GUI mining - updated Dec 3 with 7970 bugfix, also supports Stratum!

[JuanPabloCuervo]

can someone explain...why two different Hash rates?
 [396.272 MH/s (~320 MH/s)]
 [395.441 MH/s (~463 MH/s)]

in solo localhost mode:
[395.441 MH/s (~0 MH/s)] ?


Terminal Mode, Kiv-poclbm-v2011-05-21.tar.gz

Bump.!

[film2240]

Do you know when the new version is coming out? and are there any more optimisaions for the app planned?

I have a suggestion for the dev.try to have your own website,that way it's a one stop shop for all the latest versions as well as change log,regressions (if any like bugs),optimisations,e.t.c.

have a website for hte app,saves ppl like me a lot of time searching through the cluttered forum thread about latest versions of the app.

I'd also like to see more optimisations for the Radeon HD69xx series cards as well as for all other cards used for BTC mining.If it takes a substantial rewrite of the whole app,then the optimisations (I expect) can be significant and should be pushed as far as they can go in s/w (as overclocking and shader unlocking can only go so far without an unstable system)

Thank you

[Beta-coiner1]

...........I'd also like to see more optimisations for the Radeon HD69xx series cards as well as for all other cards used for BTC mining.If it takes a substantial rewrite of the whole app,then the optimisations (I expect) can be significant and should be pushed as far as they can go in s/w (as overclocking and shader unlocking can only go so far without an unstable system)

Thank you

+1

It would explain the disparity in speed between the 58xx and 69xx series of videocards somewhat with regards to efficiency.Another point to consider would be that most new architectures whether Nv or more importantly ATI/AMD will more than likely be using the VLIW4 architecture as well making it even more important that the software be up to date with the current standard and future changes.Considering mining requires large amounts of electicity and BTC is not valued that much now.....the only thing that can be done is to optimize for efficiency on the software side.

[Elder III]

Is it typical to have a lower average hash rate when running 3 GPUs as opposed to running them 1 at a time?  I seem to lose close to 15% of the potential hash rate when running all 3 as opposed to what they each get individually.

3 x 6770s @ 1000/300 stock voltages
223 Mh/s single - averaging approx. 200 Mh/s each when running all 3.
-v -w128
Windows 7 64bit
11.6 drivers
Antec HighPower 750 watt
Asrock 970 mobo

[film2240]

Is it typical to have a lower average hash rate when running 3 GPUs as opposed to running them 1 at a time?  I seem to lose close to 15% of the potential hash rate when running all 3 as opposed to what they each get individually.

3 x 6770s @ 1000/300 stock voltages
223 Mh/s single - averaging approx. 200 Mh/s each when running all 3.
-v -w128
Windows 7 64bit
11.6 drivers
Antec HighPower 750 watt
Asrock 970 mobo

This doesn't sound right.I've heard that in many cases,the accepted practice is to run 1 miner on each individual GPU as opposed to running 1 miner on 3 cards in crossfire.I'm not too sure myself as I'm no expert but that's something you may wish to try.

set up 1 miner on each of your GPUs basically.

[Elder III]

I do, they are called - Top, Middle, and Bottom...  anyways, if I reboot I only lose about 5% per card avg. which is a little more acceptable.

[Beta-coiner1]

I do, they are called - Top, Middle, and Bottom...  anyways, if I reboot I only lose about 5% per card avg. which is a little more acceptable.

Could be the 100 % Cpu bug as well.For the card connected to your Monitor try to use -f40 or higher number and lower numbers for the cards not connected.

[murfshake]

Still the best of the best!

[OggerMC]

any chance that we will get that improved phatk kernel build in? ive tryed to use it manualy, but i think it didnt worked for me.

[OgNasty]

any chance that we will get that improved phatk kernel build in? ive tryed to use it manualy, but i think it didnt worked for me.

+1  I didn't want to try it myself because it seemed like it required changes to the miner that I didn't think would be compatible with this GUI.

[critical]

bro time to update to 1.61 phoenix!

[dub0matic]

bro time to update to 1.61 phoenix!

+1 please do. ppl need to start donating damnit

[fcmatt]

just by replacing the correct files for the new kernel of your choice will result in getting almost all the speed
others are getting with newer software. now i did not attempt to stick in the new phoenix yet but phatk 2.2 is
in and i am seeing good results compared to others while taking the clock speed factor into account.

perhaps the new pheonix has features i just do not use though.. hm.

[Meatball]

Alright, I'm going to start off a Bounty drive for Kiv to update GUIMiner with the latest and greatest miners/kernels that are out there.

I'll throw in 1 BTC towards it.  Anyone else?

[dub0matic]

im down for .5

[Beta-coiner1]

I'll throw in another .5 if it becomes more optimized for the 69xx architecture.

[Bananington]

The GUIMiner doesn't have the latest version of Ufasoft CPU miner. It took me several hours to figure out. Please add this to the download.

[Meatball]

Alright, we're up to 2 BTC bounty for a new/updated version of GUIMiner.

• Meatball: 1 BTC
• dub0matic: .5 BTC
• Beta-coiner1: .5 BTC

 For everyone else that wants an updated version, put your money where your mouth is  

[Bananington]

Alright, we're up to 2 BTC bounty for a new/updated version of GUIMiner.

• Meatball: 1 BTC
• dub0matic: .5 BTC
• Beta-coiner1: .5 BTC

 For everyone else that wants an updated version, put your money where your mouth is  

I will donate only if there is a flexcoin ID that I can donate too. Promoting flexcoin while improving GUIMiner. What's not to love?

Post an ID here and I will donate. Who is handling the bounty pot?

[leveer]

Alright, I'm going to start off a Bounty drive for Kiv to update GUIMiner with the latest and greatest miners/kernels that are out there.

I'll throw in 1 BTC towards it.  Anyone else?

Mark me down for 1.