rodyw
|
|
April 13, 2018, 05:42:07 PM |
|
Clay-Phoenix-Ethermine-Autostarter Phoenix,Claymore Devfee no Hash Stop ,Autostart the Miner and Go Common problem with Phoenixminer and Claymore Miner is when DEVFEE comes by and the third or fourth time does not catch Shares gives these miners warning and stops the miner, to remedy this is this startbat watchdog and this ensures that the miner starts again or if necessary restart the whole miner rig, you place the contents of the start debate of the miner in this watchdog bat, and works great, you can download it at: Download: https://github.com/digitalpara/Clay-Phoenix-Ethermine-AutostarterDownload: https://mirrorace.com/m/1qlvnWhy don't you guys just use the free version of Awesome Miner? The latest version of Awesome Miner comes with support for PhoenixMiner 2.8b (including basic API support) and it has all these rules you can setup to restart your miner on failures/low hashrate etc?
|
|
|
|
wtfonly16
|
|
April 13, 2018, 05:44:49 PM |
|
mine monero lol stop supporting this asic coin
and i advise minerdevs to make better monero miners too, current ones are trash
|
ye i aint bares
|
|
|
cobaltmdn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
April 13, 2018, 07:29:27 PM Last edit: April 13, 2018, 08:22:07 PM by cobaltmdn |
|
Comparing PhoenixMiner 2.9d to Claymore 11.6 in ETH mining: - it has more hashrate -> +0.8MH/s - less 20-30w power draw - less temperature - less fan usage Keep it up.
|
|
|
|
sidaliroy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
April 13, 2018, 08:05:05 PM |
|
When 2.9 final edition (non-beta) will be out? And what will be the improvements?
|
|
|
|
jojo sevilla
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
April 13, 2018, 08:14:39 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
April 13, 2018, 10:18:21 PM |
|
2.9D running rock solid for 27 hours, reported hasrate between 91,5 and 92MH/s for 3X RX570.
|
|
|
|
gsrcrxsi314
Member
Offline
Activity: 367
Merit: 34
|
|
April 14, 2018, 12:41:24 AM |
|
mine monero lol stop supporting this asic coin
and i advise minerdevs to make better monero miners too, current ones are trash
but ETH is still much more profitable than XMR unless you have Vegas so no.
|
|
|
|
wtfonly16
|
|
April 14, 2018, 01:15:51 AM |
|
mine monero lol stop supporting this asic coin
and i advise minerdevs to make better monero miners too, current ones are trash
but ETH is still much more profitable than XMR unless you have Vegas so no. rx570: 27-31mh/s ETH @ 90-110w rx570: 850-900sol/s Monero @ 120w Monero pulls ahead by 20-25%... Keep Dreaming buddy, eth is dead.
|
ye i aint bares
|
|
|
fimatiku
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
April 14, 2018, 04:22:26 AM |
|
rx570: 27-31mh/s ETH @ 90-110w rx570: 850-900sol/s Monero @ 120w
Monero pulls ahead by 20-25%... Keep Dreaming buddy, eth is dead.
Wow your an idiot ..... thanks for sharing only HALF of the data perhaps when you quote someone of "dreaming" elaborate more with details to a pennie. coins received to dollar value in a given time frame etc... end result and so on.................... For instance, I personally (not blowing smoke out of my asss) have 35 GPUs and I mine ETC rx 580 or in ur case 570 it dont matter I do have only one of those hashing at 29.9 the reset are 580's depending on the card 28-32.6 . anyways I get 1etc every 11hours or so - so thats 2+ in a 24 hour period aka 1 DAY = each etc currant rate of $16 for a grand total of $32 a day let me know if you can get $32 a day with SOLS and how many UNITS GPUs it will take with todays rate ---- I reckon 300 give or take SOLS with rx580 would imagine the same for 570 ? personally tried it on bitcoin private pool same zcash crap 800sols maybe with a gtx 1070 or 1080 I dont know Sooooooo quickly coming to a conclusion that your an idiot that doesn't know wtf ur talking about
|
|
|
|
fimatiku
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
April 14, 2018, 04:29:13 AM |
|
After running PM 2.9d for few days yes it "SHOWS" higher hash rate but the time it takes to CLEAR a block for me INCREASED as apposed to running CL some would say difficulty increased Id have to run it for 2 weeks to collect data and then switch back to CL and collect more data to eliminate that theory
|
|
|
|
wtfonly16
|
|
April 14, 2018, 04:42:25 AM |
|
rx570: 27-31mh/s ETH @ 90-110w rx570: 850-900sol/s Monero @ 120w
Monero pulls ahead by 20-25%... Keep Dreaming buddy, eth is dead.
