Bitcoin Forum
November 19, 2024, 03:26:39 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 [235] 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4382639 times)
ensign_lee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 886
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 29, 2011, 01:28:40 PM
 #4681

Does the "blocks found" counter still work? Just wondering, since it says that none of my miners have found any in basically the last several months. This could be true, but it seems like I'm several standard deviations away from normal when I've only officially found one block for the pool, but have received like 188 in payouts. Mining at like 1.7 Ghash here.


 ██▄                ██        ▄███████▄        ██                  ██      ▄█████████▄ 
 ████              ██      █                  █      ██                  ██      ██                ██
 ██  ▀█            ██    ▄█                  █▄    ██                  ██    ██                  ██
 ██    █▄          ██    ██                  ██    ██                  ██    ▀█                     
 ██      █▄        ██    ██                  ██    ██                  ██      ██                   
 ██        █▄      ██                                  ██                  ██       ▀████████▄   
 ██          █▄    ██    ██                  ██    ██                  ██                        ██ 
 ██            █▄  ██    ██                  ██    ██                  ██                          ██
 ██              █▄██    ██                  ██    ▀█                  █▀    ▄▄                  █▀
 ██                ███      █                  █        █                  █      ██                ██ 
 ██                  ▀█        ▀███████▀            ▀███████▀         ▀█████████▀   











Nousplatform Youtube     
a2offrb
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 101


RISE WITH RAYS FOR THE FUTURE


View Profile
December 30, 2011, 12:03:46 PM
 #4682

Hi Slush!
I think you have little error calculating namecoin reward.
This block
9694   2011-12-30 11:23:21   4:18:40   4211228   0.00000036   0.00000411   159805     97 confirmations left
I have turned off miner after about 3 hour mining(this block),  while hashing this bitcoin block - 6 namecoin blocks was found...
Just cannot believe that for 3 hour namecoin reward was only 0.00000411.

]–]  Announce  ]–[    RAYS NETWORK    ]–[  Whitepaper  [–[
A Blockchain Based On Customized DPOS And Bulletproof Protocol
[–[   RISE WITH RAYS   [–[  Telegram  |  Twitter  |  Facebook  ]–]
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
December 30, 2011, 12:10:54 PM
 #4683

Does the "blocks found" counter still work?

Yes, it works. And it's nice example that without pool mining, a lot of users won't find a block in months, even with significant hashrate. Btw some of my cards didn't find a block for months, too.

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
December 30, 2011, 12:22:26 PM
 #4684

I think you have little error calculating namecoin reward.

Pool is calculating only one score for both chains, using BTC as main currency. When bitcoin block is found, pool calculate user's scores and calculate bitcoin rewards. Then it pick all namecoin blocks found during Bitcoin round and split them between users using BTC score. The overall efect for block rewards in long term is the same, however if you stop or start mining in the middle of bitcoin round, your namecoin reward can be affected significantly.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 30, 2011, 08:11:01 PM
 #4685

Something just went down...

Everything just got real quiet all of a sudden.   Cry

Let's hope it's not another ddos.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
December 30, 2011, 08:13:19 PM
 #4686

Looks like. Im travelling home right now,i'll look what's going on in few minutes.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 30, 2011, 08:14:46 PM
 #4687

And it's back up again....

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
notawake
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 30, 2011, 08:18:34 PM
 #4688

And it's back up again....

+1

My miners had connection problems for 6-7 minutes.
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
December 30, 2011, 09:07:04 PM
 #4689

I checked the server and found the message about losing network link for a moment. It looks like somebody pulled out network cable/restart switch. Actually it's second time when I see this type of outage, firstly it was ~month ago. Now everything works fine, sorry for the issue.

BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 31, 2011, 03:41:22 PM
 #4690

Fairly bad luck over the last couple of days... Hopefully there'll be a few days of good luck to make up for it soon Smiley
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
December 31, 2011, 04:09:16 PM
 #4691

Fairly bad luck over the last couple of days... Hopefully there'll be a few days of good luck to make up for it soon Smiley

7 day luck average is still 102% ;-).

BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 31, 2011, 06:32:46 PM
 #4692

7 day luck average is still 102% ;-).

Very true Smiley

Hopefully there will be enough confirmations today for me to get my 1st "big" payout of 10BTC Smiley

If all goes well over January I'll be looking at building a few more miners. Quite new to bitcoin really, got 3x 5830s (and a Geforce and a Core i7 CPU) mining away for now.
mb300sd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000

Drunk Posts


View Profile WWW
December 31, 2011, 07:52:05 PM
 #4693

Unfortunately, my miner was down for that whole period of good luck...  Angry

1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
Bemtje
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 01, 2012, 07:34:39 AM
 #4694

Any plans to implement merged mining for i0Coins?
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
January 01, 2012, 03:21:04 PM
 #4695

Bemtje: No, I even don't know i0coin project. Actually I'm not a fan of alternative currencies, because it is splittling development effort between many small projects, instead of focusing to improve Bitcoin as much as possible. There's still a lot of unused potential in Bitcoin.

