Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[nadrojcote]

Guys, has anybody noticed that hashrate of your rigs fell down a bit last time?
I had 1005 mh initially, after two months it was  992,  now it's 988, yeah it's not much but dont understand why this happened...same frequencies, similar memory error rate

It has been discussed many times. As the DAG gets larger hashrate will decrease. Some cards are affected more than others.

[QuadraQ]

I didn't see anything in my search to address this, so at the risk of asking a redundant question, is it at all feasible that ZCash could be dual-mined with Ethereum like Decred/Sia/Library?

[Calatravo]

hi guys
im running dual mining eth and sia.
but the problem is hes not connecting to the pool i think. what am i doing wrong?

Code:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal "mywallet" -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal "mywallet"
/YOUR_WORKER/YOUR_EMAIL -dpsw x -dcoin sia -ftime 10

im getting

Code:

 DCR: Stratum - connecting to 'sia-eu1.nanopool.org' <213.32.29.168> port 7777
 DCR: Stratum - Connected (sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777)
 DCR: Failed to get nonce1 at handshaking
 DCR: Authorized

....

DCR: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...


...


DCR: Stratum - connecting to 'pasc-eu2.nanopool.org' <92.222.180.118> port 15555
 DCR: Stratum - Connected (pasc-eu2.nanopool.org:15555)
 DCR: Authorized

thank you for your help

calatravo

[nadrojcote]

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal "mywallet" -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal "mywallet"
/YOUR_WORKER/YOUR_EMAIL -dpsw x -dcoin sia -ftime 10

calatravo

Are you putting in your wallet, worker name and email address....?

[brizio71]

Hello,

I have a RIG with 7 x 1080 8GB and 1 x 1060 6GB, stratinf from today after few minutes the miner crash with this log output:

22:47:01:067   1b54   GPU 3, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:084   1b54   GPU 3, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:090   424   GPU 2, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:105   1798   GPU 6, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:090   1b54   Set global fail flag, failed GPU3
22:47:01:122   a24   GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:160   1ac4   GPU 5, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:167   424   GPU 2, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:208   de4   GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:234   1b60   GPU 4, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:278   1798   GPU 6, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:287   1b58   GPU 3, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:296   1b54   GPU 3 failed
22:47:01:303   a24   GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:337   1ac4   GPU 5, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:207   424   Set global fail flag, failed GPU2
22:47:01:354   de4   GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:358   1b60   GPU 4, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:286   1798   Set global fail flag, failed GPU6
22:47:01:371   1b58   GPU 3, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:331   a24   Set global fail flag, failed GPU0
22:47:01:400   a24   GPU 0 failed
22:47:01:436   1a90   GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:442   1a90   GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:450   16e8   GPU 6, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:365   1b60   Set global fail flag, failed GPU4
22:47:01:358   de4   Set global fail flag, failed GPU1
22:47:01:482   de4   GPU 1 failed
22:47:01:515   1b48   GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:526   16e8   GPU 6, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:448   1a90   Set global fail flag, failed GPU0
22:47:01:534   1798   GPU 6 failed
22:47:01:400   1b58   Set global fail flag, failed GPU3
22:47:01:581   1b58   GPU 3 failed
22:47:01:587   1a90   GPU 0 failed
22:47:01:534   16e8   Set global fail flag, failed GPU6
22:47:01:641   1b48   GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:644   1b60   GPU 4 failed
22:47:01:687   1b74   GPU 4, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:694   424   GPU 2 failed
22:47:01:707   1ad8   GPU 2, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:349   1ac4   Set global fail flag, failed GPU5
22:47:01:719   16e8   GPU 6 failed
22:47:01:644   1b48   Set global fail flag, failed GPU1
22:47:01:773   1b74   GPU 4, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:777   1ad8   GPU 2, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:812   15c4   GPU 5, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered
22:47:01:822   1ac4   GPU 5 failed
22:47:01:864   1b48   GPU 1 failed
22:47:01:777   1b74   Set global fail flag, failed GPU4
22:47:01:811   1ad8   Set global fail flag, failed GPU2
22:47:01:885   15c4   GPU 5, GpuMiner kx failed 1
22:47:01:932   1b74   GPU 4 failed
22:47:01:945   1ad8   GPU 2 failed
22:47:01:932   15c4   Set global fail flag, failed GPU5
22:47:01:963   15c4   GPU 5 failed

Do u know the reason ?

