DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
February 15, 2013, 07:23:44 PM |
|
For those who didn't win any BTC trinkets during the last mint race, there's a good deal at Bitmit right now. A BTC/Tux keychain at half price. Offer still valid for over 23 hours as I write this. https://www.bitmit.net/en/item/16732-bitcoin-tux-opensource-keychainThis is my first time buying at Bitmit. Looks like the site is really taking off, lots of stuff for sale. And, except for someone selling used underwear, it seems to be mostly useful things.
|
|
|
|
willphase
|
|
February 16, 2013, 07:21:26 AM |
|
Duration: 11:07:00
long block! Will
|
|
|
|
xorxor
|
|
February 17, 2013, 08:24:00 AM Last edit: February 17, 2013, 08:59:30 AM by xorxor |
|
averaging 99.94% efficiency last 3 days.
best rig is 28R per 48000A
also, the 17-second block is shown as 17m not 17s.
|
fuck deeponion, fuck bitcoincash, all glory to one BITCOIN
|
|
|
Turbor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
BitMinter
|
|
February 17, 2013, 12:01:35 PM |
|
Looks like the eagle has landed
|
|
|
|
dooferorg
|
|
February 17, 2013, 07:33:59 PM |
|
With regard to BitMinter and stratum, I would like to ask if anyone else has been seeing a high percentage of rejects from using the BitMinter stratum?
I get something along the lines of 10% rejected due to 'below difficulty' shares. If I go directly to the regular bitminter getwork server it functions fine (no rejects), I also do not get any rejects from Stratum if I go to BTCGuild's stratum server. It's only stratum on BitMinter that has the problem.
This has been happening for a few days now, so it does not appear to be some transient problem.
I am using the 1.3.0 mining_proxy. The proxy and the miners are under Linux. The different mining machines have their own worker account, so I do not believe there's some oddity there, unless the variable difficulty affects all miners under the same user account, which would be incredibly dumb so I hope that's not the case.
|
BTC: 1dooferoD3vnwgez3Jo1E4bFfgMf81LR2 ZEC: t1gnToN2HZW4GD52kofEVdijhRijWjCNfYi
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
February 17, 2013, 09:39:56 PM |
|
I get something along the lines of 10% rejected due to 'below difficulty' shares. If I go directly to the regular bitminter getwork server it functions fine (no rejects), I also do not get any rejects from Stratum if I go to BTCGuild's stratum server. It's only stratum on BitMinter that has the problem.
The way difficulty changes work under Stratum has changed. You'll see rejects that are below difficulty if you use old software. They typically submit all work, because of the weird way this used to work with Stratum in the olden days. Old cgminer will have rejects, new cgminer will not. Not sure what the status is on stratum proxies.
|
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
February 18, 2013, 07:24:54 AM |
|
I changed maximum worker difficulty from 64 to 4096. There are some crazy fast miners around these days.
Let me know if there are any issues.
|
|
|
|
psilan
|
|
February 18, 2013, 08:42:30 AM |
|
My mint speed per day went from .49 to .20 BTC from yesterday to today. Is that just because of ASIc or something else going on?
|
dip
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
February 18, 2013, 09:05:52 AM |
|
My mint speed per day went from .49 to .20 BTC from yesterday to today. Is that just because of ASIc or something else going on?
The mint speed shown in BitMinter client is based only on your hashrate and the current difficulty. The difficulty recently went up quite a bit, but not that much. Also, BitMinter client versions prior to 1.3.1 assumed 50 BTC blocks. So if you were running an old version until today, that would explain most of it.
|
|
|
|
psilan
|
|
February 18, 2013, 09:21:07 AM |
|
My mint speed per day went from .49 to .20 BTC from yesterday to today. Is that just because of ASIc or something else going on?
The mint speed shown in BitMinter client is based only on your hashrate and the current difficulty. The difficulty recently went up quite a bit, but not that much. Also, BitMinter client versions prior to 1.3.1 assumed 50 BTC blocks. So if you were running an old version until today, that would explain most of it. Ahh yes it must have been the block calculation and a bit of difficulty. Thank you for the quick explanation .
|
dip
|
|
|
loshia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 18, 2013, 06:41:28 PM |
|
I changed maximum worker difficulty from 64 to 4096. There are some crazy fast miners around these days.
Let me know if there are any issues.
Doc, A word how you calculate difficulty based on miner speeds will be great:) let say i have about 100 000 Mhps what difficulty shall i have?
|
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
February 18, 2013, 07:37:41 PM |
|
Doc, A word how you calculate difficulty based on miner speeds will be great:)
let say i have about 100 000 Mhps what difficulty shall i have?