I did only one exception with Namecoin, for a good reason. Namecoin mainly isn't a currency, but general-purpose decentralized key/value store. Another benefit is that Namecoin was created especially for storing non-financial data into blockchain, so existence of Namecoin keep Bitcoin blockchain (potentially) cleaner.

disclaimer201
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001


View Profile
January 02, 2012, 02:30:54 AM
 #4696

Happy New Year Slush and community! Personally, I would love to see work done on security and perhaps making visible the average current hash-rate & statistics for particular workers if possible.

I very much like the idea of locking in the bitcoin and namecoin addresses for one day after updating them, as well as a notification email when a change of payout address / or even email address / account password has been made, sent to the formerly registered email address.

In case anyone ever hacks my account, I have 24 hours to notice and to take action. If it's not too much of a problem programming, one can and should imitate take the good stuff from other pools. It would allow me to keep slightly higher amounts of bitcoins on the pool site and I wouldn't have to bother checking every few hours if my latest transaction made it to my client. Having to spend time checking up on transactions and profile safety is money, too. Time I could use to relax and do something fun with my bitcoins.  This security measure is even more important now that people seem to have (luckily?) forgotten all about the bitcoin bubble of last year and we are in RALLY Mode. It would just make me feel safer.
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
January 02, 2012, 04:17:15 PM
 #4697

Happy New Year Slush and community!

Thanks!

Quote
Personally, I would love to see work done on security and perhaps making visible the average current hash-rate & statistics for particular workers if possible.

I think that security is at comparable level with all other pools. To be honest, I see some "security solutions" more like "security thru obscurity". For example, locking payout addresses is nightmare to resolve for me as sysadmin when somebody lose his wallet and have significant amount of coins on the account. Should I leave it "as is" and potentially send his bitcoins to black hole or should I do "an exception" and change his payout address manually? Where's the point of such security option?

Actually all significant changes must be confirmed from registered email, so locking address have no sense. If anybody use same password for the pool account and for his email, it's his problem, this is not a kindergarten. If he has computer compromited (so the attacker have an access to pool account and to mailbox), then the attacker can do the payout to 'locked address' and steal coins from compromited computer. I still don't see the benefit of address locking.

Quote
It would allow me to keep slightly higher amounts of bitcoins on the pool site

Honestly, I'm trying to push people to don't keep their balance on the pool. It's a pool, not a bank and I don't want to be responsible for already mined coins. You know, my pool has no security issues so far, but a) there's no reason to keep high balances on pool b) higher balances motivate attackers...

Quote
I wouldn't have to bother checking every few hours if my latest transaction made it to my client

Do you have any issue with payouts? Afaik it's 'set it up and forget', so I don't think it's necessary to check every transaction... Simply use some amount which will lead to one payout per one or two days and everything will work for you automatically...

About the hashrate - it's more technical issue, I can display 10-round average or current block average. First one has significant latency and second one is inexact. Unfortunately current pool solution don't let me provide worker hashrate in some standard way, like '30 min average'.

I very much like the idea of locking in the bitcoin and namecoin addresses for one day after updating them, as well as a notification email when a change of payout address / or even email address / account password has been made, sent to the formerly registered email address.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 02, 2012, 04:26:27 PM
 #4698


About the hashrate - it's more technical issue, I can display 10-round average or current block average. First one has significant latency and second one is inexact. Unfortunately current pool solution don't let me provide worker hashrate in some standard way, like '30 min average'.


I wouldn't mind seeing the current block average hashrate in my account.  That would make it a lot easier for me to tell if I had a problem with one of my miners.

I know the hashrate will fluctuate a little bit, but if it drops like 300 mhash from one block to another then I know to start checking things out.  With the ten block average I don't always notice right away because it takes a few blocks before the change is noticeable.

Just my two bitcents....

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
January 02, 2012, 04:47:54 PM
 #4699

I wouldn't mind seeing the current block average hashrate in my account.  That would make it a lot easier for me to tell if I had a problem with one of my miners.

The problem is that with every new round, you'll see all hashrates as 0 Mhash/s, which is mostly unusable for normal users. This is the reason why worker hashrate is hidden and you can see it only in HTML source of profile page...

BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 02, 2012, 05:01:18 PM
 #4700

The problem is that with every new round, you'll see all hashrates as 0 Mhash/s, which is mostly unusable for normal users. This is the reason why worker hashrate is hidden and you can see it only in HTML source of profile page...

How about doing a check to see if there's been over x amount of shares submitted? If it's less than x then it will display "calculating" instead.
Pages: « 1 ... 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 [235] 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!