WhyMe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2019, 06:36:51 PM |
|
Any chance to have BFC variant ?
|
|
|
|
tromp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 990
Merit: 1108
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2019, 10:10:42 PM |
|
So is it more profitable to mine c32 or c31 now ?
Until the C31 phaseout starts around Jan 15, C31 will certainly be more profitable. It depends on your hardware when C32 becomes more profitable, but likely not until April...
|
|
|
|
Lolliedieb (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 17, 2019, 06:40:55 PM |
|
Until the C31 phaseout starts around Jan 15, C31 will certainly be more profitable. It depends on your hardware when C32 becomes more profitable, but likely not until April...
Well I would guess a little earlier - lets assume a Vega64 does 1.3 g/s C31 and 0.4 g/s C32. So 30.7% of the speed. Considering the higher scale of C32 the profitability is right now 63% of C31. So at current speeds it will take until end of March until the profitability flips. But C32 is barely optimized yet Ps: currently on travel, sry for the silence. Also still waiting for reply from AMD about the Windows issue :/
|
Check out lolMiner 1.56, an efficient miner for Ethash, Beam and many Cuckoo-Cycle and Equihash variants for AMD & Nvidia cards at low fees.
|
|
|
Lolliedieb (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 19, 2019, 09:17:44 AM |
|
Good and bad news from AMD ( Link if anyone wants to read themselves why) It seems I will be able to port 0.9.4 speedup for Navi on Windows, but not for Vega 56/64 and VII. "Stupid" driver limitation imao - well at least they are aware of the issue now. Will need to figure out if I see a way to speed it up without using the extra memory (in that case also 470/480/570 and 580 would profit ... I will try...)
|
Check out lolMiner 1.56, an efficient miner for Ethash, Beam and many Cuckoo-Cycle and Equihash variants for AMD & Nvidia cards at low fees.
|
|
|
|
xMindx163
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2019, 10:21:20 AM |
|
As soon as there is support with manners, the coin will be rolled into the bottom. So you don't need anything. Be happy with what you have.
|
|
|
|
Lolliedieb (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 01, 2020, 08:39:49 AM |
|
Happy new Year you all ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) As soon as there is support with manners, the coin will be rolled into the bottom. So you don't need anything. Be happy with what you have. Just hearing of MoneroV the first time. Wonder what this is about. Well it seems there are only changes in the cycle length and some small stuff in the stratum (Hell, why people always fail to document that stuff when they fork a coin)... but seriously: There is not even 1k g/s using my C29D code although its the only 4G implementation for AMDs ... how much can I expect from this - the network not even is 1/100 the size of grin. That likely won't roi the time for me changing the code
|
Check out lolMiner 1.56, an efficient miner for Ethash, Beam and many Cuckoo-Cycle and Equihash variants for AMD & Nvidia cards at low fees.
|
|
|
pbfarmer
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 340
Merit: 29
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 02, 2020, 12:57:37 AM Last edit: January 05, 2020, 10:07:25 AM by pbfarmer |
|
HNY! Just wanted to post some c31 settings (for vega64) which may be more interesting to people w/ prices so low these days. In general, it seems that 1150cclk/800mclk @ 800mv is pretty safe - for about 1.03-1.05gps. Only one of my 8 Nitros needed a tiny bump down on cclk (to 1140MHz) to be stable. Some can go up quite a bit while still maintaining 800mv - the last two in this screenshot are running w/ a setting of 1250+ cclk for ~1.1gps (I haven't tuned the others yet.) I'm seeing an avg of about 150-153w/GPU ATW on a 1600 plat PSU @ 120v, which should be significantly more efficient than any of the settings provided in the ann. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FbcOTxlam.png&t=665&c=ShiwevwBOdKdkA)
|
|
|
|
un4given
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 05, 2020, 03:53:57 PM |
|
Hi!
