Bitcoin Forum
December 14, 2017, 10:40:44 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3199 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 408 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 368 (9.3%)
Total Voters: 3973

Pages: « 1 ... 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 [279] 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 ... 1125 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [150+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 4319355 times)
Idzy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 95


View Profile
October 23, 2012, 09:43:45 PM
 #5561

I believe you do need to stop and start for the flags to take effect

Successful Transactions with: 21after2
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513248044
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513248044

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513248044
Reply with quote  #2

1513248044
Report to moderator
Aahzman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602


Your *what* is itchy?


View Profile
October 24, 2012, 12:56:19 AM
 #5562

dangit. that'll break my share streak.. it's over 30k now.
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 24, 2012, 01:17:24 AM
 #5563

dangit. that'll break my share streak.. it's over 30k now.


lol

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
max in montreal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
October 24, 2012, 05:56:18 AM
 #5564

 Grin
Thralen
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123


View Profile
October 24, 2012, 06:05:27 AM
 #5565

Woohoo!

I knew I kept that old 5670 in the BAMT rig with the faster cards for a reason. It just found my first block (after mining for well over a year), block number 204492. About time...

Thralen

Supporting bitcoin as best I can with 1. mining, 2. buying with bitcoin, 3. selling (or trying to) for bitcoin. If you make a donation to:  1MahzUUEYJrZ4VbPRm2h5itGZKEguGVZK1  I'll get it into circulation.
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 28, 2012, 03:12:29 PM
 #5566

Zero namecoin rewards in the last 4 rounds?

That seems extremely odd.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 751


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
October 28, 2012, 06:12:48 PM
 #5567

Zero namecoin rewards in the last 4 rounds?

That seems extremely odd.

namecoins are pretty useless anyway so I wouldn't make a big deal out of it Smiley
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 28, 2012, 07:04:21 PM
 #5568

Zero namecoin rewards in the last 4 rounds?

That seems extremely odd.

namecoins are pretty useless anyway so I wouldn't make a big deal out of it Smiley

Not helpful, but hey, at least you got your opinion out there right?

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
xhoud01
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56

Let's support community


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2012, 09:28:01 PM
 #5569

Hi Slush, I am running cluster at about 21177 Mhash/s over Stratum 24/hours a day.
I am experiencing weird results:

In rounds that take less than 10 min,  I am getting in everage aprox 25% less BTC reward than in longer rounds.
Do you have an explanation for that?

14499    2012-10-28 21:04:57    3:19:28    6225948    0.47559232    205457    99 confirmations left
14498    2012-10-28 17:45:29    0:08:20    329669    0.36785404    205435    77 confirmations left
14497    2012-10-28 17:37:04    0:24:19    861367    0.46408428    205432    74 confirmations left
14496    2012-10-28 17:12:38    1:03:37    2085276    0.44666061    205429    71 confirmations left
14495    2012-10-28 16:08:52    2:39:19    5026981    0.47298015    205422    64 confirmations left
14494    2012-10-28 13:29:33    2:09:20    4109653    0.46649767    205398    40 confirmations left
14493    2012-10-28 11:20:13    1:04:48    2102209    0.46776012    205377    19 confirmations left
14492    2012-10-28 10:15:25    0:05:52    221440    0.37440259    205368    10 confirmations left
14491    2012-10-28 10:09:33    1:32:52    2902404    0.46973427    205366    8 confirmations left
14490    2012-10-28 08:36:35    0:08:10    309157    0.38314444    205353    confirmed
14489    2012-10-28 08:28:18    0:17:34    632768    0.44944079    205351    confirmed
14488    2012-10-28 08:10:38    1:10:27    2265815    0.45915052    205350    confirmed
14487    2012-10-28 07:00:05    0:10:25    390258    0.37391746    205343    confirmed
14486    2012-10-28 06:49:35    0:50:15    1631890    0.47672695    205342    confirmed
14485    2012-10-28 05:59:20    0:19:20    660704    0.46180293    205339    confirmed
14484    2012-10-28 05:39:52    4:10:25    7779746    0.48759257    205338    confirmed
14483    2012-10-28 01:29:21    0:08:08    309159    0.39049572    205318    confirmed

Dan

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 28, 2012, 09:52:06 PM
 #5570

Old news man...

The short answer, is it's basically a result of pool hoppers.  they come in at the beginning of rounds hoping to capitalize on short rounds.  And on short rounds they do capitalize as you can see by the lower numbers.

Slush is currently working on a different scoring algorithm (double gemoetric or dgm) that is hopping proof.  Not sure of where he's as far as progress, he'll have to let you know on that end.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
xhoud01
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56

Let's support community


View Profile WWW
October 29, 2012, 08:32:30 PM
 #5571

Old news man...

The short answer, is it's basically a result of pool hoppers.  they come in at the beginning of rounds hoping to capitalize on short rounds.  And on short rounds they do capitalize as you can see by the lower numbers.

Slush is currently working on a different scoring algorithm (double gemoetric or dgm) that is hopping proof.  Not sure of where he's as far as progress, he'll have to let you know on that end.

