Bitcoin Forum
November 05, 2024, 12:41:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 [181] 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 ... 417 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [OS] nvOC easy-to-use Linux Nvidia Mining  (Read 418142 times)
dbolivar
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 15, 2017, 05:21:37 AM
 #3601

Guys; I thought of keeping all the best OC settings in one place for all the available cards in the market.

I would need your help to input your best OC finds bit of details; happy to update it time to time; it would help us hit the rock bottom (even for a beginner).

You can PM me or Post a reply on this post or request on this post :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2176936

Hope I get good support from our nvOC community members to make this possible Smiley

This is URL :

http://krypto-mining.blogspot.co.uk/

I've only started; any suggestions welcome Smiley

That's a good idea, congrats on the initiative! I've visited your website and would like to suggest to include a column specifying the exact brand and model of the card. And even with the same brand and model, I've seen differences regarding the maximum stable OC values, probably due to different memory manufacturer or other slight differences in manufacturing. But with your idea it will be definitely *a lot* easier to know what values should be stable, and play with slight differences.

I'll PM you soon with my cards' OC specs.
papampi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 140


Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2017, 07:01:05 AM
 #3602

Can someone please tell me where the logs are stored for claymore miner ?

I have a GPU which is causing the miner to reset and I would like to see which GPU it is from the log
You should enable logging in 3main
find the claymore line in 3main and add L to arguments like this :

from
Code:
screen -dmS miner $HCD ... 
to
Code:
screen -dmSL miner $HCD ..... 

then you get a screenlog.0

damNmad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 104


nvOC forever


View Profile
September 15, 2017, 08:10:46 AM
 #3603

@damNmad

Thanx for your reply.

Quote
It has to go like this:

Worker is what you add on suprnova portal

Code:

ZEN_WORKER="gaol"


Address is your username for logging into suprnova portal

Code:

ZEN_ADDRESS="gaol"

Now all working fine ...

After some minutes I have >750 sol/s per GPU. Is it a good number for a gtx1080ti ?

I probably need to twicking powerlimit / cc / cm ...

By the way, powerlimit is a watt number but I just don't know if cc and/or cm are for Mhz or % ?

What's your favorite overclocking or dowclocking numbers (powerlimit / cc / cm) for a MSI Geforce gtx1080ti Gaming OC ?

In advance, thanks for your help.

_S_C_

Glad it worked.

Speaking of OC's , I only have 1 rig, which has only 1060's.

I can suggest the best for it but not much about 1080 TBH.

nvOC doesn't use %

I would suggest to try 80% of your power limit, my 1060 power limit is 120 and 80% of it is 96.

Core clock, fullzero suggested me in the beginning to increase 10 at a time until it crashes.

Once you find the stable CC - core clock then increase the MC - memory clock 50 at a time until you see the number of sols stable

This is just my illustration from my experience of 1060. If I were you, I would Google first and try what people suggesting, there are lots of topics about this

Tip: Every algorithm and every coin is different, so you need to change it depending on algorithm/coin you mine.

PS: Welcome to the Jungle Cheesy

Thanks for your reply damNmad.

As you mentioned and as suggested by fullzero, I'm gonna try to oc core clock 10 by 10 until crashes.

Once the cc is stable, I'm gonna try to oc memory clock by 50 until stable sols levels.

Regards.

_S_C_

P.S.: many thanks to fullzero and all the co-workers for this amazing mining nvoc' os.


Not a problem; for such miners like us I've started this blog where you can find the best OC settings for all the cards (just started yesterday; would eventually add all the cards time to time).

This is the topic :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2176936

Hope I get good support from our nvOC community members to make this possible

This is URL :

http://krypto-mining.blogspot.co.uk/

I've only started; any suggestions welcome

DeepOnion    ▬▬  Anonymous and Untraceable  ▬▬    ENJOY YOUR PRIVACY  •  JOIN DEEPONION
▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐   ANN  Whitepaper  Facebook  Twitter  Telegram  Discord    ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌
Get $ONION  (✔Cryptopia  ✔KuCoin)  |  VoteCentral  Register NOW!  |  Download DeepOnion
damNmad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 104


nvOC forever


View Profile
September 15, 2017, 08:19:32 AM
 #3604

Guys; I thought of keeping all the best OC settings in one place for all the available cards in the market.