when i try mining BEAM V2 on my 5700 XT i see jobs received but speed is 0 and miner is not showing in pool? any idea what is wrong? the configuration s correct and miner connects to the pool
|
|
|
|
kbs1
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 08, 2020, 08:02:07 AM |
|
Lolliedieb, will cuckaroom29 on RX 580 8GB on Win 10 be supported?
|
https://xdag.org - reliable World-Wide XDAG mining pool with automatic failover and extra mining rewards!
|
|
|
cluburlauber
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 11, 2020, 12:31:33 AM |
|
Hi Lollidieb Have you an old miner for x16r for amd? Your miner for other algos is one of the best I use very old graphic cards (r9 290) and no miner i try will work (very low hashrate <0,6 mhs with standard clocks) Best wishes Cluburlauber
|
|
|
|
jasta more
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 18
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 11, 2020, 08:17:50 AM |
|
Hi Lollidieb Have you an old miner for x16r for amd? Your miner for other algos is one of the best I use very old graphic cards (r9 290) and no miner i try will work (very low hashrate <0,6 mhs with standard clocks) Best wishes Cluburlauber
X16r is Asics territory now, you would just lose money mining it
|
|
|
|
cluburlauber
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 11, 2020, 02:17:47 PM |
|
Hi Lollidieb Have you an old miner for x16r for amd? Your miner for other algos is one of the best I use very old graphic cards (r9 290) and no miner i try will work (very low hashrate <0,6 mhs with standard clocks) Best wishes Cluburlauber
X16r is Asics territory now, you would just lose money mining it X16r is asic - really? I want to mine the death coin gravium. Maybee in the future it will be reactivated. Because there is only one miner. But i didnt find a miner who works with r9 290. So i ask here lollidieb Greetings
|
|
|
|
Lolliedieb (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 14, 2020, 11:27:54 AM |
|
Hey Friends, just pushed the update to lolMiner 0.9.5. For all that just need the link: Here it isThis one will finally bring support for the C29M upgrade on Thursday ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Here is the full change log: Version 0.9.5- Added support for Grin CuckarooM-29 (hard fork on Jan 16th) on 8G AMD GPUs, use --coin GRIN-C29M to mine with it.
Hint: The miner will pause until the fork height is reached not to waste energy. Use --coin FLOO-C29M to test the miner in floonet testnet before if you like. - Improved C31 performance on 8G cards by ~5% (Windows: relatively to 0.9.3, Linux: relatively to 0.9.4)
- Navi on Windows now runs same kernels as in Linux
- Slightly lowered energy use of C31 / C32 solver
- Added aliases GRIN-C31 and GRIN-C32 for the Cuckatoo solvers (the old names still exist and continue to work)
- Changed driver requirement for all GRIN codes: 18.50 for all pre-Navi cards, 19.30 for Navi (Linux); Adrenaline 18.12 for all pre-Navi, Adrenaline 19.10 for Navi
Expected performances:GRIN-C29M (stock clocks, tested using amdgpu-pro 19.30) Note: Windows speeds may differ slightly (max 3-4%) - Radeon VII: 6.1 g/s
- Vega 64: 4.4 g/s
- Vega 56: 3.7 g/s
- RX 5700: 4.0 g/s
- RX 570: 2.2 g/s
Any feedback appreciated
|
Check out lolMiner 1.56, an efficient miner for Ethash, Beam and many Cuckoo-Cycle and Equihash variants for AMD & Nvidia cards at low fees.
|
|
|
Bathmat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 14, 2020, 12:59:19 PM |
|
Just tested the new version: nice improvement for Navi on Windows. Also, I'm using 19.9.2 without any issues so far.
