Bitcoin Forum
November 06, 2024, 07:36:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 ... 326 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3  (Read 2145048 times)
renegadepcsolutions
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100

Yeah... I mined your mom last night.


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 06:51:52 AM
 #1041

About 740 h/s on stock 290X (Hynix memory).
About 650 h/s on stock 290X (Elpida memory).
About 450 h/s on stock 280X (Hynix memory).
About 300 h/s on stock 270X.


Getting ~360 h/s on a 7870 GHz OC (Sapphire Dual-X v1) 1250 gpu / 1350 mem / 1.218 vddc / powertune 20 / 100% fan speed ~50°C (Ambient temp is 75°F) (Hynix Memory)
-a 1


Fan died on my other card, same card, only Elpida Memory. Going to go to microcenter tomorrow to be an ass and buy a NZXT Kraken G10 and toss my Corsair H70 on it with some vrm heatsinks and make this bitch hit 400h/s. Tongue

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.  -John F. Kennedy
renegadepcsolutions
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100

Yeah... I mined your mom last night.


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 07:00:40 AM
 #1042

v3.4, 13.12 drivers, Asus R9280x @ 1190/1800 yields 545 H/s

You should make this available on Linux and offer it within PiMP (www.getpimp.org).

yeah i agree talk to the guys in #pimp on freenode

just make a working linux executeble ad ask them to include it....




I'd rock it. I love PiMP.

The only reason I switched this rig over to Windows is so I could use this miner.

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.  -John F. Kennedy
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
June 28, 2014, 08:13:51 AM
 #1043

well version 4.0 and drivers 14.6 on 6950's seems to be way touchy, driver crash and thread hangs 98% of the time..... will test 4.0 on 13.12 drivers and report results.
asus 280x's 2x achieve 1068H/s at 1190-1800 and stable on 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
x2 7950's achieve 950h/s at 1145-1250 and stable with 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
X2 Gb 280x's with elpida memory do 791 at stock clocks and stable with 4.0 miner and 14.6 drivers. have yet to OC to gain higher results....

Edit*
Asus 6950 runs 90% stable with v3.4 miner with 13.12 drivers. 200H/s at stock clocks, 925-1200 nets 215h/s stable.
x2 GB 280x's do 401H/s each netting 802h/s at 1170-1500, OC'ed. High OC seems to not really be worth it given the small gain's from the much higher clocks... althou its stable for now.

Works fine on a HD 6950 with 2GB of memory, but the 1GB version crashes. Seems like the old cards have to have 2GB memory  or more to run proper with the new 4.0 miner.

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
nrg_wolf
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 28, 2014, 09:31:55 AM
 #1044

well version 4.0 and drivers 14.6 on 6950's seems to be way touchy, driver crash and thread hangs 98% of the time..... will test 4.0 on 13.12 drivers and report results.
asus 280x's 2x achieve 1068H/s at 1190-1800 and stable on 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
x2 7950's achieve 950h/s at 1145-1250 and stable with 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
X2 Gb 280x's with elpida memory do 791 at stock clocks and stable with 4.0 miner and 14.6 drivers. have yet to OC to gain higher results....

Edit*
Asus 6950 runs 90% stable with v3.4 miner with 13.12 drivers. 200H/s at stock clocks, 925-1200 nets 215h/s stable.
x2 GB 280x's do 401H/s each netting 802h/s at 1170-1500, OC'ed. High OC seems to not really be worth it given the small gain's from the much higher clocks... althou its stable for now.

Works fine on a HD 6950 with 2GB of memory, but the 1GB version crashes. Seems like the old cards have to have 2GB memory  or more to run proper with the new 4.0 miner.

iam still trying to get mine to work better with newer miner/drivers..... seems to crash very fast, and now it crash's with all the older versions as well..... which seems wierd....
burnbabyburn71
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 12:47:05 PM
 #1045

well version 4.0 and drivers 14.6 on 6950's seems to be way touchy, driver crash and thread hangs 98% of the time..... will test 4.0 on 13.12 drivers and report results.
asus 280x's 2x achieve 1068H/s at 1190-1800 and stable on 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
x2 7950's achieve 950h/s at 1145-1250 and stable with 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
X2 Gb 280x's with elpida memory do 791 at stock clocks and stable with 4.0 miner and 14.6 drivers. have yet to OC to gain higher results....