I would need your help to input your best OC finds bit of details; happy to update it time to time; it would help us hit the rock bottom (even for a beginner).

You can PM me or Post a reply on this post or request on this post :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2176936

Hope I get good support from our nvOC community members to make this possible Smiley

This is URL :

http://krypto-mining.blogspot.co.uk/

I've only started; any suggestions welcome Smiley

That's a good idea, congrats on the initiative! I've visited your website and would like to suggest to include a column specifying the exact brand and model of the card. And even with the same brand and model, I've seen differences regarding the maximum stable OC values, probably due to different memory manufacturer or other slight differences in manufacturing. But with your idea it will be definitely *a lot* easier to know what values should be stable, and play with slight differences.

I'll PM you soon with my cards' OC specs.

Thanks @dbolivar; I came up with this for all the beginners, who had lots of questions about best OC and spending loads of time on tuning rather than earning.

I will definitely add the additional column today; I agree, I've seen differences too.

I got your PM, thank you so much for support; we can continue discussing more about it on this topic (I would rather not hijack the nvOC topic Cheesy)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2176936.0

I would also like to add posts about some simple things we can do with nvOC (after confirming with fullzero - havent asked yet); as going through these pages is hectic time consuming.

Thank you so much for your support on this.

DeepOnion    ▬▬  Anonymous and Untraceable  ▬▬    ENJOY YOUR PRIVACY  •  JOIN DEEPONION
▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐   ANN  Whitepaper  Facebook  Twitter  Telegram  Discord    ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌
Get $ONION  (✔Cryptopia  ✔KuCoin)  |  VoteCentral  Register NOW!  |  Download DeepOnion
damNmad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 104


nvOC forever


View Profile
September 15, 2017, 08:28:13 AM
 #3605



Cool, thanks! I'll look again in the previous pages to catch up with this discussion.

Sorry, it wasn't in this discussion, but on bitcointalk.org somewhere. You'll have to have a google to find it! Regardless, I think they're still working on full zpool integration into nvOC. But anyways, I don't know anything as I don't use any of these services.

yes; I'm working on integrating most of the zpool algos (with the best help from @papampi).

DeepOnion    ▬▬  Anonymous and Untraceable  ▬▬    ENJOY YOUR PRIVACY  •  JOIN DEEPONION
▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐   ANN  Whitepaper  Facebook  Twitter  Telegram  Discord    ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌
Get $ONION  (✔Cryptopia  ✔KuCoin)  |  VoteCentral  Register NOW!  |  Download DeepOnion
papampi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 140


Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2017, 01:29:21 PM
 #3606



Cool, thanks! I'll look again in the previous pages to catch up with this discussion.

Sorry, it wasn't in this discussion, but on bitcointalk.org somewhere. You'll have to have a google to find it! Regardless, I think they're still working on full zpool integration into nvOC. But anyways, I don't know anything as I don't use any of these services.

yes; I'm working on integrating most of the zpool algos (with the best help from @papampi).
👍👍👍👍
Glad to be helpful

VoskCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 487


YouTube.com/VoskCoin


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2017, 02:20:14 PM
 #3607

Code:
Quote
Posted by: VoskCoin
Insert Quote
I connected to the rig via ssh . . but I don't understand what to do after that? I followed the guide I quoted on the last page but it is not working for me?

I'm basically stuck @ this point

just type following :
Code:
screen -ls
                    => + return     it's to see the actual running jobs

if you are mining, normaly, you should see 3 jobs :
1) the miner
2) temp (assuming temp supervision is on yes in your bash file)
3) watchdog (assuming wdog supervision is on yes in your bash file)

to see each job type the following :
Code:
screen -r miner 
               => + return    it's to see your mining jobs

Code:
ctrl + a + d 
                    => to exit the miner windows

same for the other jobs
Code:
screen -r temp
                 => + return
 
Code:
ctrl + a + d

Code:
screen -r wdog 
                => + return

Code:
ctrl + a + d

then type :
Code:
exit
                          => + return      it's to close your ssh session but the jobs still running

if you want to change your bash file, just type :
Code:
nano 1bash 
               => + return      nano it's a text editor - you can change what you want then ctrl + o to write out / then return /
                                                      then ctrl + x to close nano

if you change your bash file, you need to kill the miner
so for that, just type :
Code:
pkill -e miner
              => + return
after some seconds, your mining process restart by itself
to see if all working ok, just type :
Code:
screen -ls
                 

