ancow
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 02, 2011, 05:11:47 AM |
|
Hmm, I'm using Catalyst 11.6 and tried it with that version and also 11.7 and neither could do it, plus the 11.7 has the high CPU utilization issue.
If you get a chance take a peek at which version Catalyst your using drop me a note and I'll give it a whirl.
Last time I tried 11.9, it didn't have the 100% CPU utilisation bug either in windows or Linux. In Linux, however, my KDE desktop became a little too crashy for my tastes and the hashing speed went down slightly. I didn't have either problem in windows, but then I don't run it much. I don't know about the dummy plugs/desktop extending issue, but it might be worth a try. 1 GPU or 2+ GPU. 11.9 fixed 100% bug but only w/ 1 GPU according to AMD forums. I see. Only one GPU as this is a laptop, not a mining rig.
|
BTC: 1GAHTMdBN4Yw3PU66sAmUBKSXy2qaq2SF4
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 02, 2011, 05:13:16 AM |
|
I believe people found that 11.9 fixed the CPU bug with one GPU on windows only when the intensity was low. If the intensity is cranked up, the CPU goes up. Me, I'm still using 11.6 on linux, last good one for CPU usage ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
neptop
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 02, 2011, 02:26:09 PM |
|
On Windows (7 x64) 11.9 completely fixed the issue regardless of intensity you are using.
|
BitCoin address: 1E25UJEbifEejpYh117APmjYSXdLiJUCAZ
|
|
|
gnar1ta$
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 798
Merit: 500
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 02, 2011, 03:39:39 PM |
|
I have a simple startup script to launch cgminer on restart (Ubuntu) and have 2>cglog.txt to generate a log. Of course it overwrites on every restart, which isn't exactly useful. Is there a way to make it change the name of the log on every restart so it doesn't overwrite?
|
Losing hundreds of Bitcoins with the best scammers in the business - BFL, Avalon, KNC, HashFast.
|
|
|
The00Dustin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 02, 2011, 03:52:01 PM |
|
I have a simple startup script to launch cgminer on restart (Ubuntu) and have 2>cglog.txt to generate a log. Of course it overwrites on every restart, which isn't exactly useful. Is there a way to make it change the name of the log on every restart so it doesn't overwrite? You could do this with a system variable if there was a dynamic one. You could probably also drop in some random data from /dev/urandom using dd in a subcommand if you wanted to. However, first, I would try 2>>cglog.txt to see if that works for appending to the existing file or have the script rename the existing file to somethiing else before starting cgminer (after deleting the something else from the previous startup).
|
|
|
|
dishwara
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 02, 2011, 03:59:37 PM |
|
Any one tried 11.10 which is released on 31st oct? I am not mining now, so cant test how 11.10 behaves with cpu usage.
|
|
|
|
Jay_Pal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1493
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 02, 2011, 05:22:35 PM |
|
Any one tried 11.10 which is released on 31st oct? I am not mining now, so cant test how 11.10 behaves with cpu usage.
I'm on 10.10 x64 on AMD Athlon II X3, with a 5550HD on Catalist 11.9 and it's the same performance as 11.04 with 11.7.
|
|
|
|
Muppion
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 02, 2011, 06:19:35 PM |
|
I have a simple startup script to launch cgminer on restart (Ubuntu) and have 2>cglog.txt to generate a log. Of course it overwrites on every restart, which isn't exactly useful. Is there a way to make it change the name of the log on every restart so it doesn't overwrite?
you can add the following lines before the start of cgminer to give the log file an unique name: DAY=`date '+%F_%T'` LOG=cglog-${DAY}.log -------------------- You can then use the variable $LOG as the unique log file name for this run of the miner as in .... 2>$LOG The different log files are named as date with time at the start of the name (as in cglog-2011-11-02_19:15:01.log). (See date --help for more formats to use if needed) /Muppion
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4578
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 02, 2011, 07:54:21 PM |
|
Actually, on linux, it's better to use:
now="`date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S`"
so now looks like: 20111101121520 and them something like:
./cgminer ....... 2> run.$now.$$.log
That way the name sorts in time order and '$$' adds the process number in case there are accidentally 2 running at the same time
|
|
|
|
The00Dustin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 02, 2011, 07:58:22 PM Last edit: November 02, 2011, 10:32:19 PM by The00Dustin |
|
Actually, on linux, it's better to use:
now="`date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S`"
so now looks like: 20111101121520 and them something like:
./cgminer ....... 2> run.$now.$$.log
That way the name sorts in time order and '$$' adds the process number in case there are accidentally 2 running at the same time Very nice, you wouldn't believe how hard it is to get people to understand why that date (and date-time in this case) structure is the logical way to go, or maybe you've been there, done that.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 02, 2011, 09:53:39 PM |
|
10.10 has the same 100% CPU bug...
Under Linux x86_64 at least..
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3582
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2011, 04:03:52 AM |
|
Hmm, I'm using Catalyst 11.6 and tried it with that version and also 11.7 and neither could do it, plus the 11.7 has the high CPU utilization issue.
