Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[ocminer]

IMHO "full" stratum is really not needed as entropy with the 64bit headers is more than enough, I see decent efficiency on https://sia.suprnova.cc (>99%) with my current implementation. It's not bitcoin, it's a more modern header and hashing algo, so why reinvent the wheel.

We already see this high of an efficiency with getwork, as that's all your "stratum implementation" is...

Why don't you keep your getwork then ?

[1714763081]

1714763081

[xurious]

IMHO "full" stratum is really not needed as entropy with the 64bit headers is more than enough, I see decent efficiency on https://sia.suprnova.cc (>99%) with my current implementation. It's not bitcoin, it's a more modern header and hashing algo, so why reinvent the wheel.

We already see this high of an efficiency with getwork, as that's all your "stratum implementation" is...

Why don't you keep your getwork then ?

Why would we get rid of it? We will continue to support stratum and getwork

[ocminer]

IMHO "full" stratum is really not needed as entropy with the 64bit headers is more than enough, I see decent efficiency on https://sia.suprnova.cc (>99%) with my current implementation. It's not bitcoin, it's a more modern header and hashing algo, so why reinvent the wheel.

We already see this high of an efficiency with getwork, as that's all your "stratum implementation" is...

Why don't you keep your getwork then ?

Why would we get rid of it? We will continue to support stratum and getwork

"We" ? The borg ?


Good luck mate

[xurious]

IMHO "full" stratum is really not needed as entropy with the 64bit headers is more than enough, I see decent efficiency on https://sia.suprnova.cc (>99%) with my current implementation. It's not bitcoin, it's a more modern header and hashing algo, so why reinvent the wheel.

We already see this high of an efficiency with getwork, as that's all your "stratum implementation" is...

Why don't you keep your getwork then ?

Why would we get rid of it? We will continue to support stratum and getwork

"We" ? The borg ?


Good luck mate

If you wish to discuss this further, there are better places for it.

[martinski]

@Claymore hi, which SIA pools do you support with v5.1 beta2 ?

[blg42598]

Anyone know why my GPU fails?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/j56tq3nfcl5e3tm/1469138775_log.txt?dl=0

16:37:30:813   9c8   em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 47,
16:37:30:813   9c8   watchdog - thread 0, hb time 44766
16:37:30:829   9c8   watchdog - thread 1, hb time 67031
16:37:30:829   9c8   WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
16:37:30:829   9c8   watchdog - thread 2, hb time 281
16:37:30:829   9c8   watchdog - thread 3, hb time 125
16:37:30:829   9c8   watchdog - thread 4, hb time 203
16:37:30:829   9c8   watchdog - thread 5, hb time 31
16:37:30:844   9c8   watchdog - thread 6, hb time 31
16:37:30:844   9c8   watchdog - thread 7, hb time 203
16:37:32:435   9c8   Restarting OK, exit...

Windows 10
4x RX 480

[hasher87]

I've been searching through this post on how to run claymore on miningrigrentals, but somehow i couldn't find any of the post that is helpful.

this is the code that i've used

Code:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool ap-01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 -ewal hasher87.30677 -epsw x -eworker rig1 -allpools 1

and below is what i got

Code:

GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480
GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480
POOL/SOLO version
GPU #0: set -etha as 0 (ETH algo for fast cards)
GPU #1: set -etha as 0 (ETH algo for fast cards)
ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'ap-01.miningrigrentals.com' <128.199.138.106> port 3333
ETH: Stratum - Connected (ap-01.miningrigrentals.com:3333)
No pool specified for Decred! Ethereum-only mining mode is enabled
ETHEREUM-ONLY MINING MODE ENABLED (-mode 1)
ETH: eth-proxy stratum mode
"-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details.
Watchdog enabled
Remote management is enabled on port 3333

ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...

appreciate if someone has the solutions to it

[adaseb]

Anyone in Ubuntu get this error

WARNING: Linking two modules of different data layouts!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil64-pc-unknown-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different data layouts!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil64-pc-unknown-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different data layouts!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil64-pc-unknown-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different data layouts!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil64-pc-unknown-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different data layouts!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil64-pc-unknown-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different data layouts!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil64-pc-unknown-amdopencl'

[CoRpO]

I've been searching through this post on how to run claymore on miningrigrentals, but somehow i couldn't find any of the post that is helpful.

this is the code that i've used

Code:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool ap-01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 -ewal hasher87.30677 -epsw x -eworker rig1 -allpools 1

and below is what i got

Code:

GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480
GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480
POOL/SOLO version
GPU #0: set -etha as 0 (ETH algo for fast cards)
GPU #1: set -etha as 0 (ETH algo for fast cards)
ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'ap-01.miningrigrentals.com' <128.199.138.106> port 3333
ETH: Stratum - Connected (ap-01.miningrigrentals.com:3333)
No pool specified for Decred! Ethereum-only mining mode is enabled
ETHEREUM-ONLY MINING MODE ENABLED (-mode 1)
ETH: eth-proxy stratum mode
"-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details.
Watchdog enabled
Remote management is enabled on port 3333

ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...

appreciate if someone has the solutions to it

try to change -esm value with 1, 2 or 3.

-esm   Ethereum Stratum mode. 0 - eth-proxy mode (for example, dwarpool.com), 1 - qtminer mode (for example, ethpool.org),
   2 - miner-proxy mode (for example, coinotron.com), 3 - nicehash mode. 0 is default.

and add -mode 1 to disable decred dual mining as you seem not to use it.

[tolazy]

what wallet do you use for sia?
https://github.com/NebulousLabs/Sia-UI/releases
doesnt work for me it just says loading.

https://github.com/NebulousLabs/Sia-UI/releases/tag/v0.5.1-beta
works perfectly

execute as administrator

doesnt seem to help for me. still loading

[jamiec79]

Hi,

I'm looking for some advice please

I have 6 x r9 390's msi, running at about 190mh/s (reported is 193).