Regards.



both of those commands just leave me with this?


guys input with this? still haven't SSH'd in

Check out my Crypto YouTube channel
https://www.youtube.com/VoskCoin
If you enjoy my content click Subscribe
hurvajs77
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 15, 2017, 05:21:38 PM
 #3608

Hi guys,
I've mobo ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ with 8x GPUs 1080Ti to today. Today I bougth next 3 GPUs, connect them, but detected next ONE card only. Hash power decreace too. With 8 gpus I had about 6400 Sol/s, now have 5500 Sol/s... Sad

There are some limitations for GPUs count or any settings for nvOS?

See nvidia-smi:
Code:
m1@rig-bafomet:~$ sudo nvidia-smi
Fri Sep 15 13:16:47 2017
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 384.59                 Driver Version: 384.59                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:01:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   44C    P2   217W / 220W |    720MiB / 11171MiB |     99%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   45C    P2   219W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     94%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   2  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:03:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   44C    P2   217W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     38%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   3  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:04:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   42C    P2   226W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     51%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   4  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:09:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   43C    P2   210W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     44%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   5  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0C:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   46C    P2   221W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     48%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   6  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0D:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   47C    P2   207W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     94%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   7  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0E:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   54C    P2   211W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     97%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   8  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0F:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   39C    P2   221W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     98%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

and number of plugged GPUs in mobo:
Code:
m1@rig-bafomet:~$ sudo lspci | grep -i VGA | wc -l
11

Thanks for advice Smiley

damNmad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 104


nvOC forever


View Profile
September 15, 2017, 05:37:42 PM
Last edit: September 15, 2017, 06:09:24 PM by damNmad
 #3609

Hi guys,
I've mobo ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ with 8x GPUs 1080Ti to today. Today I bougth next 3 GPUs, connect them, but detected next ONE card only. Hash power decreace too. With 8 gpus I had about 6400 Sol/s, now have 5500 Sol/s... Sad

There are some limitations for GPUs count or any settings for nvOS?

See nvidia-smi:
Code:
m1@rig-bafomet:~$ sudo nvidia-smi
Fri Sep 15 13:16:47 2017
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 384.59                 Driver Version: 384.59                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:01:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   44C    P2   217W / 220W |    720MiB / 11171MiB |     99%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   45C    P2   219W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     94%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   2  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:03:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   44C    P2   217W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     38%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   3  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:04:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   42C    P2   226W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     51%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   4  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:09:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   43C    P2   210W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     44%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   5  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0C:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   46C    P2   221W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     48%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   6  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0D:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   47C    P2   207W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     94%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   7  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0E:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   54C    P2   211W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     97%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   8  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0F:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   39C    P2   221W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     98%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

and number of plugged GPUs in mobo:
Code:
m1@rig-bafomet:~$ sudo lspci | grep -i VGA | wc -l
11

Thanks for advice Smiley



There are NO such limitations; nvOC is designed to max of 13 cards without any modification of 1bash & 3main (can add more by modifying these two files). Try to verify the risers (swap them around with the working ones).

Hash rates dropped with your 8 cards??

DeepOnion    ▬▬  Anonymous and Untraceable  ▬▬    ENJOY YOUR PRIVACY  •  JOIN DEEPONION
▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐   ANN  Whitepaper  Facebook  Twitter  Telegram  Discord    ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌
Get $ONION  (✔Cryptopia  ✔KuCoin)  |  VoteCentral  Register NOW!  |  Download DeepOnion
papampi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 140


Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2017, 06:13:52 PM
 #3610

Hi guys,
I've mobo ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ with 8x GPUs 1080Ti to today. Today I bougth next 3 GPUs, connect them, but detected next ONE card only. Hash power decreace too. With 8 gpus I had about 6400 Sol/s, now have 5500 Sol/s... Sad

There are some limitations for GPUs count or any settings for nvOS?

