Add second (or more) pool(s) to the epools.txt list. You can add the same pool there twice.
Example of epools.txt:
# Ethermine.org
# Main pool listed in the config.txt file: POOL: eu1.ethermine.org:4444,   WALLET: %WALLET%.%WORKER%, PSW: x, WORKER: , ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 0
POOL: us1.ethermine.org:4444,   WALLET: %WALLET%.%WORKER%, PSW: x, WORKER: , ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 0
POOL: us2.ethermine.org:4444,   WALLET: %WALLET%.%WORKER%, PSW: x, WORKER: , ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 0
POOL: asia1.ethermine.org:4444, WALLET: %WALLET%.%WORKER%, PSW: x, WORKER: , ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 0
POOL: asia2.ethermine.org:4444, WALLET: %WALLET%.%WORKER%, PSW: x, WORKER: , ESM: 0, ALLPOOLS: 0

might works but other address will have different geo location which has higher ping time thus higher stale share...
j2james
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 08:24:31 AM
 #1442

The -logsmaxsize option defines the max size of all log files, not a single file, so 200 MB should be adequate if you want to keep a history for the last few weeks (or months). We don't have a limit of the size of a single logfile but it may be added in the future.

Strange solution. Never seen that. For example in java there is RollingFileAppender (https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/RollingFileAppender.html) which creates new log file when current file has reached limit size. I waited to have the same functionality, and I think that not only me. If the current behaviour is like you have described, then can you please to use parameter 0 as recomendation do not delete logs (so limit is absent).
rodyw
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 102


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 08:27:32 AM
 #1443

Wow, I am impressed with the results of the new 2.9b version on my rig with 5x AMD RX580 4Gb (Elpida):
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main *** 44:36 ***************************************************
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Mining ETH on eth.coinfoundry.org:3073 for 36:54
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth speed: 156.019 MH/s, shares: 24292/1/6, time: 44:36
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main GPUs: 1: 31.212 MH/s (4827) 2: 31.200 MH/s (4898) 3: 31.216 MH/s (4840/6) 4: 31.215 MH/s (4868) 5: 31.177 MH/s (4860)
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Accepted shares 24292 (116 stales), rejected shares 1 (0 stales)
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Incorrect shares 6 (0.02%), est. stales percentage 0.42%
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 87.3 TH (!!!)
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Average speed (5 min): 155.910 MH/s
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Effective speed: 150.14 MH/s; at pool: 150.13 MH/s

inv1s1bl3
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 09:46:15 AM
 #1444

Wow, I am impressed with the results of the new 2.9b version on my rig with 5x AMD RX580 4Gb (Elpida):
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main *** 44:36 ***************************************************
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Mining ETH on eth.coinfoundry.org:3073 for 36:54
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth speed: 156.019 MH/s, shares: 24292/1/6, time: 44:36
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main GPUs: 1: 31.212 MH/s (4827) 2: 31.200 MH/s (4898) 3: 31.216 MH/s (4840/6) 4: 31.215 MH/s (4868) 5: 31.177 MH/s (4860)
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Accepted shares 24292 (116 stales), rejected shares 1 (0 stales)
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Incorrect shares 6 (0.02%), est. stales percentage 0.42%
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 87.3 TH (!!!)
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Average speed (5 min): 155.910 MH/s
2018.04.13:10:24:29.987: main Eth: Effective speed: 150.14 MH/s; at pool: 150.13 MH/s

Nice results there! Is the pool reporting the same, btw? I have noticed for the 12 hours I mined ETH, that the miner reported more stales than the pool  Grin Grin Dunno who to trust, lol, but anyway 6 cards hashing waaay better than they should be, considering that they've been running 24/7 for the last couple of months, always squeezing them to their maximum limit I still get around 31.5mh/s on each card and that's reported by the pool, not locally from the miner.
Digital_Seytan
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 222
Merit: 2

digiseytan@walletofsatoshi.com


View Profile WWW
April 13, 2018, 11:04:05 AM
 #1445

Where is version 2.9? Can't find it

Edit: Nvm found it.

for people who can not find phoenixminer 2.9.d in the forum here is the download link again.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2647654.msg34449237#msg34449237
maybe for the phoenix developer an idea to place the download link on the opening page 1 better.

DonateSATS:Digiseytan@WALLETOFSATOSHi.COM
SHOPFREE: https://satsback.com/register/1QEJyGPlg4LN5kwx
ETC+Zil Pool:https://k1pool.com/invite/895eb07555
lesjokolat
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 117
Merit: 3


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 01:41:56 PM
 #1446

Update and comparison
2.9d is actually a bit of a loss in hashrate. vega 64 virtually no change from 2.8c. fury x are lower than 2.8c 34.5 avg now

the best speed was 2.8b but stales now are virtually nil.

Regards
  You can try higher -gt values with the Fury cards with the new kernels. We found optimal performance in some of our Fury cards at about -gt 150.