The server watches how often you send in proofs of work, and tries to adjust the difficulty so you send on average 20 proofs of work per minute. This number (20 per minute) may become adjustable in the future. Will see when I have time for that.
|
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
February 18, 2013, 08:37:55 PM |
|
My apologies - Yahoo logins were not working for a little while. Fixed again now.
I upgraded many libraries used by the website to new versions and there was a compatibility issue with Yahoo.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
WhitePhantom
|
|
February 19, 2013, 06:45:11 PM |
|
Now that the 94.7% 8-hour block is out of the way (thanks Keled), let's have twenty <50% blocks in a row. Who's with me?!
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 19, 2013, 09:19:46 PM |
|
Now that the 94.7% 8-hour block is out of the way (thanks Keled), let's have twenty <50% blocks in a row. Who's with me?!
Did you already know that the probability of the former is approximately equal to the probability of the latter? Or was is just a wild guess?
|
|
|
|
WhitePhantom
|
|
February 19, 2013, 09:32:37 PM |
|
Now that the 94.7% 8-hour block is out of the way (thanks Keled), let's have twenty <50% blocks in a row. Who's with me?!
Did you already know that the probability of the former is approximately equal to the probability of the latter? Or was is just a wild guess? Heh, I see that (vaguely, without doing the math) now that you point it out, but at the time I was just being silly.
|
|
|
|
dooferorg
|
|
February 19, 2013, 09:34:06 PM |
|
I get something along the lines of 10% rejected due to 'below difficulty' shares. If I go directly to the regular bitminter getwork server it functions fine (no rejects), I also do not get any rejects from Stratum if I go to BTCGuild's stratum server. It's only stratum on BitMinter that has the problem.
The way difficulty changes work under Stratum has changed. You'll see rejects that are below difficulty if you use old software. They typically submit all work, because of the weird way this used to work with Stratum in the olden days. Old cgminer will have rejects, new cgminer will not. Not sure what the status is on stratum proxies. Hmm.. I had cgminer 2.10.2 and upgraded to 2.10.5 and still get a lot of rejects (about 9%), although not from 'below difficulty' as an error, just 'rejects'. Running for a day with just the regular getwork server via the nginx/PHP proxy I use and I get nearly zero rejects. I will try again with direct from miner to the stratum proxy and see if it's my nginx/PHP proxy getting in the way. Pity it if is since it's SO useful for pool failovers and configurations and monitoring all miners at once.
|
BTC: 1dooferoD3vnwgez3Jo1E4bFfgMf81LR2 ZEC: t1gnToN2HZW4GD52kofEVdijhRijWjCNfYi
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
February 19, 2013, 09:46:17 PM |
|
Hmm.. I had cgminer 2.10.2 and upgraded to 2.10.5 and still get a lot of rejects (about 9%), although not from 'below difficulty' as an error, just 'rejects'. Running for a day with just the regular getwork server via the nginx/PHP proxy I use and I get nearly zero rejects. I will try again with direct from miner to the stratum proxy and see if it's my nginx/PHP proxy getting in the way. Pity it if is since it's SO useful for pool failovers and configurations and monitoring all miners at once.
Yeah, 9% is ridiculous. Something is wrong there. I guess somewhere in your dual proxy setup things get slowed down a lot. Try connecting cgminer directly to the pool and see how that works. Poolwide rejects for the current round is 0.16% as I write this. I'd expect some getwork users are above and most Stratum users are below that.
|
|
|
|
dooferorg
|
|
February 20, 2013, 06:12:01 PM |
|
Hmm.. I had cgminer 2.10.2 and upgraded to 2.10.5 and still get a lot of rejects (about 9%), although not from 'below difficulty' as an error, just 'rejects'. Running for a day with just the regular getwork server via the nginx/PHP proxy I use and I get nearly zero rejects. I will try again with direct from miner to the stratum proxy and see if it's my nginx/PHP proxy getting in the way. Pity it if is since it's SO useful for pool failovers and configurations and monitoring all miners at once.
Yeah, 9% is ridiculous. Something is wrong there. I guess somewhere in your dual proxy setup things get slowed down a lot. Try connecting cgminer directly to the pool and see how that works. Poolwide rejects for the current round is 0.16% as I write this. I'd expect some getwork users are above and most Stratum users are below that. Yea, I had wondered if my setup was confusing things.. Seems like it is. Telling cgminer 2.10.5 to go to stratum+tcp://mint.bitminter.com:3333/ yields zero rejects for the 10 minutes I've been running it. Before I would see the rejects pop up now and then a few times by now. Well, at least I'll have my crap together by the time BFL ships.. lol.
|
BTC: 1dooferoD3vnwgez3Jo1E4bFfgMf81LR2 ZEC: t1gnToN2HZW4GD52kofEVdijhRijWjCNfYi
|
|
|
Digigami
|
|
February 20, 2013, 09:59:23 PM |
|
Working fine over here..
|
|
|
|
|