Wow your an idiot ..... thanks for sharing only HALF of the data perhaps when you quote someone of "dreaming" elaborate more with details to a pennie. coins received to dollar value in a given time frame etc... end result and so on.................... For instance, I personally (not blowing smoke out of my asss) have 35 GPUs and I mine ETC rx 580 or in ur case 570 it dont matter I do have only one of those hashing at 29.9 the reset are 580's depending on the card 28-32.6 . anyways I get 1etc every 11hours or so - so thats 2+ in a 24 hour period aka 1 DAY = each etc currant rate of $16 for a grand total of $32 a day let me know if you can get $32 a day with SOLS and how many UNITS GPUs it will take with todays rate ---- I reckon 300 give or take SOLS with rx580 would imagine the same for 570 ? personally tried it on bitcoin private pool same zcash crap 800sols maybe with a gtx 1070 or 1080 I dont know Sooooooo quickly coming to a conclusion that your an idiot that doesn't know wtf ur talking about 580's push 900far and 570's are 850+ for moneroV7 the past is gone. get with the times. we are not in 2012 anymore, new miners push rx series far for monero. Vegas are not king for price/performance anymore. and ur the idiot here, 35gpus dont pull $32 a day in etc lol
|
ye i aint bares
|
|
|
drgrog
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
April 14, 2018, 09:11:44 AM |
|
Tried Phoenix 2.8c today. Mostly good, but have a problem with the remote monitoring. I have a basic python script using sockets to monitor all rigs and send me alerts if things go wrong. This works with claymore, which says it uses raw TCP/IP connections (not HTTP) for remote management. This same script does not work with Phoenix, and hangs when waiting for data from the miner. It sends the request JSON as per the claymore API {"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"miner_getstat1"}It then waits for the response, expecting {"result": ["9.3 - ETH" ... data, but it never gets any data. It uses the socket.recv(1024) method which blocks until there is some data to be read. The remote monitoring is enabled, and responds to HTTP requests on 3333, showing a html version of the console. Interestingly claymore's EthMan.exe does work and can see the rigs using Phoenix. The devs say "Phoenix miner is fully compatible with Claymore's dual miner protocol for remote monitoring and management.", so am I correct to assume that phoenix should support the raw TCP/IP requests in JSON format? It's a pretty simple script, that works with claymore, perhaps someone can see if I'm doing something wrong, here is a stripped down version that hangs when waiting for data from the miner. #!/usr/bin/python3
import socket import json
def contact_miner(ip,port): request = b'{"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"miner_getstat1"}' with socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) as s: try: s.connect((ip, port)) except Exception: return None s.sendall(request) data = s.recv(1024) if data != b'': return(json.loads(data.decode('utf-8'))['result'])
answer = contact_miner('192.168.1.198', 3333) print(answer)
It hangs because socket.recv blocks when there is no data. If you Ctrl+C you get user@server:~/bin$ ./checkPhoenix.py ^CTraceback (most recent call last): File "./checkPhoenix.py", line 19, in <module> answer = contact_miner('192.168.1.198', 3333) File "./checkPhoenix.py", line 14, in contact_miner data = s.recv(1024) KeyboardInterrupt
Anyone else got monitoring scripts working with Phoenix? Any idea what could be going wrong?
|
|
|
|
anoraknophobia
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
April 14, 2018, 01:37:11 PM |
|
When 2.9 final edition (non-beta) will be out? And what will be the improvements?
2.9 final will be released soon! It will dobule the hashrate and reduce power consumption to 0... Just ask more of this questions and the final product will get better and better...
|
|
|
|
BlackPrapor
|
|
April 14, 2018, 02:02:50 PM |
|
rx570: 27-31mh/s ETH @ 90-110w rx570: 850-900sol/s Monero @ 120w
Monero pulls ahead by 20-25%... Keep Dreaming buddy, eth is dead.
