brizio71
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 456
Merit: 250
Blockchain Just Entered The Real World
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 09:13:42 PM |
|
I have this strange, at least for me but maybe is normal, behavior if I connect the monitor to one of my GPU all works fine but in case I start my RIG without a monitor connect to a GPU or connecting the monitor directly on VGA output of MB the Radeom driver doesn't start and I can not mine. There are some workaround ?
|
|
|
|
denned
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 09:21:23 PM |
|
pls, add solo with parity (ethcore).
From readme: ... Ethereum SOLO mining (assume geth is on 192.168.0.1:8545): EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool http://192.168.0.1:8545... you tested?
|
|
|
|
Bakery
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 09:25:15 PM |
|
I have problem with mining speed somehow. Getting 12mh per card but it should be close to 14mh I'm not sure if i put the enviromental variables correctly, can anyone confirm how this is done exaclty? I have 6x 370 rig - intel g3220 -h81 pro-g -4gb ram - windows 10 home single language - catalyst 15.12 claymore v5.1 set virtual memory inital size to 16384 and maximum 16384 https://s31.postimg.org/e7rsyh0wb/Untitled.png
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 09:49:04 PM |
|
pls, add solo with parity (ethcore).
From readme: ... Ethereum SOLO mining (assume geth is on 192.168.0.1:8545): EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool http://192.168.0.1:8545... you tested? Yes. v5.1 Beta2.
|
|
|
|
thesmokingman
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 09:59:26 PM |
|
I was getting the same message in Win10. Since the message said something about Overdrive 7 not being supported, I checked for updates for the AMD Settings app and there was an update available. I updated and now the miner is running fine and stable again.
|
|
|
|
blg42598
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 10:01:48 PM |
|
I was getting the same message in Win10. Since the message said something about Overdrive 7 not being supported, I checked for updates for the AMD Settings app and there was an update available. I updated and now the miner is running fine and stable again. I just installed everything yesterday. Let me check again. Edit: There are no available updates and I get the same problem. But it says that the miner doesn't support it. Maybe Claymore miner hasn't supported the new amd update?
|
|
|
|
thesmokingman
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 10:11:56 PM |
|
I was getting the same message in Win10. Since the message said something about Overdrive 7 not being supported, I checked for updates for the AMD Settings app and there was an update available. I updated and now the miner is running fine and stable again. I just installed everything yesterday. Let me check again. Edit: There are no available updates and I get the same problem. But it says that the miner doesn't support it. Maybe Claymore miner hasn't supported the new amd update? Hmm not sure. I was running Claymore v4.7 and the previous drivers and then I received the error message. I upgraded AMD Settings and Claymore v5.1 Beta2 and things are running fine now.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 10:57:36 PM |
|
Can you please add Stratum Support for SIA at https://sia.suprnova.ccI have 99.6% efficiency there with stratum and about the same speed with the Windows miner by wolf which is much better The problem is every pool started to implement own Stratum protocol for Siacoin, it's not a good idea. Now I check them in details... Message me or contact me in IRC if you need any help, my implementation is quite similar to DCR implementation. Actually there is no other stratum implementation for Sia currently. What about this? http://siamining.com/helpI'm unsure why they changed the the header specs, it's still no "true" stratum, it's the also regular getwork-over-tcp like my implementation just with longer ntime and nonce fields - it would have been wiser to communicate and build ONE protocol where everyone works on instead of forking "my" sgminer and changing some values and calling it "true" stratum However, you might want to implement both, the second one just uses longer fields. I don't want to implement both though I can add an option to miner which will select protocol. The reason is that several protocols will cause problems when users will try wrong option value. And then they will ask me why my miner does not work, again and again, on every page. As a pool owner, you implement one Stratum version. But I have to support them all. There is also third stratum version, mine (in ethereum-proxy style), so it becomes really funny. I will add support for all protocols if you cannot select some one stratum version, but it will take some time. IMHO "full" stratum is really not needed as entropy with the 64bit headers is more than enough, I see decent efficiency on https://sia.suprnova.cc (>99%) with my current implementation. It's not bitcoin, it's a more modern header and hashing algo, so why reinvent the wheel. I absolutely see your point though, I had to follow "your" implementation also because people wanted to mine ETH & DCR ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) However, "my" protocol is based on my DCR protocol, so you already have it ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 11:23:59 PM |
|
I have this strange, at least for me but maybe is normal, behavior if I connect the monitor to one of my GPU all works fine but in case I start my RIG without a monitor connect to a GPU or connecting the monitor directly on VGA output of MB the Radeom driver doesn't start and I can not mine. There are some workaround ?
