|
gilad215
|
 |
June 20, 2014, 06:27:36 PM |
|
Guys could use some help
6x280x Pentium Haswell 4GB RAM = 1930h/s
5x280x Pentium Haswell 2GB RAM = 2200h/s
the 6x280x rig is slower, is the CPU the problem? is there any -ss option for the miner? anyone with 6xgpus can help?
thank you
|
Neluns ♦ New Generation Financial Ecosystem ♦ Pre-sale on Aug, 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a
SourceForge forum.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kqpahv
|
|
June 20, 2014, 07:04:52 PM |
|
Ok, Did some thorough comparisons on my MSI 280x's at different core speeds and 3.0 vs 3.1.
R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.0
430Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/47c/ = 101W
460Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/50c/ = 113W
466Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/51c/ = 123W
R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.1
433Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/46c/ = 90W
457Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/49c/ = 108W
463Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/50c/ = 114W
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 20, 2014, 07:37:47 PM |
|
Well, I think -1% of mining speed worth -10% of power. If you don't like it - use v3.0.
|
|
|
|
surfer43
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
|
|
June 20, 2014, 07:37:59 PM |
|
MoneroPool.org is back! 0% fees for now
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 20, 2014, 07:40:38 PM |
|
Update link for my miner, v1.2 is too old  |
|
|
|
|
kqpahv
|
|
June 20, 2014, 07:45:53 PM |
|
Well, I think -1% of mining speed worth -10% of power. If you don't like it - use v3.0.
Obviously  Never said I dint like it, I was just wondering how could anyone have high temps with 3.0  Brought this table out just to inform others |
|
|
|
|
|
sk00t3r
|
|
June 20, 2014, 07:59:34 PM |
|
Ok, Did some thorough comparisons on my MSI 280x's at different core speeds and 3.0 vs 3.1.
R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.0
430Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/47c/ = 101W
460Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/50c/ = 113W
466Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/51c/ = 123W
R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.1
433Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/46c/ = 90W
457Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/49c/ = 108W
463Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/50c/ = 114W
Thanks man! It is good to see comparisson! |
|
|
|
|
frenkyshka
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 08:14:14 PM |
|
I just cant make my sapphires dual x 280x to work like it should.
4x280x is hashing at 1450hs.
Tryed to run just one and result is 360-365hs.
Win 7, 8gb, drivers r 13.12, virtual mem set to 16gb.
Interesting thing is that i have same results on 1100mhz and on 950mhz gpu core clock.
How can ppl run Asus on 450+ hs?
|
|
|
|
|
crowetic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1072
https://crowetic.com | https://qortal.org
|
|
June 20, 2014, 08:27:59 PM |
|
I just cant make my sapphires dual x 280x to work like it should.
4x280x is hashing at 1450hs.
Tryed to run just one and result is 360-365hs.
Win 7, 8gb, drivers r 13.12, virtual mem set to 16gb.
Interesting thing is that i have same results on 1100mhz and on 950mhz gpu core clock.
How can ppl run Asus on 450+ hs?
my ASUS 280x's on default clocks hit 475h/s a piece. Not sure, I didn't make any changes. |
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▓▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▒ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
|
ORTAL
| .⊙.Web and Application hosting.
⊙ decentralized infrastructure
.⊙.leveling and voting.
| Founder/current dev group facilitator |
[/td][/tr][/table] [/table] |
|
|
|
kqpahv
|
|
June 20, 2014, 08:31:46 PM |
|
Ok, Did some thorough comparisons on my MSI 280x's at different core speeds and 3.0 vs 3.1.