Wow your an idiot ..... thanks for sharing only HALF of the data perhaps when you quote someone of "dreaming" elaborate more with details to a pennie. coins received to dollar value in a given time frame etc... end result and so on.................... For instance, I personally (not blowing smoke out of my asss) have 35 GPUs and I mine ETC rx 580 or in ur case 570 it dont matter I do have only one of those hashing at 29.9 the reset are 580's depending on the card 28-32.6 . anyways I get 1etc every 11hours or so - so thats 2+ in a 24 hour period aka 1 DAY = each etc currant rate of $16 for a grand total of $32 a day let me know if you can get $32 a day with SOLS and how many UNITS GPUs it will take with todays rate ---- I reckon 300 give or take SOLS with rx580 would imagine the same for 570 ? personally tried it on bitcoin private pool same zcash crap 800sols maybe with a gtx 1070 or 1080 I dont know Sooooooo quickly coming to a conclusion that your an idiot that doesn't know wtf ur talking about 580's push 900far and 570's are 850+ for moneroV7 the past is gone. get with the times. we are not in 2012 anymore, new miners push rx series far for monero. Vegas are not king for price/performance anymore. and ur the idiot here, 35gpus dont pull $32 a day in etc lol Guys, both of you are having issues with math, or you're not aware of dual mining. Here's how it goes for me atm: Eth $28,43, Monero $30,22 and Dual Eth+XVG $34. This is real Eth+Xvg profit, not the one estimated by WTM on the number of coins you're "supposed" to get (which would be $37). You're welcome =) P.S: not sure why would someone use this solo miner at all, when dual is always more profitable, even with higher fees.
|
There is no place like 127.0.0.1 In blockchain we trust
|
|
|
Geniusvzla
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
April 14, 2018, 07:35:11 PM |
|
rx570: 27-31mh/s ETH @ 90-110w rx570: 850-900sol/s Monero @ 120w
Monero pulls ahead by 20-25%... Keep Dreaming buddy, eth is dead.
Wow your an idiot ..... thanks for sharing only HALF of the data perhaps when you quote someone of "dreaming" elaborate more with details to a pennie. coins received to dollar value in a given time frame etc... end result and so on.................... For instance, I personally (not blowing smoke out of my asss) have 35 GPUs and I mine ETC rx 580 or in ur case 570 it dont matter I do have only one of those hashing at 29.9 the reset are 580's depending on the card 28-32.6 . anyways I get 1etc every 11hours or so - so thats 2+ in a 24 hour period aka 1 DAY = each etc currant rate of $16 for a grand total of $32 a day let me know if you can get $32 a day with SOLS and how many UNITS GPUs it will take with todays rate ---- I reckon 300 give or take SOLS with rx580 would imagine the same for 570 ? personally tried it on bitcoin private pool same zcash crap 800sols maybe with a gtx 1070 or 1080 I dont know Sooooooo quickly coming to a conclusion that your an idiot that doesn't know wtf ur talking about 580's push 900far and 570's are 850+ for moneroV7 the past is gone. get with the times. we are not in 2012 anymore, new miners push rx series far for monero. Vegas are not king for price/performance anymore. and ur the idiot here, 35gpus dont pull $32 a day in etc lol Guys, both of you are having issues with math, or you're not aware of dual mining. Here's how it goes for me atm: Eth $28,43, Monero $30,22 and Dual Eth+XVG $34. This is real Eth+Xvg profit, not the one estimated by WTM on the number of coins you're "supposed" to get (which would be $37). You're welcome =) P.S: not sure why would someone use this solo miner at all, when dual is always more profitable, even with higher fees. Hello everyone, greetings from Venezuela, I have 5 RIG each with 6 GPU Sapphire Nitro + Radeon RX580 8GB GDDR5 = 30 GPU, only mino ETH ($ 501.96) and at today's price at this time I make $ 33.35 daily, in short if you have 35 GPU and your configuration is within the average then you should make more than $ 39 a day; Now in my case I would like to mine Eth + Xvg but I do not know when the temperature would rise in my GPU since I am at the limit And I do not have information about a purse or a pool and I would generate more money every day because in my country the light It's literally free, take care, excuse my bad English
|
|
|
|
nitrobg
Member
Offline
Activity: 413
Merit: 17
|
|
April 14, 2018, 08:29:58 PM |
|
Guys, both of you are having issues with math, or you're not aware of dual mining. Here's how it goes for me atm: Eth $28,43, Monero $30,22 and Dual Eth+XVG $34. This is real Eth+Xvg profit, not the one estimated by WTM on the number of coins you're "supposed" to get (which would be $37). You're welcome =)
P.S: not sure why would someone use this solo miner at all, when dual is always more profitable, even with higher fees.
