|
shad
|
 |
December 16, 2011, 10:46:05 PM |
|
HAPPY BIRTHDAY  so now i have a excuse to get really drunk |
15dUzJEUkxgjrtcvDSdsEDkXu7E7RCbNN3
|
|
|
|
BinoX
|
|
December 16, 2011, 11:01:24 PM |
|
Happy Birthday to the pool! lol
|
|
|
|
|
0ni0ns
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
December 17, 2011, 03:12:08 AM |
|
It it just me or has the pool luck been really bad lately? 66% in the last day...
|
|
|
|
|
|
kkurtmann
|
|
December 17, 2011, 03:21:32 AM |
|
do not upgrade catalyst drivers from 11.11 to 11.12
i upgraded and lost about 80 Mh/s
im back on the 11.11's and happy
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 17, 2011, 04:12:15 AM |
|
It it just me or has the pool luck been really bad lately? 66% in the last day...
Yep, recent luck is pretty strange. Pool probably celebrated too much and now have a hangover... |
|
|
|
DeepBit
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
December 17, 2011, 04:26:55 AM |
|
It it just me or has the pool luck been really bad lately? 66% in the last day...
Yep, recent luck is pretty strange. Pool probably celebrated too much and now have a hangover... The entire network is affected, we are passing through an interstellar Cloud of Unluck. Yesterday and today we had a spans of about 40~60 minutes without any block. |
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform |
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1083
|
|
December 17, 2011, 08:10:47 AM |
|
do not upgrade catalyst drivers from 11.11 to 11.12
i upgraded and lost about 80 Mh/s
im back on the 11.11's and happy
That may be the case, but I prefer to have no cpu usage so I'm sticking with 11.12. - at least on windows based miners. |
|
|
|
|
kkurtmann
|
|
December 17, 2011, 08:45:15 AM |
|
i should have been more precise... i went from 330 Mhash/s to 250 Mhash/s with the 11.12 on this machine alone, other machines had the same percentage drop in hashrate. I went back to 11.11 drivers that fixed the cpu usage issue from previous driver versions.
|
|
|
|
|
martychubbs
|
|
December 17, 2011, 11:54:08 PM |
|
AFAIK,11.11 did not fix the cpu usage bug...that was fixed in 11.12 (SDK 2.6) ala the performance drop. Slush is awesome...
|
|
|
|
|
sadpandatech
|
|
December 18, 2011, 01:26:56 AM |
|
AFAIK,11.11 did not fix the cpu usage bug...that was fixed in 11.12 (SDK 2.6) ala the performance drop. Slush is awesome...
I was under the impression that 11.11 fixed the cpu issues for those running one single GPU card. Maybe I misread though. While the CPU issue is annoying, you lose more income with 0-4% cpu usage and -80MHs verses 100% of one core on a semi efficient CPU imho. |
If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system.
- GA
It is being worked on by smart people. -DamienBlack
|
|
|
trilby
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
December 18, 2011, 10:28:12 AM |
|
Well pool luck seems alot better today
|
|
|
|
|
|
BinoX
|
|
December 18, 2011, 11:34:34 AM |
|
I noticed that. I seem to have made as many bitcoins today as I have over the last 4 or 5 days...
|
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 18, 2011, 03:21:43 PM |
|
Agree, luck over 200% is pretty nice satisfaction for few last days.
|
|
|
|
|
cosurgi
|
|
December 19, 2011, 09:00:08 PM |
|
happy birthday! |
|
|
|
|
Litt
|
|
December 20, 2011, 12:59:29 AM |
|
Really glad to see Slush's pool still going strong after a year when many have come and gone. Being the first pool I ever and first I mined at, it's makes me feel good celebrating it's first's B-day. It also goes to show what great job Slush have been doing throughout the year. I wish the best and many more B-day's to celebrate in the future. Happy belated B-day! |
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
December 20, 2011, 10:04:30 AM |
|
Is this pool still using a port for its longpoll instead of a /lp or similar type URL? I need to know if I have to special code support for this unique approach to longpoll that no other pool uses.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 20, 2011, 10:43:19 AM |
|
ckolivas: Yes, it's still using another port, because long polling daemon is separate application. There's nothing 'dirty' on such approach; if your miner have correct support for long polling standard and follows redirects of URL correctly, it will work.
|
|
|
|
|
shad
|
|
December 20, 2011, 04:56:22 PM |
|
hi first! i like your pool, started mining here in summer, but with my gpu and my electric costs it wasn't so nice, but i am back with a x6500  i have 2 questions 1) any chance to get the graphs from summer back? why are they deleted? or is there a max time? 2) any chance to get an email if my hashrate drops under a limit? maybe per worker? would love that |
15dUzJEUkxgjrtcvDSdsEDkXu7E7RCbNN3
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
December 21, 2011, 11:30:34 AM |
|
ckolivas: Yes, it's still using another port, because long polling daemon is separate application. There's nothing 'dirty' on such approach; if your miner have correct support for long polling standard and follows redirects of URL correctly, it will work.
Thanks. I didn't say "dirty" I just said unique, and there really is no "standard" for anything really, just precedence, and deepbit was first. Their precedence was just a url, not a different port. Anyway I'll think about it since this is really just providing better support for slush and has no influence on any other pool. |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 21, 2011, 01:36:29 PM |
|
Thanks. I didn't say "dirty" I just said unique, and there really is no "standard" for anything really, just precedence, and deepbit was first. Their precedence was just a url, not a different port. Anyway I'll think about it since this is really just providing better support for slush and has no influence on any other pool.
"Just a URL" - it's exactly the reason why I said I'm following deepbit's specification, as I'm using standard URL in LP response. And yes, port is the part of URL, too. Sorry to hear that it's problem in C++, but it's currently almost impossible to change implementation to run on the same port. I hope you'll resolve the issue on your side and it will run without any problem. |
|
|
|
|