See nvidia-smi:
Code:
m1@rig-bafomet:~$ sudo nvidia-smi
Fri Sep 15 13:16:47 2017
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 384.59                 Driver Version: 384.59                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:01:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   44C    P2   217W / 220W |    720MiB / 11171MiB |     99%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   45C    P2   219W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     94%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   2  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:03:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   44C    P2   217W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     38%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   3  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:04:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   42C    P2   226W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     51%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   4  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:09:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   43C    P2   210W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     44%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   5  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0C:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   46C    P2   221W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     48%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   6  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0D:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   47C    P2   207W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     94%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   7  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0E:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   54C    P2   211W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     97%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   8  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:0F:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 40%   39C    P2   221W / 220W |    679MiB / 11172MiB |     98%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

and number of plugged GPUs in mobo:
Code:
m1@rig-bafomet:~$ sudo lspci | grep -i VGA | wc -l
11

Thanks for advice Smiley


what are you mining and where is your rig ?
fan 40% temp 45 utilization 99
those numbers are incredible.
are you on v0019 ?

Bibi187
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 106


https://steemit.com/@bibi187


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2017, 06:29:33 PM
 #3611



both of those commands just leave me with this?


guys input with this? still haven't SSH'd in

I assume u wait a little after your miner work to do screen -ls

Process take 20-30 sec to be showed in screen -ls

I also see a lot of update suggestion on your screen, first of all use nvOC19 Wink


DeepOnion    ▬▬  Anonymous and Untraceable  ▬▬    ENJOY YOUR PRIVACY  •  JOIN DEEPONION
▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐   ANN  Whitepaper  Facebook  Twitter  Telegram  Discord    ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌
Get $ONION  (✔Cryptopia  ✔KuCoin)  |  VoteCentral  Register NOW!  |  Download DeepOnion
VoskCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 487


YouTube.com/VoskCoin


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2017, 07:24:11 PM
 #3612



both of those commands just leave me with this?


guys input with this? still haven't SSH'd in

I assume u wait a little after your miner work to do screen -ls

Process take 20-30 sec to be showed in screen -ls

I also see a lot of update suggestion on your screen, first of all use nvOC19 Wink



hmmm, now I realize I was connecting to my rig on 17 and not my nvoc19 rigs - would this be part of my issue O_O

Check out my Crypto YouTube channel
https://www.youtube.com/VoskCoin
If you enjoy my content click Subscribe
fullzero (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1009



View Profile
September 15, 2017, 07:33:00 PM
 #3613

Code:
Quote
Posted by: VoskCoin
Insert Quote
I connected to the rig via ssh . . but I don't understand what to do after that? I followed the guide I quoted on the last page but it is not working for me?

I'm basically stuck @ this point

just type following :
Code:
screen -ls
                    => + return     it's to see the actual running jobs

if you are mining, normaly, you should see 3 jobs :
1) the miner
2) temp (assuming temp supervision is on yes in your bash file)
3) watchdog (assuming wdog supervision is on yes in your bash file)

to see each job type the following :
Code:
screen -r miner 
               => + return    it's to see your mining jobs

Code:
ctrl + a + d 
                    => to exit the miner windows

same for the other jobs
Code:
screen -r temp
                 => + return
 
Code:
ctrl + a + d

Code:
screen -r wdog 
                => + return

Code:
ctrl + a + d

then type :
Code:
exit
                          => + return      it's to close your ssh session but the jobs still running

if you want to change your bash file, just type :
Code:
nano 1bash 
               => + return      nano it's a text editor - you can change what you want then ctrl + o to write out / then return /
                                                      then ctrl + x to close nano

if you change your bash file, you need to kill the miner
so for that, just type :
Code:
pkill -e miner
              => + return
after some seconds, your mining process restart by itself
to see if all working ok, just type :
Code:
screen -ls
                 

Regards.



both of those commands just leave me with this?


guys input with this? still haven't SSH'd in

From this pic it appears you have SSHed in; but you have no currently running mining process. 

If:

Code:
screen -ls
has the result like in this picture (and the rig you have SSHed into is running v0019: v0017 doesn't launch the processes in screen so the process is more involved)

try entering the cmd:

Code:
bash 2unix

then after you see the message indicating the mining process has started; press:

ctrl + c

then:

Code:
screen -r miner

If you have set

Code:
SSH="YES"

and

Code:
LOCALorREMOTE="REMOTE"

after restarting your rig and SSHing in you should find an already running mining process which can be attached to with:
Code:
screen -r miner 

without any of the above.

