Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3

[filou4]

first pool have break the ice as blocking fees for showing it can be done.
it is now only matter of time other pools to ban the fee, permanenty
you will soon see first good pool blocking fees rising with their hashrates to the roof.
whos pool will it be?

I can stop mantaining my miners and don't release new ones, the only reason I do this job is dev fee.
It seems you would prefer not to have CryptoNote AMD GPU miner at all, it's up to you. The only reason you have it is dev fee.
There is another solution - create private miner and mine coins on a lot of aws servers, get 30-50% of ALL coins. You know this way works for BBR.
Is it better than my approach? I can do similar thing, but I don't like it and I'm not going to do it, that's what I call unfair. IMO, dev fee is much better.

Claymore, keep the good job up.
dev fees are simply needed.
every job need a reward.
i don't use your tool because my rigs are running with linux, but if i had too, i wont complain about fees at all.

[nrg_wolf]

first pool have break the ice as blocking fees for showing it can be done.
it is now only matter of time other pools to ban the fee, permanenty
you will soon see first good pool blocking fees rising with their hashrates to the roof.
whos pool will it be?

I can stop mantaining my miners and don't release new ones, the only reason I do this job is dev fee.
It seems you would prefer not to have CryptoNote AMD GPU miner at all, it's up to you. The only reason you have it is dev fee.
There is another solution - create private miner and mine coins on a lot of aws servers, get 30-50% of ALL coins. You know this way works for BBR.
Is it better than my approach? I can do similar thing, but I don't like it and I'm not going to do it, that's what I call unfair. IMO, dev fee is much better.

why is claymore not entitled to some form of compensation for his hard work in making a miner for AMD gpu's? people are not always that generous to donate, or they simply don't earn enough daily to be able to donate, so really a small dev fee is really not a bad thing. would any of you whiners work your jobs for free? i think not so why expect claymore to work for free........

[seljak]

my suggestion to Claymore is: release a +30% performance update(you know you can do it  ) and all mouths complaining about 5% devfee will be shut.  

[TheMathGuy]

Any news regarding a linux version?

[33reg]

And my programm will be updated  

5% fee - mining, 2% fee - pool, 5% - of exchange

Total:12%
It is a lot of fees.

Still, It fees dumping cost of crypto because them at once sell.

I against such situations.

I'm against someone who can't even type a fucking sentence without sounding like a moron... let alone try to jip someone on their hard work... or try to steal everyone else's hash-rate or mining earnings... or whatever.

I'm not even going to dignify this little shit's software with a download and analysis. Run it through virus-total all you want. I can tell just from the looks of it, it's a cheap visual-basic program with a keylogger, and port-forwarding.

I could have written this program in my sleep when I was 15yrs old.

Your computer skills are shit, your English is shit, and your ETHICS are SHIT.

Go fuck yourself with a cactus.

I vote he gets the ban-hammer.

Claymore - I love fairy tales and do not like evasive answers. Test have 10 minutes - total hashes 206k - target 142k, devhashes 10k - target 18k. On hash - 5%, on target - more then 10%. Draw conclusions.

Hmm... would like to see an actual screenshot of this... because I've ran his miner for days on end, and even did the math, and it still came less than 5%.

Sounds like you're just not happy with a working miner.

In that case, go play around with your pet rock.

renegadepcsolutions,
You the uneducated fool.
Think the head instead of an ass.

[Taxidermista]

About the memory situation I could test 6 cards this weekend and this is what I've got from them:

3 Sapphire Vapor-X R9 280x (Hynix memory) = 1450 H/s
3 Sapphire Dual-X R9 280x (Elpida memory) = 1120 H/s

Claymore miner 4.0 and Catalyst 13.12

[Claymore]

About the memory situation I could test 6 cards this weekend and this is what I've got from them:

3 Sapphire Vapor-X R9 280x (Hynix memory) = 1450 H/s
3 Sapphire Dual-X R9 280x (Elpida memory) = 1120 H/s

Claymore miner 4.0 and Catalyst 13.12

Wrong thread, this thread is only to discuss dev fee and for insults 

[ivanlabrie]

Yeah, I had to switch one of the elpida based rigs to x11-x13/nicehash/tmb for now :/ (4 x 280x)

[nrg_wolf]

Yeah, I had to switch one of the elpida based rigs to x11-x13/nicehash/tmb for now :/ (4 x 280x)

i found that elpida 280x cards seem to be about 90% stable with driver 14.6 and useing 3.4 miner. leave clocks at stock.