Yeah that can happen. Either connect a monitor or buy a dummy plug / make your own. ( https://rumorscity.com/2013/12/06/how-to-create-dummy-plugs-for-your-graphics-cards/) - first link I have found, google for it if needed. When I was playing with dual setup of nvidia / amd cards on the same rig, I noticed that leaving the AMD card at 16x riser solves it as well without connecting the monitor. Still it varies from rig to rig...
|
|
|
|
adamvp
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 11:43:42 PM |
|
Will be GTX 1060 supported? I am thinking about buying it.. and would like to use for dual mining ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) but i am afraid of problems...
|
I am looking for signature campaign ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) pm me
|
|
|
thesmokingman
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 12:33:51 AM |
|
I was getting the same message in Win10. Since the message said something about Overdrive 7 not being supported, I checked for updates for the AMD Settings app and there was an update available. I updated and now the miner is running fine and stable again. I just installed everything yesterday. Let me check again. Edit: There are no available updates and I get the same problem. But it says that the miner doesn't support it. Maybe Claymore miner hasn't supported the new amd update? Looks like I was mistaken. System just crashed again and I'm receiving the same message in my log file. System has been running flawlessly ever since I picked up the rx480s and only recently started. EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethpool.org:3333 -ewal 0x4Ba46B59546b138Eb1210916cACA9fb40c7dBE27.rx480 -epsw x 17:28:39:940 268 Unsupported Overdrive version 7
|
|
|
|
blg42598
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 01:13:06 AM |
|
I was getting the same message in Win10. Since the message said something about Overdrive 7 not being supported, I checked for updates for the AMD Settings app and there was an update available. I updated and now the miner is running fine and stable again. I just installed everything yesterday. Let me check again. Edit: There are no available updates and I get the same problem. But it says that the miner doesn't support it. Maybe Claymore miner hasn't supported the new amd update? Looks like I was mistaken. System just crashed again and I'm receiving the same message in my log file. System has been running flawlessly ever since I picked up the rx480s and only recently started. EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethpool.org:3333 -ewal 0x4Ba46B59546b138Eb1210916cACA9fb40c7dBE27.rx480 -epsw x 17:28:39:940 268 Unsupported Overdrive version 7 I'm not sure how to fix the problem. Let me know if you find a solution.
|
|
|
|
Bakery
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 06:14:46 AM |
|
I have problem with mining speed somehow. Getting 12mh per card but it should be close to 14mh I'm not sure if i put the enviromental variables correctly, can anyone confirm how this is done exaclty? I have 6x 370 rig - intel g3220 -h81 pro-g -4gb ram - windows 10 home single language - catalyst 15.12 claymore v5.1 set virtual memory inital size to 16384 and maximum 16384 https://s31.postimg.org/e7rsyh0wb/Untitled.pngAnyone? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 07:04:32 AM |
|
I have problem with mining speed somehow. Getting 12mh per card but it should be close to 14mh I'm not sure if i put the enviromental variables correctly, can anyone confirm how this is done exaclty? I have 6x 370 rig - intel g3220 -h81 pro-g -4gb ram - windows 10 home single language - catalyst 15.12 claymore v5.1 set virtual memory inital size to 16384 and maximum 16384 https://s31.postimg.org/e7rsyh0wb/Untitled.pngAnyone? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I assume you added the following in the beginning of batch file? GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 but I have 7 x 370 (using 3to1-PCI riser to get 6+1=7 x GPUs), H81-Pro-BTC, Celeron1840, 8GB RAM and SSD using latest Crimson 16.3.2, Windows 8.1, Virtual memory set MIN=16,000 and MAX 20,000 CDM v5.1 mining ETH and DCR Total hashrate dual mining: 102.6MHs
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 07:08:00 AM |
|
Claymore.... any chance for a 3rd coin.... LBRY? Thoughts? Thanks
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
blg42598
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 07:10:13 AM |
|
Anyone have answers for this problem that causes the miner to stop?
17:28:39:940 268 Unsupported Overdrive version 7
|
|
|
|
brizio71
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 456
Merit: 250
Blockchain Just Entered The Real World
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 07:29:55 AM |
|
I have this strange, at least for me but maybe is normal, behavior if I connect the monitor to one of my GPU all works fine but in case I start my RIG without a monitor connect to a GPU or connecting the monitor directly on VGA output of MB the Radeom driver doesn't start and I can not mine. There are some workaround ?
Anyone use the rig with no monitor connected on windows 7 and teamviewer ? In my case just with monitor connected to one of my Radeon GPU using Claymore's Dual Ethereum client works !
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 07:50:22 AM |
|
Clymore are you going in the future to build something in DM, for nvidia? or this is a lost case?
|
|
|
|
denned
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 07:59:51 AM |
|
pls, add solo with parity (ethcore).
From readme: ... Ethereum SOLO mining (assume geth is on 192.168.0.1:8545): EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool http://192.168.0.1:8545... you tested? Yes. v5.1 Beta2. on Parity/1.2.2/1.9.0/wi and v5.1 i see... ETH: Received error: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32600,"message":"Invalid request","data":null},"id":null}
|
|
|
|
|