It is worth noting that you can SSH into a rig before it has fully booted and starting mining.  Give the rig time to ensure it has fully booted before SSHing in.



decayinjack
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 15, 2017, 07:42:47 PM
 #3614

I couldn't get the /getid command to work with my telegram bot. Just in case anyone else is having that issue, this guide helped me get around that:

https://www.forsomedefinition.com/automation/creating-telegram-bot-notifications/
fullzero (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1009



View Profile
September 15, 2017, 08:04:01 PM
 #3615

Is it possible to compile latest ccminer klaust for linux ?
I'm getting +1000 kh/s neoscrypt with 1070 on windows with it
while SPccminer gives 800 kh/s on nvoc

Code:
m1@m1-desktop-101:~/Downloads/ccminer-klaust/ccminer-klaust$ ./ccminer --version
ccminer 8.13-KlausT (64bit) for nVidia GPUs
Compiled with GCC 5.4 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0

Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp-hash, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.

ccminer v8.13-KlausT
libcurl/7.47.0 GnuTLS/3.4.10 zlib/1.2.8 libidn/1.32 librtmp/2.3

I compiled it but gives me error :


Code:
[2017-09-09 15:28:05] GPU #3: waiting for data
[2017-09-09 15:28:05] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2017-09-09 15:28:05] GPU #4: waiting for data
[2017-09-09 15:28:05] GPU #5: waiting for data
[2017-09-09 15:28:05] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2017-09-09 15:28:06] Stratum difficulty set to 256
[2017-09-09 15:28:06] Stratum difficulty set to 64
[2017-09-09 15:28:06] hub.miningpoolhub.com:20510 neoscrypt block 1876969
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init_2stream' at line 1439 : invalid device symbol.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init_2stream' at line 1428 : driver shutting down.

I believe I compiled this miner for v0019; it should be under the directory KTminer.  Might be a different version.

Unfortunately we dont have KTccminer, we have KX for skunk-krnlx  and TP for tpruvot 2.2 and AS for alexis78
Can you please give it a shot?
Hash rate difference is around 20% with 1070
1000+ on windows with klaust ccminer and 800 with SP and KX ccminer on nvoc

So many forks of ccminer.

I compiled the KT on my desktop; but it has an i7: I will compile it again with a g1840 and add it with the next update.


fullzero (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1009



View Profile
September 15, 2017, 08:04:56 PM
 #3616

Im building another rig next week and I want to try nv OC or SMos, not sure which one Ill try first yet.

Here are the main parts Im waiting for:
ASRock H110 Pro BTC+
12 Asus GTX-1070
16GB RAM
m.2 SSD

Anything I should know before I start ?

TYIA

There is a bug in v0019 when using an SSD or m2 SSD ( on first boot your 1bash will not replace the one in main automatically.)  You will need to manually copy it over replacing the one in the home directory (folder) with your own.

2 days a go I have installed nvoc 0.19 on a 250GB standar hd and 1bash was not replaced either.

Yes, I should have said:

There is a bug in v0019 when using an SSD or m2 SSD or HDD ( on first boot your 1bash will not replace the one in main automatically.)  You will need to manually copy it over replacing the one in the home directory (folder) with your own.



hurvajs77
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 15, 2017, 08:11:48 PM
Last edit: September 15, 2017, 08:42:22 PM by hurvajs77
 #3617

There are NO such limitations; nvOC is designed to max of 13 cards without any modification of 1bash & 3main (can add more by modifying these two files). Try to verify the risers (swap them around with the working ones).

Hash rates dropped with your 8 cards??
OK, I think same - no limitations...

I've rate ~6400 Sol/s with 8 cards.

After connection next 3 cards, rate dropped to ~5100 Sol/s only. nvOS didn't detect more than 8 cards, as you can saw on nvidia-smi.

Well, risers maybe problem - I'm novice in mining, so I ordered more types. I using version v006C and v008S. On cards plugged on v006C blinking LEDs below power connectors on card. I've ordered 13 pcs of v008S (these: www.aliexpress.com/item/TISHRIC-2018-Hot-VER008S-Molex-4PIN-15PIN-SATA-6PIN-3-in-1-PCIE-PCI-Express-Riser/32830747032.html). I hope that will works well.

Many thanks :-)
hurvajs77
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 15, 2017, 08:22:27 PM
 #3618

what are you mining and where is your rig ?
fan 40% temp 45 utilization 99
those numbers are incredible.
are you on v0019 ?
I'm mining ZEC / ZEN / SIGT. I'm in EU.
Yes, using v0019.

