Chipychop
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
July 02, 2017, 10:05:47 AM |
|
hi all
I have just received gtx 1080 ti in adition to my rx 480 8gb
I have connected gtx to monitor and the other one with second pci-e slot and I have installed only the nvidia drivers and removed amd drivers
the problem comes when I want to overclock both cards, I have used always msi afterburner for rx 480 but it seems that now I can only do oc to gtx 1080
anyone knows how can I solve that?
thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
sweetydady
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
July 02, 2017, 10:09:06 AM |
|
@Claymore check this new video from BitsBeTrippin https://youtu.be/ZzAbECBnJmY?t=4836AMD confirm about DAG issue with Email . @Guys if anyone can make a test using SGminer with OpenCL 2.0 on Linux it will be very helpful Thanks AFAIK, you can't benchmark future epoch's in SGminer like you can with the Claymore miner. we can run it and compare current hashrates, no need to benchmark at all
|
|
|
|
Vann
|
|
July 02, 2017, 10:10:05 AM |
|
hi all
I have just received gtx 1080 ti in adition to my rx 480 8gb
I have connected gtx to monitor and the other one with second pci-e slot and I have installed only the nvidia drivers and removed amd drivers
the problem comes when I want to overclock both cards, I have used always msi afterburner for rx 480 but it seems that now I can only do oc to gtx 1080
anyone knows how can I solve that?
thanks in advance
You have to connect a monitor or dummy plug to the AMD card to be able to use Afterburner and for the drivers to read and set the temerature and fan speed.
|
|
|
|
Vann
|
|
July 02, 2017, 10:15:46 AM |
|
@Claymore check this new video from BitsBeTrippin https://youtu.be/ZzAbECBnJmY?t=4836AMD confirm about DAG issue with Email . @Guys if anyone can make a test using SGminer with OpenCL 2.0 on Linux it will be very helpful Thanks AFAIK, you can't benchmark future epoch's in SGminer like you can with the Claymore miner. we can run it and compare current hashrates, no need to benchmark at all At the current epcoh, the difference in hash rate is not significant enough to be able to make a conclusion. There are always hash rates diffrences when using different miners. One way to get some indication if SGminer will be affected would be to mine ETH and then ETC, which is at higher epcoh.
|
|
|
|
cryptolelefla
Member
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
|
|
July 02, 2017, 12:02:39 PM |
|
hello. these are my stat mining on ethermine. i have another rig elsewhere and seems more constant hashrate. Can someone tell me please if this seems correct? thanks for helping. ps. first time upload img here https://pasteboard.co/Gz4bL8F.jpg
|
|
|
|
crypto.bin101
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
July 02, 2017, 12:13:33 PM |
|
hello. these are my stat mining on ethermine. i have another rig elsewhere and seems more constant hashrate. Can someone tell me please if this seems correct? thanks for helping. ps. first time upload img here https://pasteboard.co/Gz4bL8F.jpgMen... your hash rate... Can you share your rig specs?