If you get a chance take a peek at which version Catalyst your using drop me a note and I'll give it a whirl.
Last time I tried 11.9, it didn't have the 100% CPU utilisation bug either in windows or Linux. In Linux, however, my KDE desktop became a little too crashy for my tastes and the hashing speed went down slightly. I didn't have either problem in windows, but then I don't run it much. I don't know about the dummy plugs/desktop extending issue, but it might be worth a try. Sounds like it ought to be worth a try. I'll dig out my Win7 hard drive and give it a try soon. I only have one mining rig so I don't like to take it down too long. Thanks, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
ancow
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2011, 04:54:41 AM |
|
Hmm, I'm using Catalyst 11.6 and tried it with that version and also 11.7 and neither could do it, plus the 11.7 has the high CPU utilization issue.
If you get a chance take a peek at which version Catalyst your using drop me a note and I'll give it a whirl.
Last time I tried 11.9, it didn't have the 100% CPU utilisation bug either in windows or Linux. In Linux, however, my KDE desktop became a little too crashy for my tastes and the hashing speed went down slightly. I didn't have either problem in windows, but then I don't run it much. I don't know about the dummy plugs/desktop extending issue, but it might be worth a try. Sounds like it ought to be worth a try. I'll dig out my Win7 hard drive and give it a try soon. I only have one mining rig so I don't like to take it down too long. Apparently it only works well with a one-GPU-setup, so it won't be very useful for your multi-GPU one... ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
BTC: 1GAHTMdBN4Yw3PU66sAmUBKSXy2qaq2SF4
|
|
|
bronan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2011, 07:38:43 AM |
|
If you have more than one GPU and all your monitors hooked up to a single GPU you can set the "monitor" GPU to dynamic and all other cards to a high I value. For example my 3x5970 workstation has 1 GPU set to D and the other 5 set to I=9. If you have multiple monitors hook them all up to the same GPU to minimze the number of GPU which need to be set to dynamic.
That doesn't hold true for Windoze does it? Since I have to extend the desktop to the GPU without the monitor to enable it. Whatever I do to that GPU seems to have an effect on the desktop GUI as well. Sam Thats where dummy plugs come in handy, no need for extend desktop and no effect on it also I have no clue why people do not want to use this simple solution. Even on the normal connected ones i have one since i switch cable often to fix other pc's Anyway for me hurrah for the dummyplug As for the I setting i found the best to be I=7 it works great and no stalls even with high overclocks With 8 i found more stalls where present which overall gave lower results anything higher makes it all worse (4770,5870 and 5970 gpu's)
|
|
|
|
bronan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2011, 07:46:50 AM |
|
10.10 has the same 100% CPU bug...
Under Linux x86_64 at least..
lol you mean 11.10 i hope since 10.10 does not have the cpu bug ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) 11.9 1 gpu used no cpu bug 11.9 2 gpu 100% cpu usage 11.10 2 gpu 100% cpu usage So again nothing changed
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2011, 09:57:27 AM |
|
sure youre right 11.10 :-)
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2011, 02:29:35 PM |
|
Thats where dummy plugs come in handy, no need for extend desktop and no effect on it also
There hasn't been a need for dummy plugs in a long time.
|
|
|
|
sgravina
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2011, 06:57:18 PM |
|
Any one tried 11.10 which is released on 31st oct? I am not mining now, so cant test how 11.10 behaves with cpu usage.
I update a machine to Ubuntu 11.10. It comes with fglrx 11.9 which has the 100% cpu bug. I was unable to downgrade it to fglrx 11.6 which doesn't have the bug. So I reloaded Ubuntu 11.04 which comes with fglrx 11.5, I upgraded fglrx to 11.6. Now it works again without the 100% bug. I also mine litecoins so the 100% bug is unacceptable. litecoin mining won't work with the 100% bug. I spent way too much time on this experiment. I'm waiting till someone else succeeds before I upgrade anything. Sam
|
|
|
|
GlenBot
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2011, 04:13:12 AM |
|
I'm running cgminer on a win7 32-bit box. With 11.9 I was getting 292Mh/s avg with 1 sapphire 5830. Upgraded to 11.10 and saw hashrate problems (60-70Mh/s avg). Rather than mess around trying to figure it out, I did a System Restore back to before the 11.10 upgrade. Worked like a charm; system rebooted with 11.9 drivers and 292Mh/s avg. I'm leaving it alone for now.
|
|
|
|
Ghostofkobra
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2011, 08:27:07 AM |
|
Actually, on linux, it's better to use:
now="`date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S`"
so now looks like: 20111101121520 and them something like:
./cgminer ....... 2> run.$now.$$.log
That way the name sorts in time order and '$$' adds the process number in case there are accidentally 2 running at the same time Very nice, you wouldn't believe how hard it is to get people to understand why that date (and date-time in this case) structure is the logical way to go, or maybe you've been there, done that. I prefer the more compact version but the result is the same. ./cgminer .... 2> run-`date +%y:%T`.log creates the file "run-02:02:01:56.log" Best //GoK
|
|
|
|
|