R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.0
430Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/47c/ = 101W
460Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/50c/ = 113W
466Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/51c/ = 123W
R9 280x @ 70% fans on Miner 3.1
433Khash @ 950Mhz/887Mv/46c/ = 90W
457Khash @ 1040Mhz/956Mv/49c/ = 108W
463Khash @ 1080Mhz 988Mv/50c/ = 114W
Thanks man! It is good to see comparisson! Scratch that, I just noticed I had the powered risers molex coming from another PSU  So the wattage will be actually a bit higher. Will do a accurate measuring tomorrow |
|
|
|
|
Barney
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 170
Merit: 100
RevolverCoin dev
|
|
June 20, 2014, 08:41:53 PM |
|
Getting
"GpuMiner k1a failed -52"
280x
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 set. Virtual memory set.
v2.2 was ok. What could cause this issue?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 20, 2014, 08:47:26 PM |
|
Getting
"GpuMiner k1a failed -52"
280x
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 set. Virtual memory set.
v2.2 was ok. What could cause this issue?
Make sure that you use ALL files from new version. Not just replace old EXE by new, but also don't forget about "data.bin" file. |
|
|
|
trip96
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 08:56:19 PM |
|
I am also having trouble with my 280x. It runs in the 360 h/s range like the poster said before me.
Here are my specs
16gb ram
i7 4770k
msi 280x
For whatever reason I cannot get this to hash at 450 yet. If anyone solves this please let me know. I am still working on it myself and if i come up with anything I will share my findings.
|
|
|
|
|
frenkyshka
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 09:01:35 PM |
|
I am also having trouble with my 280x. It runs in the 360 h/s range like the poster said before me.
Here are my specs
16gb ram
i7 4770k
msi 280x
For whatever reason I cannot get this to hash at 450 yet. If anyone solves this please let me know. I am still working on it myself and if i come up with anything I will share my findings.
Allready tryed everything, it just wont work like it should. Claymore we need help here. |
|
|
|
|
olajos
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 09:52:54 PM |
|
I am also having trouble with my 280x. It runs in the 360 h/s range like the poster said before me.
Here are my specs
16gb ram
i7 4770k
msi 280x
For whatever reason I cannot get this to hash at 450 yet. If anyone solves this please let me know. I am still working on it myself and if i come up with anything I will share my findings.
mines run around 350 h/s with 280x catalyst 13.2 athlon x2 250 cpu 4gb ram 20gb virtual windows 7 64 bit miner 3.1 4x280x stock mem and gpu 1400 h/s Help Claymore |
|
|
|
|
|
pinoyminer1977
|
|
June 20, 2014, 09:55:35 PM |
|
2044 h/s on x3 r9 290.
681 h/s each.
Would you mine sharing your settings? |
|
|
|
|
|
AceCobra1
|
|
June 20, 2014, 10:10:20 PM |
|
are you guys using GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100?
I find 85 gives me most hash
|
|
|
|
|
trip96
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 10:14:14 PM |
|
I am also having trouble with my 280x. It runs in the 360 h/s range like the poster said before me.
Here are my specs
16gb ram
i7 4770k
msi 280x
For whatever reason I cannot get this to hash at 450 yet. If anyone solves this please let me know. I am still working on it myself and if i come up with anything I will share my findings.
mines run around 350 h/s with 280x catalyst 13.2 athlon x2 250 cpu 4gb ram 20gb virtual windows 7 64 bit miner 3.1 4x280x stock mem and gpu 1400 h/s Help Claymore Hey just to give an update: Tried 13.10 that MSI recommends on their website. No luck Also tried 14.4 recommended from amd and no luck. I wonder if its on our end or the programs end? If anyone who has a 280x working well know of any tricks to try? |
|
|
|
|
trip96
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 10:15:43 PM |
|
are you guys using GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100?
I find 85 gives me most hash
Yes I am using 100 percent as suggested in readme. I will try variation of that now starting with 85 percent. Thank you for the idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
AceCobra1
|
|
June 20, 2014, 10:18:26 PM |
|
are you guys using GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100?
I find 85 gives me most hash
Yes I am using 100 percent as suggested in readme. I will try variation of that now starting with 85 percent. Thank you for the idea. I read here 80 is best for some people... I find my miner too unstable at 100... Does 100 consume more power than 85 or does it not make any difference? What does GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT actually do? |
|
|
|
|
|