|
|
|
|
sweetydady
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
July 02, 2017, 12:17:31 PM |
|
@Claymore check this new video from BitsBeTrippin https://youtu.be/ZzAbECBnJmY?t=4836AMD confirm about DAG issue with Email . @Guys if anyone can make a test using SGminer with OpenCL 2.0 on Linux it will be very helpful Thanks AFAIK, you can't benchmark future epoch's in SGminer like you can with the Claymore miner. we can run it and compare current hashrates, no need to benchmark at all At the current epcoh, the difference in hash rate is not significant enough to be able to make a conclusion. There are always hash rates diffrences when using different miners. One way to get some indication if SGminer will be affected would be to mine ETH and then ETC, which is at higher epcoh. My rig, at it best times, could mine 168 mh/s with claymore miner, now it is 165 mh/s. SO if this SGminer can give me 168 mh/s back, it is all obvious, I don't need to do a benchmark
|
|
|
|
Bob_chemist
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
July 02, 2017, 12:19:48 PM |
|
hello. these are my stat mining on ethermine. i have another rig elsewhere and seems more constant hashrate. Can someone tell me please if this seems correct? thanks for helping. ps. first time upload img here https://pasteboard.co/Gz4bL8F.jpgMen... your hash rate... Can you share your rig specs? I think there are 5x1080 or 7-8 other cards with sligth OC
|
|
|
|
cryptolelefla
Member
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
|
|
July 02, 2017, 12:19:56 PM |
|
hello. these are my stat mining on ethermine. i have another rig elsewhere and seems more constant hashrate. Can someone tell me please if this seems correct? thanks for helping. ps. first time upload img here https://pasteboard.co/Gz4bL8F.jpgMen... your hash rate... Can you share your rig specs? just 2 rigs (as you cann see there are 2 workers) one x7 rx 470 other with x6 same gpu because amd shortage
|
|
|
|
Vann
|
|
July 02, 2017, 12:57:51 PM Last edit: July 02, 2017, 01:10:01 PM by Vann |
|
@Claymore check this new video from BitsBeTrippin https://youtu.be/ZzAbECBnJmY?t=4836AMD confirm about DAG issue with Email . @Guys if anyone can make a test using SGminer with OpenCL 2.0 on Linux it will be very helpful Thanks AFAIK, you can't benchmark future epoch's in SGminer like you can with the Claymore miner. we can run it and compare current hashrates, no need to benchmark at all At the current epcoh, the difference in hash rate is not significant enough to be able to make a conclusion. There are always hash rates diffrences when using different miners. One way to get some indication if SGminer will be affected would be to mine ETH and then ETC, which is at higher epcoh. My rig, at it best times, could mine 168 mh/s with claymore miner, now it is 165 mh/s. SO if this SGminer can give me 168 mh/s back, it is all obvious, I don't need to do a benchmark Among other things, the hash rate you get is also dependent on the miner optimizations, settings and configuration options you use in the miner. Claymore's miner and SGminer are completely different miners and use different configuration options. A few MH/s difference for a rig between two different miners is normal and doesn't show anything except which miner is faster, it doesn't tell you WHY. e.g. Claymore's Zcash miner gives me ~320 H/s on a RX 480, with the Silent Army miner I don't get even half that. The only way to conclusively test whether SGminer is affected by the epoch hash drop is to test a future epoch or see if your hash drops with the next epoch using the SAME miner and settings.
|
|
|
|
ReaperCaution
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
July 02, 2017, 01:26:56 PM |
|
I added a couple Nvidia GPU's to my rig and now the temp/fan output line doesn't parse correctly and then it crashes my monitoring app when I go to use it.
It doesn't show the info for GPU0 (AMD). It shows "; GPU1 t-56 fan-40%, GPU2 t-57 fan-40%" (just the Nvidia's)
I've search around and haven't found an answer. Any ideas?
I shifted my AMD card to mine Zcash and put the 2 NVIDIA's on Claymore's Dual. The temp/fan info now shows correctly with the 2 GPU's and no longer crashes the monitoring app. How can I add back in my AMD card to Claymores Dual and get it to output correctly? Maybe a screenshot will help? Am I the only one with this problem while running AMD and Nvidia GPUs? http://i63.tinypic.com/24465w9.png
|
|
|
|
Munhenhos
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
July 02, 2017, 01:32:17 PM |
|
hi all
I have just received gtx 1080 ti in adition to my rx 480 8gb
I have connected gtx to monitor and the other one with second pci-e slot and I have installed only the nvidia drivers and removed amd drivers
the problem comes when I want to overclock both cards, I have used always msi afterburner for rx 480 but it seems that now I can only do oc to gtx 1080
anyone knows how can I solve that?
thanks in advance
You have to connect a monitor or dummy plug to the AMD card to be able to use Afterburner and for the drivers to read and set the temerature and fan speed. dummy plug? like those dvi to vga adapters for example?
|
|
|
|
Vann
|
|
July 02, 2017, 01:40:32 PM |
|
hi all
I have just received gtx 1080 ti in adition to my rx 480 8gb
I have connected gtx to monitor and the other one with second pci-e slot and I have installed only the nvidia drivers and removed amd drivers
the problem comes when I want to overclock both cards, I have used always msi afterburner for rx 480 but it seems that now I can only do oc to gtx 1080
anyone knows how can I solve that?