GPU settings: 1500/875/825mV (~100W gpu only power draw), averaging ~1.05 gps per Navi (up from around 0.93 gps)
|
|
|
|
|
artful
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 15, 2020, 09:26:14 PM |
|
Bug in lolminer on nvidia card I run lolminer string: ./lolMiner --coin GRIN-AD29 --pool grincuckarood29.eu.nicehash.com --port 3377 --user --user wallet.worker --devices 12
me see log: Setup Miner... Device 0: Name: GeForce GTX 1650 Address: 1:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 3910 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 1: Name: GeForce GTX 1070 Address: 2:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 8119 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 2: Name: GeForce GTX 1070 Address: 3:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 8119 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 3: Name: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Address: 7:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 3019 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 4: Name: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Address: 8:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 8119 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 5: Name: P104-100 Address: 9:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 8121 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 6: Name: GeForce RTX 2070 Address: 11:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 7982 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 7: Name: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Address: 13:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 4040 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 8: Name: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Address: 15:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 3019 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 9: Name: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB Address: 16:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 6078 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 10: Name: P104-100 Address: 17:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 4042 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 11: Name: P104-100 Address: 18:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 8121 MByte Active: false (not selected) Device 12: Name: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB Address: 19:0 Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Memory: 6078 MByte Active: true (Selected Algorithm: Cuckarood 29-6G)
after run miner - me check working - nvidia-smi +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Processes: GPU Memory | | GPU PID Type Process name Usage | |=============================================================================| | 0 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 0 863 C ./lolMiner 55MiB | | 0 3904 C .../calcprofit/miners/pm/4.2c/PhoenixMiner 3705MiB | | 1 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 1 863 C ./lolMiner 85MiB | | 1 11603 C ...ing/calcprofit/miners/gminer/1.93/miner 7707MiB | | 2 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 2 863 C ./lolMiner 85MiB | | 2 11610 C ...ing/calcprofit/miners/gminer/1.93/miner 7707MiB | | 3 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 3 863 C ./lolMiner 61MiB | | 3 31127 C ...ing/calcprofit/miners/gminer/1.70/miner 1747MiB | | 4 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 4 863 C ./lolMiner 103MiB | | 4 11596 C ...ing/calcprofit/miners/gminer/1.82/miner 7725MiB | | 5 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 5 863 C ./lolMiner 85MiB | | 5 5680 C .../calcprofit/miners/pm/4.2c/PhoenixMiner 3737MiB | | 6 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 6 863 C ./lolMiner 99MiB | | 6 11614 C ...ing/calcprofit/miners/gminer/1.93/miner 7725MiB | | 7 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 7 863 C ./lolMiner 47MiB | | 7 24771 C .../calcprofit/miners/pm/4.2c/PhoenixMiner 3699MiB | | 8 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 8 863 C ./lolMiner 61MiB | | 8 31132 C ...ing/calcprofit/miners/gminer/1.82/miner 1747MiB | | 9 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 9 863 C ./lolMiner 65MiB | | 9 3892 C .../calcprofit/miners/pm/4.2c/PhoenixMiner 3717MiB | | 10 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 10 863 C ./lolMiner 85MiB | | 10 27853 C .../calcprofit/miners/pm/4.2c/PhoenixMiner 3737MiB | | 11 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 11 863 C ./lolMiner 85MiB | | 11 27853 C .../calcprofit/miners/pm/4.2c/PhoenixMiner 3737MiB | | 12 778 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 5MiB | | 12 863 C ./lolMiner 5261MiB | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
why lolminer launch in all videocards (55-100Mb using in all videocard)
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 15, 2020, 09:47:49 PM |
|
Now reread the logfile a bit more recursive ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Hint: They are displayed - not selected.
|
|
|
|
WhyMe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 16, 2020, 04:51:55 AM |
|
Are we facing a fail ? No more C29 block since the fork ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
|
Lolliedieb (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 16, 2020, 05:33:50 AM |
|
Bug in lolminer on nvidia card
.... why lolminer launch in all videocards (55-100Mb using in all videocard)
I will check - seems some of the cleanup does not work for unselected cards. That lolMine is displayed at all comes from.OpenCL context that is created... By the way we had C29M blocks now, but the diff balancibg in grin takes a while to adjust to the new scheme. Give it 3-4 hrs then every thing should be normal ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
Check out lolMiner 1.56, an efficient miner for Ethash, Beam and many Cuckoo-Cycle and Equihash variants for AMD & Nvidia cards at low fees.
|
|
|
|