Why incredible?
My config:
 - power limit set to 220W for all gpus,
 - OC for all cards: Core +75, Mem +90 (I can overclock more, but OS is unstable and graphical drivers some times crash)

Are these invalid? For ZEC mining, I've this rate:
Code:
Temp: GPU0: 43C GPU1: 44C GPU2: 44C GPU3: 41C GPU4: 44C GPU5: 46C GPU6: 47C GPU7: 53C GPU8: 36C
GPU0: 724 Sol/s GPU1: 718 Sol/s GPU2: 729 Sol/s GPU3: 721 Sol/s GPU4: 721 Sol/s GPU5: 719 Sol/s GPU6: 712 Sol/s GPU7: 716 Sol/s GPU8: 709 Sol/s
Total speed: 6469 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage |  Efficiency  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
|  0  |    222W     |  3.26 Sol/W  |
|  1  |    218W     |  3.29 Sol/W  |
|  2  |    220W     |  3.31 Sol/W  |
|  3  |    187W     |  3.86 Sol/W  |
|  4  |    217W     |  3.32 Sol/W  |
|  5  |    194W     |  3.71 Sol/W  |
|  6  |    215W     |  3.31 Sol/W  |
|  7  |    201W     |  3.56 Sol/W  |
|  8  |    220W     |  3.22 Sol/W  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
papampi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 140


Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2017, 08:24:15 PM
 #3619

Is it possible to compile latest ccminer klaust for linux ?
I'm getting +1000 kh/s neoscrypt with 1070 on windows with it
while SPccminer gives 800 kh/s on nvoc

Code:
m1@m1-desktop-101:~/Downloads/ccminer-klaust/ccminer-klaust$ ./ccminer --version
ccminer 8.13-KlausT (64bit) for nVidia GPUs
Compiled with GCC 5.4 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0

Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp-hash, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.

ccminer v8.13-KlausT
libcurl/7.47.0 GnuTLS/3.4.10 zlib/1.2.8 libidn/1.32 librtmp/2.3

I compiled it but gives me error :


Code:
[2017-09-09 15:28:05] GPU #3: waiting for data
[2017-09-09 15:28:05] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2017-09-09 15:28:05] GPU #4: waiting for data
[2017-09-09 15:28:05] GPU #5: waiting for data
[2017-09-09 15:28:05] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2017-09-09 15:28:06] Stratum difficulty set to 256
[2017-09-09 15:28:06] Stratum difficulty set to 64
[2017-09-09 15:28:06] hub.miningpoolhub.com:20510 neoscrypt block 1876969
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init_2stream' at line 1439 : invalid device symbol.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init_2stream' at line 1428 : driver shutting down.

I believe I compiled this miner for v0019; it should be under the directory KTminer.  Might be a different version.

Unfortunately we dont have KTccminer, we have KX for skunk-krnlx  and TP for tpruvot 2.2 and AS for alexis78
Can you please give it a shot?
Hash rate difference is around 20% with 1070
1000+ on windows with klaust ccminer and 800 with SP and KX ccminer on nvoc

So many forks of ccminer.

I compiled the KT on my desktop; but it has an i7: I will compile it again with a g1840 and add it with the next update.


No Need
I posted later, Klaust has problem on linux with neoscrypt.
Thanks

fullzero (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1009



View Profile
September 15, 2017, 08:56:26 PM
 #3620

Hi guys, can someone give some hints or explain what is wrong with my rigs since only the gpu0 can have can receive/execute the fan speed as being set ? Below is the error i see all the time when any other than gpu0 fan gets set:

ERROR: Error assigning value 50 to attribute
       'GPUTargetFanSpeed' (m1-desktop:0[fan:1])
       as specified in assignment
       '[fan:1]/GPUTargetFanSpeed=50' (Unknown
       Error).

I am currently using rigs with 3 x 1080 Ti and 3 x 1070's and having the first release of v019 installed on SSD.
Tried manually to do:

nvidia-xconfig --enable-all-gpus
nvidia-xconfig --cool-bits=4
nvidia-settings -a [gpu:1]/GPUFanControlState=1
nvidia-settings -a [fan:1]/GPUTargetFanSpeed=50

but the error is the same.
Other than being unable to set the fan speeds, the rigs are chugging along, however, the speed of the fans for the cards other than gpu0 is the factory default as neither the minimum fan speed set in 1bash gets applied, with or without the automated fan control feature.