thanks in advance
You have to connect a monitor or dummy plug to the AMD card to be able to use Afterburner and for the drivers to read and set the temerature and fan speed. dummy plug? like those dvi to vga adapters for example? You could build your own, but it's easier to use an HDMI connector with an EDID chip built in. http://www.geeks3d.com/20091230/vga-hack-how-to-make-a-vga-dummy-plughttps://www.amazon.com/CompuLab-4K-Display-Emulator-fit-Headless/dp/B00JKFTYA8
|
|
|
|
firesec
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 104
Knowledge must be free !
|
|
July 02, 2017, 02:27:13 PM |
|
Hi guys,
I'm testing a 1080tis rig and I get around 38Mh/s on win 10 and around 35Mh/s on ubuntu 16.04 with claymore 9.6 only eth mining. Did you see same slowness on linux or are you aware of any fixes ? Thanks
|
Bitcoin address for donations: 3EfLoRWJwrXnep29drmhT19aPJcdqszswK
|
|
|
thameur
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
July 02, 2017, 03:35:28 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
firesec
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 104
Knowledge must be free !
|
|
July 02, 2017, 04:57:48 PM |
|
nope .. same results like 9.6
ETH - Total Speed: 242.455 Mh/s, Total Shares: 10, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02 ETH: GPU0 34.263 Mh/s, GPU1 34.960 Mh/s, GPU2 34.230 Mh/s, GPU3 34.273 Mh/s, GPU4 34.906 Mh/s, GPU5 34.916 Mh/s, GPU6 34.908 Mh/s
I've also tried with other drivers. I'm afraid I'll have to go back to w1nd0ze for eth
|
Bitcoin address for donations: 3EfLoRWJwrXnep29drmhT19aPJcdqszswK
|
|
|
AlainC
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
July 02, 2017, 05:43:21 PM |
|
Hi all, since v9.6 I used -ejobtimeout 1 (1 minute timeout on new job) on nanopool ETH. 1 minute without any job seems long with 12 seconds Ethereum round, but I see a dozen of timeout per hour.
Is it just normal (should increase timeout), or a problems with nanopool, or with my network ?
|
|
|
|
burgla7711
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
July 02, 2017, 05:59:40 PM |
|
So i know this post is for Claymore miner, but i was having such issues, I moved to nicehash, does anyone else on here use nicehash with multiple gpus. It benchmarks all the algo's fine. When i go to start, it starts mining and then 20-30 min into mining the computer locks up. It doesn't turn off , or give any error message. It just locks , no mouse or keyboard. I have to then hard shut down the pc, and start mining over and it does it again. I don't know if it is certain algo's causing it or not, i tried most of them individually and it seems to do the same thing. I just want my rig mining already and i am having so many issues with the software configuration. any help is appreciated. Even if it is claymore code that will allow me to mine nicehash stratum links.
When mining any Ethash coin Nicehash miner uses Claymore so you have accomplished nothing. It is just a shell running the typical mining software depending on coin being mined. ok so , i have now switched back to mining just eth on claymore miner. Still the computer just locks after 30 min or so of mining. Any suggestions of what can cause that?
|
|
|
|
DefiantMiner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
July 02, 2017, 06:17:20 PM |
|
Anyone else having problems with Remote Manager 3.3? The configuration file doesn't save (or read) properly and it drops miner entries and settings when closed and re-opened.
I can copy an old config over the options.ini file from a previous version and it will read it, but once closed it comes back partial and I have to re-enter most of the miners again. Then it doesn't save the changes and comes back different again. I have also tried re-entering the miner list from a clean install and still the same problem.
In short - unusable.
What gives?
|
|
|
|
MonetaCoin
|
|
July 02, 2017, 06:23:43 PM |
|
Has anyone noticed their computers lagging out since the recent difficulty increase? I have two seperate alienware auroa r6 mining, both are lagging out only when gpu mining.
A week ago this didnt happen i could even game while mining. Now fps is 10 from 110 on d3 while mining.
|
|
|
|
|