[ivanlabrie]

Yeah, I had to switch one of the elpida based rigs to x11-x13/nicehash/tmb for now :/ (4 x 280x)

i found that elpida 280x cards seem to be about 90% stable with driver 14.6 and useing 3.4 miner. leave clocks at stock.

Yeah, but super slow on both 14.6 and 13.12...I'd rather mine singularity coin or other new crap coins with that rig xD

[nrg_wolf]

Yeah, I had to switch one of the elpida based rigs to x11-x13/nicehash/tmb for now :/ (4 x 280x)

i found that elpida 280x cards seem to be about 90% stable with driver 14.6 and useing 3.4 miner. leave clocks at stock.

Yeah, but super slow on both 14.6 and 13.12...I'd rather mine singularity coin or other new crap coins with that rig xD

only aabout 210h/s difference with mine, they do 790 compared to my other asus 280x that do 1054h/s. not an overally big deal, mid end cpu can cover that loss until a solution can be figured out on how to get around such issues...... just annoying with the thread dropping that happens randomly. althou alot less now which is good.

[ozzy1926]

any 290 user,which catalyst giving more hash 13.12, 14.4 or 14.6?

[slimdim]

vapor-x r9 280x = 344 H/sec

[ivanlabrie]

any 290 user,which catalyst giving more hash 13.12, 14.4 or 14.6?

13.12

[braxx]

miner 4.0 with catalyst 14.6

3x 7950 (@ core 1050 / mem 1175)
1175 hashes/sec

(about 400 / card)

power usage: 560 w (total rig)

[Vanderi]

Hey,

Just dropping in to say that I'm happy with Claymores fee - just look at how it turned out for the Nvidia crew where cbuchner took all the cuda xmr for himself and they are stuck still brown-nosing him because, after all, he wrote it.

As I am happy to expect that Claymore will keep the miner updated and post sooner that later more effective versions - all being in his own interests.

Good work Claymore, do not unnecessarily embarass yourself by trying to justify your miner. Be noted - your miner.


Now here's one for xmr keeping integrity and rise up to the established default private crypto-currency #1. Aminorex felt optimistic in the main dev thread and said that 1xmr=1M USD in 10 years. If that is so, most of us would have more money than ever being able to dream about anyway.

All the best guys.

[incognitoworker]

About the memory situation I could test 6 cards this weekend and this is what I've got from them:

3 Sapphire Vapor-X R9 280x (Hynix memory) = 1450 H/s
3 Sapphire Dual-X R9 280x (Elpida memory) = 1120 H/s

Claymore miner 4.0 and Catalyst 13.12

Wrong thread, this thread is only to discuss dev fee and for insults 

Lol
If you guys complain about the fee, just dont use the miner??
Nobody is forcing you to use it.
xpm miners pay 10% fee, so stop whining and make a faster/better miner and compete instead?
Make love, not war :-)
happy mining

[Vizierx]

Any advice how to keep my 290 stay under 75 c ?

i run at stock clock but they go to 79-82 fan at 90

how to lower the intensity?

[gilad215]

Any advice how to keep my 290 stay under 75 c ?

i run at stock clock but they go to 79-82 fan at 90

how to lower the intensity?

I got 3 of those 290. the cooling is absolutley terrible in terms of heat and noise.

all of them are in open space. if you have a spare fan at home point it at them.

[Claymore]

Any advice how to keep my 290 stay under 75 c ?

i run at stock clock but they go to 79-82 fan at 90

how to lower the intensity?

I will add "intensity" option soon, working on it.