[Calatravo]

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal "mywallet" -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal "mywallet"
/YOUR_WORKER/YOUR_EMAIL -dpsw x -dcoin sia -ftime 10

calatravo

Are you putting in your wallet, worker name and email address....?

only putting in my wallet. do i need worker name and email?

[MetalHelmet]

Code:

╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║      Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.6      ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

ETH: 1 pool is specified
Main Ethereum pool is eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
DCR: 0 pool is specified
AMD OpenCL platform not found

Driver 368.81 is recommended for best performance and compatibility

Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.6 recommends nVidia driver 368.81 while I'm using 382.53).

Does it means that Claymore's Dual ETH 9.6 just recommends driver that was actual on v9.6 was released ?  Should I downgrade 382.53 to 368.81 ?

Or maybe update to actual version is 384.76 (2017.6.29) ?

[yany]

Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.6 recommends nVidia driver 368.81 while I'm using 382.53).

Does it means that Claymore's Dual ETH 9.6 just recommends driver that was actual on v9.6 was released ?  Should I downgrade 382.53 to 368.81 ?

Or maybe update to actual version is 384.76 (2017.6.29) ?

I'm using the latest driver for 6 pieces of GTX 1070 in 7/24 with no problems: 180 MH/s.

[Finners]

I have searched so apologise if this is a noob question, just got a GTX 980 to add to a system with an rx 480 in it. Currently testing it in a separate system that normally runs a 1070 no problem doing the same thing I'm trying to do with the 980 which is boot and use the computer with the iGPU of the CPU and mine on the GPU.

If I boot with the display plugged into the 980 I have no problems but when I'm using the iGPU I get the error "CUDA error: cannot allocate big buffer for DAG"

my bat file, which I run as admin

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999 -ewal *My-Wallet-Address*.*My-Worker-Name*/*My-E-mail* -epsw x -mode 1

I'm On windows 10

382.53 drivers
Claymore 9.6

Parameters I have tried changing

-gser 2
-lidag 3
Virtual memory to 16gb
No-Overclock

I'm pulling my hair out trying to get this to work ( what little I have left!), I have no problems doing the same thing on the 1070 but the 980 will just not play ball. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

You need to use "-di <GPU #>"
So if your IGP is GPU 0, your 480 card is GPU 1, and your 980 is GPU 2; you need to use "-di 2" to use the 980 only, or "-di 12" to use the 480 and the 980

Tried that earlier with no success, I forgot to say. Not sure what I've down now but I cant mine at all on the 980. That same error "CUDA error: cannot allocate big buffer for DAG"  happens now whether or not I'm plugged into the 980 or not.

[br2459]

I have searched so apologise if this is a noob question, just got a GTX 980 to add to a system with an rx 480 in it. Currently testing it in a separate system that normally runs a 1070 no problem doing the same thing I'm trying to do with the 980 which is boot and use the computer with the iGPU of the CPU and mine on the GPU.

If I boot with the display plugged into the 980 I have no problems but when I'm using the iGPU I get the error "CUDA error: cannot allocate big buffer for DAG"

my bat file, which I run as admin

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999 -ewal *My-Wallet-Address*.*My-Worker-Name*/*My-E-mail* -epsw x -mode 1

I'm On windows 10

382.53 drivers
Claymore 9.6

Parameters I have tried changing

-gser 2
-lidag 3
Virtual memory to 16gb
No-Overclock

I'm pulling my hair out trying to get this to work ( what little I have left!), I have no problems doing the same thing on the 1070 but the 980 will just not play ball. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

You need to use "-di <GPU #>"
So if your IGP is GPU 0, your 480 card is GPU 1, and your 980 is GPU 2; you need to use "-di 2" to use the 980 only, or "-di 12" to use the 480 and the 980

Tried that earlier with no success, I forgot to say. Not sure what I've down now but I cant mine at all on the 980. That same error "CUDA error: cannot allocate big buffer for DAG"  happens now whether or not I'm plugged into the 980 or not.