Edit*
Asus 6950 runs 90% stable with v3.4 miner with 13.12 drivers. 200H/s at stock clocks, 925-1200 nets 215h/s stable.
x2 GB 280x's do 401H/s each netting 802h/s at 1170-1500, OC'ed. High OC seems to not really be worth it given the small gain's from the much higher clocks... althou its stable for now.

Works fine on a HD 6950 with 2GB of memory, but the 1GB version crashes. Seems like the old cards have to have 2GB memory  or more to run proper with the new 4.0 miner.

My 5970 with 1gb of memory works fine

Web Dev | General Graphics Design | Windows/Linux Wallet Compiles | Certified member of the BCs
jeanjean15
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 02:52:13 PM
 #1046

Hi.

I am mining since several hours with a hashrate of 8.5 kh/s but i don't have any XMR in my balance or wallet .

What happen ?    the blocks request a long time to be found  ?? Huh
kyndik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:00:35 PM
 #1047

Claymore, please check 14.6 driver for AMD. I get 385 h/s per card. I use 3x270X (Sapphire Toxic)
4.0+14.6=400h/s per card (270X Sapphire-Hynix)
4.0+14.4=360h/s per card (270X Gigabyte-Elpida)
d-unknown
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 1


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:33:31 PM
 #1048

well version 4.0 and drivers 14.6 on 6950's seems to be way touchy, driver crash and thread hangs 98% of the time..... will test 4.0 on 13.12 drivers and report results.
asus 280x's 2x achieve 1068H/s at 1190-1800 and stable on 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
x2 7950's achieve 950h/s at 1145-1250 and stable with 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
X2 Gb 280x's with elpida memory do 791 at stock clocks and stable with 4.0 miner and 14.6 drivers. have yet to OC to gain higher results....

Edit*
Asus 6950 runs 90% stable with v3.4 miner with 13.12 drivers. 200H/s at stock clocks, 925-1200 nets 215h/s stable.
x2 GB 280x's do 401H/s each netting 802h/s at 1170-1500, OC'ed. High OC seems to not really be worth it given the small gain's from the much higher clocks... althou its stable for now.

Works fine on a HD 6950 with 2GB of memory, but the 1GB version crashes. Seems like the old cards have to have 2GB memory  or more to run proper with the new 4.0 miner.

My 5970 with 1gb of memory works fine

please post your hashrate with a 5970, also mem/core freq, catalyst version

i get 225h/s , 880/1000 , catalyst 13.12

SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
June 28, 2014, 07:51:00 PM
 #1049

well version 4.0 and drivers 14.6 on 6950's seems to be way touchy, driver crash and thread hangs 98% of the time..... will test 4.0 on 13.12 drivers and report results.
asus 280x's 2x achieve 1068H/s at 1190-1800 and stable on 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
x2 7950's achieve 950h/s at 1145-1250 and stable with 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
X2 Gb 280x's with elpida memory do 791 at stock clocks and stable with 4.0 miner and 14.6 drivers. have yet to OC to gain higher results....

Edit*
Asus 6950 runs 90% stable with v3.4 miner with 13.12 drivers. 200H/s at stock clocks, 925-1200 nets 215h/s stable.
x2 GB 280x's do 401H/s each netting 802h/s at 1170-1500, OC'ed. High OC seems to not really be worth it given the small gain's from the much higher clocks... althou its stable for now.

Works fine on a HD 6950 with 2GB of memory, but the 1GB version crashes. Seems like the old cards have to have 2GB memory  or more to run proper with the new 4.0 miner.

My 5970 with 1gb of memory works fine

Technically that's a 2GB card, 2x 1GB 5870's.

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
coke15
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 08:28:27 PM
 #1050

hi

driver still crash with this version 4  ati  6950/6970 :: crying
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
June 28, 2014, 08:34:35 PM
 #1051

hi

driver still crash with this version 4  ati  6950/6970 :: crying

Is your 6950 a 1GB or 2GB version? I have no problems with a 2GB 6950, but the 1GB version I do. The 6970 have has no issues.