Edit: in the nvidia x server settings i can see the Enable fan control feature for the gpu0 but it is missing for the other gpu's.

Does the error happens if you set speed to higher values like 60-65 too ?
I think I had the same problem on low values

Thank you for your answer !

Yes, the problem persists even if i set higher fan values or 100%...

In the Thermal Settings in the nvidia x settings utility only gpu0 has fan control option enabled, the other gpu's are missing this feature.
Then may be some things wrong with the image/OS
Some times starting from scratch is easier than trying to solve the problem.

P.S. is GPU Power Mizer Mode set in 1bash?

Code:
GPUPowerMizerMode_Adjust="YES"

The PowerMizer setting makes no difference.
However, i think there is something odd here. When i run manually
m1@m1-desktop:~$ lspci |grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1b81 (rev a1)
20:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1b81 (rev a1)
30:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1b81 (rev a1)

Then in the xorg.conf generated in an attempt to debug the issue i have:

Section "Device"
    Identifier     "Device0"
    Driver         "nvidia"
    VendorName     "NVIDIA Corporation"
    BoardName      "GeForce GTX 1070"
    BusID          "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection

Section "Device"
    Identifier     "Device1"
    Driver         "nvidia"
    VendorName     "NVIDIA Corporation"
    BoardName      "GeForce GTX 1070"
    BusID          "PCI:32:0:0"
EndSection

Section "Device"
    Identifier     "Device2"
    Driver         "nvidia"
    VendorName     "NVIDIA Corporation"
    BoardName      "GeForce GTX 1070"
    BusID          "PCI:48:0:0"
EndSection


Shouldn't there be some sort of relation between what the lspci command lists and the Xorg.conf device id ?

I think its better not to waste your time on finding the solution to the problem, as it should be none
start from scratch.

Set your bios, connect one gpu, boot,copy your 1bash (there is a bug that wont copy it from temp partition), reboot, check if every thing is ok.
shutdown, connect rest of the gpu, restart, while first one is still connected, it may reboot with xorg error.
After restart all should be ok.

Well... i can build a complete rig for less than usd50 using older hp compaq business pc's like dc7800 or dc7900, everything works ok with dc7900, this issue seems to be related to the dc7800.
The dc7800 has 3 pciex slots as its biger sibling dc7900, the only difference being the chipset: dc7900 has a q45 chipset while dc7800 has a q35 chipset.
I'll try tomorrow with a dc7900 using the same gpu cards to see if it works.

These older motherboards might have glitches with the latest ubuntu...

EDIT: SOLUTION:

In the /etc/X11/xorg.conf in the Devices section there should be a
Screen         0
added right before the EndSection. That fixes it. Apparently if the busId of the VGA is >16 nvOc doesn't attach the screen to the cards and hence there is no power nor fan control enabled for the cards.
Tested the fix with old motherboards using Q35 and Q45 chipsets.


Can you mine with Skein multi algo on CCminer Alexis connected to zpool?

I have 10x 1080ti but windows can only support 8 so far so the other two just being idle in the box..

Is it possible to do it on nvOC as the above with 10 GPUs?

If so where can I find instructions?

Thanks  Smiley


Is it sort of trivial to make the adjustments in nvOC for going over 13 GPUs? I should be crossing that threshold soon enough..

The default setting in nvOC support up to 14 GPU's. With a bit of editing (1bash, 3main, auto_temp, xorg.conf) you should be able to add support for more GPU's.

Someone reported that got 19 GPU's to work with a bit of editing, but do you really want to add more GPU's to one motherboard? If something goes wrong, all 19 GPU's will go down and not mine... not to mention troubleshooting nightmares if one GPU or riser start acting up, then there is power strugle...



v0018+ has a hardcoded xorg.conf to support up to 16x gpus. Supporting 16x+ gpus this would also require some 1bash, 3main, autotemp edits to fully work; so really only 13x gpus are currently fully supported by v0019.  I have ordered one of the new 19x mobos; I will update all the necessary files / test 19x soon.  It is worth noting that for a single line GPU setup with 19x gpus you will also need longer usb cables from your risers.


Pages: « 1 ... 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 [181] 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 ... 417 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!