Might sound silly but I had a friend that had the same issue except we put the Virtual mem to 32GB instead of 16GB and it worked for him. Its worth a shot and a reboot.

[reb0rn21]

Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.6 recommends nVidia driver 368.81 while I'm using 382.53).

Does it means that Claymore's Dual ETH 9.6 just recommends driver that was actual on v9.6 was released ?  Should I downgrade 382.53 to 368.81 ?

Or maybe update to actual version is 384.76 (2017.6.29) ?

I'm using the latest driver for 6 pieces of GTX 1070 in 7/24 with no problems: 180 MH/s.

If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization!
Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs

[krnlx]

Mr. Claymore, do you need my log file of crashed ETH mining with AMD Vega for bug fixing in your miners?
I tested your ZCash miner too, same issue.

Thanks.

-swisstrader

Can you try with -asm 0 option ?

[Meatball]

If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization!
Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs

So...not sure how you came to that conclusion.  I'm sure Claymore wants to optimize the miner for any / all cards as much as possible.  The more efficient the miner, the more shares / MH he's going to get from each person that uses his miner...

[christiano88]

If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization!
Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs

So...not sure how you came to that conclusion.  I'm sure Claymore wants to optimize the miner for any / all cards as much as possible.  The more efficient the miner, the more shares / MH he's going to get from each person that uses his miner...

You sir, must not know how difficulty works.

[Meatball]

If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization!
Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs

So...not sure how you came to that conclusion.  I'm sure Claymore wants to optimize the miner for any / all cards as much as possible.  The more efficient the miner, the more shares / MH he's going to get from each person that uses his miner...

You sir, must not know how difficulty works.

I do understand difficulty, but if he can make his miner more efficient than all other miners, while that would certainly raise the difficulty due to the overall increased hash rate, his miners (and Claymore himself with his dev fee) would have a larger portion of that hash rate in comparison to everyone else, which translates to a larger portion of the overall mined coins at the expense of the people using the other mining applications (until the other mining applications come up with their improved version).  Not to mention, improvements to his miner will drive more people to use his miner.  So yes, he does have motivation to improve his miner.

[reb0rn21]

If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization!
Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs

So...not sure how you came to that conclusion.  I'm sure Claymore wants to optimize the miner for any / all cards as much as possible.  The more efficient the miner, the more shares / MH he's going to get from each person that uses his miner...

SUre and guess why he need ~1 year to optimize dual mining with NV, for past 1 year only profit from nvidia dual mining was claymore, stupid ppl/miners just burned more power for no benefit! because they are stupid to do profitability math and see they lose more on lower ethereum speed then on dc/sia/lbc gain!

[Meatball]

If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization!
Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs

So...not sure how you came to that conclusion.  I'm sure Claymore wants to optimize the miner for any / all cards as much as possible.  The more efficient the miner, the more shares / MH he's going to get from each person that uses his miner...

SUre and guess why he need ~1 year to optimize dual mining with NV, for past 1 year only profit from nvidia dual mining was claymore, stupid ppl/miners just burned more power for no benefit! because they are stupid to do profitability math and see they lose more on lower ethereum speed then on dc/sia/lbc gain!

That I don't disagree with, people really should spend the few minutes it takes to figure out the cost / benefit of dual mining and they may see they'd make more just straight up single mining ETH.

[manotroll]

Why are you giving this error?

[BennyAndDeJets]

Is there a way to identify multiple wallets and pools without using the epools file?

[Cyper_BLC]

Why are you giving this error?

try to connect nicehash eu server

also use in config file:
-allcoins 1
-allpools 1
-esm 3
-mode 1