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 28, 2014, 09:37:33 PM
 #1052

well version 4.0 and drivers 14.6 on 6950's seems to be way touchy, driver crash and thread hangs 98% of the time..... will test 4.0 on 13.12 drivers and report results.
asus 280x's 2x achieve 1068H/s at 1190-1800 and stable on 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
x2 7950's achieve 950h/s at 1145-1250 and stable with 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
X2 Gb 280x's with elpida memory do 791 at stock clocks and stable with 4.0 miner and 14.6 drivers. have yet to OC to gain higher results....

Edit*
Asus 6950 runs 90% stable with v3.4 miner with 13.12 drivers. 200H/s at stock clocks, 925-1200 nets 215h/s stable.
x2 GB 280x's do 401H/s each netting 802h/s at 1170-1500, OC'ed. High OC seems to not really be worth it given the small gain's from the much higher clocks... althou its stable for now.

Works fine on a HD 6950 with 2GB of memory, but the 1GB version crashes. Seems like the old cards have to have 2GB memory  or more to run proper with the new 4.0 miner.

My 5970 with 1gb of memory works fine

Technically that's a 2GB card, 2x 1GB 5870's.

No, 1gb card, 1gb buffer mirrored on each core. 1gb usable mem.
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
June 28, 2014, 10:42:52 PM
 #1053

well version 4.0 and drivers 14.6 on 6950's seems to be way touchy, driver crash and thread hangs 98% of the time..... will test 4.0 on 13.12 drivers and report results.
asus 280x's 2x achieve 1068H/s at 1190-1800 and stable on 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
x2 7950's achieve 950h/s at 1145-1250 and stable with 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
X2 Gb 280x's with elpida memory do 791 at stock clocks and stable with 4.0 miner and 14.6 drivers. have yet to OC to gain higher results....

Edit*
Asus 6950 runs 90% stable with v3.4 miner with 13.12 drivers. 200H/s at stock clocks, 925-1200 nets 215h/s stable.
x2 GB 280x's do 401H/s each netting 802h/s at 1170-1500, OC'ed. High OC seems to not really be worth it given the small gain's from the much higher clocks... althou its stable for now.

Works fine on a HD 6950 with 2GB of memory, but the 1GB version crashes. Seems like the old cards have to have 2GB memory  or more to run proper with the new 4.0 miner.

My 5970 with 1gb of memory works fine


Technically that's a 2GB card, 2x 1GB 5870's.

No, 1gb card, 1gb buffer mirrored on each core. 1gb usable mem.

I know that...

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
superresistant
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1131



View Profile
June 28, 2014, 10:59:20 PM
 #1054


monero.crypto-pool.fr --> Pool Efficiency: 113%

It means that we find more blocks on average than other pools or solo miners.

SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
June 28, 2014, 11:33:24 PM
 #1055


monero.crypto-pool.fr --> Pool Efficiency: 113%

It means that we find more blocks on average than other pools or solo miners.



I would definitely mine at you pool again, if you have merge mining.

Do you have plans in the future to do that?

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
RentaMouse
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 29, 2014, 02:25:58 AM
 #1056

Hi.

I am mining since several hours with a hashrate of 8.5 kh/s but i don't have any XMR in my balance or wallet .

What happen ?    the blocks request a long time to be found  ?? Huh

I assume you are on a standard CryptoNote pool, do you see your total hashes submitted increasing but not receiving any XMR? Most likely cause is pool not finding a block, you can see under the "pool blocks" menu - you will only receive XMR for green blocks that you have mined on. Small pool only finding a few blocks a day isnt bad, you still get paid much the same over a few days, just make sure you have backup pools configured in case of downtime.

If there are blocks mined but you have no XMR then something else is wrong, maybe pool admin can help you, or if you try mining on my pool http://cryptonotepool.org.uk and pm me in IRC (#monero - CryptoNotePoolUK) then I can check the pool logs for you and see if we can find the problem.

Pool admin @ http://cryptonotepool.org.uk/ - for miners who value reliability (and like orange)!
Currently donating all of our 1% pool fee to the dev fund - mine at CryptonotepoolUK and support XMR at no extra cost!
superresistant
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1131



View Profile
June 29, 2014, 09:16:56 AM
Last edit: June 29, 2014, 12:22:51 PM by superresistant
 #1057

monero.crypto-pool.fr --> Pool Efficiency: 113%
It means that we find more blocks on average than other pools or solo miners.
I would definitely mine at you pool again, if you have merge mining.
Do you have plans in the future to do that?

