|
kkurtmann
|
 |
December 22, 2011, 08:03:41 AM |
|
anyone ever give bitcoins as x-mas gifts b4?
|
|
|
|
dishwara
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016
|
|
December 22, 2011, 12:04:27 PM |
|
anyone ever give bitcoins as x-mas gifts b4?
No So far only 2 x-mas came after bitcoin created. & last time bitcoin is less than 1 USD when x-mas came. Let see anyone gives this year. |
|
|
|
|
SistaS0uljah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
December 22, 2011, 05:21:46 PM |
|
anyone ever give bitcoins as x-mas gifts b4?
No So far only 2 x-mas came after bitcoin created. & last time bitcoin is less than 1 USD when x-mas came. Let see anyone gives this year. I'm thinking about giving my son some bitcoins this year as a gift. He's expressed some interest in the concept, but hasn't pursued it with any enthusiasm yet (he's in college, and overwhelmed with schoolwork right now). All I need to do is have him install the client on his Mac and then provide me with an address and then I can send him a shiny new Bitcoin, freshly mined. He doesn't see the use for them right now, but we'll have a discussion about it when he comes home for the holidays. |
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
December 23, 2011, 09:06:09 PM |
|
Thanks. I didn't say "dirty" I just said unique, and there really is no "standard" for anything really, just precedence, and deepbit was first. Their precedence was just a url, not a different port. Anyway I'll think about it since this is really just providing better support for slush and has no influence on any other pool.
"Just a URL" - it's exactly the reason why I said I'm following deepbit's specification, as I'm using standard URL in LP response. And yes, port is the part of URL, too. Sorry to hear that it's problem in C++, but it's currently almost impossible to change implementation to run on the same port. I hope you'll resolve the issue on your side and it will run without any problem. I just tested connecting to your pool: [2011-12-24 08:00:33] Pool 0 http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 active [2011-12-24 08:00:33] Long-polling activated for http://api.bitcoin.cz:8401 Then I waited for a longpoll which worked. Seems to work fine as far as I can tell. |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 23, 2011, 09:11:25 PM |
|
I just tested connecting to your pool: [2011-12-24 08:00:33] Pool 0 http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 active [2011-12-24 08:00:33] Long-polling activated for http://api.bitcoin.cz:8401 Then I waited for a longpoll which worked. Seems to work fine as far as I can tell. Yes, that looks fine. Great that it works! |
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
December 24, 2011, 04:43:44 AM |
|
I just tested connecting to your pool: [2011-12-24 08:00:33] Pool 0 http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 active [2011-12-24 08:00:33] Long-polling activated for http://api.bitcoin.cz:8401 Then I waited for a longpoll which worked. Seems to work fine as far as I can tell. Yes, that looks fine. Great that it works! Indeed, but it doesn't explain the bug report occurring in the first place, unless they entered the pool details wrongly into cgminer. |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 24, 2011, 01:17:35 PM |
|
Indeed, but it doesn't explain the bug report occurring in the first place, unless they entered the pool details wrongly into cgminer.
What is the original bug report? Maybe I can help to track it... |
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
December 26, 2011, 12:26:46 AM |
|
Indeed, but it doesn't explain the bug report occurring in the first place, unless they entered the pool details wrongly into cgminer.
What is the original bug report? Maybe I can help to track it... |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
|
BinoX
|
|
December 28, 2011, 03:47:47 PM |
|
Just noticed on the stats page that the last 3 blocks have been "Processing..." for quite a long time, is there some kind of issue, or should I just be more patient?
|
|
|
|
|
Idzy
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
|
December 28, 2011, 05:18:30 PM |
|
Yeah and my average mhs is wrong too, I'm pushsing close to 300mhs with my 2 miners and the site is showing 156mhs.
|
|
|
|
Littleshop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1004
|
|
December 28, 2011, 06:05:05 PM |
|
Just noticed on the stats page that the last 3 blocks have been "Processing..." for quite a long time, is there some kind of issue, or should I just be more patient?
Also my confirmed balance stopped rising even though a few blocks have been confirmed. |
|
|
|
jonathan
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 14
|
|
December 28, 2011, 06:12:52 PM
Last edit: December 28, 2011, 10:10:00 PM by jonathan |
|
seems there is a problem here too. I've been stuck on a confirmed reward of 0.96934018 BTC since this morning--it's now 6PM here. I'm watching confirmations roll past 120, one after the other. My GPU is whirring away, and my stats page at bitcoin.cz is showing my shares, but there's no change to the reward. I gotta go now, unfortunately :-O
Update: All good now. Thanks Slush :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Littleshop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1004
|
|
December 28, 2011, 06:19:37 PM |
|
And now it appears fixed! My confirmed has rose and a payment processed. Thanks Slush!
|
|
|
|
bz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2011, 10:50:58 PM |
|
From BTC stats:
9665 2011-12-28 15:04:18 1:02:26 1025518 0.16221904 0.76167915 159551 53 confirmations left
9664 2011-12-28 14:01:48 2:32:25 2379799 0.17081438 none 159547 49 confirmations left
9663 2011-12-28 11:29:19 0:03:35 60187 0.13084748 0.19946604 159534 36 confirmations left
Given NMC stats:
6923 2011-12-28 14:01:48 0:01:53 35286 41 confirmations left
6922 2011-12-28 13:59:53 0:00:50 35285 40 confirmations left
6921 2011-12-28 13:59:01 0:12:07 35284 39 confirmations left
6920 2011-12-28 13:46:52 0:19:17 35283 38 confirmations left
6919 2011-12-28 13:27:33 1:58:09 35280 35 confirmations left
6918 2011-12-28 11:29:19 0:03:34 35265 20 confirmations left
Should namecoins for BTC 9664 be none?
|
|
|
|
|
|
BinoX
|
|
December 28, 2011, 10:55:51 PM |
|
Mine is also none for namecoins on the same block, so it's possible that it's how it's supposed to be...
0.1+ bitcoins a round? What kinda hashrate you got?
|
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 28, 2011, 11:38:36 PM |
|
I'm sorry for today issue with block rewards, everything is fixed now.
|
|
|
|
bz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 29, 2011, 02:08:09 AM |
|
I'm sorry for today issue with block rewards, everything is fixed now.
Looks good now, thanks! |
|
|
|
|
bz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 29, 2011, 02:09:10 AM |
|
Mine is also none for namecoins on the same block, so it's possible that it's how it's supposed to be...
0.1+ bitcoins a round? What kinda hashrate you got?
3.9GH (a mix of 13 GPUs in 5 systems, wish I could justify FPGAs) |
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
|
December 29, 2011, 08:11:39 AM |
|
slush: did you get my PM? Would it be possible for you to send me the IP address of my miner? I'd prefer to avoid driving 100 miles round trip just to get it and can provide whatever you need to prove the account is mine.
Thanks.
|
1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
|
|
|
Foon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
December 29, 2011, 10:19:49 AM |
|
Hi folks,
I'm wondering why I'm seeing severely reduced performance from my 5-GPU miner when connecting to this pool? I get a constant 1650MH/s reported by Diablo when I'm on DeepBit (although DeepBit reports slightly less) but anywhere from 700-1300 on Slush, with a current 10-round hashrate of only 1161 (that's confirmed by submitted shares as well as Diablo reported hashrate). LOTS of fluctuation in hashing speed, peaking well below what I know the miner can do (and no, it's not stales, which are currently ~0.3%). If it helps my username is the same over there as here; PM me if you need more info than that.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