Hello Slush, do you plan to implement some hopping proof method + will you share Bitcoin fees with pool miners once the BTC reward drop to 25BTC/block?


slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
October 30, 2012, 07:59:58 AM
 #5572

Hello Slush, do you plan to implement some hopping proof method + will you share Bitcoin fees with pool miners once the BTC reward drop to 25BTC/block?

Yes and yes.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
October 30, 2012, 08:03:54 AM
 #5573

Zero namecoin rewards in the last 4 rounds?
That seems extremely odd.

Stratum pool don't have support for Namecoin (yet), so around 30% of hashpower isn't mining for Namecoin. Still you should have higher namecoin income than on other pools, because quite a lot people didn't filled NMC address...

I'm considering to drop of NMC support, because this project is basically dead and current merged mining sources are incompatible with latest bitcoin development (no support for merged mining over getblocktemplate etc). There's no project development since merged mining has been introduced in last October...

VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 751


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
October 30, 2012, 08:08:53 AM
 #5574

Zero namecoin rewards in the last 4 rounds?

That seems extremely odd.

namecoins are pretty useless anyway so I wouldn't make a big deal out of it Smiley

Not helpful, but hey, at least you got your opinion out there right?

right Smiley
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2012, 06:39:28 PM
 #5575

I'm considering to drop of NMC support, because this project is basically dead and current merged mining sources are incompatible with latest bitcoin development (no support for merged mining over getblocktemplate etc). There's no project development since merged mining has been introduced in last October...

What's the problem with using getblocktemplate for merged mining? I think that should work.

I agree namecoin seems dead, though. I wish they would at least fix the bugs they have that were fixed in bitcoin long ago.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750



View Profile
October 30, 2012, 09:40:07 PM
 #5576

I'm considering to drop of NMC support, because this project is basically dead and current merged mining sources are incompatible with latest bitcoin development (no support for merged mining over getblocktemplate etc). There's no project development since merged mining has been introduced in last October...

What's the problem with using getblocktemplate for merged mining? I think that should work.

I agree namecoin seems dead, though. I wish they would at least fix the bugs they have that were fixed in bitcoin long ago.


As far as I'm aware there is no problem with doing so, you just have to implement the merged mining process into your pool software rather than some of the older (less efficient) methods that were done when merged mining was first being pushed.

Like slush, I'm considering dropping NMC support as well.  The project really does seem dead.  It was a great concept, but it feels like it should have been a fresh project rather than a fork off bitcoin.  There is simply far too little innovation compared to how much garbage has been dragged along for the ride.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
October 30, 2012, 11:40:08 PM
 #5577

As far as I'm aware there is no problem with doing so, you just have to implement the merged mining process into your pool software rather than some of the older (less efficient) methods that were done when merged mining was first being pushed.

Yes, it is clearly possible, although there's no docs for merged mining process and existing software and patch to older bitcoind is mostly hack to "get it work" instead of "get it work properly". I'll discuss this in #namecoin anyway. If there'll be somebody willing to help me with re-implementation of MM and removing dependency to bitcoind patches, I'll try to do it...

-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2366


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2012, 12:54:25 AM
 #5578

I'd rather see merged mining go.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Portnoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988

My money; Our Bitcoin.


View Profile
October 31, 2012, 12:59:57 AM
 #5579

As far as I'm aware there is no problem with doing so, you just have to implement the merged mining process into your pool software rather than some of the older (less efficient) methods that were done when merged mining was first being pushed.

Yes, it is clearly possible, although there's no docs for merged mining process and existing software and patch to older bitcoind is mostly hack to "get it work" instead of "get it work properly". I'll discuss this in #namecoin anyway. If there'll be somebody willing to help me with re-implementation of MM and removing dependency to bitcoind patches, I'll try to do it...

Thanks.  I feel there is much promise there, but perhaps not much need for it... yet.
And, as they say, it is better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it. 

Like slush, I'm considering dropping NMC support as well.  The project really does seem dead...

Quote from: H.P. Lovecraft
Whoever speaketh of Cthulhu shall remember that he
but seemeth dead, he sleeps, and yet he does not sleep,
he has died and yet he is not dead, asleep and dead
though he is, he shall rise again. Again it should be shown that

    That is not dead which can eternal lie,
    and with strange aeons even death may die.

 Grin

eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750



View Profile
October 31, 2012, 02:38:28 AM
 #5580

As far as I'm aware there is no problem with doing so, you just have to implement the merged mining process into your pool software rather than some of the older (less efficient) methods that were done when merged mining was first being pushed.

Yes, it is clearly possible, although there's no docs for merged mining process and existing software and patch to older bitcoind is mostly hack to "get it work" instead of "get it work properly". I'll discuss this in #namecoin anyway. If there'll be somebody willing to help me with re-implementation of MM and removing dependency to bitcoind patches, I'll try to do it...

Thanks.  I feel there is much promise there, but perhaps not much need for it... yet.
And, as they say, it is better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it. 

Honestly I think there is no need for namecoin.  It won't route around government/ISP censorship like TOR can.  The only thing I see going for it is it's a lot easier to tell somebody a .bit address than a .onion.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
Pages: « 1 ... 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 [279] 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 ... 1125 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!