No I didn't think about it. Let me see what I can do.

EDIT : it seems that merged mining lower the overall hashing speed resulting in lower gain...
coke15
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 29, 2014, 12:03:20 PM
 #1058

hi

driver still crash with this version 4  ati  6950/6970 :: crying

Is your 6950 a 1GB or 2GB version? I have no problems with a 2GB 6950, but the 1GB version I do. The 6970 have has no issues.


hi  

6970 2go  and 6950@6970 ,no OC,  drivers still crashing  with all version of claymore :/
try  with 5 and 4 cards in same rig
try with -di 0  ...1...2...3....no effect,1 card but crash

setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://pool adreess -u wallet -p x


i d ont know what i miss :/

idem  on motherboard intel and amd ,driver 13.12  and 14.4

i m lost

here the log
2:38:36:758   964   º          Claymore XMR/QCN/FCN/BCN GPU Miner  v4.0 Beta         º
22:38:36:758   964   ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ
22:38:38:651   964   
Cards available: 4
22:38:38:651   964   GPU #0: name: Cayman, 2048 MB available, 24 units
22:38:38:651   964   GPU #1: name: Cayman, 2048 MB available, 22 units
22:38:38:651   964   GPU #2: name: Cayman, 2048 MB available, 24 units
22:38:38:666   964   GPU #3: name: Cayman, 2048 MB available, 24 units
22:38:38:666   964   Total cards: 4
22:38:38:666   964   Initializing...

22:38:38:698   964   card 0, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 192
22:38:38:713   964   0 m = 2
22:38:38:745   964   card 1, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 176
22:38:38:745   964   1 m = 2
22:38:38:791   964   card 2, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 192
22:38:38:791   964   2 m = 2
22:38:38:823   964   card 3, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 192
22:38:38:823   964   3 m = 2
22:38:38:823   964   POOL version
22:38:38:823   964   b103
22:38:41:682   964   GPU 0: -a 1 mode selected
22:38:41:682   964   GPU 1: -a 1 mode selected
22:38:41:698   964   GPU 2: -a 1 mode selected
22:38:41:698   964   GPU 3: -a 1 mode selected
22:38:41:698   964   5 pools specified.
22:38:41:823   bcc   Stratum - connecting to 'duck.extremepool.org' <216.119.175.92> port 5555
22:38:41:839   bc8   Stratum - connecting to 'duck.extremepool.org' <216.119.175.92> port 5555
22:38:42:323   bcc   Stratum - Connected
22:38:42:323   bc8   Stratum - Connected
22:38:42:526   bcc   got 303 bytes
22:38:42:526   bcc   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"928043222054839","job":{"blob":"0100a5cfbc9d05b9db437416fec0049e247519e55251dd5e3754a60b9622ac7a42d98e340015130 0000000fd1f2c23019c967d0fd330f924800ed4b8544e922c501fbfaa239c87b4a8476001","job_id":"847114724223502","target":"9bc42000"},"status":"OK"}}

22:38:42:526   bcc   parse packet: 303
22:38:42:526   bcc   new buf size: 0
22:38:42:526   bcc   DevFee: Pool Diff 2000
22:38:42:542   bc8   got 303 bytes
22:38:42:542   bc8   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"612573677813634","job":{"blob":"0100a5cfbc9d05b9db437416fec0049e247519e55251dd5e3754a60b9622ac7a42d98e340015130 0000000165cdb944c5488422862f945a85acdcde506db91a06e80bfac09b7091c46c79601","job_id":"155769770382903","target":"9bc42000"},"status":"OK"}}

22:38:42:542   bc8   parse packet: 303
22:38:42:542   bc8   new buf size: 0
22:38:42:542   bc8   Pool Diff 2000
22:38:42:542   bc8   df has same pool, skip
22:38:42:573   ae8   Round
22:38:42:573   be4   Round
22:38:42:573   77c   Round
22:38:42:573   a54   Round
followtheboss
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 29, 2014, 05:33:03 PM
 #1059

I use latest claymore with my hd6870.
My pc directly crash when I launch the bat

Someone was in same situation and can help me out Huh

cheers

janos666
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 29, 2014, 07:19:50 PM
 #1060

Still no Linux build? Embarrassed
Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 ... 326 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!