For whatever reason when using ethermine the reported hashrate is correct 193mhs, the current effective hashrate varies from 160mhs to 210mhs, and the reported average never seems to go much higher than 180-183mhs.

Can someone tell me why there is such a variance between reported, average and actual hashrate? I can understand a few Mhs difference due to connection to pool, but I'm losing around 10mhs?

I've pinged the ethermine servers and reaponse time is good, I've tried all drivers from 15.12 to current. I'm using cdm v5.1 beta 2. But I've tried using the previous versions without a great deal of difference.

Core clock -1130
Mem clock - 1375
Undervolted -9

I can post the config file or provide a copy of my log? If that would be helpful

I get very few rejected or invalid shares, so it's not that I've overclocked too hard and GPU temperatures are all running around 65 degrees Celsius?

Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated. I love th cdm miner, but the hashrate instability is a concern.

[thevictimofuktyranny]

Hi,

I'm looking for some advice please

I have 6 x r9 390's msi, running at about 190mh/s (reported is 193).

For whatever reason when using ethermine the reported hashrate is correct 193mhs, the current effective hashrate varies from 160mhs to 210mhs, and the reported average never seems to go much higher than 180-183mhs.

Can someone tell me why there is such a variance between reported, average and actual hashrate? I can understand a few Mhs difference due to connection to pool, but I'm losing around 10mhs?

I've pinged the ethermine servers and reaponse time is good, I've tried all drivers from 15.12 to current. I'm using cdm v5.1 beta 2. But I've tried using the previous versions without a great deal of difference.

Core clock -1130
Mem clock - 1375
Undervolted -9

I can post the config file or provide a copy of my log? If that would be helpful

I get very few rejected or invalid shares, so it's not that I've overclocked too hard and GPU temperatures are all running around 65 degrees Celsius?

Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated. I love th cdm miner, but the hashrate instability is a concern.

No idea myself, I just spent 2 days messing around with overclocking myself. Yes, it was a real hoot to do!

But, you can use Dwarfpool for testing - it has the best statistical breakdown of shares accepted on a hourly basis.

[jamiec79]

Thank you for providing a response.

I'll try switching to dwarfpool to see if that shows up any anomalies in submitted shares.

Does anyone else have a similar issue and found a way to resolve this?

Thank you in advance :-)

[fittsy]

I've been searching through this post on how to run claymore on miningrigrentals, but somehow i couldn't find any of the post that is helpful.

this is the code that i've used

Use a different miner?  I know qtminer works with MRR.

It probably isn't a good idea to be giving up 2-4% of your rented mining time to pay the Claymore devfee anyway.  Your renters probably won't appreciate that and it could affect your stats.

[fittsy]

Thank you for providing a response.

I'll try switching to dwarfpool to see if that shows up any anomalies in submitted shares.

Does anyone else have a similar issue and found a way to resolve this?

Thank you in advance :-)

From the FAQ in post #1:

----------
- Why pool shows less hashrate than miner?

  On my test rigs I use miner with default settings and on pool I see about 4-5% less than miner shows (my hashrate is about 800MH/s if I turn on all rigs).
  Miner shows "raw" hashrate, 2% is devfee in dual mode, other 2-3% can be related to the connection quality, current pool status/luck or/and may be something else.
  Also, from my calculations miner loses about 0.5-1% because it cannot drop current GPU round when it gets new job, it is related to "-ethi" value, so I made it 8 by default instead of 16.
  But if on pool you see 10% less than miner shows all the time - something is wrong with pool, your connection to internet or your hashrate is low and you did not wait enough time to see average hashrate for 24 hours.
  Usually I use "ethpool" pool for tests.
----------

Like @thevictimofuktyranny the difference in hashrate bothered me enough I quit mining at ethermine I switched to dwarfpool and coinotron.

[ps_jb]

Hi,

I'm looking for some advice please

I have 6 x r9 390's msi, running at about 190mh/s (reported is 193).

For whatever reason when using ethermine the reported hashrate is correct 193mhs, the current effective hashrate varies from 160mhs to 210mhs, and the reported average never seems to go much higher than 180-183mhs.

Can someone tell me why there is such a variance between reported, average and actual hashrate? I can understand a few Mhs difference due to connection to pool, but I'm losing around 10mhs?

I've pinged the ethermine servers and reaponse time is good, I've tried all drivers from 15.12 to current. I'm using cdm v5.1 beta 2. But I've tried using the previous versions without a great deal of difference.

Core clock -1130
Mem clock - 1375
Undervolted -9

I can post the config file or provide a copy of my log? If that would be helpful

I get very few rejected or invalid shares, so it's not that I've overclocked too hard and GPU temperatures are all running around 65 degrees Celsius?

Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated. I love th cdm miner, but the hashrate instability is a concern.

Please put your stats in this topic

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1550780.0

[Bakery]

with remote manager, the applied settings from config.txt should apply automatically? no miner restart or anything needed?
Somehow this function doesnt work for me, just says in miner window that config.txt has been applied but nothing changes.

[tolazy]

anyone here tried https://ethcore.io/parity ?

[dddrgonzooo]

I'm having trouble with one of my rigs. I keep getting "server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec..."

Any ideas on what's going on?

[BenSF]

with remote manager, the applied settings from config.txt should apply automatically? no miner restart or anything needed?
Somehow this function doesnt work for me, just says in miner window that config.txt has been applied but nothing changes.

If you send a new config file using the remote manager I believe you need to restart miner to apply the new config settings.