You have issues with the math. 25ish cards should earn you this profit daily, so if you factor the 0.5% devfee, the increased power draw of 40 watts per card, add the additional stress on the GPU, cooling, PSU, fans, heat output, air conditioning - you are basically running at a very slim margin.
|
|
|
|
wtfonly16
|
|
April 14, 2018, 09:06:53 PM |
|
Guys, both of you are having issues with math, or you're not aware of dual mining. Here's how it goes for me atm: Eth $28,43, Monero $30,22 and Dual Eth+XVG $34. This is real Eth+Xvg profit, not the one estimated by WTM on the number of coins you're "supposed" to get (which would be $37). You're welcome =)
P.S: not sure why would someone use this solo miner at all, when dual is always more profitable, even with higher fees.
You have issues with the math. 25ish cards should earn you this profit daily, so if you factor the 0.5% devfee, the increased power draw of 40 watts per card, add the additional stress on the GPU, cooling, PSU, fans, heat output, air conditioning - you are basically running at a very slim margin. 50 cards produce that not 25... idk what fuking rock everyone here is living under.
|
ye i aint bares
|
|
|
janding
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 170
Merit: 6
|
|
April 15, 2018, 08:37:41 AM |
|
Tried Phoenix 2.8c today. Mostly good, but have a problem with the remote monitoring. I have a basic python script using sockets to monitor all rigs and send me alerts if things go wrong. This works with claymore, which says it uses raw TCP/IP connections (not HTTP) for remote management. This same script does not work with Phoenix, and hangs when waiting for data from the miner. It sends the request JSON as per the claymore API {"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"miner_getstat1"}It then waits for the response, expecting {"result": ["9.3 - ETH" ... data, but it never gets any data. It uses the socket.recv(1024) method which blocks until there is some data to be read. The remote monitoring is enabled, and responds to HTTP requests on 3333, showing a html version of the console. Interestingly claymore's EthMan.exe does work and can see the rigs using Phoenix. The devs say "Phoenix miner is fully compatible with Claymore's dual miner protocol for remote monitoring and management.", so am I correct to assume that phoenix should support the raw TCP/IP requests in JSON format? It's a pretty simple script, that works with claymore, perhaps someone can see if I'm doing something wrong, here is a stripped down version that hangs when waiting for data from the miner. #!/usr/bin/python3
import socket import json
def contact_miner(ip,port): request = b'{"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"miner_getstat1"}' with socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) as s: try: s.connect((ip, port)) except Exception: return None s.sendall(request) data = s.recv(1024) if data != b'': return(json.loads(data.decode('utf-8'))['result'])
answer = contact_miner('192.168.1.198', 3333) print(answer)
It hangs because socket.recv blocks when there is no data. If you Ctrl+C you get user@server:~/bin$ ./checkPhoenix.py ^CTraceback (most recent call last): File "./checkPhoenix.py", line 19, in <module> answer = contact_miner('192.168.1.198', 3333) File "./checkPhoenix.py", line 14, in contact_miner data = s.recv(1024) KeyboardInterrupt
Anyone else got monitoring scripts working with Phoenix? Any idea what could be going wrong? Add a newline character at the end of the request request = b'{"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"miner_getstat1"}' + "\n"
|
|
|
|
|
PhoenixMiner (OP)
|
|
April 15, 2018, 11:25:27 AM Last edit: March 09, 2021, 01:57:36 AM by PhoenixMiner |
|
PhoenixMiner 2.9e is officially released. Note that there are changes since 2.9d, so if you are running 2.9d, you should upgrade to this version. Here is the list of changes since the last beta version 2.9e (the full list of changes since the last official release can be seen in the first post of this thread): - Added detection of AMD Compute mode in the supported drivers and GPUs. The detection is performed when the miner starts and if the Compute mode is off on some of the GPUs, you will get warning messages.
- Added console command 'y' to turn on the AMD Compute mode if it is not turned on on some of the cards.
- Small improvement in the -logfile option: now you can insert $ chararcter in the name, which will be removed from the name but will force the miner to overwrite the log file on each startup, instead of appending to it.
- Fixed a problem with miner restart on some CUDA errors with Nvidia cards when the miner crashes instead of restarting.
- Some other small fixes and changes
You can download 2.9e from here: (MEGA links are no longer active) Checksums to verify your download: File: PhoenixMiner_2.9e.zip SHA-1: e2b9c72e561ac0fdb4e3c9ebddd7d703a35da36c SHA-256: 9817c89623025cf392a4e800a41cff96a87eee02e241d9f08d62dc43e0975e96 SHA-512: 33c78a73a53791c01bbfff2ad830ffd40d4007f69ca329300815ab1c189f744aafdc6683033cfcb0315db7f322e6dee44181b9dff2922b1fb408b0f04dba163b We are now working on 3.0, which will include auto-tuning capabilities and more.
|
|
|
|
|