I have tried from 50 to 300 for the furys, I am running fastest at -gt 225. I also found it faster running the -clf 2


The screen output for each line of the GPU summary you have a list of all GPUs and the shares found for each.(If and when a stale is found then beside each count you would have a secondary total.)

GPU 1 - (105/3) in this case the 105 is found shares, the 3 are the stales)

Make sense now?
  Actually, these are the incorrect shares, not the stales. As stated above, the stales are not shown for each GPU (only as total number).

ok thanks for clarifying.
lncm
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 388
Merit: 13


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 02:51:03 PM
 #1447


So, no love for Baffin at all?
   Please try to use -clkernel 2 for Baffin or try to change the -gt values. We will add auto-tuning in the next version (3.0), which will make the fining of optimal parameters easier.



Thanks! Using -clkernel 2 and -gt 50 for Baffin card improved performance from ~11 Mh/s to 14+ Mh/s!

Back to PhoenixMiner again!
Digital_Seytan
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 222
Merit: 2

digiseytan@walletofsatoshi.com


View Profile WWW
April 13, 2018, 05:18:33 PM
 #1448

Clay-Phoenix-Ethermine-Autostarter
Phoenix,Claymore Devfee no Hash Stop ,Autostart the Miner and Go Common problem with Phoenixminer and Claymore Miner is when DEVFEE comes by and the third or fourth time does not catch Shares gives these miners warning and stops the miner, to remedy this is this startbat watchdog and this ensures that the miner starts again or if necessary restart the whole miner rig, you place the contents of the start debate of the miner in this watchdog bat, and works great, you can download it at:

Download: https://github.com/digitalpara/Clay-Phoenix-Ethermine-Autostarter

Download: https://mirrorace.com/m/1qlvn

DonateSATS:Digiseytan@WALLETOFSATOSHi.COM
SHOPFREE: https://satsback.com/register/1QEJyGPlg4LN5kwx
ETC+Zil Pool:https://k1pool.com/invite/895eb07555
rodyw
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 102


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 05:42:07 PM
 #1449

Clay-Phoenix-Ethermine-Autostarter
Phoenix,Claymore Devfee no Hash Stop ,Autostart the Miner and Go Common problem with Phoenixminer and Claymore Miner is when DEVFEE comes by and the third or fourth time does not catch Shares gives these miners warning and stops the miner, to remedy this is this startbat watchdog and this ensures that the miner starts again or if necessary restart the whole miner rig, you place the contents of the start debate of the miner in this watchdog bat, and works great, you can download it at:

Download: https://github.com/digitalpara/Clay-Phoenix-Ethermine-Autostarter

Download: https://mirrorace.com/m/1qlvn
Why don't you guys just use the free version of Awesome Miner? The latest version of Awesome Miner comes with support for PhoenixMiner 2.8b (including basic API support) and it has all these rules you can setup to restart your miner on failures/low hashrate etc?

wtfonly16
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 296
Merit: 108


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 05:44:49 PM
 #1450

mine monero lol
stop supporting this asic coin

and i advise minerdevs to make better monero miners too, current ones are trash

ye i aint bares
cobaltmdn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 07:29:27 PM
Last edit: April 13, 2018, 08:22:07 PM by cobaltmdn
 #1451

Comparing PhoenixMiner 2.9d to Claymore 11.6 in ETH mining:

- it has more hashrate -> +0.8MH/s
- less 20-30w power draw
- less temperature
- less fan usage

Keep it up.  Smiley
sidaliroy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 08:05:05 PM
 #1452

When 2.9 final edition (non-beta) will be out? And what will be the improvements?
jojo sevilla
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 08:14:39 PM
 #1453

 Huh Huh
Iamtutut
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 131


View Profile
April 13, 2018, 10:18:21 PM
 #1454

2.9D running rock solid for 27 hours, reported hasrate between 91,5 and 92MH/s for 3X RX570.
gsrcrxsi314
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 367
Merit: 34


View Profile
April 14, 2018, 12:41:24 AM
 #1455

mine monero lol
stop supporting this asic coin

and i advise minerdevs to make better monero miners too, current ones are trash

but ETH is still much more profitable than XMR unless you have Vegas

so no.
wtfonly16
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 296
Merit: 108


View Profile
April 14, 2018, 01:15:51 AM
 #1456

mine monero lol
stop supporting this asic coin

and i advise minerdevs to make better monero miners too, current ones are trash

but ETH is still much more profitable than XMR unless you have Vegas

so no.

rx570: 27-31mh/s ETH @ 90-110w
rx570: 850-900sol/s Monero @ 120w

Monero pulls ahead by 20-25%... Keep Dreaming buddy, eth is dead.

ye i aint bares
fimatiku
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 14, 2018, 04:22:26 AM
 #1457



rx570: 27-31mh/s ETH @ 90-110w
rx570: 850-900sol/s Monero @ 120w

Monero pulls ahead by 20-25%... Keep Dreaming buddy, eth is dead.

