-snip- then use another wallet (like blockchain.info that I'm using).
Move your coins out of Blockchain.info wallet. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1085983.0;all For your tx, it only need 0.0001 BTC as fees if you use that function.
Have you checked his transaction? He has a lot of inputs which increase fee.
|
|
|
I didn't specify, but I agree, except that the Buddhists are not theistic.
They are.
|
|
|
Check whether the address you used is a change address and can you please list all files you see in C:\Users\YourUserName\Appdata\Roaming\Local\Electrum?
|
|
|
oww MZ so how much you can lend me for this account as collateral?
Not interested. Sorry!
|
|
|
Loan Amount: 0.05 BTCReason :Very private lol BTC Address : 1GTgeAqNpbhkP18Qf167QM9rFWyCfMcnP3 Term Length : 10 days since i dont have a high activity i would like to give my steam account as a collateral. http://steamcommunity.com/id/SanderwalkthroughsHey MZ
i need 0.09 BTC repayment in 8 days or less
collateral this account if needed
1NaK4S31qp9owd5mFpDLKBqusDVLJhRWSW
Thankyou
Denied.
|
|
|
Okay. Didn't knew we can push transaction from Bitcoin core without fully syncing. So... what do you want to do now? You want re-broadcast first transaction? If yes, try running getrawtransaction c827d5ee52f8cfb8f728c1f481ab96f6b1ab1d73ddccecffd67fb769d1140e65 and push raw transaction you get via an online website or from any other client. Eg:- https://blockchain.info/pushtx and http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/pushtxn.php.
|
|
|
Can you prove you have 100BTC+ in BTC-e?
|
|
|
-snip- Currently I am 'catching up' at the moment and am 21 weeks behind, not that, that's relevant...I think. -snip-
You need to fully sync your client to be able to broadcast a transaction. Do you mean rebroadcast a transaction? because like I said I was able to send a transaction ok after finding my initial transaction wasn't appearing on the blockchain despite being 21 weeks behind. I send transaction ok quite ofter despite not having downloaded all the blocks. No. AFAIK you need to fully sync to push a transaction. Did the transaction you broadcasted appeared in any of the block explorers?
|
|
|
-snip- Currently I am 'catching up' at the moment and am 21 weeks behind, not that, that's relevant...I think. -snip-
You need to fully sync your client to be able to broadcast a transaction. To re-broadcast a transaction, first try running getrawtransaction <txid> and then push that raw transaction you got via an online website or from any other client. Eg:- https://blockchain.info/pushtx and http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/pushtxn.php. * Edited.
|
|
|
Just change your password to a random one and leave if that's what you want!
|
|
|
I agree with you. It can lead to confusion especially if there is a few topics related to similar subject.
If you quoted a post and was replying to it, then you can click that quoted post to go to the thread where your post was deleted from.
|
|
|
That indeed is the sad truth. Iraq is in peril because of the hate different muslim communities have among them. Not sure how this situation changes because orthodox hot heads tend to be the ones people choose to follow. Iraq was a peaceful country, before the Americans triggered the Iran-Iraq war in 1980 for their own selfish needs. Not only different sects of Muslims, but also other minorities such as Christians, Yazidis, Mandeans, and the Bahais were living in perfect harmony. Iraq was one of the few secular countries in the Middle East. But the Americans destroyed all that. It will be a "real" problem and "bad" thing only if theists were involved in it. Else, it will be one of the "soon-forgotten" things.
|
|
|
I gave a loan to TheGr33k, who has +ve green trust and was stated as alt of a scammer by quickseller but I thought that its no harm to give out the loan of 0.1BTC as I assumed I will be able to sell the account for more than 0.1 atleast. -snip-
"was stated as alt of a scammer by quickseller" - THIS. Why did you give out a loan even after it was marked as alt of scammer/extortionist? You should have asked community to ensure your assumptions are possible. @QS: Please don't remove the feedback and I know you won't.
|
|
|
You can't self-moderate a topic after you create it but I think Admins manually can make your topic self-moderated. If they can, you will need to give them a solid reason to do so.
|
|
|
Congrats, TheAnalogKid and keep up the good work, BadBear! your trust rating: : -1 / +4. freakin emoticon... might wanna PM shorena to get that red trust removed. I don't think he/she are aware of this yet.. Shorena is offline atm. He will remove it when he comes.
|
|
|
Double-spending is spending same bitcoin more than once. Miners ensure that the inputs for the transaction is not used to prevent double-spending. Example: 1. Bob send 1 BTC to Alice. 2. Bob send same 1 BTC to Joe. 3. Miner confirms both transaction and included it in block. A real example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=152348See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Double-spending for more details. It is a type of exploit. The person sends funds without a transaction fee, then sends again with a fee. The transaction with the fee will get confirmed and the other will eventually get rejected by the network. -snip-
Wrong. You can also double-spend a transaction with fee. The transaction which will be confirmed depends on miners. Most of the miners include transaction with higher fee and some includes older transaction.
|
|
|
The forum isn't a video a game. New ranks can be added as and when needed just like Legendary was. The ranks are just a way to show the age / activity of an account.
The forum isn't a video game, but there's no reason why we can't implement gamification in it. The Stack Exchange network does something similar (with points and achievements), and I think it works fine, encouraging people to give useful answers. When you are saying achievements, I started to think, other than the current activity count, what can we do? Then I think of post counts and time logged in. Although post counts can be boosted by making many useless posts here, the total time logged in must be real time. Maybe shall we make a new rank for those who have one of the highest values of the total time logged in? There shouldn't be a rank based on logged in time as 'Total time logged in' can be manipulated easily. See 'Most Time Online' in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats.
|
|
|
|