Wow your an idiot ..... thanks for sharing only HALF of the data
perhaps when you quote someone of "dreaming"

elaborate more with details to a pennie.

coins received to dollar value in a given time frame etc... end result and so on....................

For instance, I personally (not blowing smoke out of my asss) have 35 GPUs and I mine ETC rx 580 or in ur case 570 it dont matter I do have only one of those hashing at 29.9 the reset are 580's depending on the card 28-32.6 .

anyways I get 1etc every 11hours or so -  so thats 2+ in a 24 hour period aka 1 DAY = each etc currant rate of $16 for a grand total of $32 a day

let me know if you can get $32 a day with SOLS and how many UNITS GPUs it will take with todays rate

----

I reckon 300 give or take SOLS with rx580 would imagine the same for 570 Huh? personally tried it on bitcoin private pool same zcash crap

800sols Huh maybe with a gtx 1070 or 1080 Huh I dont know


Sooooooo quickly coming to a conclusion that your an idiot that doesn't know wtf ur talking about
fimatiku
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 14, 2018, 04:29:13 AM
 #1458

After running PM 2.9d for few days yes it "SHOWS" higher hash rate but the time it takes to CLEAR a block for me INCREASED as apposed to running CL

some would say difficulty increased Huh Id have to run it for 2 weeks to collect data and then switch back to CL and collect more data to eliminate that theory
wtfonly16
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 296
Merit: 108


View Profile
April 14, 2018, 04:42:25 AM
 #1459



rx570: 27-31mh/s ETH @ 90-110w
rx570: 850-900sol/s Monero @ 120w

Monero pulls ahead by 20-25%... Keep Dreaming buddy, eth is dead.

Wow your an idiot ..... thanks for sharing only HALF of the data
perhaps when you quote someone of "dreaming"

elaborate more with details to a pennie.

coins received to dollar value in a given time frame etc... end result and so on....................

For instance, I personally (not blowing smoke out of my asss) have 35 GPUs and I mine ETC rx 580 or in ur case 570 it dont matter I do have only one of those hashing at 29.9 the reset are 580's depending on the card 28-32.6 .

anyways I get 1etc every 11hours or so -  so thats 2+ in a 24 hour period aka 1 DAY = each etc currant rate of $16 for a grand total of $32 a day

let me know if you can get $32 a day with SOLS and how many UNITS GPUs it will take with todays rate

----

I reckon 300 give or take SOLS with rx580 would imagine the same for 570 Huh? personally tried it on bitcoin private pool same zcash crap

800sols Huh maybe with a gtx 1070 or 1080 Huh I dont know


Sooooooo quickly coming to a conclusion that your an idiot that doesn't know wtf ur talking about

580's push 900far and 570's are 850+ for moneroV7
the past is gone. get with the times. we are not in 2012 anymore, new miners push rx series far for monero. Vegas are not king for price/performance anymore.

and ur the idiot here, 35gpus dont pull $32 a day in etc lol

ye i aint bares
drgrog
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 14, 2018, 09:11:44 AM
 #1460

Tried Phoenix 2.8c today. Mostly good, but have a problem with the remote monitoring.

I have a basic python script using sockets to monitor all rigs and send me alerts if things go wrong. 
This works with claymore, which says it uses raw TCP/IP connections (not HTTP) for remote management.
This same script does not work with Phoenix, and hangs when waiting for data from the miner.

It sends the request JSON as per the claymore API {"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"miner_getstat1"}
It then waits for the response, expecting {"result": ["9.3 - ETH" ... data, but it never gets any data.
It uses the socket.recv(1024) method which blocks until there is some data to be read.

The remote monitoring is enabled, and responds to HTTP requests on 3333, showing a html version of the console.
Interestingly claymore's EthMan.exe does work and can see the rigs using Phoenix.

The devs say "Phoenix miner is fully compatible with Claymore's dual miner protocol for remote monitoring and
management.", so am I correct to assume that phoenix should support the raw TCP/IP requests in JSON format?

It's a pretty simple script, that works with claymore, perhaps someone can see if I'm doing something wrong, here is a stripped down version that hangs when waiting for data from the miner.

Code:
#!/usr/bin/python3

import socket
import json

def contact_miner(ip,port):
    request = b'{"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"miner_getstat1"}'
    with socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) as s:
        try:
            s.connect((ip, port))
        except Exception:
            return None
        s.sendall(request)
        data = s.recv(1024)
        if data != b'':
            return(json.loads(data.decode('utf-8'))['result'])


answer = contact_miner('192.168.1.198', 3333)
print(answer)

It hangs because socket.recv blocks when there is no data. If you Ctrl+C you get

Code:
user@server:~/bin$ ./checkPhoenix.py
^CTraceback (most recent call last):
  File "./checkPhoenix.py", line 19, in <module>
    answer = contact_miner('192.168.1.198', 3333)
  File "./checkPhoenix.py", line 14, in contact_miner
    data = s.recv(1024)
KeyboardInterrupt

Anyone else got monitoring scripts working with Phoenix?  Any idea what could be going wrong?
Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 497 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!